Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Radioprotection: smart games with death
Andrei V. Gudkov, Elena A. Komarova
Andrei V. Gudkov, Elena A. Komarova
Published June 23, 2010
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2010;120(7):2270-2273. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43794.
View: Text | PDF
Commentary

Radioprotection: smart games with death

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The efficacy of cancer treatment by radiation and chemotherapeutic drugs is often limited by severe side effects that primarily affect the hematopoietic system and the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract. Progress in understanding differences in the mechanisms involved in the responses of normal and tumor cells to genotoxic stress has led to the development of new rational approaches to selective protection of normal cells, such as suppression of apoptosis by pharmacological inhibition of p53 or activation of NF-κB. Another promising approach presented in this issue by Johnson et al. is based on the idea of using pharmacological inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) to convert normal cells into a radioresistant state by inducing reversible cell cycle arrest at the G1/S transition. The evidence indicates that this approach is likely to be specific for protection of normal cells and may, therefore, have clinical potential as an adjuvant in anticancer therapies.

Authors

Andrei V. Gudkov, Elena A. Komarova

×

Figure 1

Hypothetical mechanisms underlying three approaches to pharmacological protection of normal cells from ionizing radiation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Hypothetical mechanisms underlying three approaches to pharmacological p...
All the mechanisms depicted are based on the presumption that apoptotic cell loss is a central event in both the HP and GI components of acute radiation syndrome. Small molecules known as pifithrins (5), acting through unknown mechanisms, inhibit p53-mediated apoptosis, thereby rescuing HP progenitors. The flagellin derivative CBLB502 activates NF-κB by inducing TLR5 signaling, also leading to suppression of apoptosis. Unlike p53 inhibitors, CBLB502 is effective not only against the HP but also the GI component of acute radiation syndrome (15). Constitutive activation of CDK4/6 frequently occurs in tumors (e.g., by overexpression of cyclin D), leading to hyperphosphorylation of the tumor suppressor protein Rb, blocking its ability to repress the E2F family of transcription factors that are essential for cell progression from the G1 to S phase of the cell cycle. As shown in this issue by Johnson et al. (16), the synthetic small molecule PD0332991, a specific CDK4/6 inhibitor with unknown mechanism of action, protects the HP system from radiation damage, presumably by inducing Rb-mediated quiescence associated with suppression of apoptosis.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts