I’ve been asked several times to give talks about various aspects of the scientific publishing enterprise, and sometimes to comment specifically on how to write a manuscript that will have maximal impact. While many in my audiences have felt that my presentations are designed for students and trainees, I hope everyone listens, as sometimes even established scientists are prone to making mistakes. I hope here to outline a few pointers that will help your manuscripts skate through the submission and peer review process. Some points may be elementary, but all bear repeating.
Ushma S. Neill
Title and authors | Publication | Year |
---|---|---|
What’s not in the news headlines or titles of Alzheimer disease articles? #InMice
M Triunfol, FC Gouveia, L Bero |
PLoS Biology | 2021 |
How to create a scientific masterpiece: an update for 2019
Ushma S. Neill |
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2019 |
Why Study the History of Neuroscience?
RE Brown |
Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience | 2019 |
How to Write an Efficient Discussion?
I Masic |
Medical Archives | 2018 |
Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often
CE Paiva, JP da Lima, BS Paiva |
Clinics | 2012 |
How to write a scientific manuscript for publication
GM Liumbruno, C Velati, P Pasqualetti, M Franchini |
Blood Transfusion | 2012 |
How to write an effective referee report
Ushma S. Neill |
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2009 |