Mammalian injury responses are predominantly characterized by fibrosis and scarring rather than functional regeneration. This limited regenerative capacity in mammals could reflect a loss of proregeneration programs or active suppression by genes functioning akin to tumor suppressors. To uncover programs governing regeneration in mammals, we screened transcripts in human participants following laser rejuvenation treatment and compared them with mice with enhanced wound-induced hair neogenesis (WIHN), a rare example of mammalian organogenesis. We found that Rnasel–/– mice exhibit an increased regenerative capacity, with elevated WIHN through enhanced IL-36α. Consistent with RNase L’s known role to stimulate caspase-1, we found that pharmacologic inhibition of caspases promoted regeneration in an IL-36–dependent manner in multiple epithelial tissues. We identified a negative feedback loop, where RNase L–activated caspase-1 restrains the proregenerative dsRNA-TLR3 signaling cascade through the cleavage of toll-like adaptor protein TRIF. Through integrated single-cell RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomic profiling, we confirmed OAS & IL-36 genes to be highly expressed at the site of wounding and elevated in Rnasel–/– mouse wounds. This work suggests that RNase L functions as a regeneration repressor gene, in a functional trade off that tempers immune hyperactivation during viral infection at the cost of inhibiting regeneration.
Charles S. Kirby, Nasif Islam, Eric Wier, Martin P. Alphonse, Evan Sweren, Gaofeng Wang, Haiyun Liu, Dongwon Kim, Ang Li, Sam S. Lee, Andrew M. Overmiller, Yingchao Xue, Sashank Reddy, Nathan K. Archer, Lloyd S. Miller, Jianshi Yu, Weiliang Huang, Jace W. Jones, Sooah Kim, Maureen A. Kane, Robert H. Silverman, Luis A. Garza
Usage data is cumulative from February 2025 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 3,464 | 0 |
737 | 0 | |
Figure | 338 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 350 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 32 | 0 |
Totals | 4,921 | 0 |
Total Views | 4,921 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.