Advertisement
Research ArticleCardiology Free access | 10.1172/JCI43068
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Perman, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Boström, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Lindbom, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Lidberg, U. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by StÅhlman, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Hägg, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Lindskog, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Scharin Täng, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Omerovic, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Mattsson Hultén, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Jeppsson, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Petursson, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Herlitz, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Olivecrona, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Strickland, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Ekroos, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Olofsson, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Sahlgrenska Center for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Research, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. 2Institute of Medicine, Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden. 3Department of Medical Biosciences/Physiological Chemistry, UmeÅ University, UmeÅ, Sweden. 4Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Disease, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 5Zora Biosciences, Espoo, Finland.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Borén, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Authorship note: Sven-Olof Olofsson and Jan Borén contributed equally to this work.
Published June 13, 2011 - More info
Impaired cardiac function is associated with myocardial triglyceride accumulation, but it is not clear how the lipids accumulate or whether this accumulation is detrimental. Here we show that hypoxia/ischemia-induced accumulation of lipids in HL-1 cardiomyocytes and mouse hearts is dependent on expression of the VLDL receptor (VLDLR). Hypoxia-induced VLDLR expression in HL-1 cells was dependent on HIF-1α through its interaction with a hypoxia-responsive element in the Vldlr promoter, and VLDLR promoted the endocytosis of lipoproteins. Furthermore, VLDLR expression was higher in ischemic compared with nonischemic left ventricles from human hearts and was correlated with the total lipid droplet area in the cardiomyocytes. Importantly, Vldlr–/– mice showed improved survival and decreased infarct area following an induced myocardial infarction. ER stress, which leads to apoptosis, is known to be involved in ischemic heart disease. We found that ischemia-induced ER stress and apoptosis in mouse hearts were reduced in Vldlr–/– mice and in mice treated with antibodies specific for VLDLR. These findings suggest that VLDLR-induced lipid accumulation in the ischemic heart worsens survival by increasing ER stress and apoptosis.
Reduced oxygen availability promotes triglyceride accumulation in hearts (1) and cardiomyocytes (2). Although it is well established that lipid accumulation in hypoxic conditions can be at least partly explained by a metabolic shift from oxidation of glucose and fatty acids to glycolysis (3, 4), it is not clear whether these metabolic changes alone are sufficient or if there is also a requirement for increased uptake of lipids. Potential mechanisms for lipid uptake include receptor-mediated endocytosis of lipoproteins, lipoprotein lipase–catalyzed (LPL-catalyzed) hydrolysis of triglycerides (5), and protein-facilitated uptake of fatty acids (reviewed in ref. 6).
Accumulation of triglycerides in the myocardium is associated with impaired cardiac function (7–10), but it is not known whether there is a causative link between these 2 phenomena. Intracellular triglycerides, which are stored in the hydrophobic core of lipid droplets and surrounded by amphipathic lipids and proteins (reviewed in ref. 11), are most likely very inert and thus not directly lipotoxic (12). However, it is possible that products formed during the degradation of triglycerides, such as diglycerides and fatty acids, and ceramides, which are formed from fatty acids, may have a pronounced effect on myocardial function and survival.
Hypoxia/ischemia is also known to promote ER stress or the unfolded protein response. This response involves the production of chaperones to promote the folding process and maintain ER homeostasis, but unresolved ER stress leads to apoptotic cell death (reviewed in refs. 13, 14). Recent evidence suggests that ER stress plays an important role in the progression of cardiovascular diseases including ischemic heart disease, indicating that strategies to reduce ER stress may be beneficial in the ischemic heart (15).
The aims of this investigation were to clarify the mechanisms behind the accumulation of lipids in the myocardium during ischemia and to determine the effect of lipid accumulation on survival following an acute myocardial infarction. We show that hypoxia/ischemia increased expression of the VLDL receptor (VLDLR) in HL-1 cardiomyocytes and mouse hearts, and that expression of the VLDLR was essential for lipid accumulation during hypoxia/ischemia. Furthermore, VLDLR mRNA expression was higher in ischemic versus nonischemic human hearts. Importantly, survival was increased and infarct size, ER stress, and apoptosis were reduced in Vldlr–/– compared with Vldlr+/+ mice following an induced myocardial infarction. We also demonstrated that blockade of the VLDLR with antibodies reduced ischemia-induced lipid accumulation, ER stress, and apoptosis in mouse heart tissue. We therefore propose that the VLDLR-induced lipid accumulation in the ischemic heart worsens survival by increasing ER stress and apoptosis.
Lipid droplets accumulate in ischemic mouse heart tissue and hypoxic HL-1 cells. An experimentally induced myocardial infarction in mice resulted in increases in the area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets and triglyceride content in heart tissue (Figure 1A), in agreement with previous studies in dogs (1). Hypoxic treatment of HL-1 cardiomyocytes also promoted an accumulation of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets and triglycerides (Figure 1B). In contrast, hypoxic treatment did not affect the levels of cholesterol, cholesterol ester, or phosphatidylcholine in HL-1 cells (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI43068DS1).
Ischemia/hypoxia induces triglyceride (TG) accumulation in mouse hearts and HL-1 cells, and decreases β-oxidation and increases glucose uptake in HL-1 cells. (A) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets (left) and triglyceride content (right) in hearts from mice 6 hours after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (MI) (n = 11–13). (B) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets (left) and triglyceride content (right) in HL-1 cells incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 6). (C) β-Oxidation, active mitochondria, and glucose uptake in HL-1 cells incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 3). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
The uptake of radiolabeled oleic acid was significantly higher in cells incubated in hypoxia compared with normoxia (Supplemental Figure 1), indicating that hypoxia promotes increased uptake of fatty acids. We therefore investigated whether hypoxia increases the expression of proteins involved in the uptake of fatty acids. Hypoxic treatment of HL-1 cells reduced the mRNA expression of fatty acid binding protein (FABP) and did not affect the mRNA expression of fatty acid transport protein (FATP) or CD36 (Supplemental Figure 2A). Furthermore, hypoxia did not significantly affect the protein levels of FABP or FATP (Supplemental Figure 2B). It has been reported that hypoxia increases fatty acid transport in the heart by promoting a shift of CD36 from the interior of the cells to the plasma membrane (16). However, we did not observe increased surface expression of CD36 on hypoxic HL-1 cells (Supplemental Figure 2C). These results indicate that the increased accumulation of lipids in the HL-1 cells during hypoxia is not due to an increased expression of proteins involved in the uptake of fatty acids.
We observed decreased β-oxidation, a reduced level of oxidative active mitochondria, and increased glucose uptake in hypoxic HL-1 cells (Figure 1C). The decrease in mitochondrial β-oxidation may influence the amount of cellular fatty acids available for triglyceride biosynthesis. Thus, it is likely that the hypoxia-induced accumulation of triglycerides in HL-1 cells is at least partially explained by a metabolic shift away from oxidation of fatty acids toward glycolysis.
VLDLR expression is increased in hypoxic HL-1 cells and ischemic mouse heart tissue. To gain further insight into the key factors that play a role in hypoxia-induced lipid accumulation, we performed an Affymetrix gene array of normoxic and hypoxic HL-1 cardiomyocytes (a subset is shown in Table 1; full analysis can be viewed online, at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds?term=GSE27975) and confirmed hypoxia-induced changes in gene expression by RT-PCR (Table 1). To determine whether similar changes occurred in ischemic heart tissue, we also used RT-PCR to analyze heart tissue from mice after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (Table 1).
We observed changes in response to hypoxia in the expression of genes involved in fatty acid and glucose metabolism and in glucose transport in HL-1 cells, and these changes were consistent with a shift away from β-oxidation and toward glycolysis (Table 1). In addition, and of particular interest, we found increases in Vldlr gene expression in both hypoxic HL-1 cells and ischemic heart tissue that were shown by RT-PCR analysis to be highly significant (Table 1). Immunoblot analysis demonstrated that VLDLR protein expression was 1.96- ± 0.14-fold higher (P = 0.005; n = 6) in hypoxic HL-1 cells and 2.41- ± 0.28-fold higher (P = 0.002; n = 6) in ischemic heart tissue. In addition, higher levels of VLDLR in hypoxic HL-1 cells were verified by immunohistochemistry (Supplemental Figure 3).
The VLDLR is essential for hypoxia/ischemia-induced lipid accumulation. We investigated whether the increased VLDLR expression observed in response to hypoxia/ischemia might play a role in promoting lipid accumulation. Knockdown of VLDLR by siRNA (Supplemental Figure 4, A and B) reduced the lipid droplet area in normoxic HL-1 cells and abolished the hypoxia-induced accumulation of lipid droplets (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 4C) and increase in triglyceride content (Figure 2A). In addition, we showed that the increases in lipid droplet area and triglyceride content in heart tissue from mice after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction were abolished in Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 2B). Our data thus show that the VLDLR is essential for lipid accumulation in response to oxygen deficiency both in vitro and in vivo.
The VLDLR is required for triglyceride accumulation during hypoxia/ischemia in HL-1 cells and mouse hearts. (A) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets (left) and triglyceride content (right) in HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA or Vldlr #1 siRNA and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 6). Results using additional Vldlr siRNAs are presented in Supplemental Figure 4. (B) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets (left) and triglyceride content (right) in heart tissue from Vldlr+/+ mice or Vldlr–/– mice 6 hours after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (n = 7–13). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
Increased VLDLR expression is dependent on HIF-1α. Increased VLDLR expression appears to be a general response to lack of oxygen, as we demonstrated hypoxia-induced increases in VLDLR expression in a number of different cell types (Supplemental Table 2). We therefore investigated whether the hypoxia-induced expression of VLDLR was dependent on the transcription factor HIF-1α, which has been described as being involved in regulation of cardiac peptides under conditions of low oxygen (17). As expected, HIF-1α expression was increased in hypoxic cells (Figure 3A). Transfection of HL-1 cells with HIF-1α siRNA reduced the hypoxia-induced increase in VLDLR expression (Figure 3A and Supplemental Figure 5). In addition, stabilization of HIF-1α by dimethyloxalylglycine (DMOG) resulted in significantly increased expression of VLDLR (Figure 3B). Furthermore, DMOG promoted a large increase in the accumulation of lipid droplets in HL-1 cells, which was reversed by VLDLR knockdown (Figure 3C). Together these findings indicate that the hypoxia-induced increase in VLDLR expression is dependent on HIF-1α.
VLDLR expression is dependent on HIF-1α in HL-1 cells. (A) Representative immunoblots of HIF-1α, VLDLR, and β-actin in HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA or Hif1a #1 siRNA and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours. (B) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Vldlr mRNA expression (n = 6) (left) and representative immunoblots (right) of HIF-1α, VLDLR, and β-actin in normoxic HL-1 cells incubated with DMSO or the HIF-1α stabilizer DMOG (1 mmol/l) for 8 hours. (C) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets in normoxic HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA and incubated with DMSO (control), DMOG (1 mmol/l), or Vldlr #1 siRNA plus DMOG (1 mmol/l) for 8 hours (n = 9). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
Identification of a hypoxia-responsive element in the promoter region of the Vldlr gene. To identify the molecular mechanism behind the effect of hypoxia on the expression of the VLDLR, we performed receptor gene assays using truncations of the VLDLR promoter coupled to the luciferase gene and measured the luciferase activity relative to the transfection control (Renilla luciferase) at normoxia and hypoxia. We observed a hypoxia-induced increase in the relative luciferase activity of the construct pGL3Vldlr180 (–180 bp to ATG) that did not increase further when longer constructs were used (Figure 4A). Hypoxia did not increase the activity of the shorter constructs pGL3Vldlr55 (–55 bp to ATG) or pGL3Vldlr123 (–123 bp to ATG) (Figure 4A). These results indicate the presence of a hypoxia-responsive element (HRE) between –180 and –123 bp. In silico analyses indicated the presence of a potential HIF-1α site between –162 and –158 bp. Mutation of this site within the pGL3Vldlr180 construct completely abolished the hypoxia-induced luciferase activity but did not change the basal activity seen in normoxia (Figure 4A). Thus we determined that the potential HIF-1α site constitutes the HRE in the Vldlr promoter.
HIF-1α activates a HRE in the Vldlr promoter. (A) Luciferase activity of HL-1 cells transfected with luciferase constructs containing truncated forms of the Vldlr promoter and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 10 hours (n = 20). (B) Luciferase activity of HL-1 cells transfected with luciferase constructs containing truncated forms of the Vldlr promoter and siRNA against Hif1a and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 10 hours (n = 12). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
These observations indicate that a potential HIF-1α site between –162 and –158 bp mediates the hypoxia-induced activation of the Vldlr promoter. To further address the importance of HIF-1α for the hypoxia-induced activity of the Vldlr promoter, we measured the relative luciferase activity of the constructs pGL3Vldlr55 and pGL3Vldlr180 in normoxia and hypoxia in cells transfected with control siRNA or siRNA to HIF-1α. The results demonstrated that knockdown of HIF-1α completely abolished the effect of hypoxia on the pGL3Vldlr180 construct but did not influence the pGL3Vldlr55 construct (Figure 4B). These data indicate that HIF-1α is essential for the activity of the HRE in the Vldlr promoter.
Hypoxia promotes VLDLR-mediated uptake of lipoproteins by endocytosis. It has been proposed that the VLDLR mediates uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by receptor-mediated internalization of lipoproteins (18, 19). In agreement, we observed clusters of VLDLR on the surface of hypoxic HL-1 cells, which internalized over time into a smooth membrane compartment (Supplemental Figure 6). We also showed that lipid accumulation in HL-1 cells induced by either hypoxia (Figure 5A) or Vldlr overexpression (Figure 5, B and C) was significantly reduced in lipoprotein-deficient medium, indicating a requirement for exogenous lipoproteins. Furthermore, hypoxia promoted the uptake of fluorescently labeled triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in HL-1 cells, and this response was abolished in HL-1 cells transfected with VLDLR siRNA (Figure 5, D and E). Thus, it is likely that VLDLR-mediated endocytosis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins plays a role in hypoxia-induced lipid accumulation.
Hypoxia-mediated lipid accumulation in HL-1 cells requires exogenous lipoproteins and is mediated by endocytosis of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) through the VLDLR. (A) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets in HL-1 cells incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours in the presence or absence of exogenous lipoproteins (n = 20). (B) Representative immunoblot against antibodies to VLDLR or β-actin in HL-1 cells transfected with an empty vector (control) or a vector encoding Vldlr. (C) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets in HL-1 cells transfected with an empty vector (control) or a vector encoding Vldlr and incubated in the presence or absence of exogenous lipoproteins (n = 10). (D) Internalization of TRLs labeled with a fluorescent probe (Dil) in HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA or Vldlr #1 siRNA and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 24). (E) Representative micrographs of D. Scale bars: 50 μm. (F) The total LPL activity in HL-1 cells incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 6). (G) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets in HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA or Lpl #1 siRNA and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 6). Results using additional Lpl siRNAs are presented in Supplemental Figure 7. Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
The VLDLR has also been reported to increase lipid accumulation by promoting the action of LPL (18, 20, 21), and we investigated whether hypoxia could promote lipid uptake by increasing the activity of LPL. We showed that the total LPL activity in HL-1 cells was not affected by hypoxia (Figure 5F). Furthermore, transfection of HL-1 cells with LPL siRNA resulted in a reduction in Lpl mRNA expression (Supplemental Figure 7) without an effect on the hypoxia-induced increase in lipid droplet area (Figure 5G and Supplemental Figure 7). Thus, LPL does not appear to be involved in hypoxia-induced lipid accumulation.
VLDLR expression correlates with lipid droplet accumulation in ischemic human hearts. To investigate the potential role of VLDLR expression in ischemia-induced lipid accumulation in the human heart, we compared ischemic left ventricle myocardial biopsies taken from patients scheduled for coronary bypass surgery with left ventricle myocardial biopsies from nonischemic hearts from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. The results showed that VLDLR mRNA expression was significantly higher in the ischemic hearts (Figure 6A).
VLDLR expression is higher in ischemic compared with nonischemic human hearts and correlates with accumulation of lipid droplets. (A) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of VLDLR mRNA expression in human biopsies from ischemic left ventricles (left; n = 52), control biopsies from nonischemic left ventricles taken from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (middle; n = 5), and control biopsies from transplanted nonischemic left ventricles (right; n = 19). (B) The relation between VLDLR mRNA expression and the total area of Oil Red O–stained (OrO-stained) lipid droplets in biopsies from ischemic human hearts.
We also compared the ischemic heart biopsies with biopsies from nonischemic hearts from a larger cohort of patients who were recipients of heart transplants and similarly showed increased expression of the VLDLR in the group with the ischemic hearts (Figure 6A). A limitation with using the transplant biopsies is that the transplant recipients are treated with the immunosuppressant cyclosporine, which is a known inhibitor of protein synthesis. Indeed, we showed that levels of VLDLR mRNA and protein in HL-1 cells were reduced following incubation with cyclosporine for 1 week at a concentration that is observed in transplant recipients (1 μmol/l) (ref. 22 and Supplemental Figure 8), indicating that cyclosporine treatment may have suppressed the VLDLR expression in the transplanted hearts. However, VLDLR mRNA levels in the transplanted healthy hearts were similar to those measured in nonischemic left ventricle myocardial biopsies from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (Figure 6A). Importantly, we also observed a strong positive correlation between expression of the VLDLR and the lipid droplet content in ischemic hearts (Figure 6B).
Improved survival after an acute myocardial infarction in Vldlr–/– mice. To elucidate the biological impact of the VLDLR-mediated lipid accumulation in response to ischemia, we investigated if knockout of the Vldlr could influence the survival after a myocardial infarction. We monitored Vldlr–/– and Vldlr+/+ mice for up to 30 days after an experimentally induced acute myocardial infarction and, importantly, we observed increased survival in the Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 7A). We also showed that although the total area at risk (a measure of the total ischemic region of the heart) was the same in ischemic hearts from Vldlr–/– and Vldlr+/+ mice, the infarct area was reduced in Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 7B).
Vldlr knockout improves survival and reduces infarct area and apoptosis in the heart after an experimentally induced acute myocardial infarction in mice. (A) The survival of Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (n = 20). (B) The area at risk (AAR) in the left ventricle (left) and infarct area (right) in Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mouse hearts 6 hours after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (n = 10). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
The Vldlr promotes hypoxia/ischemia-induced ER stress. Hypoxia/ischemia is known to trigger ER stress, and recent evidence suggests that ER stress plays an important role in the progression of cardiovascular disease (15, 23). We therefore investigated whether the VLDLR is involved in promoting ER stress. Indeed, we showed that knockdown of the VLDLR in HL-1 cells decreased hypoxia-induced ER stress (Figure 8A). In addition, ER stress induced by thapsigargin resulted in increased expression of VLDLR (Figure 8, B and C). These results indicate that the VLDLR is important for hypoxia-induced ER stress, and they provide evidence for positive feedback between ER stress and the VLDLR.
Hypoxia-induced ER stress in HL-1 cells is decreased by Vldlr knockdown. ER stress also induces Vldlr expression in HL-1 cells. (A) Quantification of immunoblots against markers for ER stress in HL-1 cells transfected with control siRNA or Vldlr siRNA and incubated in normoxia or hypoxia for 8 hours (n = 6). (B and C) Quantification of immunoblots against markers for ER stress or the VLDLR (B) and real-time quantitative RT-PCR of Vldlr mRNA (C) in HL-1 cells incubated with vehicle or thapsigargin (Thaps, 1 μmol/l) for 12 hours (n = 6). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
We also investigated whether the ischemia-induced increase in VLDLR expression observed in vivo might be able to promote ER stress. Indeed, we showed that the expected increase in ER stress in heart tissue from mice after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction was abolished in Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 9A). These data indicate the importance of the VLDLR in promoting ischemia-induced ER stress. Because ER stress promotes apoptosis (15), we therefore also investigated the effect of Vldlr knockout on apoptosis in the ischemic hearts. We first measured the expression of caspases (markers for the induction of apoptosis) and showed lower levels of caspase-3, -6, and -12 in ischemic hearts from Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 9B). We also used the TUNEL assay to identify apoptotic cells and showed that the increase in TUNEL-positive cells in heart tissue from mice following an experimentally induced myocardial infarction was abolished in Vldlr–/– mice (Figure 9C).
Ischemia-induced ER stress and apoptosis are reduced in hearts from Vldlr–/– mice. (A–C) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR of ER stress markers (A), quantification of immunoblots against caspase-3, -6, and -12 (B), and the number of apoptotic TUNEL-positive cells (C) in hearts from Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice 6 hours after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (n = 7–13). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
Reduced long-chain ceramides in the ischemic heart in Vldlr–/– mice. Accumulated triglycerides per se are unlikely to promote ER stress, and we therefore investigated whether altered levels of triglyceride degradation products in the ischemic Vldlr–/– hearts might account for the reduced ER stress. However, we observed similar levels of total long-chain acyl-CoA, total diglycerides, and total ceramides in ischemic hearts from both groups of mice (Supplemental Figure 9), and thus we concluded that effects on total levels of lipid species could not explain the difference in ER stress between Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice.
A recent publication highlighting the importance of subspecies of ceramides for survival during lack of oxygen (24) prompted us to analyze ceramide subspecies in ischemic hearts from Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice. We observed a decrease in ceramide species with longer acyl chains (ceramides C24–C26) in ischemic hearts from Vldlr–/– mice but found no change in the ceramide species with shorter chains (ceramides C20–C22) (Figure 10A and see Supplemental Table 3 for all ceramide subspecies). Furthermore, we showed that C24–C26 ceramides were the most abundant ceramide species in human ischemic left ventricle biopsies, with significantly higher levels compared with C20–C22 ceramides (Supplemental Figure 10A). Moreover, C24–C26 ceramides, but not C20–C22 ceramides, correlated positively with Vldlr mRNA expression (Supplemental Figure 10B). Finally, we incubated HL-1 cells with ceramides and showed that C24 but not C20–C22 ceramides induced ER stress (Figure 10B). These results indicate that the increase of ceramides C24–C26 seen in the ischemic hearts may participate in the induction of ER stress.
Long-chain ceramides (C24–C26) are reduced in Vldlr–/– mice and induce ER stress when added to HL-1 cells. (A) Quantification of the total amount of ceramides C24–C26 and C20–C22 in heart tissue from Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice 6 hours after a sham operation or an experimentally induced myocardial infarction (n = 7–13) (B) Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of ER stress markers in HL-1 cells incubated with vehicle, ceramides C20–C22, or ceramide C24 (3 μmol/l) for 8 hours (n = 6). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
VLDLR antibodies inhibit ischemia-induced lipid accumulation and ER stress. Our results indicate that the VLDLR is a potential target for therapy against ER stress and apoptosis during ischemia, and we therefore investigated the therapeutic potential of blocking the VLDLR by injecting mice with antibodies against the VLDLR or saline during an experimentally induced myocardial infarction. We observed that antibody treatment significantly decreased both the lipid droplet area (Figure 11A) and ER stress (Figure 11B) and resulted in a strong tendency toward decreased apoptosis (Figure 11C) in ischemic hearts. These data provide further support for the role of the VLDLR in promoting both lipid accumulation and ER stress.
Ischemia-induced lipid accumulation, ER stress, and apoptosis are reduced in hearts from mice treated with antibodies to VLDLR. (A–C) The total area of Oil Red O–stained lipid droplets (A), real-time quantitative RT-PCR of ER stress markers (B), and the number of apoptotic TUNEL positive cells (C) in heart tissue taken 6 hours after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction in Vldlr+/+ mice injected with saline or antibodies against VLDLR during surgery (n = 10–13). Results are shown as mean ± SEM.
In this article, we demonstrate the importance of the VLDLR in hypoxia/ischemia-induced lipid accumulation in HL-1 cardiomyocytes and mouse hearts, and we also provide evidence indicating a role for the VLDLR in human ischemic heart tissue. Importantly, we show that survival after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction is improved in Vldlr–/– mice, which may be explained by the observed reduction in ischemia-induced ER stress and apoptosis in Vldlr–/– mouse hearts. Finally, treatment with antibodies to the VLDLR indicates that this receptor is a potential target for the treatment of ER stress during myocardial ischemia.
The hypoxia-induced accumulation of triglycerides in HL-1 cells might potentially be explained by increased uptake of fatty acids due to increased transport into the cell. This was supported by our observation of an increased uptake of fatty acids in hypoxic HL-1 cells. However, we show that hypoxia did not increase the expression of FATP, CD36, or FABP, which are well known to participate in fatty acid uptake. Hypoxia has been shown to promote the relocalization of CD36 from a storage form in the interior of the cell to the plasma membrane, where it is involved in the uptake of fatty acids (16), and we therefore used FACS analyses to investigate whether this also occurs in HL-1 cells. We did not detect a hypoxia-induced increase of CD36 in the plasma membrane, but it is possible that different times of exposure to hypoxia might explain the discrepancy. We incubated cells in hypoxia for 8 hours, whereas CD36 relocalization was observed after 15 minutes hypoxia in the previous study (16).
Although relocalization of CD36 cannot explain the increased accumulation of triglycerides seen in our study, our data should not be used to rule out the basic principle of relocalization of CD36 and the significance of this transporter for the accumulation of lipids in the myocardium. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that CD36 deficiency might rescue the lipotoxic cardiomyopathy induced by overexpression of PPARα in the myocardium (25). Such overexpression of PPARα has been shown to induce a cardiac phenotype that mimics that induced by diabetes mellitus, in which the heart relies almost exclusively on fatty acid oxidation for energy production and has a severely decreased uptake and oxidation of glucose (26). In our study, hypoxia promoted a shift away from oxidation of fatty acids toward glycolysis, in agreement with earlier studies (3, 4). Fatty acids that enter the cells are not used for energy production but are instead converted to lipids. In addition, glucose uptake and glycolysis are promoted. The phenotype induced by hypoxia/ischemia thus differs from the situation in mice with overexpressed PPARα (26).
Neither the increased uptake of fatty acids nor the metabolic changes induced by hypoxia in our study were sufficient to induce lipid accumulation when the VLDLR was knocked down in HL-1 cells or knocked out or blocked by antibodies in heart tissue, highlighting the importance of the VLDLR in lipid accumulation. Our results thus indicate that increased expression of the VLDLR is essential for the accumulation of triglycerides in hypoxic HL-1 cells and ischemic myocardium in mice.
The hypoxia-induced increase in VLDLR expression is likely a general phenomenon, as hypoxia has previously been shown to increase Vldlr mRNA expression in Müller cells (27) and human monocytes (28). In agreement with those findings, we demonstrate that hypoxia induced an increase in the VLDLR expression in a number of cell lines. We also show that HIF-1α was important for the hypoxia-induced expression of the VLDLR in HL-1 cells. Analysis of the VLDLR promoter showed a HRE between –162 and –158 bp, and knockdown experiments showed that HIF-1α was essential for the activity of this HRE. Thus we conclude that HIF-1α mediates the hypoxia-induced expression of the VLDLR through a HRE in the promoter region of the gene.
Our investigations into how hypoxia promotes lipid accumulation indicate that the VLDLR likely mediates uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins by endocytosis, in agreement with previous studies (18, 19). The VLDLR has also been reported to promote lipid accumulation by co-operating with LPL (18, 20, 21). However, we show that hypoxia did not affect LPL activity and that Lpl knockdown did not influence the hypoxia-induced lipid accumulation in HL-1 cells, in agreement with a previous study showing that Lpl knockout does not influence cardiac lipid accumulation (29). We therefore conclude that LPL is not essential for the VLDLR-dependent accumulation of triglycerides during hypoxia/ischemia.
We also showed that VLDLR expression was higher in biopsies from the left ventricle of ischemic human hearts compared with biopsies from nonischemic left ventricles. Furthermore, we observed a significant relationship between the VLDLR expression and the pool of lipid droplets in ischemic hearts. These observations indicate that ischemia is also associated with increased expression of the VLDLR in the human heart. Moreover, although these types of analyses cannot provide information about mechanisms, these associations are consistent with a link between VLDLR expression and accumulation of neutral lipids in the ischemic human heart.
One of our major aims was to determine whether lipid accumulation is detrimental to the ischemic heart. We therefore tested the hypothesis that increased VLDLR expression in the heart is coupled to increased risk of death shortly after a myocardial infarction in mice. Our results showed improved survival in Vldlr–/– mice compared with Vldlr+/+ mice in the early phase of an experimentally induced acute myocardial infarction. Echocardiographic analysis of Vldlr–/– and Vldlr+/+ mice at rest and during dobutamine stress showed some differences between the groups, but the changes were generally small and there was no difference in fractional shortening (Supplemental Table 4). However, the Vldlr–/– mice failed to increase their cardiac index during stress and had a significantly lower cardiac index compared with Vldlr+/+ mice during this stress. These observations may, if anything, indicate that the myocardial function of Vldlr+/+ mice is better than that of Vldlr–/– mice at baseline. Therefore, it is unlikely that these observations can explain the improved survival of the Vldlr–/– mice. We further examined whether Vldlr–/– mice are resistant to pathological remodeling after myocardial infarction by analyzing the left ventricular mass at baseline and 1 and 6 weeks after an induced myocardial infarction using echocardiography. The results did not show any significant difference in left ventricular mass between Vldlr–/– and Vldlr+/+ mice (data not shown). We also weighed the left ventricles of hearts from Vldlr–/– and Vldlr+/+ mice 6 weeks after an induced myocardial infarction and did not observe any significant difference (data not shown). Thus, the results do not support that Vldlr–/– mice are resistant to ischemia-induced pathological remodeling after a myocardial infarction.
The majority of the deaths occurred within the first 1–3 days. Lipid droplet area was significantly increased in heart tissue from Vldlr+/+ mice 6 hours after the induction of a myocardial infarction (Figure 2B), and thus the difference in lipid droplet accumulation was established when most of the deaths occurred. The ischemia-induced accumulation of lipid droplets decreased with time, but a difference between the lipid droplet area in Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice remained 1 week after the myocardial infarction (Supplemental Figure 11).
It is known that the size of the infarct area is a key determinant of the outcome of an acute myocardial infarction (30, 31), and here we showed that Vldlr knockout also reduced infarct area in mouse hearts after an experimentally induced myocardial infarction. There were no differences in the total area at risk of infarct between Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice, excluding variations in the experimental system as an explanation for this result. We thus propose that this reduced infarct size may be a major contributor to the improved survival in Vldlr–/– mice.
Although the correlation between VLDLR expression and the pool of lipid droplets in ischemic human hearts remained when patients with diabetes were excluded, it is possible that VLDLR-mediated lipid accumulation is of particular importance in patients with diabetes and/or obesity. These patients have increased myocardial levels of triglycerides even under normoxic conditions (7, 32–35), and their high myocardial triglyceride content has been associated with impaired left and right ventricle function (34, 35). In these cases, uptake of fatty acids via CD36 seems to be important (25). These patients may also have an increased storage of triglycerides during acute ischemia because they overproduce triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (36), which are ligands of the VLDLR. The increased VLDLR-mediated lipid accumulation may partly explain why patients with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction (37).
Accumulation of lipids in the cell and exposure to fatty acids have been linked to the development of ER stress (15, 38–40). Moreover, hypoxia/ischemia has been shown to promote ER stress (15, 23), which has been proposed to play an important role in the progression of ischemic heart disease (15). We therefore investigated whether the detrimental effect of the VLDLR in the ischemic heart might be explained by a link between the VLDLR and ER stress. In agreement with our hypothesis, we showed that the VLDLR promoted hypoxia-induced ER stress in HL-1 cells and mouse heart tissue. Interestingly, we observed that ER stress also induced expression of the VLDLR in HL-1 cells. This indicates that there is a feedback loop in which the hypoxia-induced increase in VLDLR results in ER stress, which in turn promotes the expression of the VLDLR. In this way, the effect of hypoxia on ER stress can be amplified.
Although our data clearly show that the VLDLR promotes increased accumulation of triglycerides in ischemic heart tissue, accumulated triglycerides per se are likely to be inert and thus not directly lipotoxic. Indeed, promotion of lipid droplets in macrophages has been shown to prevent lipotoxicity (12). However, increased triglyceride accumulation is likely to be associated with increased accumulation of degradation products, including diglycerides, fatty acids, and products of fatty acids such as ceramides, which have been linked to the induction of apoptosis (reviewed in ref. 41). We thus hypothesized that increased accumulation of triglycerides would promote ER stress by increasing the availability of degradation products in ischemic hearts from Vldlr+/+ compared with Vldlr–/– mice.
To address our hypothesis, we first investigated the effect of Vldlr knockout on total levels of lipid species in the ischemic heart, but we did not observe any differences that could explain reduced ER stress. However, we demonstrated lower levels of C24–C26 ceramides (and similar levels of C20–C22 ceramides) in ischemic heart tissue from Vldlr–/– compared with Vldlr+/+ mice. Long-chain ceramides have been shown to accumulate in hearts of mice exposed to hypoxia from birth (42), but the importance of individual ceramide subspecies on ER stress has not been previously investigated. However, recent results indicate that the fatty acid chain length of ceramides is an important determinant of the biological effect mediated by the bioactive lipid. Thus, C24–C26 ceramides have been shown to mediate the death of a Caenorhabditis elegans mutant that fails to withstand asphyxia, whereas ceramides with shorter chains have the opposite effect (ref. 24 and comments in ref. 43). This study prompted us to investigate the relative effect of longer- versus shorter-chain ceramides in HL-1 cells, and we showed that the C24 ceramide induced ER stress, whereas the shorter chain (C20–C22 and C16) ceramides had no effect. This indicates that the hypoxia/ischemia-induced ER stress might at least in part be explained by the increased level of C24–C26 ceramides.
The involvement of ER stress in diseases such as neurodegenerative diseases, type 1 and 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (15, 23, 44) indicate that it is important to consider therapeutic strategies to limit the damage caused by ER stress. Our data showing that the VLDLR has a central role in the development of ER stress and apoptosis in the ischemic heart suggested the therapeutic potential of targeting the VLDLR to reduce the effects of these potentially damaging processes during ischemia. We therefore injected mice with antibodies against the VLDLR during the induction of an experimental myocardial infarction and showed that blockade of the VLDLR decreased both the accumulation of lipids and the ER stress and showed a strong trend toward a reduction in apoptosis in ischemic hearts. These results complement the genetic deletion experiments and overcome concerns about potential developmental issues with genetic deletion of the Vldlr. They also provide a context for a therapeutic approach to acute ischemia of the heart by blocking the VLDLR.
In summary, this is to our knowledge the first study to show increased expression of VLDLR protein in response to hypoxia/ischemia of cardiomyocytes and mouse hearts. More importantly, we also demonstrate that this receptor mediates the accumulation of lipids in the myocardium during ischemia, resulting in reduced survival following an acute myocardial infarction. We propose that survival during acute ischemia is increased in Vldlr–/– mice because of reduced ER stress, which leads to decreased apoptosis and a decreased infarct area. Our results also indicate that the VLDLR is a potential target for therapy to reduce mortality in the early phase of a myocardial infarction.
Induction of myocardial infarction and preparation of tissue sections. Myocardial infarction in C57BL/6 Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice (The Jackson Laboratory) was induced by permanent ligation of the left coronary artery as described previously (45). For the VLDLR antibody experiments, C57BL/6 Vldlr+/+ mice were injected intraperitoneally during surgery (46) with 100 μl antibodies (2.3 μg/μl) or saline solution. The antibodies have been described previously (47, 48). Mice were fed ad libitum but fasted 4 hours before the operation, and water was available ab libitum during the whole procedure. With the exception of the Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice in the survival study, mice were killed with an overdose of isoflurane 6 hours after occlusion (i.e., in the middle to late afternoon). The hearts were removed, briefly rinsed in PBS, embedded in OCT compound, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C until analysis. Areas at risk of infarction and infarct size were measured using the ImageJ software after staining with Evan’s Blue and triphenyltetrazolium chloride. The experiments were approved by the Gothenburg Ethical Committee on Animal Experiments.
Human heart biopsies. Ischemic heart biopsies were obtained from 79 patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Angiograms of these patients revealed significant coronary atherosclerosis within the left anterior descending artery and/or the left coronary artery and/or branches from these vessels, and needle biopsies were taken from the left ventricle region affected by ischemia. Of 79 biopsies, 27 were excluded because the biopsy was too small, there was too little RNA, or the RNA was of unacceptable quality. Therefore, 52 biopsies were analyzed for Vldlr expression and lipid content. The subjects had a mean ± SEM BMI of 27.6 ± 3.8 (median 26.4), and ten subjects had type 2 diabetes (further characteristics of these subjects are presented in Supplemental Table 5). Exclusion of diabetic subjects did not affect the statistical outcome.
Nonischemic heart biopsies from the left ventricle were also obtained from 3 women and 2 men undergoing aortic valve replacement. These subjects all had angiography-verified absence of coronary artery disease in any major myocardial coronary artery branch. Nonischemic left ventricle myocardial biopsies were obtained from 19 subjects 4 months after orthotopic heart transplantation as a routine check for graft rejection (49). Only biopsies without signs of rejection were used. The experimental protocol was approved by the Gothenburg Regional Ethics Committee and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent.
HL-1 cells and incubation in hypoxia. The HL-1 cardiomyocyte cell line was a gift from W. Claycomb (Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA). The cells were cultured as described previously (50) and incubated in supplemented Claycomb media (50) at 21% oxygen (normoxia) or 1% oxygen (hypoxia) for 8 hours. We demonstrated that the expression of the VLDLR or the accumulation of lipid droplets in the HL-1 cells was not influenced by norepinephrine or retinoic acid (Supplemental Figure 12). Potentially cytotoxic effects of the cell culture conditions were measured using the trypan blue exclusion test (51). Incubation in hypoxia for 8 hours did not alter the viability of HL-1 cells (Supplemental Figure 13).
Measurement of lipid droplet area and triglyceride content. To determine the lipid droplet area in heart tissue, frozen mouse hearts and human heart biopsies were cryosectioned in 8-μm slices, transferred to polysine glass slides, and stained with Oil Red O as previously described (52). The slides were mounted with gelatin-glycine solution, photographed with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope, and the area of Oil Red O staining per tissue area was determined as previously described (53). The lipid droplet area in HL-1 cells was also determined by staining with Oil Red O, as described in ref. 54. The intracellular triglyceride content in heart tissue and HL-1 cell lysates was measured as previously described (55).
Measurement of lipid classes in HL-1 cells. For analysis of lipid classes in HL-1 cells (Supplemental Table 1), lipid classes were extracted from HL-1 cells as described previously (56) and quantified using straight-phase HPLC with evaporative light scattering detection (57).
FACS. HL-1 cells in suspension were incubated with Fc block (2.4G2; BD Biosciences) for 20 minutes at room temperature to avoid nonspecific binding via Fc receptor interactions. Staining was performed by incubating the selected antibodies for 45 minutes at 4°C diluted in FACS buffer (1% FCS, 0.1% NaAz, 0.5% EDTA), followed by washing and secondary detection antibody incubation. The following antibodies were used for VLDLR analysis: monoclonal goat anti-mouse VLDLR antibody (R&R Systems) at 200 μl/ml with secondary antibody APC-conjugated donkey anti-goat F(ab′)2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 40 μg/ml. For CD36 analysis, APC-conjugated monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD36 antibody (AbCam) at 40 μg/ml was used. After the staining procedure, the cells were resuspended in 200 μl of FACS buffer and kept on ice. From each sample, 1–5 × 105 cells were collected in a FACS Canto II equipped with FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences). The cells were gated based on the “fluorochrome minus one” setting when needed (58). All analyses were performed using the FlowJo software (Three Star Inc.).
Metabolic studies. To measure uptake of free fatty acids, HL-1 cells were incubated in hypoxia or normoxia for times indicated in the figures with medium containing 0.5 μCi/ml of 3H-oleic acid (PerkinElmer) crosslinked to albumin. The recovery of radioactivity in the HL-1 cells was measured by scintillation counting. β-Oxidation in HL-1 cells was determined as previously described (59). Briefly, cells were incubated in hypoxia or normoxia for 8 hours with medium containing 0.5 μCi/ml 3H-palmitate with 1% fatty acid–free BSA and 110 μmol/l palmitic acid for the final 105 minutes. The medium was then collected and fatty acids were precipitated 3 times with perchloric acid and a high concentration of BSA. The unprecipitated medium (containing metabolites of β-oxidation) was then analyzed for radioactivity. MitoTracker staining for mitochondria (MitoTracker Green) and metabolically active mitochondria (MitoTracker Red; Invitrogen) was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were cultured on coverslips for 8 hours in normoxia or hypoxia before addition of MitoTracker (50 nmol/l) diluted in prewarmed culture medium. After a further 30 minutes, the cells were washed, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and mounted on glass slides. Slides were photographed with a Zeiss Axioplan microscope under fluorescent light. The number of active and total mitochondria was quantified using the BioPix software. To investigate the uptake of glucose, HL-1 cells were incubated in hypoxia or normoxia for 8 hours with the addition of 25 μCi/ml 2-deoxy-D-[14C] glucose (Amersham Biosciences) 15 minutes before the end of the incubation. This method was performed as previously described (60), with the adjustments described in ref. 54.
Analysis of gene and protein expression. Total RNA was isolated from cells and homogenized mouse and human heart tissue using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cRNA synthesized from HL-1 cell mRNA was hybridized to microarrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions and analyzed using an Affymetrix gene array (Moe 430 2.0) (54). For real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis, we analyzed cRNA synthesized from total RNA from HL-1 cells, mouse heart tissue, or human biopsies using cDNA archive kit (Applied Biosciences), and results were normalized against 18S. Immunoblots were performed as described previously (61), and protein levels were normalized against β-actin.
Immunohistochemistry. VLDLR expression in HL-1 cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry as previously described (61).
Transfection of HL-1 cells. The siRNAs used are shown in Supplemental Table 6 and were purchased from Applied Biosciences. They were transfected into HL-1 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) (62) 48 hours before analyses. For hypoxia experiments, HL-1 cells were incubated in hypoxia for the final 8 hours of the 48-hour siRNA incubation. A vector expressing human Vldlr was a gift from G.W. Rebeck (Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA) (63) and was transfected into HL-1 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 twenty-four hours before analysis.
Vldlr expression in different cell types. Human aortic endothelial cells (cc2535) and human aortic smooth muscle cells (cc2571) were from In Vitro and were grown according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Human satellite cells (a gift from A. Rustan, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway) were differentiated into myotubes as previously described (64). NIH-3T3 cells were cultured as recommended by the American Type Culture Collection, and L6 cells were a gift from A. Klip (The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and grown as previously described (65). The cells were incubated at 21% oxygen (normoxia) or 1% oxygen (hypoxia) for 24 hours as previously described (66), prior to real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Vldlr expression.
Promoter constructs. The pGL3 Vldlr luciferase plasmid (67), containing the proximal 2,590 bp of the mouse Vldlr promoter, was used to make a series of successive 5′ deletion constructs using standard cloning techniques. The mutant promoter pGL3 Vldlr 180HREmut was made by exchanging the putative HRE sequence GCGTG at –162 to –158 to GGATC (in which bold text indicates alterations).
Transient transfection and reporter gene assay. HL-1 cells were transiently transfected with promoter constructs using Lipofectamine LTX and PLUS reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were seeded in 12-well plates, transfected with 2.4 μg promoter construct and 0.1 μg pCMV-RL (Promega). The cells were harvested 48 hours after transfection (and incubated in hypoxia where indicated in the figure legends for the final 10 hours). The cells were then washed once with ice-cold PBS, harvested in 100 μl lysis buffer, freeze-thawed 3 times, and then analyzed using Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunoelectron microscopy. HL-1 cells cultured on Thermanox coverslips (Nunc) were washed 3 times with PBS at 4°C and incubated on ice for 2 hours with 1:200 goat anti-VLDLR primary antibody (R&D Systems). The cells were then washed 3 times with PBS at 4°C, incubated on ice for 1 hour with the secondary antibody (donkey anti-goat IgG conjugated with 25-nm colloidal gold antibody; British Biocell International), and again washed 3 times with PBS at 4°C. Culture media was then added and the cells were incubated in hypoxia for 0, 0.5, and 1 hour. The cells were fixed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.15 mol/l Na cacodylate buffer for 1 hour and postfixed in 0.5% OsO4 in 0.1 mol/l Na cacodylate buffer for 1.5 hours at 8°C. The contrast was increased by incubation with 0.5% uranylacetate for 1 hour. Specimens were dehydrated by a progressive increase of ethanol concentration (70.0%–99.5% over 1 hour) and thereafter imbedded in agar 100 resin and allowed to polymerize for 70 hours. Ultrathin sections were obtained with a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) and were collected on nickel grids. Sections were examined in a LEO 912AB Omega transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss NTS). Digital image files were captured with a MegaView III camera (Soft Imaging Systems).
Lipoprotein uptake. To investigate the effect of exogenous lipoproteins, HL-1 cells were incubated in media containing either standard serum or lipoprotein-deficient serum (Sigma-Aldrich) during the 8-hour hypoxic incubation period. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins were isolated from mouse plasma as previously described (68) and labeled with 1,1′-dioctadecyl-1-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanin (Dil) (69). HL-1 cells in normoxia or hypoxia were incubated with 10 μg/ml of Dil-labeled triglyceride-rich lipoproteins for the final 3 hours of the 48-hour siRNA incubation. Micrographs were captured by confocal microscopy, and lipoprotein uptake was determined by measuring the intracellular fluorescent area of each cell as described previously (54).
LPL activity. Total LPL activity in HL-1 whole cell lysates was determined as described previously (70).
Measurement of TUNEL staining. TUNEL staining was performed in 8-μm slices of mouse hearts at the level of infarction using ApopTag ISOL Dual Fluorescence Apoptosis Detection Kit (Millipore) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The stained samples were analyzed by microscopy.
Lipid species analysis. Mouse hearts and human heart biopsies were homogenized in 70% methanol at 4°C for 5 minutes at 20 Hz. Known amounts of internal standards were added to the samples before extraction, and the final lipid extracts were dried under nitrogen. Sphingolipids and glycerolipids were extracted as described previously (56) and reconstituted in chloroform-methanol (1:2 vol/vol). Sphingolipids were analyzed as described in ref. 71 on a 4000 QTRAP mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies) equipped with an ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) system, CTC PAL autosampler (Leap Technologies), and Rheos Allegro UHPLC (Flux Instruments) using multiple-reaction monitoring. Glycerolipids were analyzed by multiple precursor ion scanning as previously described (72) on a QTRAP 5500 mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies) equipped with a robotic nanoflow ion source NanoMate HD (Advion). Mass spectrometry data files were processed using MultiQuant 1.1.0.26 or Lipid Profiler (73) (Applied Biosystems/MDS Analytical Technologies). Identified lipids were quantified by normalizing against their respective internal standard and tissue wet weight. Levels of acyl-CoA were analyzed as previously described (74).
Incubation of HL-1 cells with ceramide. HL-1 cells were incubated with 3.5 μmol/l ceramide (N-arachidoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine [C20 ceramide d18:1/20:0] and N-behenoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine [C22 ceramide d18:1/22:0] or N-lignoceroyl-D-erythro-sphingosine [C24 ceramide d18:1/24:0] and N-nervonoyl-D-erythro-sphingosine [C24:1 ceramide d18:1/24:1(15Z)]) (Avanti Polar Lipids) in ethanol/dodecane (98:2) (75) for 8 hours.
Echocardiography. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on Vldlr+/+ and Vldlr–/– mice at rest and during dobutamine stress (dobutamine 1 μg/g body weight was given intraperitoneally). During the procedure, the mice were maintained lightly anesthetized with an isoflurane dose of approximately 1.2% in air using a nose mask. Examinations were performed using a high-frequency 15-MHz linear transducer (CL 15-7; Philip Medical System) connected to an HDI 5000 ultrasound system (ATL; Philip Medical System). A warming pad was used to maintain normal body temperature. All data were stored and later evaluated offline on an Echo-Pac (Vingmed) system by one investigator blinded to the identity of the mice. For optimal orientation, the long-axis view was first performed and M-mode of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) measured. From an optimal parasternal short-axis view at the level of the papillary muscles, 2-dimensional targeted M-mode measurements of left ventricular internal diameters and wall thickness were obtained by using the leading-edge method of the American Society of Echocardiography. End diastole was defined as the largest left ventricular dimension and end systole as the peak inward motion of ventricular septum. All measurements were based on the average of at least 3 cardiac cycles. The following parameters were measured from short axis view: left ventricular diameter in diastole (LVEDd), left ventricular diameter in systole (LVEDs) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWd). Fractional shortening was calculated as (LVEDd – LVESd) / LVEDd × 100. Two-dimensionally guided pulse Doppler recordings of left ventricular outflow were obtained from the apical “4-chamber” view for measurements of heart rate and aortic velocity time integral. Cardiac index was calculated as aorta velocity time integral × (π × (LVOT / 2)2) / body weight and relative wall thickness as 2 × LVPWd / LVEDd. Doppler tissue imaging measurements were obtained for systolic and diastolic velocities from left ventricular posterior wall in the short-axis view. Because the groups were age matched and therefore differed in body weight, all measurements affected by size were divided by body weight. This protocol was approved by the Gothenburg Ethical Committee on Animal Experiments.
Statistics. Differences between groups were assessed using Mann-Whitney rank sum tests or 1-way ANOVA followed by the Dunette or Bonferroni post hoc test to determine statistical significance. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to test the relationships between 2 variables. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant, and data are shown as mean ± SEM unless otherwise indicated.
We thank Rosie Perkins for very valuable and stimulating discussions and for editing the manuscript, Maria Heyden and Kristina SkÅlén for expert technical assistance, Azra Miljanovic for assistance in echocardiography measurements, Mikael Brisslert for help with FACS, and Bengt R. Johansson for help with electron microscopy experiments. This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, The Swedish Diabetes Society, Torsten, and Ragnar Söderberg Foundation, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, NIH grant HL054710, and the European Union–funded projects ETHERPATHS and Lipidomic Net.
Address correspondence to: Jan Borén, Wallenberg Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Bruna StrÅket 16, SE-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46.31.342.2949; Fax: 46.31.823.762; E-mail: jan.boren@wlab.gu.se.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2625–2640. doi:10.1172/JCI43068.