Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
mTORC1 and mTORC2 selectively regulate CD8+ T cell differentiation
Kristen N. Pollizzi, … , Greg M. Delgoffe, Jonathan D. Powell
Kristen N. Pollizzi, … , Greg M. Delgoffe, Jonathan D. Powell
Published April 20, 2015
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(5):2090-2108. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI77746.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Article has an altmetric score of 18

mTORC1 and mTORC2 selectively regulate CD8+ T cell differentiation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Activation of mTOR-dependent pathways regulates the specification and differentiation of CD4+ T effector cell subsets. Herein, we show that mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTORC2 have distinct roles in the generation of CD8+ T cell effector and memory populations. Evaluation of mice with a T cell–specific deletion of the gene encoding the negative regulator of mTORC1, tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2), resulted in the generation of highly glycolytic and potent effector CD8+ T cells; however, due to constitutive mTORC1 activation, these cells retained a terminally differentiated effector phenotype and were incapable of transitioning into a memory state. In contrast, CD8+ T cells deficient in mTORC1 activity due to loss of RAS homolog enriched in brain (RHEB) failed to differentiate into effector cells but retained memory characteristics, such as surface marker expression, a lower metabolic rate, and increased longevity. However, these RHEB-deficient memory-like T cells failed to generate recall responses as the result of metabolic defects. While mTORC1 influenced CD8+ T cell effector responses, mTORC2 activity regulated CD8+ T cell memory. mTORC2 inhibition resulted in metabolic reprogramming, which enhanced the generation of CD8+ memory cells. Overall, these results define specific roles for mTORC1 and mTORC2 that link metabolism and CD8+ T cell effector and memory generation and suggest that these functions have the potential to be targeted for enhancing vaccine efficacy and antitumor immunity.

Authors

Kristen N. Pollizzi, Chirag H. Patel, Im-Hong Sun, Min-Hee Oh, Adam T. Waickman, Jiayu Wen, Greg M. Delgoffe, Jonathan D. Powell

×

Figure 3

mTORC1 activity is required for effector generation in vivo.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
mTORC1 activity is required for effector generation in vivo.
WT, T-Rheb–...
WT, T-Rheb–/–, and T-Tsc2–/– mice were infected with 1 × 106 PFU vaccinia-OVA. On day 6, splenocytes were harvested. (A) Percentage of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells from day 6 infected mice was determined by flow cytometric analysis of H-2 kb/SIINFEKL tetramer staining (OVA tet). Plots were gated from the CD8+ population. Graphs depict the percentage of tetramer+ cells from the CD8+ population and the absolute number of tetramer+ cells (n = 16). (B) KLRG1 expression was assessed from the tetramer+ population, with statistics shown to the right (n = 16). (C) Cytokine production was assessed from the CD44+CD8+ splenic populations after ex vivo stimulation with SIINFEKL peptide. The graph depicts the percentage of double-producing cells (n = 16). (D) Functional analysis of CD8+ T cells by an in vivo CTL assay 6 days after vaccinia-OVA infection. Plots depict CFSEhi SIINFEKL peptide–pulsed targets and CFSElo control targets recovered from splenocytes harvested 10 hours after target transfer, with statistics shown to the right (n = 18). Data are representative of at least 3 independent experiments. For the box-and-whiskers plots, the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum values, the box boundaries represent the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the middle line is the median value. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ANOVA.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Blogged by 1
Posted by 6 X users
Referenced in 12 patents
On 2 Facebook pages
Mentioned in 1 Google+ posts
294 readers on Mendeley
See more details