Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2024;134(11):e178915. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI178915.
Abstract
Molecular profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumors of patients in a clinical trial has identified distinct transcriptomic signatures with predictive value, yet data in non–clear cell variants (nccRCC) are lacking. We examined the transcriptional profiles of RCC tumors representing key molecular pathways, from a multi-institutional, real-world patient cohort, including ccRCC and centrally reviewed nccRCC samples. ccRCC had increased angiogenesis signature scores compared with the heterogeneous group of nccRCC tumors, while cell cycle, fatty acid oxidation/AMPK signaling, and fatty acid synthesis/pentose phosphate signature scores were increased in one or more nccRCC subtypes. Among both ccRCC and nccRCC tumors, T effector scores statistically correlated with increased immune cell infiltration and were more commonly associated with immunotherapy-related markers (PD-L1+/TMBhi/MSIhi). In conclusion, this study provides evidence of differential gene transcriptional profiles among ccRCC versus nccRCC tumors, providing insights for optimizing personalized and histology-specific therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced RCC.
Authors
Pedro Barata, Shuchi Gulati, Andrew Elliott, Hans J. Hammers, Earle Burgess, Benjamin A. Gartrell, Sourat Darabi, Mehmet A. Bilen, Arnab Basu, Daniel M. Geynisman, Nancy A. Dawson, Matthew R. Zibelman, Tian Zhang, Shuanzeng Wei, Charles J. Ryan, Elisabeth I. Heath, Kelsey A. Poorman, Chadi Nabhan, Rana R. McKay
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,168 | 208 |
| 737 | 81 | |
| Figure | 381 | 4 |
| Table | 132 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 208 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 125 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,751 | 295 |
| Total Views | 5,046 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)