Advertisement
Personal perspective Free access | 10.1172/JCI31811
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Address correspondence to: Norbert F. Voelkel, Victoria Johnson Center for Emphysema Research, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St. Sanger Hall 7024, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. Phone: (804) 628-9615; Fax: (804) 628-0325; E-mail: nvoelkel@mcvh-vcu.edu.
Find articles by Taraseviciene-Stewart, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Address correspondence to: Norbert F. Voelkel, Victoria Johnson Center for Emphysema Research, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St. Sanger Hall 7024, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. Phone: (804) 628-9615; Fax: (804) 628-0325; E-mail: nvoelkel@mcvh-vcu.edu.
Find articles by Voelkel, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published February 1, 2008 - More info
Emphysema is one manifestation of a group of chronic, obstructive, and frequently progressive destructive lung diseases. Cigarette smoking and air pollution are the main causes of emphysema in humans, and cigarette smoking causes emphysema in rodents. This review examines the concept of a homeostatically active lung structure maintenance program that, when attacked by proteases and oxidants, leads to the loss of alveolar septal cells and airspace enlargement. Inflammatory and noninflammatory mechanisms of disease pathogenesis, as well as the role of the innate and adaptive immune systems, are being explored in genetically altered animals and in exposure models of this disease. These recent scientific advances support a model whereby alveolar destruction resulting from a coalescence of mechanical forces, such as hyperinflation, and more recently recognized cellular and molecular events, including apoptosis, cellular senescence, and failed lung tissue repair, produces the clinically recognized syndrome of emphysema.
. . . animals have really two environments: a milieu exterieur in which the organism is situated and a milieu interieur in which the tissue elements live. — All the vital mechanisms, varied as they are, have only one object: that of preserving constant the conditions of life in the milieu interieur.
—Claude Bernard (1)
Emphysema is defined as airspace enlargement of the adult lung (2) (Figures 1 and 2), in contrast to developmentally impaired alveolarization of the neonatal lung. Human emphysema was originally described by Ruysch in Amsterdam at the end of the 17th century and in the 19th century by the French physician Laennec (3), who noted “marked variations in the size of the air vesicles, which might be smaller than a millet seed or as large as a cherry stone or haricot. Vesicles of the latter size were produced by the coalescence of adjacent air spaces following rupture of the alveolar walls” (4).
Human emphysema. (A) Chest CT scan of a 56-year-old man with COPD demonstrating a profound loss of the lung parenchyma and paucity of lung vessels. (B) Whole-lung section demonstrating ubiquitous “holes,” i.e., emphysema. (C) Histology of end-stage emphysematous lung. H&E staining; magnification, ×40. The loss of alveolar septal cells is not accompanied (in this specimen) by significant inflammatory cell accumulation.
Emphysema most frequently develops between the ages of 45 and 60 as a component of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in smokers (5), but emphysematous lung destruction has also been reported in other non–smoking-related disorders such as HIV-1 infection (6) or hypersensitivity pneumonitis (7). The clinical syndrome of COPD includes both pulmonary manifestations, including airflow obstruction, small airway inflammation (bronchiolitis), and lung parenchyma (alveolar) destruction (8); and extrapulmonary manifestations, including muscle wasting, osteoporosis, and anemia (9–11). Although sputum production and cough are frequent symptoms, the most disabling aspect of severe COPD is breathlessness (dyspnea). The present treatment of COPD consists of daily administration of inhaled bronchodilators and/or steroids and oxygen supplementation, often continuously for 24 hours for hypoxemic patients (12); there is no emphysema-specific treatment. Mortality and morbidity from COPD is an increasingly serious global health problem; COPD ranked sixth among the causes of death globally in 1990 but is expected to be the third most common cause of death in 2020 (13). In addition, the health care costs of COPD are considerable (14).
The question of whether cigarette smoking is a cause of emphysema was raised in the 1950s (15), and the landmark study by the British epidemiologists Fletcher and Peto supported the concept that chronic cigarette smoking is indeed the major cause of chronic bronchitis and emphysema (16). More recently, a consensus has begun building that the lung structure is attacked and destroyed by inhaled noxious agents contained in cigarette smoke or in polluted air; the effects of exposure to diesel exhaust, ozone, and microparticles are being examined (17–19). There is also agreement that not every long-term heavy smoker develops emphysema — the painter Pablo Picasso, who started smoking as a teenager but remained active and productive beyond his ninetieth year, comes to mind — and that genetic susceptibility factors underlie emphysema development (20). One alternative concept of emphysema pathogenesis is that the disease is a manifestation of premature aging of the lung; gene polymorphisms are being investigated, and researchers are searching for candidate genes that encode proteins that are components of inflammatory pathways (21), antioxidants, and proteolysis inhibitors (20, 22, 23). Many aspects of the pathobiology of human emphysema remain unclear. For example, it has been recognized for many years that human emphysema can affect the entire lung or have a predilection for the upper lobes and subpleural areas. The reasons for these regional differences in emphysema distribution are not understood (23). Evidence of both emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis in the same patient has been reported, implicating some common pathways leading to the different outcomes (24, 25). It remains likewise unresolved why emphysematous lung destruction is relentlessly progressive in some patients even many years after smoking cessation.
The destruction of alveolar-capillary (epithelial and endothelial) cells by proteolytic enzymes has been generally accepted as one of the principle mechanisms of destructive airspace enlargement (Figure 3), based on the demonstration that intratracheal instillation of the cysteine protease papain (a meat tenderizer) caused emphysema in rats (26) and on an association between emphysema and a genetic deficiency in the neutrophil elastase inhibitor α1-antitrypsin (AAT) (27). Whereas a large number of animal studies, which make use of spontaneous or engineered genetic variations, support the inflammation-proteolysis theory, some studies have raised questions about whether inflammatory mechanisms are sufficient or necessary to explain airspace enlargement per se, and other pathogenetic mechanisms of this disease are being considered (28–31) (see Adaptive immunity in emphysema). Although emphysema is only part of the radiographic and histological presentation of COPD, this review focuses on alveolar septum destruction and airspace enlargement and will highlight a number of different pathogenetic mechanisms that can be understood to operate individually or in concert. We also attempt to integrate the increasingly large — and growing — number of molecular targets that have been experimentally investigated and shown to cause airspace enlargement. For further information, we refer the reader to recent comprehensive reviews on the pathogenesis of emphysema (32, 33).
Proteolytic destruction of the elastin fiber network by cigarette smoke–activated inflammatory cells. This schematic illustrates the dense elastin fiber network in the lung; the elastin fibers form a particularly dense network around lung capillaries. Neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells have been recognized as producers of proteases. In addition to neutrophil elastase and MMP-12, there have been a myriad of proteases identified in human and animal emphysema that can degrade elastin, collagen, and fibronectin. Loss of the alveolar septal scaffold after enzymatic degradation of various matrix proteins causes airspace enlargement. Elastin peptides are chemotactic and can attract additional inflammatory cells into the lung, thus generating a vicious cycle.
The lung, like the skin and the gut, has a large surface area that is constantly exposed to the environment and is also a metabolically active organ with a large blood-air interface designed for both gas exchange and capillary endothelial cell processing of a myriad of endogenous substances. This dual function of gas exchange and metabolism can only be maintained throughout adult life if the structure of the organ is homeostatically maintained and defended against the external and internal environment. A modern concept is that both resident and bone marrow–derived stem cells participate in the maintenance of the adult lung structure. Our knowledge of lung cell turnover and dependence on extrapulmonary repair mechanisms at present is rudimentary. However, it is conceivable that a program of lung structure maintenance of critical importance during lung development has retained and preserved architectural building principles and that, later in life, elements of this developmental program are utilized to protect the lung against destruction, antioxidants, antiproteases, and attack by the innate immune system. Furthermore, it is possible that destruction of the lung parenchyma may result if there is chronic unopposed oxidant stress, unopposed proteolysis, apoptosis, and impaired clearance of apoptosed cell bodies (34–37), cellular senescence without adequate cell replacement (38, 39), or a switch from an innate toward an autoimmune response (40).
As stated above, the pathology of COPD relates to inflammatory changes in the small airways and to the loss of alveolar septal structures and small vessels (41). The alveolar septae are infiltrated by neutrophils, clusters of CD68+ macrophages, and lymphocytes. A recent study by Hogg et al. (42) provided a quantitative cellular analysis of lung tissue samples from patients with COPD of all degrees of severity and lung function impairment. The presence of lymph follicles in the parenchyma or dendritic cell infiltration and Th1 cells was noted, raising questions about the nature of the immune response and its potential role in emphysematous destruction. One contemporary pathogenetic model of emphysema has been built on the data provided by many laboratories (Figure 3). This model posits that neutrophil elastase and MMP-12 released by activated macrophages enzymatically destroy the elastin scaffold of the alveolar spaces. However, the production of proteases is not restricted to inflammatory cells; structural cells such as epithelial and endothelial cells are also capable of producing proteases (43, 44). Elastin fragments in turn are chemotactic (45) and attract inflammatory cells to sites of injury, thus suggesting a joint role of inflammatory cells and proteases. Strong experimental support of this concept is provided by data showing that elimination of alveolar macrophages in rats (46) and knockout of MMP-12 in mice (47) protected these animals against cigarette smoke–induced emphysema.
Although the presence of inflammatory cells that can release oxidants and proteases has now been well documented, one is reminded that a number of acute lung diseases that manifest with massive inflammation (such as bacterial pneumonia and acute lung injury) develop and resolve entirely without emphysematous parenchyma destruction. Figure 2C shows a section of a human lung with severe airspace destruction — yet inflammatory cells are absent; this does not imply that inflammatory cells were not present earlier or that lung structural cells secrete destructive proteases.
Can animal models help us to resolve the issue of whether inflammation is necessary in emphysema pathogenesis? Inflammation is defined as the presence of inflammatory cells and altered levels of mediators of inflammation in the parenchyma. Rodent emphysema models can perhaps be broadly categorized as: (a) genetic models, which via the use of gene manipulations such as gene overexpression or knockout, can be utilized to identify the usually silent and hidden actions of elements of the lung structure maintenance program; and (b) exposure models, which involve inducing damage to the adult lung of wild-type or transgenic animals (Tables 1 and 2) and explore the mechanisms of cellular damage and protection. Many of the recently developed experimental models of emphysema — smoking-related or not — show that inflammatory cells of varying compositions populate the airspaces in increased numbers (48, 49).
Yeast, worm, fly, and mouse molecular genetic analysis and engineering allow us to dissect elementary biological mechanisms, but in the long run it may be unproductive to assume that all the important problems of human lung pathobiology can be solved in the mouse, for at least four different reasons. The mouse lung has no systemic pressure bronchial circulation; the mouse likely does not possess many of the cytochrome P450 genes that govern human toxicology; and there are many important differences in the function of the immune systems of mice and humans. Last, rodents may have — and may use — the option of perpetual lung growth.
Proteases can enzymatically degrade a variety of lung matrix proteins, and antiproteases protect against their degradation. The topic of proteases and antiproteases and their roles in various emphysema models has recently been reviewed (50). As the number of reported elastases, MMPs, cathepsins, and known actions of caspases (51) is steadily increasing, it becomes apparent that the structure maintenance program must function with both proteases and antiproteases (reviewed in refs. 52, 53). The activity of inflammatory cell–released proteases is inhibited by antiproteases, while other proteases in alveolar septal structure cells are engaged in the ongoing work of repair and angiogenic remodeling and join the neutrophil and macrophage elastases in support of the innate immune response. Although Figure 3 schematically depicts an elastin-based aspect of lung tissue destruction, a large number of reports have also emphasized a role of collagenases and described collagen breakdown in emphysema and emphysema models (54–58). Other known factors such as breakdown of hyaluronan by reactive oxygen species can also contribute to the inflammatory effects, while aerosolized hyaluronan prevents airspace enlargement in a mouse model of cigarette smoke–induced pulmonary emphysema (Table 2). The fact that a null mutation of the gene encoding the elastolytic cysteine cathepsin S–protected mice against IFN-γ–induced emphysema (59) illustrates how complex potentially proteolytic lung destruction may be, particularly given the large number of enzymes as well as their targets — many structural proteins. For example, cathepsin S affects the production of type IV collagen–derived antiangiogenic peptides (60). Many questions remain unanswered. One fundamental question relates to the functional and temporal interactions among proteolysis, oxidant stress, and caspase-dependent and -independent apoptosis in the epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and macrophages of the alveolar spaces. For example, in a rodent model of emphysema, broad-spectrum caspase and MMP inhibitors and antioxidants (36, 61, 62), as well as AAT, (63) inhibit apoptosis, suggesting that some powerful, perhaps mutually enhancing interactions between products of proteolysis (cleaved protein fragments?) and oxidant stress culminate in endothelial and epithelial cell death (64). Since AAT can stop the vicious cycle of oxidant stress/proteolysis/apoptosis, and protect against experimental emphysema in rodents (65), Tuder’s group explored whether this usually very abundant plasma protein inhibits caspase activation. Indeed, AAT induced the inhibition of caspases, which was associated with reduced oxidant stress in vivo and also in cultured endothelial cells (66). Again, a new concept is emerging: that AAT has additional actions (67) that are clearly unrelated to its well-studied enzymatic antineutrophil elastase activity and that it protects endothelial cells against oxidants.
Innate immunity relies on pattern recognition receptors that recognize molecular structures common to many microorganisms, such as LPS and endogenous ligands such as heat shock proteins. Activation of TLR4 by LPS triggers production of both cytokines and reactive oxidant species. Alterations of lung cytokines, oxidant stress, and TLR signaling have all been associated with experimental emphysema. For example, lung-specific overexpression of TNF-α in mice causes emphysema and some degree of pulmonary hypertension (68). Knockout of the antioxidant transcription factor nuclear erythroid-related factor 2 (Nrf-2), which among other genes regulates the expression of glutathione peroxidase 2 (69), made mice susceptible to cigarette smoke exposure; they developed airspace enlargement as well as more pronounced inflammation and apoptosis of alveolar septal epithelial and endothelial cells (70). In a manner analogous to the way in which elimination of an important antioxidant “switchboard” upsets the lung cell oxidant/antioxidant balance, alterations of the TLR system may change the interactions of the lung with the milieu exterieur. Zhang et al. (31) followed TLR4-knockout mice (Tlr4–/– mice) into middle age and found that the animals spontaneously developed emphysema associated with an oxidant/antioxidant imbalance due to increased Nox3 (a novel NADPH oxidase) gene expression and elastin degradation. Interestingly, the elastin breakdown was caused by oxidants, since NADPH oxidoreductase inhibition prevented the elastin breakdown. Also of interest, the Tlr4–/– mice did not show infiltration of the lung parenchyma with inflammatory cells, and the authors speculate that the source of oxidants and of proteolytic activity may be the alveolar septal endothelial cells. A new concept has thus emerged: there may be a “TLR4 tone” (and perhaps a more general “TLR tone”) that provides a low-grade activation of the innate immune system that is required for day-to-day lung structure stability. This would make TLR4 an integral element of the lung structure maintenance program (71) by contributing to the defense of endothelial cells against oxidants and also via Th2 cell activation (72). Other soluble innate host defense molecules such as surfactant protein D are associated with regulation of local lung inflammatory milieu, and the knockout mice develop emphysema (Table 1).
Sphingolipids have recently received attention since Petrache et al. (73) found elevated levels of long-chain ceramides in human emphysematous lungs, increased ceramide levels in the VEGFR blockade rat emphysema model, and inhibition of apoptosis and emphysema after the use of neutralizing anticeramide antibodies. In contrast to the proapoptotic ceramides, sphingosine-1 phosphate may, in such a scenario, serve as a balancing prosurvival factor.
Finally, there may be additional mechanisms at play in the slow, progressive destruction of the lung parenchyma, which can continue for decades after smoking cessation. What sustains the chronic inflammation for years after smoking cessation continues to puzzle investigators. Chronic, poorly controlled asthma in humans is associated with lung remodeling and a transition to fixed airway obstruction. Whether or how this fixed airway destruction relates to alveolar destruction is unclear. Whereas allergic asthma is understood to be an immune disorder wherein the antigen is sometimes known, and animal models of asthma — developed using a variety of immunization strategies — can be dissected to uncover multiple layers of the adaptive immune response, emphysema until recently has, as discussed, been seen as a problem of proteolysis, not of adaptive immunity. While this is somewhat perplexing because the burning cigarette can be seen as an antigen delivery device, most recently a concept of emphysema pathogenesis based on immune mechanisms has begun to emerge. A few elements of this concept are discussed here. Lung gene expression profiling of cigarette smoke–exposed rats demonstrated a sustained, increased expression of a number of genes implicated in the innate and adaptive immune responses (74). Chronic lung cell damage, and in particular apoptosis, when combined with ineffective phagocytic removal of apoptosed cell bodies (37) may result in the generation of neoantigens (for example, nucleosomes or DNA fragments; ref. 75), peptides (76), and autoantibodies. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes are abundantly present in emphysematous lungs (30, 42, 77), as are B cells, arranged also in lymph follicles (40, 42). Comparisons can be drawn with rheumatoid arthritis (28), another slowly progressive inflammatory disease wherein B cell follicles are prevalent. In addition, tobacco anti-idiotypic antibodies have been identified in serum from smokers (78) and anti-elastin antibodies in serum from patients with emphysema (79).
Based on studies designed to destroy tumor vessel endothelium by immunizing mice with xenogeneic HUVECs (80), we immunized rats with HUVECs with the intent of attacking the pulmonary endothelium (44). In this model, intraperitoneal injection of endothelial cells causes emphysema, activation of MMP-2 and –9, and generation of anti–endothelial cell antibodies. This model provides proof of concept for an autoimmune mechanism of endothelial cell apoptosis in the development of emphysema, because the emphysema can be passively transferred to naive animals following administration of either CD4+ T cells or serum from HUVEC-immunized rats. If detected in patients with emphysema, anti–endothelial cell antibodies conceivably could explain the loss of capillaries not only in the lung, but also in skeletal muscle, as well as the muscle wasting in patients with COPD-emphysema. Interestingly, HUVEC-immunized rats injected concomitantly with the TLR4 ligand lipid A are protected against lung cell apoptosis and do not develop emphysema (81). Reports that smoking decreases the number of lung tissue dendritic cells (82) but also that smoking induces an increase in the number of airway dendritic cells (83) have been published. In addition, smoking causes TLR4-dependent dendritic cell activation (72).
At present there are no data that provide solid evidence in support of an autoimmune pathogenesis of human emphysema, but at least we can see the horizon, and the evidence seekers are armed with criteria consistent with modified Koch’s postulates for autoimmune diseases (84): namely, that emphysema develops in the presence of pathogenic CD4+ T cells, that adoptive transfer of CD4+ T cells results in emphysema, and that emphysema does not occur in the absence of CD4+ T cells (44). Although smoking has been identified as a risk factor for the development of autoimmune diseases, it is unknown whether smoking can generate anti–endothelial cell or anti–epithelial cell antibodies. Perhaps a productive search can follow the lead of arthritis research, for which antibodies against citrulinated proteins (which are highly specific for rheumatoid arthritis) have been found in almost every patient (85). Other aspects of the involvement of the immune system in the pathogenesis of emphysema can perhaps be examined in the setting of pulmonary capillaritis, a distinct interstitial reaction associated with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (86). Clearly, the tools are available to pursue and explore the hypothesis of “autoimmune emphysema.”
In two different mouse strains with lung-specific overexpression of IL-4 (Th2-prone BALB/c and Th1-prone C57BL/6 mice), only the Th1-prone C57BL/6 strain develops an inflammatory emphysematous and fibrotic phenotype (87). In a remarkable series of experiments, the authors showed that the effects of IL-4 overexpression were not due to overexpression of Th2 cytokines, but that IL-4 overexpression affected lung TGF-β1 and AAT levels and reduced adenosine deaminase activity, leading to a fold increase in adenosine levels. Interestingly, adenosine deaminase–deficient mouse lungs show inflammation and alveolar space enlargement (88), adenosine causes endothelial cell apoptosis (89), and indeed the authors could demonstrate that treatment with adenosine deaminase reduced inflammation, emphysema, and fibrosis in the IL-4–overexpressing C57BL/6 mice (87). Thus, this transgenic mouse study ties together genetic susceptibility, immune response, and lung pathology. High expression of IL-4 has indeed been reported in human emphysema lungs (90). Whether adenosine deaminase levels or activity are increased in human emphysema is unknown.
Although it is premature to delineate a particular molecular sequence of events that begins with some form of mitochondrial stress and ends with death of alveolar septal structure cells, collectively the data indicate that oxidant stress occurs and that there is indeed proteolysis and apoptosis. Both epithelial cells and endothelial cells die, and their apoptosis has been demonstrated in human and animal lungs (34, 62, 91–93). The loss of alveolar capillary endothelial cells and of small capillaries (94) de facto makes emphysema also a vascular disease (95–99). However, whether the loss of the structure-supporting matrix is primary and begets epithelial cell death, which in turn leads to endothelial cell demise, remains unresolved. The pleiotropic “arch–growth factor,” VEGF (its role in the lung has been recently reviewed; ref. 100), is normally abundantly expressed in the adult lung tissue. Its receptor, VEGFR2 (also known as KDR), is, at least in the rat (101), expressed on both epithelial and endothelial cells, and VEGFR blockade (62) or conditional knockout of the VEGF gene (102) causes lung cell apoptosis and emphysema. Both VEGF ligand and VEGFR expression are reduced in human emphysematous lungs (92). As in the islet cell apparatus of the pancreas (103) and in the glomeruli of the kidney (104), alveolar septal endothelial cells may vitally depend on paracrine and autocrine (105) VEGF survival signals and may be vulnerable to VEGFR blockade or VEGF withdrawal (106). In addition, VEGF signaling leads to endothelial prostacyclin synthesis (Figure 4), and loss of prostacyclin synthase expression in the endothelial monolayers of small pulmonary arteries in emphysematous lungs and decreased prostacyclin synthesis (107) may put these cells into double jeopardy and may remove yet another lung capillary endothelial cell survival factor. Effective transcription of the VEGF gene may be hampered by oxidative DNA damage of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) response element of the VEGF promoter (108). Given the bombardment of the cells in smokers’ lungs with oxidants, one could easily embrace a VEGF/endothelial cell–centric hypothesis of emphysema. However, we should acknowledge that while this section focuses on VEGF, other growth factors and signaling molecules also play a role in emphysema pathogenesis. Gene expression studies of lungs from patients with COPD (109) suggest that the cells in these end-stage lungs are fundamentally compromised because of impaired mitochondrial energy metabolism and impaired protein synthesis. The precise mechanisms of this metabolic synthetic failure are not understood, but posttranslational protein modifications and impaired transcription due to DNA damage come to mind.
One pathway likely involved in lung cell structure maintenance. VEGF gene expression is controlled by hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α). In endothelial cells, synthesis of prostacyclin (PGI2) and NO is one outcome of VEGFR activation. Reactive oxygen species can damage the promoter region of the VEGF gene and thus impair VEGF transcription. Activation of VEGFR2 induces NO production. NO and PGI2 promote endothelial cell survival. While it is known that VEGFR2 activation promotes NO production, the link between VEGFR2 activation and PGI2 synthesis still needs to be established.
In addition to outright cell death, we have to consider a role of cellular senescence (not to be confused with the normal aging process of the lung) — a process of replication fatigue — in emphysema (110), as there is mounting evidence that cellular senescence may contribute to emphysema pathogenesis. Sato et al. (111) showed that cigarette smoke exposure caused airspace enlargement in senescence marker protein–30–knockout (SMP30-knockout) mice (SMP30 is a multifactorial protein that protects against aging), and Tsuji et al. (39) demonstrated overexpression of the cellular senescence marker p16 and telomere shortening in alveolar type II cells and endothelial cells in the lungs of smokers with emphysema. Cigarette smoke extract induces cellular senescence of normal human fibroblasts (38). Of interest, senescent cells may contribute to the chronicity of inflammation. Senescent cells stop synthesizing proteins, and this aspect may be shared by conditions of starvation, which, likely by affecting protein synthesis, causes potentially reversible emphysema (112). Results of early studies by Massaro and colleagues in rats (113) are now reflected in the radiographically documented emphysema in patients with anorexia (114). Recent data indicate that starvation causes lung cell apoptosis (112), but starvation-induced emphysema was not accompanied by inflammation; neither was the alveolar septum destruction caused by intratracheal instillation of active caspase-3 (29). Whether this caspase-3–induced emphysema model also displays features of impaired phagocytosis of apoptosed cell bodies is unknown.
Lung repair and restitution of function are the holy grail of modern lung biology. At present, the winning arguments are with those who maintain: it can’t be done, it won’t work. The loss of the densely woven, well-organized network of collagen and elastin fibers (Figure 3) on which alveolar epithelial and endothelial cell sit may be critical and repair-limiting (115). In addition, the damaged lung may “remember” the accumulated inflicted injury. For example, in damaged skin, colocalization of elastin and the oxidative stress marker 4-hydroxy-nonenal has been identified, as well as colocalization of elastin and the cell toxin acrolein (116). Although acrolein can upregulate endothelial cell heme oxygenase-1 (117), it is also one of the most chemically reactive aldehydes inhaled with cigarette smoke (118), and lysyl-acroleinated proteins have been detected in plasma samples from smokers (119). Acrolein-DNA adducts may prevent the return to normal lung cell function; so may a smoking-induced imbalance between histone deacetylation and acetylation (120, 121).
What about the idea that the bone marrow can repair the lung? Indeed, small numbers of bone marrow–derived cells have been identified in the adult human lung (122). For bone marrow–derived precursor cells to repair the injured lung, several conditions must be met: (a) precursor cells must be available in the marrow; (b) precursor cells must be mobilized from the bone marrow and traffic to the site of injury; and (c) the precursor cells must be integrated into the existing lung structure, divide, and differentiate. It may be possible to examine all of these steps in the adult and even the senile mouse. But in emphysema patients, these mechanisms may be impaired. In the human long-term smoker, the marrow precursor cell pool may be reduced (123) and VEGF-dependent precursor cell mobilization (124) may be impaired. At present the issue of hematopoietic cells repopulating the lung after injury remains controversial (125, S1) (see Supplemental References; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI31811DS1). Of note, inflammatory lipid mediators, like leukotriene B4, may control the proliferation of some stem cell populations (S2), again perhaps pointing toward a potentially homeostatic role of some elements of the inflammatory repertoire. Most likely, chronic cigarette smoking alters the gene expression pattern of all different cell types of the lung (S3, S4).
Hogan’s group investigated the contribution of ciliated cells in the repair of naphthalene-injured airways and found that ciliated cells do not proliferate or transdifferentiate as part of the repair process (S5). Side population cells have been found in the rat lung (S6), but their role in lung repair is unclear.
Emphysema research is going strong and going forward. Controversial issues ranging from how to measure airspace enlargement accurately (S7) and how to define aging of the lung (S8) are being raised and debated.
Transgenic mouse studies have uncovered a few of the facets and inner workings of the lung structure maintenance program (S9); however, we do not understand how so many different genetic manipulations result in emphysema. This maintenance program, so we believe, has a purpose and is designed for homeostasis — balancing cell loss and cell regeneration. The complexity of this program is presently beyond our comprehension, as new components of the program are being discovered on an ongoing basis. The maintenance of the structure is not only jeopardized by a multitude of proteases; not only can the defense against oxidants be overwhelmed by ceramide (73), but myeloperoxidase-derived products such as acrolein (S10) may modify proteins and DNA, thus generating a permanent record of environmental and endogenous stress. Cell death, now accepted as a cause of emphysema, may occur in the lung in a variety of scenarios when stress pathways have been activated beyond a point of no return. Where exactly is this point? If intervention with the goal to prevent cell death were feasible, would it prevent or treat an autoimmune disease component but lead to cancer?
Breakdown of structure maintenance may also lead to, or may be associated with, repair failure. Conceptually, the failure to repair the adult lung is caused by an impairment of resident lung stem cells, the impaired mobilization of precursor cells from the bone marrow (S11), or a failure of integration of adequately mobilized bone marrow–derived precursors (S12) into the residual lung tissue because of a permanent loss of the scaffold.
Intuitively, prevention of emphysema (S13) or perhaps disease arrest (S14) appears to be a more achievable goal than reversal of often massive lung structure damage. The impact of diet on COPD has been considered (S15). The Mediterranean diet, in particular the consumption of olive oil, may protect DNA against oxidative damage (S16), resveratrol may inhibit inflammatory cytokine release (S17), and fish consumption may limit the lung damage caused by smoking (S18). Dietary manipulations have successfully been tested in rodent models (S19), and drugs such as statins (S20) also show a protective effect in COPD patients (S21).
In the aggregate, the field of COPD and emphysema research has been very much energized in the last decade. A spirit of enterprise and hope for improving the lives of millions of patients suffering from this disease has emerged in both the clinic and the laboratory. Patients with smoking-related COPD/emphysema and patients with emphysema of unclear etiology alike are expected to benefit from this hopeful change. Future research will surely increase our understanding of both the cellular and molecular mechanisms at work during normal lung function and under conditions in which the lung is exposed to environmental stress.
This work was supported by NIH grant R01 HL66554, a Hart Family Endowed Chair in Emphysema Research, and the Bixler COPD Foundation. The critical reading of this manuscript by Mark Nicolls, Stanford Medical School, is gratefully acknowledged.
Address correspondence to: Norbert F. Voelkel, Victoria Johnson Center for Emphysema Research, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1101 E. Marshall St. Sanger Hall 7024, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. Phone: (804) 628-9615; Fax: (804) 628-0325; E-mail: nvoelkel@mcvh-vcu.edu.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: AAT, α1-antitrypsin; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: J. Clin. Invest.118:394–402 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI31811.