Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 3

See more details

Referenced in 1 patents
18 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (23)

Advertisement

Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI4584

Donor MHC and adhesion molecules in transplant arteriosclerosis

Chengwei Shi,1 Mark W. Feinberg,1 Dorothy Zhang,1 Anand Patel,1 Chang U. Sim,1 Zhao Ming Dong,2,3 Susan M. Chapman,2 Jose-Carlos Gutierrez-Ramos,2,4 Denisa D. Wagner,2,3 Nicholas E.S. Sibinga,1,5,6 and Edgar Haber1,5

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Shi, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Feinberg, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Zhang, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Patel, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Sim, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Dong, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Chapman, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Gutierrez-Ramos, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Wagner, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Sibinga, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Cardiovascular Biology Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA2Center for Blood Research, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA3Department of Pathology,4Department of Genetics, and5Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA6Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

Address correspondence to: Nicholas E.S. Sibinga, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Phone: (617) 432-3586; Fax: (617) 432-2980; E-mail: sibinga@cvlab.harvard.edu

Find articles by Haber, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published February 15, 1999 - More info

Published in Volume 103, Issue 4 on February 15, 1999
J Clin Invest. 1999;103(4):469–474. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI4584.
© 1999 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published February 15, 1999 - Version history
Received: July 14, 1998; Accepted: January 5, 1999
View PDF
Abstract

Transplant-associated arteriosclerosis remains an obstacle to long-term graft survival. To determine the contribution to transplant arteriosclerosis of MHC and adhesion molecules from cells of the donor vasculature, we allografted carotid artery loops from six mutant mouse strains into immunocompetent CBA/CaJ recipients. The donor mice were deficient in either MHC I molecules or MHC II molecules, both MHC I and MHC II molecules, the adhesion molecule P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, or both P-selectin and ICAM-1. Donor arteries in which ICAM-1, MHC II, or both MHC I and MHC II were absent showed reductions in neointima formation of 52%, 33%, and 38%, respectively, due primarily to a reduction in smooth muscle cell (SMC) accumulation. In P-selectin–deficient donor arteries, neointima formation did not differ from that in controls. In donor arteries lacking both P-selectin and ICAM-1, the size of the neointima was similar to that in those lacking ICAM-1 alone. In contrast, neointima formation increased by 52% in MHC I–deficient donor arteries. The number of CD4-positive T cells increased by 2.8-fold in MHC I–deficient arteries, and that of α-actin–positive SMCs by twofold. These observations indicate that ICAM-1 and MHC II molecules expressed in the donor vessel wall may promote transplant-associated arteriosclerosis. MHC I molecules expressed in the donor may have a protective effect.

Introduction

Transplant-associated arteriosclerosis, characterized by diffuse and concentric intimal thickening in blood vessels of the transplanted organ, is the major cause of graft failure after the first year of transplantation (1–3). Although the pathogenesis of this disease remains unclear, clinical and laboratory studies both indicate that transplant arteriosclerosis is a local, immune-mediated process involving an interaction between the recipient's mononuclear cells and cells of the donor vessel wall (4–6).

Donor MHC molecules may foster transplant arteriosclerosis through immune-mediated injury to the donor vessel wall (7). These MHC I and MHC II antigens are recognized by host CD8+ cytolytic and CD4+ helper T cells, respectively, and can elicit specific immune responses (8). While increased expression of MHC I molecules in donor organs has been associated with acute rejection (9), increased expression of MHC II molecules has been linked to chronic rejection (10). Although it is clear that these molecules may become targets of the host's immune response, their functional significance in the development of transplant vasculopathy is not well understood.

Cell adhesion molecules are also important in transplant arteriosclerosis because they mediate recipient inflammatory cell attachment to and migration into the donor vessel wall (11). P-selectin, expressed on the surface of activated endothelial cells and platelets, is a glycosylated adhesion receptor for leukocytes (12). In P-selectin–deficient mice, leukocyte rolling and macrophage recruitment during an inflammatory response are reduced (13, 14). Another mediator of leukocyte migration, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, binds to lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 and macrophage antigen complex 1 on leukocytes (11). In mice deficient in ICAM-1, allogeneic T-cell responses and leukocyte infiltration are reduced (15). In addition to their roles in leukocyte trafficking, adhesion molecules may also regulate the migration of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) within the vessel wall (16).

In previous studies of transplant arteriosclerosis, blocking antibodies have been used to investigate molecular mechanisms underlying neointima formation (17–19, for example). We recently developed a mouse model of carotid artery allotransplantation (20) and used it to identify immunologic components in recipient mice that are necessary for transplant arteriosclerosis — CD4+ T cells, B cells, and macrophages (21). We continue our analysis by using this model with donor arteries derived from knockout mice, an approach that avoids the potential problems of blocking antibody nonspecificity or cross-reactivity. In the present study we used donor carotid artery loops deficient in molecules that mediate antigen presentation (MHC I, MHC II, or both) or molecules that mediate leukocyte migration (P-selectin, ICAM-1, or both) to examine the donor's contribution to the development of transplant arteriosclerosis. Carotid artery loops were allografted from six mutant mouse strains into immunocompetent CBA/CaJ recipients. The allografted loops were harvested 42 days after transplantation and their morphology, morphometry, and cellular composition were characterized.

Our findings indicate that both direct and indirect antigen presentation are necessary for the development of transplant arteriosclerosis and that the presence of MHC II and ICAM-1 in the donor vasculature is required for typical neointima formation. In contrast, P-selectin expression is not required for transplant arteriosclerosis. MHC I molecules from the donor vasculature appear to limit neointima formation and thereby may protect the function of the graft.

Methods

Animals. Table 1 lists the mutant mouse strains used as donors and their respective controls. CBA/CaJ (H-2k) mice were used as recipients because a predictable and substantial neointima formed after transplantation of wild-type arteries from all donor strains. All mice were obtained from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA) unless indicated otherwise in the table legend.

Table 1

Mouse strains used as donors of carotid artery loops transplanted into CBA/CaJ recipients

Transplantation. A donor carotid artery was attached in a loop onto the carotid artery of a histoincompatible recipient (20). The operation was performed on anesthetized mice under a dissecting microscope (Model M3Z; Wild, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). In the recipient mouse, a midline incision was made on the ventral side of the neck from the suprasternal notch to the chin. The left carotid artery was dissected from the bifurcation in the distal end toward the proximal end as far as was technically possible. The artery was then occluded with two microvascular clamps (8 mm long; Roboz Surgical Instruments, Rockville, Maryland, USA), one at each end, and two longitudinal arteriotomies (0.5–0.6 mm) were made with a fine needle (30 gauge) and scissors. In the donor mouse, both the left and right carotid arteries were dissected fully from the arch to the bifurcation. The graft was then transplanted paratopically into the recipient in an end-to-side anastomosis with an 11/0 continuous nylon suture under 16× or 25×, and the skin incision was closed with a 4/0 interrupted suture. The time from graft harvest to completion of anastomosis did not exceed 60 min.

Histology and morphology. Grafts were harvested 42 days after transplantation, a point at which a fully developed, nearly occlusive lesion had been observed in carotid artery loops transplanted from wild-type controls to CBA/CaJ mouse recipients (20). The harvested loops were divided in two: one half (2–2.5 mm) was fixed in methyl Carnoy's fixative and embedded in paraffin. The other half was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in OCT, and kept at –80°C. The homogeneity of lesion formation in this model was confirmed in our previous study (20) of consecutive serial sections from the center of the donor loop to the site of the anastomosis with the recipient carotid artery. Sections for morphometry studies (5 μm thick) were obtained from the center of the graft to avoid the effects of the suture line. The areas of the neointima, the media, and the lumen were measured by computerized planimetry of sections obtained 150, 300, and 450 μm from the center of the graft. Paraffin sections were stained with Verhoeff's elastin tissue stain anti–α-actin antibody (20 μg/ml; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), or anti-CD45 antibody (0.5 μg/ml; PharMingen, San Diego, California, USA) (20). Frozen samples were stained with antibodies to CD4 (10 μg/ml) and CD8 (2.5 μg/ml; both from PharMingen) (20). Morphometric and immunohistochemical analyses were performed as described (20).

Color video images were recorded from a Nikon Labophot-2 light microscope equipped with a Sony DXC-760MD video camera and control unit. Image analysis routines were created within a modified version (Organize-It Software, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) of the NIH Image 1.1 program. After tracing the area to be measured with the cursor, the operator sampled five pixels of the color that defined a given stain. The area encompassed by pixels (not always contiguous) in the color range for that stain was then computed automatically by the software. The neointima was defined as the area bounded by the internal elastic lamina and the lumen. The media was defined as the region between the internal and external elastic laminae. The lumen was defined as the clear part of the vessel in the center of the section.

Results

Intimal area in allografted arterial loops. Carotid arteries from six mutant mouse strains and their respective controls were allografted into immunocompetent CBA/CaJ recipients (Table 1). In each arterial loop, the area of neointima formed 42 days after transplantation, on cross-section from the vessel lumen to the internal elastic lamina, indicated the degree of transplant arteriosclerosis (Fig. 1, between arrows in a–j; and Fig. 2). In arteries from MHC I and MHC II double-knockout donors, neointima formation decreased significantly (38% reduction, P = 0.005) 42 days after allografting into immunocompetent recipients (Fig. 1, b vs. a; and Fig. 2). To determine the relative contribution of MHC I and MHC II molecules to this decrease in neointima formation, we also allografted donor arteries from mice lacking either MHC I or MHC II. In arteries without MHC II molecules, a significantly smaller neointima formed (33% reduction, P = 0.02) than in arteries from wild-type donors (Fig. 1, e vs. c; and Fig. 2), indicating that the presence of MHC II was necessary for optimal neointima formation. To our surprise, a much larger neointima (52% increase, P = 0.026) formed in donor arteries lacking MHC I molecules in comparison with arteries from wild-type donors (Fig. 1, d vs. c; and Fig. 2), suggesting that the presence of MHC I in this setting may protect against transplant arteriosclerosis.

Sections of mouse carotid artery loops, 42 days after transplantation intoFigure 1

Sections of mouse carotid artery loops, 42 days after transplantation into histoincompatible recipients. Table 1 describes donor strains. CBA/CaJ mice were used as recipients. (a–j) Arrows mark neointima, which extends between the internal elastic lamina (Verhoeff's elastin tissue stain) and the vessel lumen. (a) B6129F2/J control for b. (c) C57BL/6J control for d and e. (f) C57BL/6J control for g and h. (i) 129 Sv control for j. ×150. ICAM-1, intracellular adhesion molecule-1.

Intimal area in sections of mouse carotid artery loops, 42 days after transFigure 2

Intimal area in sections of mouse carotid artery loops, 42 days after transplantation into histoincompatible recipients. Table 1 describes donor strains. CBA/CaJ mice were used as recipients. B6129F2/J control donor, n = 6; MHC I–/– and MHC II–/– donor, n = 5; C57BL/6J control donor, n = 6; MHC I–/– donor, n = 9; MHC II–/– donor, n = 8; C57BL/6J control donor, n = 9; ICAM-1–/– donor, n = 5; P-selectin and ICAM-1–/– donor, n = 8; 129 Sv control donor, n = 7; P-selectin–/– donor, n = 7. Data (mean ± SE) were subjected to ANOVA. Asterisks mark values significantly lower than respective controls: MHC I–/– and MHC II–/–, P = 0.005; MHC II–/–, P = 0.021; ICAM-1–/–, P < 0.001; P-selectin and ICAM-1–/–, P < 0.001. Dagger marks value significantly higher than respective control: MHC I–/–, P = 0.026.

As with the MHC II–deficient donor arteries, the neointima that formed in donor ICAM-1–deficient arteries was markedly smaller (52% reduction, P < 0.001) in comparison with wild-type donor arteries (Fig. 1, g vs. f; and Fig. 2). No further reduction in neointima formation occurred in donor arteries lacking both ICAM-1 and P-selectin (Fig. 1, h vs. g; and Fig. 2). In donor arteries lacking only P-selectin, the robust neointima formation was not different from that in wild-type donor arteries (Fig. 1, j vs. i; and Fig. 2). This suggests that the reduction in neointima formation in donor arteries from P-selectin and ICAM-1 double-knockout mice was due mainly to the absence of ICAM-1 in the grafts.

Characteristics of the neointima in donor arteries. To determine whether the cellular composition of the reduced neointimas differed from that of the fully developed neointimas in controls, we stained transplanted arteries harvested 42 days after allografting for CD4, CD8, SMC α-actin, and CD45. In wild-type donor arteries and in those deficient in MHC I and P-selectin, most of the neointima consisted of α-actin–positive SMCs and, to a lesser extent, CD45+ inflammatory cells (Figs. 3 and 4). In contrast, in arteries from MHC II knockout donors, MHC I and MHC II double-knockout donors, and ICAM-1 knockout donors, the number of SMCs in the neointima was significantly lower than in arteries from wild-type donors (Fig. 4). In these arteries, CD45+ inflammatory cells were the major constituent of the reduced neointima (Fig. 3). The percentage of neointimal CD4+ T cells in donor arteries from MHC I knockout mice was significantly higher than in arteries from wild-type donors (2.8-fold increase, P = 0.005; Fig. 5). In donor arteries lacking MHC II molecules, CD4+ T cells decreased by 66% in comparison with controls (P = 0.005; Fig. 5). The percentage of neointimal CD8+ T cells did not differ between MHC I knockout donors and controls (data not shown).

Neointimal inflammatory cells (CD45+) per carotid artery section, 42 days aFigure 3

Neointimal inflammatory cells (CD45+) per carotid artery section, 42 days after transplantation. Nuclei were counted in each of three sections from five to six mice. Data (mean ± SE) were subjected to ANOVA. Asterisks mark values significantly higher than respective controls: MHC I–/– and MHC II–/–, P = 0.0028; MHC II–/–, P = 0.02.

Neointimal smooth muscle cells (α-actin–positive) per carotid artery sectioFigure 4

Neointimal smooth muscle cells (α-actin–positive) per carotid artery section, 42 days after transplantation. Neointimal area corresponding to α-actin–positive staining was measured automatically with a modified version of the NIH Image 1.1 analysis program (see Methods) in each of three sections from five to six mice. Data (mean ± SE) were subjected to ANOVA. Asterisks mark values significantly lower than respective controls: MHC I–/– and MHC II–/–, P = 0.0073; MHC II–/–, P = 0.0048; ICAM-1–/–, P = 0.0084; P-selectin and ICAM-1–/–, P = 0.0071. Dagger marks value significantly higher than respective control: MHC I–/–, P = 0.011.

Neointimal CD4+ cells per carotid artery section, 42 days after transplantaFigure 5

Neointimal CD4+ cells per carotid artery section, 42 days after transplantation. Nuclei were counted in each of three sections from five to six mice. Data (mean ± SE) were subjected to ANOVA. Asterisk marks value significantly higher than control: MHC I–/–, P = 0.005. Dagger marks value significantly lower than control: MHC II–/–, P = 0.005.

Isografted arteries harvested 42 days after transplantation did not show significant neointima formation. Consistent with our previous findings (20), in approximately 10% of the isografts we saw at most a single layer of cells that stained for α-actin, and this layer formed only along part of the vessel circumference. In contrast, donor arteries deficient in MHC II molecules contained a small neointima of several layers that stained mainly for CD45+ leukocytes. Thus, the differences we observed in MHC II–deficient donor arteries were not only quantitative but also qualitative.

Discussion

Transplant arteriosclerosis is characterized by an early stage of transendothelial inflammatory cell migration, followed by the formation of a neointima in which smooth muscle cells accumulate (7, 21). Adhesion molecules on cells of the donor endothelium play an important role in this inflammatory infiltration (22–24). The experiments described here indicate that the neointima-forming response in MHC II–deficient donor arteries is significantly diminished. Because a small neointima did form in these arteries (Figs. 1e and 2), alternative antigen-presentation pathways, such as the indirect pathway through the recipient's MHC molecules, may also be involved in the arteriosclerotic process. Nevertheless, we conclude that donor MHC II molecules play an important role in transplant arteriosclerosis, despite the small residual neointima in MHC II–deficient arteries. MHC I molecules present on graft vascular cells may protect against the formation of a neointima (Figs. 1d and 2). In addition, ICAM-1 molecules, but not P-selectin molecules, must be present in the graft for robust neointima formation (Fig. 1, g and j; and Fig. 2). Because this study was designed to examine the role in transplant arteriosclerosis of specific molecules expressed in donor tissues, the significance of MHC molecules, P-selectin, and ICAM-1 expressed by the recipient was not addressed.

T cells recognize allogeneic MHC molecules on a graft through the direct and indirect antigen-presentation pathways (8, 25). The direct pathway involves T cells that react against MHC molecule–peptide complexes expressed on the surface of donor (non-self) antigen-presenting cells (26). The indirect pathway involves T cells that recognize peptides derived from the processing and presentation of allogeneic MHC molecules by recipient (self) antigen-presenting cells (27). It has been proposed that the direct pathway may be involved primarily in acute rejection, whereas the indirect pathway may be more important in chronic rejection (8). In our study, the smaller neointima formed in MHC II–deficient donor arteries (Figs. 1e and 2) indicates that the direct antigen presentation pathway is involved in the development of transplant arteriosclerosis. Since neointima formation was not totally abolished in these arteries, the indirect pathway may also be involved in the process.

Normal vascular endothelial cells do not express MHC II antigens, and SMCs express them at very low levels (6). In response to inflammatory stimuli, the vascular cells in grafts express MHC II antigens (10, 28). Moreover, in long-term mouse heart allografts stained with an allospecific antiserum, endothelial cells and SMCs have been shown to express MHC II molecules that derive from the donor (29). CD4+ T cells activated by MHC II–bearing graft endothelial cells can then infiltrate the graft and perpetuate the secretion of growth factors and cytokines. In MHC II–deficient donor arteries, the number of infiltrating CD4+ T cells decreased in comparison with that in arteries from wild-type donors (P = 0.005; Fig. 5). Thus, the absence of MHC II molecules on donor vascular cells may diminish the number of activated CD4+ T cells and thereby reduce neointima formation. A deficit of CD4+ T cells would result in decreased cytokine secretion, leading to a decrease in macrophage activation and SMC proliferation, as proposed in our previous study (21).

Although the involvement of donor MHC I molecules in acute rejection has been examined (7, 9), their role in transplant vasculopathy is not well defined. In our study, donor arteries lacking MHC I molecules developed a larger neointima in comparison with controls (Figs. 1d and 2), whereas medial cellularity did not change (data not shown). One possible explanation for the increase is that neointima formation may be mediated in part by an increase in CD4+ T-cell infiltration (P = 0.005; Fig. 5). We have found previously that CD4+ T cells are important in transplant arteriosclerosis (21). MHC I molecules can negatively regulate natural killer (NK) cells (30). Cytokines secreted by NK cells are usually proinflammatory (31), contribute to the development of transplant arteriosclerosis (10, 32), and activate CD4+ T cells (33). Thus, the lack of MHC I molecules in donor tissue may result in an increase in NK cell activity that may in turn stimulate the increased number of CD4+ T cells and thus promote transplant arteriosclerosis. We cannot exclude the possibility in this model that recipient β2-microglobulin could rescue donor tissue from a deficiency in MHC I expression, or that β2-microglobulin deficiency in donor tissue could affect downstream or coregulatory molecules, such as the transporters associated with antigen processing (34). Although this form of rescue remains a theoretical possibility, Markmann et al. (35) have shown that expression of MHC I molecules in cultured β2-microglobulin–deficient pancreatic islet cells is not reconstituted by the addition of β2-microglobulin.

The development of transplant arteriosclerosis depends on an interaction between cells of the donor vessel wall and the host's mononuclear inflammatory cells (11). The endothelium provides the interface for this interaction (36). Endothelial cell activation/damage is a major factor in transplant arteriosclerosis (chronic rejection) (7). The early stage in this process is dominated by subendothelial inflammatory cell infiltration (37). In response to inflammatory cytokines, endothelial cells increase their expression of proinflammatory surface adhesion molecules, which includes ICAM-1, P-selectin, and others (9, 38). Studies in vitro suggest that ICAM-1 may be more important in transendothelial leukocyte migration than other adhesion molecules (39), and studies in animals with antibodies to ICAM-1 show a decrease in cardiac allograft rejection (17, 18). Our experiments indicate that graft-derived expression of ICAM-1 (one of several adhesion molecules involved in transendothelial migration) is critical to the development of transplant arteriosclerosis (Figs. 1g and 2). Because ICAM-1 is also expressed on antigen-presenting cells such as macrophages, ICAM-1 can participate in the activation of CD4+ T lymphocytes after it has associated with MHC II–antigen complexes (40). Thus, the reduced neointima in ICAM-1–deficient donor arteries may have resulted from an interruption of the effect of ICAM-1 on leukocyte adhesion, transendothelial migration, or CD4+ T-cell activation through association with MHC II molecules.

In contrast to ICAM-1, P-selectin does not contribute significantly to transplant arteriosclerosis in our model (Figs. 1j and 2). P-selectin is involved primarily in leukocyte rolling along the endothelium (24, 41). A comparison of P-selectin, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor double-knockout mice with LDL receptor single-knockout mice suggested a role for P-selectin in early fatty streak formation (42). At later stages, however, there was no difference in fatty streak formation. We cannot exclude a role for P-selectin in transplant arteriosclerosis at very early stages, but our results with more advanced lesions suggest that P-selectin is not involved, or that its absence on donor tissues is well compensated by redundant adhesion mechanisms. Taken together, these observations suggest that P-selectin itself is not critical to the development of advanced vascular disease in different models of arteriosclerosis.

By examining this series of allografted carotid arteries, we have shown that donor MHC molecules and ICAM-1 molecules are important in transplant arteriosclerosis. In a recent clinical study, increased expression of MHC II molecules and ICAM-1 in arterial tissue from transplanted hearts was found to be predictive of arteriosclerosis and graft failure (43). Our findings in this mouse model of transplant arteriosclerosis indicate that these molecules are not only markers but are also functionally important in the pathogenesis of the disease. Our results also suggest that donor MHC I molecules may play a protective role in transplant vasculopathy. Studies of grafts from genetically modified donors may further elucidate the specific molecular pathways of transplant arteriosclerosis and speed the identification of novel interventions.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mu-En Lee and Mark A. Perrella for their critical review of the manuscript. We thank Lester Kobzik for reviewing the histological sections and Thomas McVarish for editing the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute and by National Institutes of Health grants RO1 HL-53756 (to D.D. Wagner) and HL-03274 (to N.E.S. Sibinga).

References
  1. Sharples, LD, et al. Risk factor analysis for the major hazards following heart transplantation—rejection, infection, and coronary occlusive disease. Transplantation 1991. 52:244-252.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Billingham, ME. Graft coronary disease: the lesions and the patients. Transplant Proc 1989. 21:3665-3666.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Sarris, GE, et al. Cardiac transplantation: the Stanford experience in the cyclosporine era. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994. 108:240-252.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Billingham, ME. Pathology of human cardiac transplantation. Monogr Pathol 1995. 37:108-128.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Hornick, P, et al. Influence of acute rejection episodes, HLA matching, and donor/recipient phenotype on the development of ‘early’ transplant-associated coronary artery disease. Circulation 1997. 96:148-153.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Libby, P, Salomon, RN, Payne, DD, Schoen, FJ, Pober, JS. Functions of vascular wall cells related to development of transplantation-associated coronary arteriosclerosis. Transplant Proc 1989. 21:3677-3684.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Duquesnoy, RJ, Demetris, AJ. Immunopathology of cardiac transplant rejection. Curr Opin Cardiol 1995. 10:193-206.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Hornick, P, Lechler, R. Direct and indirect pathways of alloantigen recognition: relevance to acute and chronic allograft rejection. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant 1997. 12:1806-1810.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Salom, RN, Maguire, JA, Hancock, WW. Endothelial activation and cytokine expression in human acute cardiac allograft rejection. Pathology 1998. 30:24-29.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Libby, P, Tanaka, H. The pathogenesis of coronary arteriosclerosis (“chronic rejection”) in transplanted hearts. Clin Transplant 1994. 8:313-318.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Heemann, UW, Tullius, SG, Azuma, H, Kupiec-Weglinsky, J, Tilney, NL. Adhesion molecules and transplantation. Ann Surg 1994. 219:4-12.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Vestweber, D. Selectins: cell surface lectins which mediate the binding of leukocytes to endothelial cells. Semin Cell Biol 1992. 3:211-220.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Mayadas, TN, Johnson, RC, Rayburn, H, Hynes, RO, Wagner, DD. Leukocyte rolling and extravasation are severely compromised in P selectin-deficient mice. Cell 1993. 74:541-554.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, RC, et al. Blood cell dynamics in P-selectin-deficient mice. Blood 1995. 86:1106-1114.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Xu, H, et al. Leukocytosis and resistance to septic shock in intercellular adhesion molecule 1-deficient mice. J Exp Med 1994. 180:95-109.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  16. Schwartz, SM. Smooth muscle migration in vascular development and pathogenesis. Transplant Immunol 1997. 5:255-260.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  17. Isobe, M, Yagita, H, Okumura, K, Ihara, A. Specific acceptance of cardiac allograft after treatment with antibodies to ICAM-1 and LFA-1. Science 1992. 255:1125-1127.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  18. Suzuki, J, et al. Inhibition of accelerated coronary atherosclerosis with short-term blockade of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 in a heterotopic murine model of heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1997. 16:1141-1148.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Murphy, B, Kim, KS, Buelow, R, Sayegh, MH, Hancock, WW. Synthetic MHC class I peptide prolongs cardiac survival and attenuates transplant arteriosclerosis in the Lewis Fischer 344 model of chronic allograft rejection. Transplantation 1997. 64:14-19.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  20. Shi, C, Russell, ME, Bianchi, C, Newell, JB, Haber, E. Murine model of accelerated transplant arteriosclerosis. Circ Res 1994. 75:199-207.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Shi, C, et al. Immunologic basis of transplant-associated arteriosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996. 93:4051-4056.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  22. Allen, MD, et al. Endothelial adhesion molecules in heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992. 11:8s-13s.
  23. Jang, Y, Lincoff, AM, Plow, EF, Topol, EJ. Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994. 24:1591-1601.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Ley, K. Molecular mechanisms of leukocyte recruitment in the inflammatory process. Cardiovasc Res 1996. 32:733-742.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  25. Tullius, SG, Tilney, NL. Both alloantigen-dependent and -independent factors influence chronic allograft rejection. Transplantation 1995. 59:313-318.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Liu, Z, et al. Contribution of direct and indirect recognition pathways to T cell alloreactivity. J Exp Med 1993. 177:1643-1650.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  27. Shoskes, DA, Wood, KJ. Indirect presentation of MHC antigens in transplantation. Immunol Today 1994. 15:32-38.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  28. Steinhoff, G, Wonigeit, K, Schafers, HJ, Haverich, A. Sequential analysis of monomorphic and polymorphic major histocompatibility complex antigen expression in human heart allograft biopsy specimens. J Heart Transplant 1989. 8:360-370.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Hasegawa, S, Becker, G, Nagano, H, Libby, P, Mitchell, RN. Pattern of graft- and host-specific MHC class II expression in long-term murine cardiac allografts: origin of inflammatory and vascular wall cells. Am J Pathol 1998. 153:69-79.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Timonen, T. Natural killer cells: endothelial interactions, migration, and target cell recognition. J Leukocyte Biol 1997. 62:693-701.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Robertson, MJ, Ritz, J. Biology and clinical relevance of human natural killer cells. Blood 1990. 76:2421-2438.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Dong, C, et al. The pathogenesis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Curr Opin Cardiol 1996. 11:183-190.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  33. Janeway, C.A., Jr., and Travers, P. 1997. Immunobiology: the immune system in health and disease. Current Biology/Garland Publishing. London, United Kingdom/San Francisco, CA/New York, NY. 9:30–9:33.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Pamer, E, Cresswell, P. Mechanisms of MHC class I–restricted antigen processing. Annu Rev Immunol 1998. 16:323-358.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  35. Markmann, JF, et al. Indefinite survival of MHC class I-deficient murine pancreatic islet allografts. Transplantation 1992. 54:1085-1089.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Fyfe, AI. Transplant atherosclerosis: the clinical syndrome, pathogenesis and possible model of spontaneous atherosclerosis. Can J Cardiol 1992. 8:509-519.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Cramer, DV, et al. Lymphocytic subsets and histopathologic changes associated with the development of heart transplant arteriosclerosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992. 11:458-466.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Tanio, JW, Basu, CB, Albelda, SM, Eisen, HJ. Differential expression of the cell adhesion molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin in normal and posttransplantation myocardium. Cell adhesion molecule expression in human cardiac allografts. Circulation 1994. 89:1760-1768.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Oppenheimer-Marks, N, Davis, LS, Bogue, DT, Ramberg, J, Lipsky, PE. Differential utilization of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 during the adhesion and transendothelial migration of human T lymphocytes. J Immunol 1991. 147:2913-2921.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  40. van de Stolpe, A, van der Saag, PT. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Mol Med 1996. 74:13-33.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Frenette, PS, Wagner, DD. Insights into selectin function from knockout mice. Thromb Haemostasis 1997. 78:60-64.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, RC, et al. Absence of P-selectin delays fatty streak formation in mice. J Clin Invest 1997. 99:1037-1043.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Labarrere, CA, Nelson, DR, Faulk, WP. Endothelial activation and development of coronary artery disease in transplanted human hearts. JAMA 1997. 278:1169-1175.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (February 15, 1999): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 3
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (23)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Referenced in 1 patents
18 readers on Mendeley
See more details