Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Citations to this article

Rescuing the NIH: the response
Andrew R. Marks
Andrew R. Marks
Published June 1, 2006
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2006;116(6):1460-1461. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI28893.
View: Text | PDF
Editorial

Rescuing the NIH: the response

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The feedback received regarding my recent editorial “Rescuing the NIH before it is too late” has been fascinating to read. The opinions expressed illustrate a huge divide between those in charge of the NIH and those who rely on extramural funding to support their research.

Authors

Andrew R. Marks

×

Total citations by year

Year: 2014 2012 2006 Total
Citations: 1 2 1 4
Citation information
This citation data is accumulated from CrossRef, which receives citation information from participating publishers, including this journal. Not all publishers participate in CrossRef, so this information is not comprehensive. Additionally, data may not reflect the most current citations to this article, and the data may differ from citation information available from other sources (for example, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus).

Citations to this article (4)

Title and authors Publication Year
What Can Comparative Effectiveness Research Contribute to Integrative Health in International Perspective?
CM Witt, SR Withers, S Grant, MS Lauer, S Tunis, BM Berman
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 2014
On the value of portfolio diversity in heart, lung, and blood research
ZS Galis, WK Hoots, JP Kiley, MS Lauer
Blood 2012
On the value of portfolio diversity in heart, lung, and blood research
ZS Galis, WK Hoots, JP Kiley, MS Lauer
Blood 2012
The Clinical Research Forum and Association of American Physicians disagree with criticism of the NIH Roadmap
W Crowley, J Courtney, L Jameson, H Pardes, J Moskowitz, E Orringer, A Rubenstein, A Wood, R Rettig, D Ausiello, D Brenner, F Collins, J Elias, W Greene, R Horowitz, L Jameson, E Kieff, C Thompson, JL Swain
Journal of Clinical Investigation 2006

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts