Advertisement
Research ArticleImmunology Free access | 10.1172/JCI25429
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Zhang, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Mousdicas, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Yi, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Al-Hassani, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Billings, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Perkins, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Howard, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Ishii, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Shimizu, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Dermatology, 2Department of Pediatrics and the H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and 4Division of Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 5Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 6Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. 7Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and 8Richard L. Roudebush V.A. Medical Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Address correspondence to: Jeffrey B. Travers, H.B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Room 2659, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. Phone: (317) 274-8804; Fax: (317) 274-5378; E-mail: jtravers@iupui.edu.
Find articles by Travers, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published October 3, 2005 - More info
Staphylococcus aureus infections are known triggers for skin inflammation and can modulate immune responses. The present studies used model systems consisting of platelet-activating factor receptor–positive and –negative (PAF-R–positive and –negative) cells and PAF-R–deficient mice to demonstrate that staphylococcal lipoteichoic acid (LTA), a constituent of Gram-positive bacteria cell walls, acts as a PAF-R agonist. We show that LTA stimulates an immediate intracellular Ca2+ flux only in PAF-R–positive cells. Intradermal injections of LTA and the PAF-R agonist 1-hexadecyl-2-N-methylcarbamoyl glycerophosphocholine (CPAF) induced cutaneous inflammation in wild-type but not PAF-R–deficient mice. Systemic exposure to LTA or CPAF inhibited delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions to the chemical dinitrofluorobenzene only in PAF-R–expressing mice. The inhibition of DTH reactions was abrogated by the addition of neutralizing antibodies to IL-10. Finally, we measured levels of LTA that were adequate to stimulate PAF-R in vitro on the skin of subjects with infected atopic dermatitis. Based on these studies, we propose that LTA exerts immunomodulatory effects via the PAF-R through production of the Th2 cytokine IL-10. These findings show a novel mechanism by which staphylococcal infections can inhibit Th1 reactions and thus worsen Th2 skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis.
Bacterial skin infections with Staphylococcus aureus cause significant morbidity and can even result in mortality. Skin infection or even colonization with S. aureus is a known trigger for inflammatory skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis (1, 2). It should be noted that patients with atopic dermatitis are particularly susceptible to S. aureus infections, in part due to lack of endogenous antimicrobial peptides (3). The mechanisms by which staphylococcal infections can modulate immune responses are an active area of study. Through their ability to act as superantigens, staphylococcal exotoxins can activate large numbers of T cells and MHC class II–expressing cells (4–6). Lytic toxins, including α toxin, are potent stimulators of cytokine production at low doses but can induce cell death at higher levels (5–7).
Teichoic acid and peptidoglycan (PDG) are major polysaccharides in Gram-positive cell walls. Teichoic acid is also presently linked to a lipid moiety as lipoteichoic acid (LTA), which, like PDG, can signal through the TLR2 (8, 9). It should be noted that several studies have demonstrated that, unlike PDG, LTA can bind to the receptor for platelet-activating factor (PAF-R) (10–12). The ability of LTA to signal through the PAF-R is potentially clinically relevant in lung disease; Lemjabber and Basbaum have demonstrated that this bacterial cell wall constituent can augment mucous production in lung epithelial cells via the PAF-R (10).
PAF (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl glycerophosphocholine) is a glycerophosphocholine-derived (GPC-derived) mediator with diverse functions (reviewed in ref. 13). Through its ability to both attract and activate leukocytes, this mediator has potent proinflammatory effects. PAF is produced in a wide variety of cell types; in keratinocytes its synthesis is stimulated by physical agents including ionophores, ultraviolet radiation, and heat/cold trauma (14–17). PAF exerts its effects via the PAF receptor, a G protein–coupled receptor found on leukocytes as well as keratinocytes. Activation of the keratinocyte PAF-R results in the production of numerous lipid and protein cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, COX-2, prostanoids, and PAF itself (18–21). Recent studies have provided evidence that PAF-R agonists inhibit murine delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions to Candida albicans (21). The present studies tested the hypothesis that LTA could exert immunomodulatory effects through its ability to act as a PAF-R agonist and assessed whether pharmacological amounts of LTA are found on lesions of infected atopic dermatitis. The current findings describe a putative mechanism by which staphylococcal bacteria can exert proinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects, which is relevant to the known ability of S. aureus to worsen skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis.
The KB PAF-R model system. Since PAF may have both receptor-dependent and -independent effects (secondary to the formation of biologically active metabolites), our laboratory previously created a cellular model system by transduction of the PAF-R into a PAF-R–deficient epidermal cell line to study the role of the PAF-R in epithelial cell biology. Unlike normal human keratinocytes and the human keratinocyte–derived carcinoma cell line HaCaT (22), the human epidermal carcinoma cell line KB does not express functional PAF-R. A PAF-R–positive KB cell line, KBP, was created by transducing KB cells with a replication-deficient MSCV2.1 retrovirus containing the human PAF-R cDNA. KB cells were also transduced with the retroviral empty vector alone to establish a transduction control cell line, KBM. Expression of the PAF-R protein was verified by binding studies using radiolabeled PAF-R antagonist WEB2086 (18). Calcium mobilization studies demonstrated that the PAF-R in the KBP cell line was functionally active (18). Therefore, this in vitro epidermoid cell system consists of both PAF-R–negative (KBM) and -positive (KBP) cells.
Effects of LTA on Ca2+ signaling and cytokine production in KB cells. The first studies assessed the ability of LTA to signal through the PAF-R. As shown in Figure 1, treatment of KBP cells loaded with the Ca2+-sensitive dye Fura-2 AM with the PAF-R agonist 1-hexadecyl-2-N-methylcarbamoyl glycerophosphocholine (CPAF) resulted in a rapid intracellular Ca2+ flux. Similarly, treatment of KBP cells with LTA triggered an immediate Ca2+ flux (Figure 1B). However, neither CPAF (not shown) nor LTA (Figure 1C) induced a Ca2+ response in PAF-R–negative KBM cells. As a positive control, treatment of KBM cells with the G-protein coupled receptor ligand endothelin-1 resulted in an intracellular calcium mobilization (Figure 1C). LTA induced an intracellular Ca2+ flux in KBP cells in a dose-dependent manner, with concentrations greater than 500 ng/ml resulting in responses (Figure 1D). Treatment of KBP cells with the known TLR2 agonist PDG (23) at 100 μg/ml did not result in an intracellular Ca2+ flux (Figure 1D). These findings suggest that LTA can signal through the PAF-R but appears to be a weaker agonist than native PAF.
Calcium mobilization responses of KBP and KBM cells in response to CPAF and LTA. PAF-R–positive KBP (A and B) and PAF-R–negative KBM (C) cells were loaded with the Ca2+ sensitive dye Fura-2 and treated with 100 nM (54 ng/ml) CPAF or 100 μg/ml LTA. Fluorescence intensity was measured over time with a spectrophotofluorimeter. Both CPAF and LTA stimulated immediate intracellular Ca2+ flux in KBP cells. LTA (C) and CPAF (not shown) had no effect on KBM cells, yet 100 nM endothelin-1 (ET-1) stimulated an intracellular Ca2+ response in KBM cells. (D). KBP cells were treated with various concentrations of CPAF or LTA or 100 μg/ml PDG and the peak change in intracellular Ca2+ determined. The data pictured are the mean ± SEM from 3 separate experiments.
To determine whether LTA exerts its effects via direct activation of the PAF-R, radioligand binding studies were employed to assess whether this bacterial product could compete with [3H]WEB2086 for binding to KBP cells. Three separate experiments indicated that KBP cells specifically bound 323 ± 24 (mean ± SEM) fmoles [3H]WEB2086/106 cells. Addition of 100 μg/ml LTA resulted in a decrease to 202 ± 22 fmoles of [3H]WEB2086/106 cells. In contrast, incubation with 100 μg/ml of the TLR2 agonist PDG resulted in similar amounts of specifically bound [3H]WEB2086 (310 ± 16 fmoles/106 cells) as binding buffer. These studies confirm that LTA can indeed bind to the epidermal PAF-R.
Intradermal injection of LTA induces cutaneous inflammation. Activation of the epidermal PAF-R induces the production of numerous proinflammatory cytokines (18–20) that could result in skin inflammation. To assess whether cutaneous exposure to LTA can result in inflammation through its ability to act as a PAF-R agonist, PAF-R–/– mice were used (24). To that end, the dorsal sides of ears of wild-type C57BL/6 (PAF-R expressing) or PAF-R–/– mice were injected intradermally with CPAF, LTA, PDG, or histamine while the other ears were injected with BSA vehicle as control. After 2 hours, 5-mm punch biopsy samples were taken from the ears, and inflammation was assessed by weighing the specimens. The 2-hour period was chosen as this is the time of maximal inflammation (as measured by tissue weight) we have previously determined for intradermal injection of CPAF in rats (25). As shown in Figure 2, A and B, both wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were equally responsive to the positive control, intradermal injection of histamine. The intradermal injection of CPAF or LTA induced cutaneous inflammation in the ears of wild-type mice. In contrast, PDG injection did not result in the levels of ear inflammation seen in response to CPAF or LTA in wild-type mice. Consistent with involvement of the PAF-R in the inflammatory response of CPAF or LTA, neither of these agents exerted significant levels of inflammation in PAF-R–/– mice. Histological examination of tissue from ear biopsies revealed significant edema with scattered neutrophils and a few eosinophils in the tissue from biopsies of wild-type mice after intradermal injection of CPAF or LTA, compared with those in PAF-R–/– mice (Figure 2B).
Effect of intradermal injections of CPAF, LTA, or PDG on skin inflammation. The dorsal sides of ears of wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were injected with 100 ng CPAF, 10 μg LTA, 10 μg PDG (wild-type mice only), or 2.0 mg histamine in 1 ear and BSA vehicle control on the other. After 2 hours, 5-mm punch biopsies were performed and tissues weighed, and the differences in ear biopsy specimen weights between CPAF/LTA versus BSA vehicle assessed. (A) Intradermal injection of CPAF or LTA induced local cutaneous inflammation (as measured by increased tissue weight) in wild-type but not PAF-R–/– mice. The data consist of the mean ± SD of the difference between LTA/PDG/CPAF/histamine and vehicle-injected ear biopsy specimen weights using 6–7 mice in each group. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in ear thickness between WT and PAF-R–/– mice. (B) Representative H&E-stained sections from CPAF-, LTA-, histamine-, or vehicle control–injected ear biopsy specimens revealed significant edema with scattered neutrophils and a few eosinophils in the skin of wild-type mice after intradermal injection of CPAF or LTA compared with essentially no effect on the ear skin of PAF-R–/– mice. Both wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were equally responsive to intradermal injection of histamine as positive control. CON, control. Magnification, ×100.
LTA suppresses DTH reactions. Systemic exposure to PAF results in an inhibition of murine DTH reactions to C. albicans, whose mechanism involves the COX-2–derived products (probably PGE2), as PAF-induced inhibition of this Th1 process was blocked by COX-2 inhibitors (21). It should be noted that a neutralizing antibody against IL-10 can also abolish ultraviolet B radiation-mediated inhibition of murine DTH reactions (26, 27). The next studies were designed to assess whether LTA can inhibit DTH reactions via its ability to act as a PAF-R agonist. To investigate whether LTA can inhibit the sensitization of DTH, wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were systemically exposed to either CPAF or LTA via intraperitoneal injection and 5 days later sensitized to the chemical compound dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB). Nine days after DNFB sensitization, the dorsal sides of ears were treated with DNFB or vehicle control. Punch biopsy specimens were taken from ears 24 hours later and inflammation assessed by weighing and comparing DNFB- versus vehicle-painted biopsy tissues. As shown in Figure 3A, CPAF treatment inhibited subsequent sensitization reactions to DNFB in wild-type but not PAF-R–/– mice. Similarly, exposure to LTA inhibited this Th1 reaction only in mice expressing the PAF-R. To test whether CPAF or LTA could inhibit the elicitation reaction in mice sensitized to DNFB, both wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were sensitized to DNFB and systemically exposed to CPAF or LTA 9 days after immunization. The day after CPAF/LTA treatment, the mice were challenged by DNFB ear painting as described above; ear biopsies were performed and tissues weighed 24 hours later. As shown in Figure 3B, both CPAF and LTA inhibited DTH elicitation reactions in wild-type but not PAF-R–/– mice.
Effects of CPAF and LTA on topical DTH reactions in wild-type versus PAF-R–/– mice. (A) Effect of CPAF/LTA on DTH sensitization reactions. 250 ng CPAF or 100 μg LTA was injected i.p. into wild-type or PAF-R–/– mice. As described in Methods, the mice underwent sensitization to topical DNFB 5 days later, and 10 days later reactions were elicited by painting DNFB or vehicle on ears. Punch biopsies were performed 24 hours later, and the differences between biopsy specimen weights of DNFB- and vehicle-treated ears were measured using 6–8 mice in each group. (B) Effects of CPAF and LTA on DTH elicitation reactions. In these experiments, the mice were first sensitized to topical DNFB. Nine days after immunization, 250 ng CPAF or 100 μg LTA was injected i.p.; 1 day after injection, DTH reactions were elicited by painting DNFB or vehicle control on ears. Punch biopsies were performed 24 hours later, and the differences between biopsy specimen weights of DNFB- and vehicle-treated ears were measured using 7–8 mice in each group. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05) decrease in difference of ear biopsy specimen weights of CPAF- or LTA-treated PAF-R–/– mice in comparison with wild-type mice.
Involvement of IL-10 in PAF-R–mediated suppression of DTH. Previous studies have shown that PAF-R activation can stimulate production of the Th2 cytokine IL-10, which is a known inhibitor for Th1 responses (21). The next studies were designed to examine the ability of CPAF or LTA to stimulate epidermal IL-10 production and the role of IL-10 in the PAF-R–mediated inhibition of DTH reactions. To that end, the dorsal sides of ears of wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were subjected to intradermal injection of CPAF, LTA, or vehicle control; the tissue was harvested at various times, and epidermal IL-10 was measured by immunohistochemistry. As shown in Figure 4A for the 72-hour time point, intradermal injection of CPAF induced epidermal IL-10 production in the ears of wild-type mice. Consistent with the previous report that PAF-R activation can induce IL-10 production in the murine keratinocyte cell line PAM 212 (21), the appearance of IL-10 in mouse epidermis was not apparent until 48 hours and was maximal around 72 hours after CPAF or LTA administration. Intradermal injections of CPAF did not result in the appearance of IL-10 in ear skin of PAF-R–/– mice. Of significance, LTA treatment also induced epidermal IL-10 production in wild-type but not PAF-R–/– mice in a manner similar to treatment with CPAF (Figure 4A).
Involvement of IL-10 in PAF-R–mediated suppression of DTH. (A) Effect of CPAF or LTA injection on epidermal IL-10 levels. Dorsal sides of ears of wild-type or PAF-R–/– mice were injected with 100 ng CPAF, 10 μg LTA, or vehicle control and the tissue harvested at various times. Immunohistochemistry was used to measure epidermal IL-10 levels. Depicted are representative sections 72 hours after treatment with CPAF, LTA, or vehicle control. Magnification, ×400. (B) Effect of a neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody on CPAF-mediated inhibition of DTH reactions. Wild-type mice were injected with 250 ng CPAF or BSA vehicle control i.p.; 4 and 24 hours later, the mice were injected i.p. with 100 μg neutralizing rat anti-mouse IL-10 or 100 μg rat IgG1 or BSA vehicle. Five days later, the mice were sensitized with DNFB, then 9 days later challenged by painting DNFB on 1 ear and vehicle control on the other. Punch biopsies were performed and specimens weighed 24 hours later. The data represent the mean ± SD difference in ear specimen weights from 7–8 mice. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05) inhibition of DNFB-mediated DTH by CPAF treatment. It should be noted that treatment with a neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody but not isotype IgG1 antibody control abolished CPAF-mediated inhibition of DTH reaction.
To confirm that IL-10 is involved in PAF-R–mediated suppression of DTH reactions, we tested the ability of a neutralizing antibody against IL-10 (27) to block CPAF-induced inhibition of DNFB reactions. As shown in Figure 4B, systemic treatment with neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody blocked the CPAF-induced inhibitory effects on DTH in wild-type mice. These studies provide the support for the notion that IL-10 is crucial for PAF-R–mediated inhibition of DTH reactions.
Measurement of LTA on infected dermatitis lesions. Given our findings that LTA could have significant proinflammatory and immunomodulatory effects and that staphylococcal infection is a known trigger for worsening of atopic dermatitis, the actual amounts of LTA associated with infected dermatitis lesions is relevant. Thus, the next studies assessed secondarily impetiginized dermatitis lesions for the presence of LTA by the method described by Williamson and Kligman (28). This method entails 2 sequential scrubbings of the surface of a defined area inside a sterile 2.5 cm diameter polypropylene tube using a mild detergent and a Teflon abrader. Wash specimens from 14 atopic dermatitis lesions (that appeared possibly secondarily impetiginized) derived from 9 subjects were tested for the presence of LTA by immunoblotting; S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteria were quantitated by limiting dilution assay. As shown in Figure 5 and Table 1, measurable levels of LTA were found in 9 of the 14 specimens. Statistical analysis showed that the levels of LTA positively correlated with the concentration of staphylococcal bacteria; the Spearman’s Rank Correlation coefficient between LTA levels and concentration of all staphylococcal bacteria was 0.62 (P = 0.0174, strong positive correlation). The coefficient between LTA levels and concentration of S. aureus was 0.66 (P = 0.0100, strong positive correlation), and the coefficient between LTA levels and concentration of coagulase-negative staphylococcus (S. epidermidis) was –0.47 (P = 0.0877, not significant). The amounts of LTA measured were expressed in Table 1 as ng/cm3. This volume concentration was determined based upon the assumption that LTA would be on the surface of the epidermis at an approximate depth of 0.1 cm. As shown in Figure 1D and Table 1, LTA concentrations adequate to activate the epidermal PAF-R (>500 ng/ml) were found in 7 of the 14 samples. These studies indicate that significant amounts of LTA can be found on atopic dermatitis lesions when they become secondarily infected.
Examples of LTA measurement on samples from atopic dermatitis lesions. Standards of commercially available LTA (10, 5, 2.5, 1, 0.5, or 0 [Blk] ng) or wash solutions derived from clinically impetiginized lesions of atopic dermatitis (samples A-1 and B-1; see Table 1) were measured by immunoblotting as described in Methods.
Through the production of biologically active products, S. aureus can exert profound effects on skin inflammation. Characterization of the mechanisms by which S. aureus can modulate immune responses enhances our understanding of the role of bacterial infections in skin inflammation, especially in skin disease such as atopic dermatitis. These studies provide evidence for a novel mechanism for staphylococcal-mediated immune modulation, namely, that the bacterial cell wall product LTA can signal through the PAF-R.
Several lines of evidence suggest involvement of PAF-R in inflammatory skin diseases, especially atopic dermatitis. First, PAF has been measured in urticarial-like eruptions, including cold urticaria and bullous pemphigoid (29–31). Second, intradermal injection of PAF results in an urticarial wheal and flare reaction (31, 32). It should be noted that intradermal injection of PAF into atopic dermatitis patients resulted in enhanced reactions with increased numbers of eosinophils in comparison to nonatopic counterparts (32). Third, the lack of functional serum PAF acetylhydrolase, which catalyzes hydrolysis of PAF and short-chained sn-2 GPC, has been linked to a worse asthma phenotype in the approximately 4% of the Japanese population with homozygous mutations (33). Finally, the ability of PAF-R activation to stimulate production of the powerful Th2 cytokine IL-10 in epidermal and other cell types provides a mechanism by which the PAF system can inhibit Th1 and enhance Th2 responses (21). The importance of IL-10 in allergic skin diseases has been identified using tools such as IL-10–/– mice, whose phenotype includes blunting of Th2 and enhanced Th1-associated reactions (34). The present studies demonstrating that PAF-R agonists can mimic the inhibitory effects of IL-10 on a Th1 model system of cutaneous DTH are consistent with the previous studies by Ullrich and colleagues indicating that PAF-R activation is an upstream signal for IL-10 production (21). Thus, activation of the PAF-R could result in an immediate urticarial papule as well as later Th2 cytokine production, 2 features seen in worsening atopic dermatitis.
LTA-induced intracellular calcium mobilization was mediated through the PAF-R, as it was only seen in PAF-R–expressing KBP cells. It should be noted that LTA stimulated an immediate intracellular Ca2+ flux in KBP cells that mimicked the effect seen with the direct PAF-R agonist CPAF. This direct effect is in contrast to an agent such as staphylococcal α-toxin that modulates intracellular Ca2+ signaling in PAF-R–expressing cells indirectly through the production of endogenous PAF, which has a lag of at least 1 minute before induction of the Ca2+ response (35). Our finding that LTA could displace [3H]WEB2086 binding from KBP cells provides direct support for LTA acting directly on the epidermal PAF-R. LTA-induced PAF-R activation is probably not due to PAF contamination as select ion monitoring gas chromatography mass spectrometry evaluation using our previous published protocols (15–17) of commercial LTA samples (Sigma-Aldrich) did not reveal significant levels of PAF (data not shown). That the known TLR2 agonist PDG did not induce a calcium response or displace [3H]WEB2086-specific binding in KBP cells suggests that the LTA signaling effects did not involve TLR2. Based upon these findings and previous demonstrations that LTA and Gram-positive bacteria actually bind to the PAF-R (10, 12), it is proposed that LTA is acting as a direct agonist for the PAF-R.
The immunomodulatory effects of LTA in vivo were demonstrated by the finding that intradermal injection of LTA resulted in an almost immediate urticarial reaction containing neutrophils and scattered eosinophils. Moreover, systemic exposure to LTA suppressed both the sensitization and elicitation processes in a murine model of Th1 DTH reactions to the chemical DNFB. It should be noted that both the early cutaneous inflammatory response and the inhibitory effects on Th1 reactions were dependent upon the expression of PAF-R, as they were both absent in PAF-R–/– mice.
The mechanism by which PAF-R activation could result in an inhibition of DTH responses was also explored. Since PAF-R activation has been shown to stimulate production of the potent Th2 cytokine IL-10 in the murine keratinocyte cell line PAM 212 (21), we examined whether IL-10 was involved in this process. Epidermal IL-10 production was shown to be positively induced by CPAF and LTA in wild-type but not PAF-R–/– mice. In addition, the systemic administration of neutralizing anti–IL-10 antibody blocked CPAF-mediated inhibition of DTH in wild-type mice, providing direct evidence for the pivotal role of the Th2 cytokine IL-10 in the PAF-R–mediated suppression of DTH, a Th1 response.
The clinical significance of LTA-mediated inflammation and immune modulation via the PAF-R is unclear. However, our demonstration that significant levels of LTA are found on the skin from impetiginized atopic dermatitis lesions suggests that this bacterial product could be an important mediator of bacteria-mediated worsening of eczema. Hence, the present studies provide one potential mechanism for the ability of staphylococcal skin infections to worsen Th2 skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis. This pathway could be a pharmacological target through the use of PAF-R antagonists, including rupatadine, a novel antihistamine/PAF-R antagonist which has been shown to be effective for allergic rhinitis (36).
Reagents. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise indicated. PAF-R antagonist WEB2086 was a gift from Boehringer Ingelheim.
Cell culture. The human epidermoid cell line KB was grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Invitrogen Corp.) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone). A KB PAF-R model system was created by transduction of PAF-R–negative KB cells with the MSCV2.1 retrovirus encoding the human leukocyte PAF-R as described previously (18). KB cells transduced with the PAF-R (KBP) or with control MSCV2.1 retrovirus (KBM) were characterized by Southern and Northern blot analysis and by radioligand binding and calcium mobilization studies to demonstrate that the PAF-R was functional (18). All experiments were replicated with at least 2 separate KBM and KBP clones.
Radioligand binding studies. [3H]WEB2086 binding studies were conducted as previously described (18). Briefly, KBP cells were plated into 24-well plates for 1 day and treated with 10 nM [3H]WEB2086 (New England Nuclear Corp.) with and without LTA, PDG, 1 μM PAF, or binding buffer alone for 16 hours at 4°C. Cells were washed and solubilized in Triton-X 100 and radioactivity counted using a scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter). Specifically bound [3H]WEB2086 was measured by the amount of radiolabel displaced by 1 μM PAF. The data presented were mean ± SEM from 3 separate studies using duplicate samples.
Calcium measurements. Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization studies in KB cells were conducted using Fura-2 AM (Invitrogen Corp.) as previously described (22).
Cutaneous inflammation measurements. PAF-R–/– mice on a C57BL/6 background were generated as previously described by Ishii and colleagues (24). Age-matched (8–12 weeks) PAF-R+/+ C57BL/6 wild-type mice were used as controls. All mice were housed in a pathogen-free environment, and studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Indiana University School of Medicine. Intradermal injections of LTA, PDG, or CPAF were conducted as previously described with minor modifications (26). In brief, the dorsal sides of ears of anesthetized mice were injected with 50 μl CPAF (100 ng), LTA (10 μg), PDG (10 μg), or histamine (2.0 mg) in 0.25% fatty acid-free BSA and the other ears injected with 50 μl BSA vehicle control. After 2 hours, 5-mm punch biopsy specimens were taken from the ears and tissues weighed. After weighing, the tissues were placed in 10% buffered formalin, then paraffin embedded and stained with H&E for routine histology.
IL-10 immunohistochemistry. The right ears of wild-type or PAF-R–/– mice were intradermally injected with 50 μl CPAF (100 ng) or LTA (10 μg), and 0.25% BSA/PBS control was injected in left ears. The 6-mm punch biopsy was performed at 24, 48, and 72 hours; the samples were then embedded in OCT, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80°C. The goat ABC Staining System (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 10-μm–thick cryostat sections of tissue block were cut and fixed in cold acetone for 10 minutes and washed in PBS 3 times for 5 minutes each time. The sections were then sequentially incubated in 1% hydrogen peroxide (in H2O) for 10 minutes to block endogenous peroxidases, in 1.5% blocking serum in PBS for 60 minutes, then with primary antibody (1:100 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) overnight at 4°C. The slides were then incubated with biotinylated secondary antibody (1:150 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) with AB enzyme reagent for 30 minutes and incubated in 3 drops peroxidase substrate for 10 minutes or longer. Then sections were counterstained in Methyl Green (Vector Laboratories) at 60°C for 3 minutes and washed with H2O until clear. Slides were then dipped in acetone containing 0.05% (v/v) acetic acid 10 times, immediately dehydrated, cleared, and permanently mounted.
DTH reactions. Studies of DTH reactions to 2, 4-DNFB were conducted as previously described (37) with minor modifications. In brief, to evaluate the effect of CPAF or LTA on sensitization reactions, both wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were injected i.p. with 50 μl CPAF (250 ng), 50 μl LTA (100 μg), or 50 μl BSA vehicle alone. After 5 days, the back skin of each mouse was shaved, and 25 μl of 0.5% DNFB in acetone/olive oil (4:1, v/v) was applied. Nine days later, 1 of the dorsal sides of the ear was challenged with painting of 10 μl of 0.5% DNFB and the other ear painted with vehicle. After 24 hours, 5-mm punch biopsy specimens were obtained from the ears and tissues weighed. For studies assessing the ability of CPAF or LTA to affect the elicitation phase of DTH reactions, both the wild-type and PAF-R–/– mice were first sensitized to DNFB. Nine days after immunization, the mice were injected i.p. with CPAF or LTA. The next day, the ears of mice were painted with DNFB or vehicle, and the ear biopsies were performed and tissues measured 24 hours after elicitation. To evaluate the effects of IL-10 in the CPAF-induced suppression of DTH, the mice were first injected i.p. with 250 ng CPAF or BSA vehicle control; 4 and 24 hours later, the mice were twice injected i.p. with 100 μg of neutralizing rat anti-mouse IL-10 antibody (BD Biosciences — Pharmingen) or 100 μg rat IgG1 (eBioscience) as antibody control or BSA vehicle control; after 5 days, mice were sensitized with DNFB. Nine days later, the mice were challenged by painting of 10 μl 0.5% DNFB on 1 ear and vehicle control on the other. The biopsies were performed 24 hours later and tissues weighed.
Measurement of LTA and bacteria in vivo. Nine subjects with atopic dermatitis diagnosed using criteria of Hanifen and Rajka (38) were enrolled in these studies, which were approved by the Indiana University Institutional Review Committee. Patients or their guardians gave informed consent for these studies. Wash fluid derived from 14 lesions was removed from a 2.5-cm diameter polypropylene chamber using the methodology established by Williamson and Kligman (28). In brief, a sterile ring of PVC tubing (NALGENE Labware; Nalgene International) was placed over the skin lesion of a patient, then 1 ml sterile rinse solution (0.069 M Na2HPO4, 0.0064 M NaH2PO4, and 0.1% Tx-100) was administered inside the ring chamber that was held tightly on the skin to prevent leakage. The rinse solution was stirred around in the chamber with a sterile Teflon rod (Scientific Commodities Inc.) for 15–20 times and collected. This collection was repeated twice, and 2 ml total rinse solution was obtained. This methodology has been shown to be 95% quantitative for aerobic surface bacteria (28). The wash solution was then aliquotted for immunoblotting analysis of LTA protein and bacterial quantitation. For quantitative measurements of LTA protein, 32 μl rinse solution from each patient sample was separated on 18% Tris-HCl gradient gel (Bio-Rad Laboratories) along with standards of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1 ng LTA protein (Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in the same rinse solution loaded on the same electrophoresis gel. LTA protein was determined by immunoblotting with LTA monoclonal antibody (QED Bioscience Inc.) and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The arbitrary optical densities were measured by ImageJ Software (NIH; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). The quantification of LTA was determined according to the standard curve drawn. LTA was quantitated based upon area (ng/cm2) that was then converted to volume (ng/cm3) based upon estimation of 0.1-cm effective epidermal thickness. S. aureus and S. epidermidis (coagulase-negative staphylococcus) colonies were quantitated in the microbiology lab in Indiana University Hospital by limiting dilution assay.
Data analysis. Data are presented as mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to assess statistical significance for differences in means, and Spearman’s Rank Correlation coefficient was calculated to measure and test the strength of the association between levels of LTA and amounts of Gram-positive bacteria. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
This research was supported in part by grants from the Showalter Memorial Foundation, the Riley Memorial Association, and the NIH (AR01993 and HL62996). The authors also wish to thank Dan Spandau and Raymond Konger for their critical reading of this manuscript. S. Ishii and T. Shimizu are supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: CPAF, 1-hexadecyl-2-N-methylcarbamoyl glycerophosphocholine; DNFB, dinitrofluorobenzene; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; GPC, glycerophosphocholine; LTA, lipoteichoic acid; PAF, platelet-activating factor; PAF-R, PAF receptor; PDG, peptidoglycan.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Re: PAFR-binding of LTA does not exclude TLR2-signaling in human keratinocytes
Jeffrey B. Travers
PAFR-binding of LTA does not exclude TLR2-signaling in human keratinocytes
Martin Mempel, MD