Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (38)

Advertisement

Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI8184

The assembly of the adult skeleton during growth and maturation: implications for senile osteoporosis

B. Lawrence Riggs,1 Sundeep Khosla,1 and L. Joseph Melton III2

1Endocrine Research Unit, and2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

Address correspondence to: B.L. Riggs, Endocrine Research Unit, 5-164 West Joseph Building, St. Mary’s Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Phone: (507) 284-3961; Fax: (507) 284-8271: E-mail: riggs.lawrence@mayo.edu.

Find articles by Riggs, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Endocrine Research Unit, and2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

Address correspondence to: B.L. Riggs, Endocrine Research Unit, 5-164 West Joseph Building, St. Mary’s Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Phone: (507) 284-3961; Fax: (507) 284-8271: E-mail: riggs.lawrence@mayo.edu.

Find articles by Khosla, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Endocrine Research Unit, and2Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA

Address correspondence to: B.L. Riggs, Endocrine Research Unit, 5-164 West Joseph Building, St. Mary’s Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. Phone: (507) 284-3961; Fax: (507) 284-8271: E-mail: riggs.lawrence@mayo.edu.

Find articles by Melton, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published September 15, 1999 - More info

Published in Volume 104, Issue 6 on September 15, 1999
J Clin Invest. 1999;104(6):671–672. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI8184.
© 1999 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published September 15, 1999 - Version history
View PDF

Senile osteoporosis is a pediatric disease.

—Charles E. Dent

Almost 30 years ago, the late Professor Charles Dent of University College, London pointed out that failure to gain sufficient bone during skeletal growth and maturation predisposes to the development of senile osteoporosis as age-related bone loss ensues. While much more is known about the patterns of bone loss than about patterns of bone growth, the following is agreed upon. Between the onset of puberty and young adulthood, skeletal mass doubles (1). Most of this increase occurs during the pubertal growth spurt, although small increases in bone mineral density (BMD) continue for an undefined interval after linear growth ceases, by a process termed bone consolidation. The increases in statural height and bone remodeling are greatest in early puberty and then progressively decline until the epiphyses close in late puberty (1–5). In contrast, maximal increases in BMD occur 2 years later — at menarche in girls and in late puberty in boys. The pattern of bone growth in boys differs from that in girls in 2 ways. First, boys have 2 more years of prepubertal growth because of a later onset of puberty (age 14, rather than 12 as in girls). Second, their pubertal growth spurt lasts for 4 years rather than the 3 years in girls (2, 3, 5). These differences largely account for the greater peak bone mass in boys.

With a few exceptions, previous studies have focused on the overall pattern of skeletal growth and maturation. However, in this issue of the JCI, Bass et al. (6) report on a comprehensive, longitudinal study of skeletal changes across puberty in 109 girls and describe specific differences in growth changes by bone types, bone regions, and bone surfaces. Both bone size and volumetric BMD (vBMD) were assessed, which is particularly important for studies of skeletal growth in which both are changing. It is not always appreciated that dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, the method used for more than 90% of bone densitometry measurements worldwide, assesses areal BMD (aBMD), measured in g/cm2, rather than vBMD, measured in g/cm3. Unfortunately, aBMD overestimates vBMD substantially by failing to account for wider bones also being deeper. Bass et al. assessed vBMD indirectly by making geometrical conversions from aBMD. They find that growth within the skeleton is not uniform during sexual maturation. Thus, prepubertal growth is disproportionately greater in the legs, whereas the adolescent growth spurt is disproportionately greater in the trunk. In both the appendicular and the axial skeleton, Bass et al. and others (1, 3, 4) find that most of the increase in bone mass in early puberty is due to increases in bone size, whereas a smaller increase in vBMD that is independent of increases in bone size occurs in late puberty. This distinction cannot be made with measurements of aBMD. Moreover, in the cortical bone of the femurs and metacarpals, Bass et al. find different patterns of growth on bone surfaces. Both the periosteal and endocortical diameters increase during puberty (the former because of a relative excess of bone apposition, and the latter because of a relative excess of bone resorption), but the rate of expansion is more at the periosteum, leading to a progressive increase in cortical width. Interestingly, in late puberty (between 1.0 and 3.7 years after menarche), rather than continued expansion, there is contraction in endocortical diameter, indicating that apposition now predominates over resorption at the endocortical surface. This leads to an even greater increase in cortical width. Also, there was a sharp but transient increase in true vBMD (defined as bone mineral content within bone itself, excluding the marrow cavity) during the first year after menarche.

What are the main hormonal determinants of these skeletal changes during puberty? Bass et al. find that serum IGF-1 levels increase by over 2-fold from puberty to menarche — the period of rapid skeletal growth — and then remain relatively constant until linear growth is terminated by epiphyseal plate closure. Their data, along with those of others (5, 7), suggest that an increase in serum IGF-1, stimulated by growth hormone (7) and sex steroids (8), is the major facilitator of increases in bone size during puberty. Also, serum estradiol correlated inversely with biochemical markers for bone turnover, consistent with the antiresorptive action of estrogen. Thus, the surge in the production of estrogen at menarche that closes the epiphyses is also the likely cause of the temporally associated increases in vBMD and cortical true vBMD, and of the conversion from endochondrial surface expansion (increasing diameter) to contraction (decreasing diameter) in cortical bone.

On the basis of these observations, Bass et al. hypothesize that childhood diseases that induce growth arrest will have different skeletal consequences depending on the age of exposure. In prepuberty, they will affect mainly the limbs; in early puberty, mainly the vertebrae; and in late puberty, mainly the enhancement in vBMD. This interesting theoretical concept warrants experimental testing. Bass et al. also firmly conclude that osteoporosis of old age may have its foundation in growth. Although the importance of peak bone mass seems indisputable, it is important to acknowledge the equally important role of bone loss in determining residual bone mass late in life in both genders, but particularly in postmenopausal women (9–11). The original hypothesis of Newton-John and Morgan (12), that age-related bone loss occurs at a relatively constant rate among individuals, is no longer generally accepted. In fact, bone loss has been shown to be highly variable over life (11, 13), and differences in individual rates probably account for up to half of the variance of cancellous bone mass (14, 15) and about one-third of the variance in cortical bone mass (10, 11) late in life. Thus, a comprehensive description of pathogenesis should encompass the contributions of both low peak bone mass and rapid bone loss, and should recognize that for a given patient, either or both of these processes may be the principal cause of osteoporosis.

References
  1. Katzman, DK, Bachrach, LK, Carter, DR, Marcus, R. Clinical and anthropometric correlates of bone mineral acquisition in healthy adolescent girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991. 73:1332-1339.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Theintz, G, et al. Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation in healthy adolescents: evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992. 75:1060-1065.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  3. Lu, PW, Cowell, CT, Lloyd-Jones, SA, Briody, JN, Howman-Giles, R. Volumetric bone mineral density in normal subjects, aged 5-27 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996. 81:1586-1590.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Gilsanz, V, et al. Differential effect of race on the axial and appendicular skeletons of children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998. 83:1420-1427.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  5. Cadogan, J, Blumsohn, A, Barker, ME, Eastell, R. A longitudinal study of bone gain I pubertal girls: anthropometric and biochemical correlates. J Bone Miner Res 1998. 13:1602-1612.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Bass, S, et al. The differing tempo of growth in bone size, mass, and density in girls is region-specific. J Clin Invest 1999. 104:795-804.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Martha (Jr), PM, Reiter, EO. Pubertal growth and growth hormone secretion. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1991. 20:165-182.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Kerrigan, JR, Rogol, AD. The impact of gonadal steroid hormone action on growth hormone secretion during childhood and adolescence. Endocr Rev 1992. 13:281-298.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Riggs, BL, Khosla, S, Melton (III), LJ. A unitary model for involutional osteoporosis: estrogen deficiency causes both type I and type II osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and contributes to bone loss in aging men. J Bone Miner Res 1998. 13:763-773.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Riggs, BL, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging: differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clin Invest 1982. 70:716-723.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Hansen, MA, Overgaard, K, Riis, BJ, Christiansen, C. Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study. BMJ 1991. 303:961-964.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Newton-John, HF, Morgan, DB. Osteoporosis: disease or senescence? Lancet 1968. 1:232-233.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Laib, A, Hauselmann, HJ, Ruegsegger, P. In vivo high resolution 3D-QCT of the human forearm. Technol Health Care 1998. 6:329-337.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Block, JE, et al. Models of spinal trabecular bone loss as determined by quantitative computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 1989. 4:249-257.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Meier, DE, Orwoll, ES, Jones, JM. Marked disparity between trabecular and cortical bone loss with age in healthy men. Ann Intern Med 1984. 101:605-612.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (September 15, 1999): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (38)

Go to

  • Top
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts