Advertisement
ArticleGenetics Free access | 10.1172/JCI19209
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Liu, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Xu, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Hsu, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Tousson, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Yang, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Wu, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Liu, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Yu, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Zhang, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, and2 Department of Cell Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3 Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC), 700 South 19th Street, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: John D. Mountz, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, 701 South 19th Street, Lyons-Harrison Research Building 473, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. Phone: (205) 934-8909; Fax: (205) 975-6648; E-mail: john.mountz@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Mountz, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published November 1, 2003 - More info
Previously, we described an APC-adenovirus (APC-Ad) FasL cell gene therapy method which could be used to deplete autoreactive T cells in vivo. FasL was toxic, however, and controlled regulation of FasL was not achieved. Here we describe an improved approach to delivering TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) in vivo in which collagen II–induced (CII-induced) arthritis–susceptible (CIA-susceptible) DBA/1j mice were treated with CII-pulsed DCs that had been transfected with a novel Ad system. The Ad was engineered to exhibit inducible TRAIL under the control of the doxycycline-inducible (DOX-inducible) tetracycline response element (TRE). Four groups of mice were treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX, CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX), CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, or DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (no CII), beginning 2 weeks after priming with CII in CFA. The incidence of arthritis and infiltration of T cells in the joint was significantly decreased in CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX–treated mice. The in vitro splenic T cell proliferative response and induction of IFN-γ to bovine CII stimulation were also significantly reduced in mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. AdTRAIL+DOX was not toxic to DCs or mice but could induce activated T cells to undergo apoptosis in the spleen. Our results suggest that CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX cell gene therapy is a safe and effective method for inhibiting the development of CIA.
Arthritis in DBA/1j mice induced with bovine type II collagen (CII) is a prototype model of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and shares many clinical and histopathological similarities to RA (1–4). Synovitis and erosions of cartilage and bone are hallmarks of CII–induced arthritis (CIA), and susceptibility to both RA and CIA is linked to the expression of specific MHC class II molecules (2, 5–8).The disease progression of CIA has been proposed to be associated with production of murine CII autoantibodies (9–11). Cumulative evidence further suggests that CD4+ T cell–mediated autoimmune responses play a critical role in the pathogenesis of RA (12–17). CIA can be transferred using CD4+ T cells, and the cytokine profile in CIA is consistent with the Th1 profile (18–23). Furthermore, T cells from CIA mice can transfer disease into SCID mice that are subsequently boosted with CII peptide. These results suggest that the generation of T cells specific for the CII epitopes presented by APCs is an important pathogenic mechanism of CIA (24–26).
A major challenge in the development of effective therapies for the treatment of RA is finding a method for the specific inhibition of the inflammatory disease processes without induction of generalized immunosuppression (4, 27, 28). Because APCs play a central role in defining antigen (Ag) specificity, they provide an access point for specific manipulation of the immune system. We have previously described techniques for modifying APCs so that they express specific Ag’s along with FasL and have demonstrated that these modified APCs deleted only those T cells that recognize the specific Ag without causing general immunosuppression (29, 30). We previously demonstrated that treatment of mycoplasmas-infected B6-generalized lymphoproliferative disease (gld/gld) mice with adenovirus (Ad) FasL-transfected (AdFasL-transfected) APCs derived from Fas-deficient lpr mice (lpr-APC-AdFasL) resulted in a significantly decreased incidence of chronic arthritis (31). We also have shown previously that normal APCs can be used in combination with an Ad system expressing an inducible FasL, providing there is coexpression of the p35 apoptosis inhibitor. For inducible expression, FasL was placed under the control of the tetracycline response element (TRE). The treatment with CII-APC-Ad FasLp35Tet effectively prevents CII-primed DBA/1j mice from developing arthritis without impairing the host immune response to an irrelevant Ag OVA (16).
TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a type II membrane protein of the TNF superfamily. TRAIL can potentially interact with two cell-surface death receptors (DR), DR4 and DR5. Although TRAIL is involved in multiple processes, the precise roles of TRAIL in health and disease are unknown. TRAIL is more effective than FasL in the induction of apoptosis in some types of tumor cells but less toxic to normal cells than FasL (32–34). Both TRAIL and TRAIL receptors are constitutively expressed in various tissues and are upregulated upon cell activation (35, 36). TRAIL-deficient mice are hypersensitive to CIA and streptozotocin-induced diabetes and develop heightened autoimmune responses (37). Chronic blockade of TRAIL in mice with soluble DR5 exacerbated autoimmune arthritis, and intraarticular TRAIL gene transfer ameliorated the disease (38, 39). In vivo, TRAIL blockade led to profound hyperproliferation of synovial cells and arthritogenic lymphocytes and heightened the production of cytokines and autoantibodies. In vitro, TRAIL inhibited DNA synthesis and prevented cell cycle progression of lymphocytes. Thus, unlike other members of the TNF superfamily, TRAIL is a prototype inhibitor protein that inhibits autoimmune inflammation by inducing apoptosis and by blocking cell cycle progression (38).
To achieve Ag-specific T cell deletion in a regulatable manner, we developed a binary adenovirus system, which permits doxycycline-inducible (DOX-inducible) expression of TRAIL under the control of the DOX-inducible TRE and a second Ad that expressed rtTA. CII-injected DBA/1j mice, which developed CII arthritis, were treated with the CII-pulsed DCs that had been transfected with this binary Ad system. AdTRAIL+DOX was not toxic to DCs. Treatment with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX significantly suppressed the T cell infiltration and development of CIA in the joint. Furthermore, T cell proliferation and IFN-γ induction were dramatically reduced in the group of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX.
Mice. Female homozygous DBA/1j mice (7 weeks old) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). All mice were kept in a room equipped with an air-filtering system. The cages, bedding, water, and food were sterilized, and the mice were handled with sterile gloves. All animal procedures were approved by The University of Alabama at Birmingham Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Ad expression vectors for inducible TRAIL and GFP. An adenovirus expressing inducible TRAIL was constructed as described previously (29, 40, 41). Briefly, the full-length TRAIL was first cloned into the BamHI polylinker site of a TRE vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, California, USA) site. The TRE-regulated TRAIL fragment, including the bovine growth hormone poly-A tail, was then excised with XhoI and HindIII, followed by insertion into the Klenow-filled NotI site of the pShuttleCMV, leading to the production of pShuttleTRAIL. The recombinant Ad AdTRAIL was produced by in vitro recombination of pShuttle TRAIL with pAdeasy1 as described previously (42). AdTRAIL was produced in 293 cells as described elsewhere (40). Using the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA), recombinant AdCMVrtTA was constructed as described previously (30) (construct generously provided by J.B. Uney, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom) (43) to allow expression of the rtTA, thereby enabling DOX-inducible expression of TRAIL. A DOX inducible AdGFP binary Ad system was developed as described above.
Induction of arthritis. DBA/1j female mice were immunized at 7 weeks of age at the base of the tail with 200 μg of bovine CII dissolved in 100 μl of 0.05 M acetic acid and mixed with an equal volume (100 μl) of CFA (Chondrex Inc., Redmond, Washington, USA).
Isolation of DCs. Bone marrow was collected from both the femurs and tibias of DBA/1j mice at 8 weeks of age. Bone marrow cells were incubated with a mixture of Ab’s directed against B220 (clone RA3-3A1/6.1), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8 (clone 53-6.72), and Ia (B21-2), using supernatants from hybridomas (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Virginia, USA) for 30 minutes on ice. Ab-coated cells were removed using goat anti-rat IgG magnetic beads (Biosource International, Camarillo, California, USA) to eliminate T cells, B cells, NK cells, and granulocytes. The remaining cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin, 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), and 5 ng/ml of recombinant mouse GM-CSF (PeproTech Inc., Rocky Hill, New Jersey, USA). After 4 days of culture, loosely adherent DC clusters were collected and replated in 100-mm dishes. The DCs were then cultured for 12 hours with 10 ng/ml of LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) to induce maturation. The purity of the analysis of DCs was established by the expression of CD80, CD86, and CD11c, indicating that more than 85% of cells were mature DCs.
Transfection of DCs with Ad. Immature DCs were generated as described above. The DCs and HT1080 cells were transfected with AdTRAIL or AdGFP at 50 pfu/cell of each virus system for 1 hour. After washing, the DCs were cultured for 12 hours with LPS, then washed again. For in vitro analysis, the cells were treated with different concentrations of DOX (Sigma-Aldrich) for an additional 24 hours. For in vivo experiments, the DCs were intraperitoneally transferred (5 × 106 cells/mouse) into mice.
In vitro analysis of DCs after transfection with Ad. The infection rate of Ad into DCs was determined using a fluorescence microscope (BX41; Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan). Expression of functional TRAIL on the DCs was evaluated by incubation with DCs or TRAIL-sensitive HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells with different concentrations of DOX for an additional 24 hours. The in vitro cytotoxicity of the DCs or HT1080 cells was estimated using an ATPlite assay.
In vivo analysis of DCs after transfection with Ad. DBA/1j mice immunized with bovine CII were intraperitoneally injected with 5 × 106 DCs transfected with AdTRAIL or AdGFP as described above. The expression of TRAIL was induced by the addition of DOX (2 mg/ml) with 4% sucrose into the drinking water. Forty-eight hours later, the spleen and liver were collected and embedded with paraffin and OCT. For mice receiving AdGFP-transfected DCs, the spleen, liver, and axillary and inguinal lymph nodes were frozen and sectioned, then counterstained with Hoechst, and GFP-positive cells were identified using a fluorescence microscope (BX41; Olympus Optical Co.).
Induction of TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in spleen. Apoptosis in the spleen and liver were evaluated using in situ TUNEL staining (Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA). The same tissues as collected above were sectioned. The slides were then incubated with fresh proteinase K (20 μg/ml) at room temperature (RT) for 15 minutes. The endogenous peroxidases were inactivated by incubating the slides with 3% H2O2 at RT for 5 minutes. After washing with H2O, Klenow enzyme was added to the slides. The slides were then incubated at 37°C for 1 hour in a humidified chamber. Nonspecific staining was blocked by incubating the slides with 5% BSA at RT for 30 minutes. The slides were then incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin at a 1:50 dilution in 5% BSA/PBS buffer at RT for 30 minutes after washing six times with PBS, the slides were incubated with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) at RT for 7 minutes for color development. Apoptotic cells were identified by the dark brown staining of the nuclei. Counterstaining was done with methyl green at RT for 3 minutes.
Treatment protocols for mice immunized with CII. To determine the role of DC-AdTRAIL (DCs transfected with AdTRAIL) cell gene therapy in CIA, the effects of the following four treatment protocols were compared: (a) CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX), (b) CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, (c) DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (no CII pulse), and (d) CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. To delete the CII-reactive T cells, mature DCs from the bone marrow of DBA/1j mice were pulsed with T cell proliferation–grade Arthrogen-CIA CII (Chondrex Inc.) as described by the manufacturer, then transfected with a novel Ad system. The DCs were injected intraperitoneally into mice at a dose of 5 × 106 cells per mouse. The Ad was engineered to exhibit DOX-inducible expression of TRAIL under the control of the DOX-inducible TRE. DCs transfected with this AdTRAIL express murine TRAIL in a DOX-inducible manner. Four groups of mice were treated with either CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX or, for control groups, with CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX), CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, or DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (no CII pulse), beginning 2 weeks after in vivo priming with CII in CFA twice per week for 2 weeks. Induction of TRAIL on these DCs was accomplished in three of these groups by the addition of DOX (2 mg/ml) or 0.3% eyhanol as a control to the drinking water with 4% sucrose for 10 weeks starting at the time of administration of DC-AdTRAIL therapy. At least ten mice were included per group.
Evaluation of development of arthritis and joint damage. A caliper was used to determine the diameter of each paw of each mouse every day. Paw swelling was determined as the increase in diameter compared with the diameter at the initiation of the experiment. The severity of arthritis was graded according to the following scale: 0, normal with no swelling and erythema and no increase in joint diameter; 1, slight swelling and erythema with 0.1- to 0.3-mm increase in joint diameter; 2, swelling and erythema with 0.3- to 0.6-mm increase in joint diameter; 3, extensive swelling and erythema with 0.6- to 0.9-mm increase in joint diameter; 4, pronounced swelling and erythema with 0.9- to 1.2-mm increase in joint thickness or obvious joint destruction associated with visible joint deformity or ankylosis. Each limb was graded, resulting in a maximum clinical score of 16 per animal and expressed as the mean score on a given day. After sacrifice, the joints (knee, elbow, ankle, and wrist) were harvested, fixed in 10% formaldehyde/PBS for at least 24 hours, decalcified using EDTA for 4 weeks, sectioned at 5-μm thickness, deparaffinized, and stained with H&E (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA).
Immunohistochemical staining of T cell infiltration. The infiltration of T cells in the joint was determined by staining tissue sections with an anti-CD3 Ab. Quenching of endogenous peroxidase was performed by incubating tissue sections with 3% H2O2 at RT for 15 minutes in a humidified chamber. After washing with PBS, tissue sections were incubated with 0.25% pepsin at 37°C for 30 minutes to reveal fixed Ag epitopes. Tissue sections were treated with blocking solution at RT for 30 minutes, followed by incubation with an HRP-conjugated anti-CD3 (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, California, USA) at RT for 1 hour. Slides were incubated with a DAB staining kit (SK4100; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA) for color visualization. Slides were counterstained by incubation with methyl green at 65°C for 3 minutes. Five fields were randomly selected for each joint, and the average number of infiltrating T cells was determined by adding the total number of T cells, then dividing by five to obtain the number of infiltrating T cells per field of each joint. All four joints were evaluated, and the average number of infiltrating T cells per field per joint for each mouse was determined by adding the total number of infiltrating T cells in all four joints, then dividing by four. At least five areas from each specimen were chosen randomly for assessment of the percentage of CD3-positive T cells in each specimen.
Analysis of the Ag-specific T cell response after CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment. Spleen T cells from the five groups of mice were cocultured with syngeneic (γ-irradiated) DCs that were incubated with bovine CII (100 μg/ml) for 3 days as described; then the supernatants were collected and IFN-γ in the supernatant was assayed by ELISA (Biosource International). After the assay, 1 μCi of 3H-thymidine, was added to the culture medium, the cells were harvested 16 hours later, and the incorporation of 3H-thymidine was determined using a scintillation counter.
ELISA quantification of autoantibody production. The concentration of the anti-CII Ab in the circulating blood was quantified using an ELISA assay in the five groups of mice. In brief, the serum levels of anti-mouse CII IgG were assayed using a mouse IgG anti-CII Ab assay ELISA kit (Chondrex Inc.) before treatment and at 12 weeks after primary immunization with bovine CII. A standard curve was produced using an anti-CII Ab provided with the ELISA kit.
Statistical analysis. The results are expressed as the mean plus or minus SEM. The two-tailed Student t test was used for statistical analysis. ANOVA was used when more than two groups of samples were compared. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.The mean value of arthritis incidence in each treatment group is compared with that in the CIA–no treatment group by using the Mann-Whitney U test.
AdTRAIL-transfected DCs express murine TRAIL in a DOX-inducible manner. Previously, we described depletion of T cells with cell gene (APC-AdFasL) therapy. FasL was toxic to the APCs, however, resulting in autocrine apoptosis (16, 44). To develop a generally applicable strategy in which autocrine apoptosis of APCs is prevented, an AdTRAIL binary system was constructed (Figure 1a). One of the Ad’s contain the TRAIL gene under the regulation of the TRE (45–47). The other Ad contains the rtTA under the regulation of the CMV promoter leading to high expression of rtTA (43, 48). This binary Ad system will be referred to as AdTRAIL. DC-AdTRAIL exhibits DOX-inducible expression of TRAIL under the control of the DOX-inducible TRE.
Inducible expression of murine TRAIL on DCs without induction of autocrine suicide. (a) A recombinant AdTRAIL was constructed as described in Methods. DCs from the bone marrow of DBA/1j mice were transfected with 50 pfu/cell of AdTRAIL and then incubated with different concentrations of DOX for 24 hours. The expression of functional TRAIL on the surface of the transfected cells was then evaluated by an ATPlite assay. (b) DCs from the bone marrow of DBA/1j mice were transfected with 50 pfu/cell of AdGFP, and the percentage of GFP+ DCs was quantitated 24 hours later under a fluorescence microscope. (c) TRAIL-sensitive HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells were transfected with 50 pfu/cell of AdTRAIL and then incubated with various concentrations of DOX for 24 hours. The expression of AdTRAIL in the target cells was tested using the ATPlite assay. Results are representative of three experiments.
To confirm the inducibility of biologically active TRAIL in this system, 5 × 106 immature DCs from the bone marrow of DBA/1j mice or TRAIL-sensitive HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells were transfected with either 50 pfu/cell of AdTRAIL or AdGFP. The cells were then stimulated with LPS to induce maturation, after which the cells were incubated with different concentrations of DOX for 24 hours. The transfection efficiency of the AdGFP-transfected DCs was evaluated using a fluorescence microscope. Nearly 90% of the AdGFP-transfected DCs were positive for GFP (Figure 1b). The expression of functional TRAIL capable of inducing apoptosis of transfected cells was then evaluated by an ATPlite assay. TRAIL expression on HT 1080 fibrosarcoma cells induced DOX-dependent killing of the cells (Figure 1c). There was no autocrine apoptosis of DCs after transfection with AdTRAIL, however, even at a high dose of DOX (Figure 1c). These results suggest that functional TRAIL could be expressed on the transfected cells and was not toxic to DCs.
Significantly decreased CII-induced arthritis after treatment with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX in vivo. To demonstrate whether the treatment of CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX could prevent CII-induced arthritis, DCs from DBA/1j mice were transfected with AdTRAIL and then pulsed with bovine CII. The DCs were induced to maturation by stimulation with LPS. These DCs were then used to treat DBA/1j mice, commencing 2 weeks after the mice had been immunized with CII in CFA. As shown in Figure 2a, mice received a total of four doses of these DCs (5 × 106 cells/dose) over a 2-week time period. At the same time, the mice (10 mice/group) received 2 mg/ml of DOX administered in drinking water with 4% sucrose or, as a control, 0.3% ethanol in water with 4% sucrose. The development of arthritis was assessed weekly up to 19 weeks of age (Figure 2a).
CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment effectively prevents CII arthritis. (a) Diagram of treatment protocol as described in Methods. (b) CIA incidence in mice. Arthritis incidence in the different treatment groups was recorded every week until the mice were sacrificed. Shown are the statistically significant differences of the instances of mice that develop arthritis, comparing the CIA–no treatment group with each of the four treatment groups, as determined by the Mann-Whitney U test. (c) DBA1j mice were challenged with CII and treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX, CII-DC-AdTRAIL, CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, or DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. The mice were sacrificed at 19 weeks of age. Tissue sections were stained with H&E. C, cartilage; BM, bone marrow cavity; SLC, synovial lining cells; SH, synovial hyperplasia. Original magnification, ×20. (d) The joint severity score was quantitated using a double-blinded method. The severity score was divided into four levels using the scoring system described in Methods. Each bar represents the mean severity score from ten mice in each treatment group. The asterisk above the bar indicates treatment groups of mice that were significantly different from the CIA–no treatment group of mice. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
The administration of DOX alone in the range of 1.0–8.0 mg/ml confirmed that DOX alone had no effect on the development of arthritis (data not shown). The incidence of arthritis was significantly decreased in the group of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (P = 0.003). Furthermore, the time of arthritis development was significantly delayed in this group compared with the control groups (Figure 2b). Arthritis was also decreased and delayed in mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (P = 0.046), indicating that DC-AdTRAIL+DOX in the absence of CII pulse can also diminish the incidence of CII arthritis. As anticipated, the control groups of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX) or CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX developed severe arthritis that was not significantly different from that in the CIA–no treatment group of mice (Figure 2b).
Histological examination of the joints of the mice in control groups sacrificed at 19 weeks of age confirmed that histologic changes of severe arthritis were exhibited, with nearly all the joints showing pronounced synovial hyperplasia, cartilage erosion, and ankylosis (Figure 2c). Moreover, the most severe morphologic change was observed in the control group of mice either untreated or treated with either CII-DC-AdTRAIL or (no DOX) CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX. Arthritis was partially decreased in mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (no CII). The histologic features were the most significantly reduced in the group of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. Compared with the CIA–no treatment group, there was a significant decrease in the joint severity score of mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (P < 0.05) or with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (P < 0.01) (Figure 2d). Interestingly, control groups treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL without DOX or CII-DC-AdGFP with DOX resulted in a higher joint severity score compared with the CIA–no treatment group (Figure 2d). These results further confirm that optimal inhibition of CIA occurs in the presence of DCs pulsed with CII and requires expression of TRAIL induced by DOX.
Significantly decreased CII Ab production after treatment with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX in vivo. To determine if CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment is associated with a reduction of CII Ab production, sera were collected at the time of sacrifice (19 weeks of age) and analyzed for the anti-CII Ab by an ELISA assay. The anti-CII IgG Ab levels in the sera of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX were significantly lower than those in the control CIA–no treatment group of mice (Figure 3). This result suggests that CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX therapy can partially block anti-CII IgG Ab in the mice.
CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment partly decreased production of anti-CII Ab. The level of anti-CII Ab in the sera of mice receiving different treatments was measured by an ELISA assay. CII arthritis was induced in DBA/1j mice, and different groups of mice were treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX, CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX), CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, or DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. The sera were collected at the time of sacrifice (19 weeks of age), and an ELISA assay was performed. CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment significantly inhibited the sera level of CII Ab in mice. Each bar represents the mean of the level of CII Ab from ten mice in each treatment group. **P < 0.01.
CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment inhibits T cell infiltration in the joint. To determine whether systemic therapy with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX could delete T cells and prevent the development of arthritis, in situ staining of the lesion areas using anti-CD3 Ab was performed. There was a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the number of CD3-positive T cells infiltrating the synovium of mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX compared with mice treated with either CII-DC-AdTRAIL or CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, and almost no T cells were observed in the joints of CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX–treated mice (P < 0.01) (Figure 4, a and b). These results suggest that CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX is very effective in suppressing T cell infiltration in the joint.
CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment inhibits T cell infiltration. (a) In situ staining of CD3+ T cells in the joint area. DBA/1j mice were immunized with CII and treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX, CII-DC-AdTRAIL, CII-DC-AdGFP+DOX, or DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. The mice were sacrificed at 19 weeks of age, and the joints were sectioned and stained with anti-CD3 Ab. Dark brown cells indicate CD3-positive T cells. C, cartilage; BM, bone marrow cavity; SH, synovial hyperplasia. Original magnification, ×40. (b) Quantitative analysis of T cell infiltration. The numbers of CD3 positive T cell infiltrating in the joint area were determined blindly as described in Methods. At least five areas from each specimen were chosen randomly to determine the numbers of T cell infiltrating in each specimen. T cell infiltration of the synovial area of CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX–treated mice was significantly reduced, compared with the CIA–no treatment group or other treatment groups. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Pretreatment of DCs with CII is required for elimination of CII-reactive T cells using DC-AdTRAIL therapy. We have demonstrated previously that pretreatment of APCs with CII pulse is required for elimination of the CII response to T cells using APC-AdFasLp35Tet treatment to prevent arthritis (16). To determine if CII-DC-AdTRAIL could specifically eliminate CII-reactive T cells, single-cell suspensions were prepared from the spleens of mice in the different CIA treatment groups. The requirement of CII-pulsed DC-AdTRAIL treatment was demonstrated by an in vitro T cell–proliferation assay and an IFN-γ–production assay. T cell proliferation was determined at 72 hours after stimulation by pulsing with 3H-thymidine 18 hours before harvest of the supernatants. There was a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the T cell proliferative response as indicated by decreased 3H-thymidine uptake (Figure 5a) and a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the level of IFN-γ production (Figure 5b) in the group of mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX compared with other treatment groups. These results indicated that CII-loaded DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment is necessary to achieve high-specificity deletion of CII-reactive T cells and to inhibit development of CII-induced arthritis.
CII-pulsed DCs are required for elimination of CII-reactive T cells. (a) Spleen T cells were isolated from the mice of various treatment groups shown at the bottom of the figure at the time of sacrifice (19 weeks of age) and were stimulated with γ-irradiated syngeneic spleen cells from DBA/1j mice that were pulsed with CII for 72 hours. The CII-specific T cell–proliferative response was measured using a 3H-thymic uptake assay. The proliferation of the CII-specific T cells was determined after an 18-hour pulse of 3H-thymidine. The counts were determined using a scintillation counter. There was a statistically significant decrease of T cell proliferation in the CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX–treatment group, compared with the other treatment groups. **P < 0.01. (b) Decreased secretion of IFN-γ in the CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX–treatment group. IFN-γ was determined in the supernatant at 72 hours after culture by an ELISA assay. The results represent the mean plus or minus SEM of duplicate cultures of ten mice per group analyzed separately. There was a statistically significant decrease of IFN-γ production in the CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment group compared with the CIA–no treatment group and other treatment groups. **P < 0.01.
DCs pulsed with AdTRAIL-induced apoptosis of T cells in the spleen. To determine if the CII-activated T cells are deleted in vivo, DBA/1j mice were intraperitoneally injected with DCs transfected with either AdTRAIL or AdGFP followed by the addition of DOX in the drinking water. The trafficking of injected DCs was monitored by sectioning of the spleen, lymph nodes and the liver; apoptosis induction was quantified by in situ TUNEL staining at 48 hours after injection.Very strong GFP fluorescence was found in the spleens of mice treated with DC-AdGFP (Figure 6a). There was no GFP fluorescence, however, in the livers and lymph nodes of the same mice (data not shown) or in the spleens of mice injected with control DCs (Figure 6b). This indicates that the spleen is a primary site of migration of the injected DCs. In situ TUNEL staining of the spleen further showed that apoptotic T cells were detected in the spleens from the mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX (Figure 6c). In contrast, there were no apoptotic T cells in the spleens from the mice treated with DC-AdGFP+DOX (Figure 6d). These results indicate that functional TRAIL is expressed on the transfected DCs and induces apoptosis of T cells in the spleen.
DCs migrate to the spleen. DCs were isolated from the bone marrow of DBA/1j mice and cultured in the presence of GM-CSF for 4 days. They were then transfected with AdGFP at 50 pfu/cell for 18 hours in vitro before being intraperitoneally injected into CII-primed DBA/1j mice. Forty-eight hours later, the spleen was collected and embedded with OCT. Ten-micrometer frozen sections were counterstained with Hoechst and examined by fluorescence microscope, then photographed. Original magnification, ×40. (a) The spleen section from DBA/1j mice injected with DC-AdGFP. (b) The spleen section from DBA/1j mice injected with PBS. DC-AdTRAIL+DOX induces activated T cell apoptosis in the spleen. The DBA/1j mice were treated with either DC-AdTRAIL+DOX or DC-AdGFP+DOX, as described above. The spleen was then collected and embedded with paraffin. In situ TUNEL staining was performed. Original magnification, ×40. (c) The spleen section from the mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. (d) The spleen section from the mice treated with DC-AdGFP+DOX.
CII arthritis is a well-established mouse model for the study of erosive arthritis. This model has been used by many investigators to analyze the effects of either anti–T cell treatment (4, 9, 14, 23, 49–52) or anti-inflammatory treatment. This model is also used for defining the timing of therapeutic treatment. The present model shows that therapy initiated 2 weeks after primary immunization with CII can be used to ameliorate arthritis.
CII arthritis is dependent upon T cells. Myers and colleagues have cloned CII-specific T cells and have used these to transfer CII arthritis (2). This result showed that the processing of CII in the DBA/1j mouse leads to CII-specific T cells that can cause and transfer arthritis. Similarly, David and colleagues have shown that in an MHC human transgenic mouse model, peptides that react to human MHC DQ6 and DQ8 can induce arthritis with expansion of CII-specific T cells (53). In the present model, we have used this principle to limit the interaction between MHC-processed peptides and T cells to specifically inhibit the development of arthritis. This was achieved by transfecting DCs with an Ad that expresses an inducible TRAIL. This results in specific induction and elimination of the T cells in the spleen (Figure 6) of the mouse, which prevents their migration into the joint. This is consistent with our previous results using a macrophage-derived APC-FasL cell gene therapy to prevent the development of arthritis in other murine arthritis models (16, 31). The present strategy is superior to our previous version, however, since DCs are more resistant to apoptosis than macrophages (54). In addition, TRAIL is a less potent cytolytic agent on normal cells than is FasL and has been used by other investigators to induce apoptosis in autoimmune disease, including arthritis (37, 38, 55–59). Therefore, the DC-AdTRAIL cell gene therapy does not need the coexpression of an inhibitor of apoptosis mechanism to prevent the autocrine apoptosis of the transfected APCs.
It has recently been shown that TRAIL can induce immune suppression by a mechanism other than deletion of autoreactive T cells (38). In the experiments presented here, we have used a different system to express TRAIL. Therefore, in our experiments the conformation of TRAIL and binding to the TRAIL receptor may exhibit higher-affinity binding and signaling that results in in vivo T cell apoptosis. Also, in the present experiment, DC expression of TRAIL may play a role in the stabilization of the interaction of TRAIL with its receptor, leading to stronger signaling.
One key component of this DC-AdTRAIL cell gene therapy is the ability to regulate TRAIL expression. The most common way to regulate such molecules is by using an inducible promoter such as DOX. In the present experiments we have used a DOX-inducible promoter to enable expression of TRAIL only in the presence of DOX. In the absence of DOX, TRAIL expression is minimal, and the DCs do not induce detectable apoptosis. As the dose of DOX is increased, however, there was a gradual increase in expression of TRAIL and TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. A second advantage of using a DOX-inducible system is that mature, but not immature, DCs can be used to induce TRAIL expression. We reported previously that only mature DCs are resistant to apoptosis (44). Here, bone marrow–derived immature DCs were first transfected with AdTRAIL without DOX, after which DC maturation was induced by LPS before the addition of DOX. TRAIL expression was induced only in mature DCs that are resistant to TRAIL apoptosis. Therefore, the CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX cell gene therapy system described here meets the objectives of therapeutic treatment; that is, the therapeutic levels can be adjusted to achieve effective levels at optimal times without reaching toxic levels.
Another important component of the present cell gene therapy is the ability to increase killing specificity by pulsing DCs with CII to enhance apoptosis of CII-specific T cells. There is a statistically significant decrease in the severity of arthritis in mice treated with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX without pulsing with CII. The optimal decrease in arthritis, however, takes place in mice treated with CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. We propose that the DC-AdTRAIL+DOX can have an ameliorating effect by nonspecific apoptosis of activated T cells that play a role in the arthritis process.
It is of interest that the onset and severity of CII arthritis is made more severe by treating the mouse with DCs that have been pulsed with CII in the absence of the induction of TRAIL. This occurred for two treatment groups, the CII-DC-AdTRAIL (no DOX) and the CII-DC-AdGFP plus DOX. In both cases, the DCs expressed high levels of CII but did not induce T cell apoptosis since TRAIL is not expressed. Moreover, these results are consistent with results by Leung et al. (60), who showed that the presentation of collagen-derived peptides by mature DCs was sufficient for induction of arthritis in DBA/1j mice. Their experiments showed that DCs could be localized in lymph nodes 2 days after transfer, could induce a specific CD4 T cell response, and that T cells expressed peripheral cell nuclear Ag (PCNA). In those experiments, the DCs were injected into the footpad, similar to induction of CII arthritis, whereas in our experiments, intraperitoneal administration of the CII-pulsed DCs led predominantly to migration to the spleen. Future experiments will be performed to determine the optimal therapeutic levels for treatment using CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX cell gene therapy.
The role of anti-CII Ab’s in CII arthritis has been controversial. In the absence of CII Ab’s, arthritis may progress, but generally has been found to be less severe (50, 61, 62). This is consistent with our previous results using APC-FasL gene therapy where lower levels of CII Ab’s are observed (16). The present experiments show that not only are autoreactive T cells eliminated by CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX cell gene therapy, but anti-CII Ab’s are also diminished. It is noteworthy that the DC-Ad TRAIL+DOX group exhibited only a modest decrease of anti-CII Ab production. This is consistent with the decreased efficiency of treatment of arthritis for this group, compared with the CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX group. We propose that the DC-AdTRAIL+DOX treatment may induce apoptosis of T cells, since the DCs could directly interact with these T cells. B cells induced by initial immunization with CII, however, may continue to be present since they were induced to differentiate under the influence of T cell cytokines prior to treatment with DC-AdTRAIL+DOX. These results indicate that CII-DC-AdTRAIL+DOX cell gene therapy most likely eliminates helper T cells that promote the development of the anti-CII Ab response. Therefore, the present therapy eliminates both T cell components as well as the B cell and Ab components of CII arthritis.
In conclusion, CII-DC-AdTRAIL cell gene therapy is a highly beneficial method for specific suppression of an immune response. The cellular component, especially in the form of macrophages and DCs, can be used to process and present Ag’s to specifically stimulate Ag-specific T cells in the context of the appropriate MHC. This type of gene therapy uses the cytolytic capability of cytotoxic molecules such as FasL or TRAIL; once these genes are transfected into the APCs, they can be delivered to the appropriate site of interaction with T cells. The activation of the T cells by the CII-pulsed APCs results in in vivo CII-specific T cell activation and specifically increases the susceptibility of these activated T cells to undergoing apoptosis. The presence of TRAIL in DCs under the regulation of DOX greatly eliminates the possibility that these cytotoxic cells can cause systemic damage. Therefore, we conclude that this inducible cell gene therapy is highly specific, yet nontoxic, and may be developed into an effective form for the treatment of arthritis or other T cell–mediated autoimmune diseases.
We thank Carol Humber for excellent secretarial work. This work was supported by grants from the Arthritis Foundation and a Birmingham VAMC Merit Review Grant. H.-G. Zhang is supported by the Arthritis Foundation. J.D. Mountz is supported by a Birmingham VAMC Merit Review Grant.
See the related Commentary beginning on page 1315.
Huang-Ge Zhang and John D. Mountz contributed equally to this work.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: rheumatoid arthritis (RA); type II collagen (CII); CII-induced arthritis (CIA); antigen (Ag); generalized lymphoproliferative disease (gld); adenovirus (Ad); tetracycline response element (TRE); TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL); death receptor (DR); doxycycline (DOX); reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA); room temperature (RT); 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB); DCs transfected with AdTRAIL (DC-AdTRAIL).