Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Long-term potentiation decay and memory loss are mediated by AMPAR endocytosis
Zhifang Dong, … , Weihong Song, Yu Tian Wang
Zhifang Dong, … , Weihong Song, Yu Tian Wang
Published December 1, 2014
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):234-247. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI77888.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Neuroscience

Long-term potentiation decay and memory loss are mediated by AMPAR endocytosis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic strength between hippocampal neurons is associated with learning and memory, and LTP dysfunction is thought to underlie memory loss. LTP can be temporally and mechanistically classified into decaying (early-phase) LTP and nondecaying (late-phase) LTP. While the nondecaying nature of LTP is thought to depend on protein synthesis and contribute to memory maintenance, little is known about the mechanisms and roles of decaying LTP. Here, we demonstrated that inhibiting endocytosis of postsynaptic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazole-4-propionic acid receptors (AMPARs) prevents LTP decay, thereby converting it into nondecaying LTP. Conversely, restoration of AMPAR endocytosis by inhibiting protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ) converted nondecaying LTP into decaying LTP. Similarly, inhibition of AMPAR endocytosis prolonged memory retention in normal animals and reduced memory loss in a murine model of Alzheimer’s disease. These results strongly suggest that an active process that involves AMPAR endocytosis mediates the decay of LTP and that inhibition of this process can prolong the longevity of LTP as well as memory under both physiological and pathological conditions.

Authors

Zhifang Dong, Huili Han, Hongjie Li, Yanrui Bai, Wei Wang, Man Tu, Yan Peng, Limin Zhou, Wenting He, Xiaobin Wu, Tao Tan, Mingjing Liu, Xiaoyan Wu, Weihui Zhou, Wuyang Jin, Shu Zhang, Todd Charlton Sacktor, Tingyu Li, Weihong Song, Yu Tian Wang

×

Figure 1

Active GluA2-dependent AMPAR endocytosis prevents the conversion of hippocampal CA1 decaying LTP into nondecaying LTP in freely moving rats.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Active GluA2-dependent AMPAR endocytosis prevents the conversion of hipp...
(A) Inhibition of GluA2-dependent AMPAR endocytosis converts decaying LTP into nondecaying LTP. The plot presents normalized slopes of fEPSPs; the bar graph summarizes the average percentage change of fEPSP slope immediately before (marked as 1) and 25 hours (marked as 2) after the induction, and corresponding representative traces are shown. wHFS (wHFS+Veh; n = 5) and sHFS (sHFS+Veh; n = 5) protocols reliably produce decaying LTP and nondecaying LTP, respectively. Application of Tat-GluA23Y (wHSF+GluA23Y; n = 7), but not its control scr-GluA23Y (wHFS+scr-GluA23Y; n = 5), prevented the decay of wHFS-induced LTP. (B and C) ZIP, applied either 1 hour (B) before or (C) after the induction stimulation, causes decay of sHFS-­induced nondecaying LTP via GluA2-AMPAR endocytosis-dependent mechanism. The plot and bar graph show that ZIP peptide (ZIP+scr-GluA23Y; n = 5 for application either before or after sHFS) causes sHFS-induced nondecaying LTP to decay and this is prevented by coapplication of GluA23Y (ZIP+ GluA23Y; n = 6 for application either before or after sHFS). The control scrambled ZIP has no observable effect in the presence of either GluA23Y (scr-ZIP+GluA23Y; n = 5 for application either before or after sHFS) or its control (scr-ZIP+scr-GluA23Y; n = 4 and n = 5 for application before and after sHFS, respectively). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Tukey’s post-hoc analysis.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts