Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 28

See more details

Picked up by 1 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Posted by 20 X users
12 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (6)

Advertisement

Research ArticleAutoimmunityEndocrinology Open Access | 10.1172/JCI169704

A partial form of AIRE deficiency underlies a mild form of autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1

Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal,1,2 Amund Holte Berger,1,3 Øyvind Bruserud,1,2 Yael Goldfarb,4 Andre Sulen,1 Lars Breivik,1,2 Alexander Hellesen,1 Shifra Ben-Dor,5 Rebecca Haffner-Krausz,6 Per M. Knappskog,1,3 Stefan Johansson,1,3 Anette S.B. Wolff,1,2 Eirik Bratland,1,3 Jakub Abramson,4 and Eystein Sverre Husebye1,2

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Oftedal, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Berger, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Bruserud, Ø. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Goldfarb, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Sulen, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Breivik, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Hellesen, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Ben-Dor, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Haffner-Krausz, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Knappskog, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Johansson, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Wolff, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Bratland, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Abramson, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, Norway.

2Department of Medicine and

3Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

4Department of Immunology and Regenerative Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

5Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Life Sciences Core Facilities and

6Department of Veterinary Resources, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Find articles by Husebye, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published November 1, 2023 - More info

Published in Volume 133, Issue 21 on November 1, 2023
J Clin Invest. 2023;133(21):e169704. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169704.
© 2023 Oftedal et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published November 1, 2023 - Version history
Received: February 13, 2023; Accepted: August 29, 2023
View PDF
Abstract

Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS-1) is caused by mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene. Most patients present with severe chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis and organ-specific autoimmunity from early childhood, but the clinical picture is highly variable. AIRE is crucial for negative selection of T cells, and scrutiny of different patient mutations has previously highlighted many of its molecular mechanisms. In patients with a milder adult-onset phenotype sharing a mutation in the canonical donor splice site of intron 7 (c.879+1G>A), both the predicted altered splicing pattern with loss of exon 7 (AireEx7–/–) and normal full-length AIRE mRNA were found, indicating leaky rather than abolished mRNA splicing. Analysis of a corresponding mouse model demonstrated that the AireEx7–/– mutant had dramatically impaired transcriptional capacity of tissue-specific antigens in medullary thymic epithelial cells but still retained some ability to induce gene expression compared with the complete loss-of-function AireC313X–/– mutant. Our data illustrate an association between AIRE activity and the severity of autoimmune disease, with implications for more common autoimmune diseases associated with AIRE variants, such as primary adrenal insufficiency, pernicious anemia, type 1 diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS-1) or autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) (OMIM #240300) is a rare, childhood-onset disorder caused by mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene (1–4). It is clinically defined by the presence of 2 of the 3 major disease components: primary adrenal insufficiency, hypoparathyroidism, and chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (1, 5), but the clinical phenotype also includes several minor disease components (6, 7). AIRE is almost exclusively expressed in the thymus (8), where it functions as a transcriptional regulator, crucial for negative selection of self-reactive T cells and development of Tregs (9, 10).

The human AIRE gene contains 14 exons that encode a protein with 545 amino acids and a has molecular weight of 57.5 kDa (3, 4). To date, over 100 mutations in the AIRE gene have been reported, with several predicted to affect mRNA splicing. This is a process involving large complexes of protein and RNA that catalyze the removal of introns from nuclear pre-mRNA called spliceosomes (11). Mutations occurring within splice sites can alter or abolish splicing or change the balance of alternative mRNA splice forms, leading to structural and functional changes in the protein (12). Information on the functional characterization and clinical correlations of splice mutations the AIRE gene is sparse (13–15).

We scrutinized the Norwegian APS-1 cohort and identified 4 patients from 3 families from a small region in Norway, who shared a disease picture characterized by a conspicuously late disease onset and extended time intervals between new disease components. They were either homozygous (3) or compound heterozygous (1) for the same AIRE mutation, a c.879+1G>A variant. This variant is located in the canonical splice donor site of intron 7 and predicted to cause skipping of exon 7 and loss of the linking region between the SAND and PHD1 domains (16). Functional studies in vitro and in a corresponding mouse model support a clear relationship between AIRE function and the degree of autoimmunity, which explains the milder phenotype.

Results

Later disease onset and milder phenotype in APS-1 patients with the c.879+1G>A AIRE mutation. Scrutiny of our national registry for organ-specific autoimmune disorders (ROAS) identified 2 female and 2 male patients with APS-1 from 3 different families with late-onset APS-1 (Figure 1A and Table 1). Three of the patients were homozygous for c.879+1G>A (patients 1–3), whereas 1 (patient 4) was compound heterozygous for c.879+1G>A and c.967_979del13, the most common AIRE mutation in Norway (Figure 1A). The median age at onset of the first major disease manifestation was 22.5 years (range, 19–43 years) compared with 8.5 (range 0–43 years) in the Norwegian APS-1 cohort. The median number of disease components was 4 (range, 2–6) compared with 5 (range, 1–8) in the Norwegian APS-1 cohort; only 1 patient (patient 3) presented with the 3 major disease components (Figure 1B). All had autoantibodies against IFN-ω and NACHT leucine-rich repeat protein 5 (NALP5), and the median number of autoantibodies was 6 (range, 4–8) of a panel of 14 APS-1–related autoantibodies (17). We studied the children of patients 1 and 4, all being monoallelic carriers of c.879+1G>A or c.967_979del13 and found no APS-1 manifestations or autoantibodies.

Pedigree of the 3 families studied and schematic representation of the AIREFigure 1

Pedigree of the 3 families studied and schematic representation of the AIRE protein, the AIRE gene, and the splice mutation c.879+1G>A. (A) Overview of the 3 families studied. All index patients have children who are carriers for monoallelic disease-causing AIRE mutations without any clinical disease manifestations or typical APS-1 autoantibodies. Genotypes are shown as the allelic combinations of WT (G), c.879+1G>A (A), and c.967_979del13 (A*). The arrows indicate the patients with APS-1. (B) The patients (red data points) harboring the c.879+1G>A had a later debut age for the 3 main manifestations of hypoparathyroidism (HP), autoimmune Addison’s disease (PAI), and chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC) compared with the general Norwegian APS-1 cohort (gray bars indicate the mean ± SD). (C) Illustration of the structure of AIRE. The 4 major subdomains: the homogeneously staining region or caspase recruitment domain/homodimerization domain (CARD/HSR, amino acids 1–105) crucial for the homo- and multimerization of AIRE; the SAND domain (for Sp100, AIRE-1, NucP41/75 or NucP41/75, DEAF-1, amino acids 181–280) needed for protein-protein interaction and DNA-binding; and 2 plant homeodomain (PHD) fingers-type zinc fingers (amino acids 296–343 and 434–475) crucial for proper chromatin binding and DNA interaction. In addition, the AIRE protein contains 4 LXXLL domains that are found on coactivators of nuclear receptors (amino acids 7–11, 63–67, 414–418, and 516–520) and a nuclear localization signal (amino acids 100–189). The gene contains 14 exons represented by rectangles. A schematic representation is given of the splice mutation c.879+1G>A located in the 5′ splice site donor in intron 7. (D) Translating RNA from PBMCs to cDNA yielded 3 different outcomes for patients in the AIRE minigene analysis. Only the transcript of AIRE exons 6 and 8 (lane P1_a); a combination of this variant and the full-length AIRE containing both exons 6, 7, and 8 lacking the first 3 bp (lane P1_b); and in some instances only the full-length transcript (lane P1_c) were observed. Data are shown for 1 representative patient and 1 representative control (Cntr). The experiment was performed for all index patients a minimum of 3 times.

Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the patients with APS-1

Splicing patterns in APS-1 patients with the c.879+1G>A AIRE mutation. The splice site mutation c.879+1G>A affects the highly conserved GT dinucleotide motif at the 5′ donor splice site in intron 7 and is thus predicted to affect splicing (Figure 1C). Since AIRE transcripts have previously been detected in different immune cell subsets (18–20), we performed RNA extraction and subsequent cDNA synthesis from cultured PBMCs from all patients and matched healthy individuals. The minigene analyses revealed the expected altered splicing pattern in all patient samples but, surprisingly, also the full-length AIRE cDNA (Figure 1D), suggesting leakiness of c.879+1G>A as an explanation for the late onset and milder phenotypes.

AIRE without exon 7 has the potential to induce the expression of AIRE-dependent genes and localizes to the nucleus in typical nuclear speckles. To investigate the functional capacity of AIRE lacking exon 7 and rule out the occurrence of a dominant-negative effect, we generated a plasmid containing AIRE cDNA without exon 7 (AIREwoEX7). Human thymic 4D6 epithelial cells were transfected with expression vectors containing either WT AIRE and/or mutated AIRE. c.967-979del13 and c.934G>A (p.C311Y) were used as recessive and dominant-negative controls, respectively. As previously described (21), WT AIRE induced high expression of the AIRE-dependent gene KRT14, while AIREwoEX7 induced the expression of KRT14 at approximately 50% of WT expression levels. We observed little or no transcriptional activity with the AIRE mutants c.967-979del13 and c.934G>A. This suggest that the lack of exon 7 led to reduced, although not abolished, transcriptional activity (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169704DS1). The subcellular location of AIREwoEX7 was similar to that of WT AIRE, revealing typical nuclear speckles (Supplemental Figure 1B). Taken together, these results indicate that AIREwoEX7retains substantial functional activity in vitro that could explain the milder phenotype.

The AireEx7–/– mutation affects the thymic medullary compartment and developing T cells to a mild degree. To further characterize the AIRE c.879+1G>A mutation under more physiological conditions, we introduced the c.879+1G>A mutation in mice on the B6 background and analyzed the effect on the cellularity of medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTECs) and their capacity to express tissue-restricted antigens (TRAs). When we compared mTEC compartments in the genetically modified mice with those in WT (Aire+/+) littermates and with those in previously described B6 AireC313X–/– mutants (22), we found that both AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mice had significantly reduced frequencies of MHC-IIlo-mid CD80lo-mid cells (65.75% ± 1.45%, Aire+/+; 58.75% ± 5.75%, AireEx7–/–; 49.08% ± 1.07%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0464, Aire+/+ vs. AireEx7–/–; P = 0.0002, Aire+/+ vs. AireC313X–/–), whereas the frequency of MHC-IIhi CD80hi mTECs (mTEChi) was significantly increased (23.00% ± 2.17%, Aire+/+; 30.50% ± 4.71%, AireEx7–/–; 36.03% ± 3.24%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0361, Aire+/+ vs. AireEx7–/–; P = 0.0014, Aire+/+ vs. AireC313X–/–) (Figure 2A and Supplemental Figure 2, A–C), although this effect was somewhat smaller than that seen in the AireC313X–/– mutant. The expression of Aire within mTEChi was comparable between Aire+/+ and AireEx7–/– mice (Figure 2B), with slightly quicker migrating bands on the immunoblots, reflecting the reduced molecular weight for Aire without exon 7 (Figure 2C). Aire expression was undetectable in AireC313X–/– mice, as previously reported (22). Hence, AireEx7–/– mice showed adequate expression of Aire, with an increased frequency of mTEChi.

Thymic microenvironment and Aire-regulated gene expression in a mouse modelFigure 2

Thymic microenvironment and Aire-regulated gene expression in a mouse model of the AIRE splice mutation. Mice mimicking the human AIRE splice mutation (AireEx7–/–) and a regular Aire-knockout mouse AireC313X–/– were analyzed and compared with WT (Aire+/+) littermates. (A) The frequency of mTEChi (MHCIIhiCD80+) was increased in mice harboring the 2 Aire mutations compared with WT littermates, with a similar reduction of mTEClo (MHC IIloCD80–). (B) Aire expression levels in mTEChi were comparable in both Aire+/+ and AireEx7–/– mice, whereas AireC313X–/– mice had no detectable AIRE expression. (C) The shorter product of Aire with the Ex7 splice mutation was verified by Western blotting using EpCAM-enriched thymic stroma. Error bars in A and B represent the SD in 1 of 4 individual experiments (n = 3–4 mice in each group). *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, and ****P ≤ 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons between AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– versus Aire+/+.

Aire deficiency has previously been linked to defects in the development of thymic Tregs (23–26). Here, both AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mice had a significantly reduced frequency of FoxP3+CD25+CD4+ Tregs compared with Aire+/+ mice (1.34% ± 0.26%, Aire+/+; 0.89% ± 0.35%, AireEx7–/–; 0.57% ± 0.17%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0249, Aire+/+ vs. AireEx7–/–; P = 0.0005, AireC313X–/–) (Figure 3A). Furthermore, lack of Aire also affected their homing back to the thymus, as discriminated by the presence of CCR6 (27), a phenomenon we only observed in the AireC313X–/– mice (43.9% ± 3.05%, Aire+/+; 40.05% ± 3.23%, AireEx7–/–; 36.1% ± 3.59%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0016, AireC313X–/–) (Figure 3B). Late-stage maturation of single-positive CD4 (SPCD4) T cells can be assessed by CD69 and MHC-I expression (28), and maturation stages 1 and 2 (M1 and M2) were also reduced, mostly in AireC313X–/– mice, followed by AireEx7–/– mice (Figure 3C). Again, we observed an intermediate effect of the AireEx7–/– mutation compared with the AireC313X–/– variant. Interestingly, in the medullary compartment, fewer AireEx7–/– CD4+ T cells expressed the apoptosis marker caspase 3, suggesting that they received a stronger survival signal than T cells from WT and AireC313X–/– mice (1.14% ± 0.09%, Aire+/+; 0.87% ± 0.11%, AireEx7–/–; 1.19% ± 0.11%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0058, Aire+/+ vs. AireEx7–/–) (Figure 3D). Collectively, AireEx7–/– mice showed a reduced capacity to develop thymic Tregs but were not as severely affected as the AireC313X–/– mice.

The AIRE splice mutation c.879+1G>A has less of an effect on T cells.Figure 3

The AIRE splice mutation c.879+1G>A has less of an effect on T cells. (A) Thymic Tregs were found to be reduced in AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mice compared with Aire+/+ mice. (B) Recirculating Tregs were reduced in the thymic compartment only in AireC313X–/– mice. (C) For SPCD4 T cell development, the effect of AIRE loss was greater in AireC313X–/– mice than in AireEx7–/– mice, with a decrease in cells destined for apoptosis, (D) as determined by cleaved caspase 3 expression. (E) In the spleen, no differences were found within the Treg (CD4+FoxP3+CD25+) compartment. (F) Anergic T cells in the spleen, as determined by CD73 and FR3 expression in CD4+FoxP3–CD44+ cells, were increased in the AireC313X–/– mice. Error bars in A–F represent SD in 1 of 3 individual experiments (n = 3–6 mice in each group). *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, and ****P ≤ 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons between AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– versus Aire+/+.

In the periphery, the levels of mature T cells from the spleen, the frequencies of CD4+, CD8+, or CD4+FoxP3+ T cells, or CD4+ or CD8+ T cells within the memory and naive compartments were equal among the mice (Figure 3E and Supplemental Figure 2, D–L). Anergic T cells lose the ability to produce autocrine growth factors and to proliferate upon antigen recognition and can be assessed using the markers CD73 and FR4. These markers have previously been found to be upregulated in Aire-knockout mice (29). Here, we found an increased frequency of anergic CD4+ T cells in AireC313X–/– mice compared with Aire+/+ and AireEx7–/– mice (2.85% ± 0.80%, Aire+/+; 5.27% ± 0.78%, AireEx7–/–; 9.25% ± 3.25%, AireC313X–/–; P = 0.0005, AireC313X–/– vs. Aire+/+) (Figure 3F), supporting the previously reported data.

AireEx7–/– mice have reduced expression of thymic self-antigens compared with WT littermates. To investigate the functionality of the AireEx7–/– variant and its effect on the expression of TRAs, we performed bulk RNA-Seq of FACS-sorted mTEChi from AireEx7–/–, AireC313X–/–, and Aire+/+ littermates. Principal component analysis (PCA) plots indicated that the transcriptomes of mTEChi from both AireEx7–/– and AireC313X–/– mice were distinctly different from those of Aire+/+ mice. Principal component 1 (PC1) accounted for 67% of the variance, suggesting that both mutants had a substantial effect on gene expression in mTEChi (Figure 4A). Differential expression analysis revealed that the ability to induce gene expression was severely impaired in both mutants compared with Aire+/+ mice, although fewer genes were significantly different in AireEx7–/– mice than in AireC313X–/– mice compared with Aire+/+ mice: a total of 3,595 genes showed significantly lower expression (FDR ≤ 0.05, log2 fold change [FC] >1 and <–1) in AireEx7–/– mTEChi and 4,190 genes in AireC313X–/– mTEChi compared with Aire+/+ mTEChi (Figure 4B). We detected a higher fraction of genes with lower expression levels in AireC313X–/– mice versus Aire+/+ mice compared with AireEx7–/– mice versus Aire+/+ mice (Figure 4C), suggesting that AireEx7–/– mice retained some residual ability to induce gene expression. Further analysis of the differential expression between AireEx7–/– and AireC313X–/– mice (FDR ≤ 0.05, log2 FC >1 and < –1) showed 219 genes with significantly higher expression in AireEx7–/– mice, while only 24 genes were expressed at higher levels in AireC313X–/– mice (Figure 4D). Looking at the overlap of those genes that were expressed at significantly lower levels in only 1 mutant compared with Aire+/+ mice, as well as significantly differentially expressed between mutants, we found that 118 genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in AireC313X–/– mTECs, while 3 genes were expressed at significantly lower levels in AireEx7–/– mTECs (Figure 4D). Hence, some TRA expression was retained despite loss of exon 7.

Differential gene expression in mTEChi populations of Aire mutants versus WFigure 4

Differential gene expression in mTEChi populations of Aire mutants versus WT. (A) PCA plots showing transcriptomes of mTEChi from AireEx7–/–, AireC313X–/–, and Aire+/+ mice. (B) Volcano and hexbin plots of the differential expression results using DESeq2, looking at each mutant versus Aire+/+ or AireEx7–/– compared with AireC313X–/–. Significance is shown on the y axis as log10 (FDR) and relative expression as log2 FC on the x axis. Hexes are colored according to the number of genes between 1 and 1,000 found within the hex area. Blue lines denote log2 FC cutoffs at 1 and –1, and red lines denote the FDR cutoff at 0.05. (C) Venn diagram of the overlap of genes expressed at significantly lower levels in AireEx7–/– and AireC313X–/– mice versus Aire+/+ mice. (D) Venn diagram of genes expressed at significantly lower levels in each mutant versus Aire+/+ mice and significantly differentially expressed genes in AireEx7–/– versus AireC313X–/– mice. (E) Combination violin and dot plots of absolute expression in transcripts per million (TPM) of the 6 most significantly expressed genes in AireEx7–/– versus WT mice. (F) TPM of known Aire-regulated genes. (G) TPM of the 6 most significantly expressed genes among the 118 genes with significantly lower expression in AireC313X–/– versus Aire+/+ mice and with significantly differential expression in AireEx7–/– versus AireC313X –/– mice. (H) TPM of the 3 genes with significantly lower expression in AireEx7–/– compared with WT mice and with significantly differential expression in AireEx7–/– compared with AireC313X–/– mice. (I) Expression of Aire in the 3 groups. (E–I) Black bars denote the median TPM in mice in each population for each gene.

To further illustrate the effect of Aire on gene expression at the individual gene level, we plotted the absolute gene expression of (a) the 6 most significant differentially expressed genes in AireEx7–/– compared with Aire+/+ mice (Figure 4E), (b) 6 canonical AIRE-regulated genes (Figure 4F), (c) the 6 most significant differentially expressed genes among the 118 genes uniquely less expressed in AireC313X–/– mice (Figure 4G), and (d) the 3 genes uniquely less expressed by AireEx7–/– mice (Figure 4H). Expanded data sets from Figure 4, E and F, as well as known mTEC-related genes and genes expressed at significantly lower levels between AireC313X and Aire+/+ mice as well as between AireEx7–/– and AireC313X mice can be found in Supplemental Figure 3. Overall, more genes failed to be induced in AireC313X–/– mice than in AireEx7–/– mice, while some genes were found to be expressed at low levels in AireEx7–/– mice. These findings were also confirmed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Supplemental Figure 4A). Aire itself was expressed at similar levels in AireEx7–/– and Aire+/+ mice, whereas AireC313X–/– mice showed significantly (P = 1.17 × 10–17) lower expression (Figure 4I). There was no apparent general pattern regarding the absolute expression of the genes significantly downregulated in either of the mutants (Supplemental Figure 4, B–G) or in the types or categories of genes that were able to be induced in these mice. After BioMart conversion of the genes expressed at significantly lower levels into human orthologs and checking them against the Human Protein Atlas data for tissue specificity, we found the distribution to be similar between the uniquely downregulated genes in AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mTECs, with 28% non-tissue-specific genes in AireC313X–/– mTECs and 27% non-tissue-specific genes in AireEx7–/– mTECs, respectively (Supplemental Figure 5A). Combined, these data demonstrate that, even if the AireEx7–/– mutant had dramatically impaired transcriptional capacity, it still retained some ability to induce gene expression of TRAs compared with the apparent complete loss-of-function AireC313X–/– mutant.

Leaky effects of the exon 7 splice mutation in AIRE. We next sought to decipher the mechanistic impact of the AIRE exon 7 splice mutation. Most prediction algorithms for splice variants predict a total abolishment of the splice site for this mutation, thus making skipping of exon 7 a highly likely event. The deep neural network–based prediction tool SpliceAI (30) indicates a high probability for loss not only of the donor slice site but also of the acceptor splice site of exon 7, located 81 bp upstream of the mutation. Neither did SpliceAI predict any alternative or cryptic splice sites in the vicinity of the mutation that could lead to frameshifts by retention of the intronic sequence or the introduction of pseudoexons. Skipping of exon 7 is therefore compatible with a retained reading frame of AIRE, leading to a polypeptide without the 27 amino acids comprising exon 7. Surprisingly, we observed both normal splicing and skipping of exon 7, including skipping of exon 7 and the first 3 bp in exon 8, in both cases keeping the reading frame intact. None of these alternative splice patterns were detected in healthy individuals (Figure 5A). The aligned Aire transcripts from RNA isolated from the 3 different mouse strains showed that, although severely reduced, the presence of exon 7 was still detectable in mTECs from the AireEx7–/– mice (Figure 5B), and differential exon analysis estimated approximately 10% retained exon usage (Figure 5C). However, it is unclear if any full-length Aire was translated from these transcripts.

c.879+1G>A leads to incomplete splicing and the production of a small propoFigure 5

c.879+1G>A leads to incomplete splicing and the production of a small proportion of WT Aire in both mice and humans. (A) In PBMCs from patients, 3 different patterns of AIRE expression were observed: normal splicing, skipping of exon 7, and loss of exon 7 and the first 3 bp of exon 8. (B) RNA-Seq read coverage and sashimi plot of Aire in 3 representative mice, with Aire+/+ mice shown in green, AireEx7–/– mice in purple, and AireC313X–/– mice in orange. (C) Differential exon use analysis using DEXseq of Aire in all AireEx7–/– mice compared AireC313X–/– mice. The location of exon 7 is highlighted in dark red.

AireEx7–/– mice show signs of autoimmunity. To test whether the impaired expression of TRA genes in the thymus of the Ex7 mutants translates into an autoimmune phenotype, mice were aged until week 35 and analyzed for signs of autoimmunity. As expected for Aire deficiency on the B6 background, we observed no wasting disease, and both the AireEx7–/– and AireC313X–/–mice had weight increases similar to the increases observed in Aire+/+ mice (Figure 6A). Since Aire deficiency on the B6 background typically results in autoimmune retinal degradation and high lymphocyte infiltration of the salivary and prostate glands (31), we specifically focused on these 3 tissues. Indeed, we found that both AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mice developed more lymphocyte infiltrations in these organs than did their Aire+/+ age-matched controls, albeit the impact of the Ex7 mutation was milder than that of C313X. As expected, other analyzed tissues (lung, prostate, pancreas) were not affected by either of the mutations (Figure 6B and Supplemental Figure 5B). After breeding homozygous AireEx7–/– males with heterozygous females, 0.25 litters were recorded, compared with 2.6 litters recorded with heterozygous breeding of the strains, suggesting that the AireEx7–/– mice, like the Aire-knockout mice (32), had markedly reduced fertility. Overall, the development of autoimmunity was reflected in the AireEx7–/– mice with lymphocyte infiltration in several tissues.

Mice on the c.879+1G>A background develop signs of autoimmunity.Figure 6

Mice on the c.879+1G>A background develop signs of autoimmunity. (A) Weight change curves of AireC313X–/–, AireEx7–/–, and Aire+/+ mice from the earliest possible time point until the end of the experiment. Weight change was calculated for each mouse from its weight at 14 weeks of age. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA found no difference in weight between groups at last the recorded weight (P = 0.58, n = 8–19). (B) Infiltration of immune cells was evident in several tissues, most prominently in AireC313X–/– mice, whereas salivary glands of AireEx7–/– mice had severe tissue infiltration. Error bars in A and B represent the SD (n = 9–16 mice per group). *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001, by 1-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons between AireC313X–/– and AireEx7–/– mice versus Aire+/+ mice.

Discussion

Here, we describe several patients with APS-1 presenting with milder autoimmune disease, who harbor the splice mutation c.879+1G>A in AIRE causing loss of exon 7, which was confirmed by observations in a corresponding mouse model. The milder phenotypes can be explained by the presence of full-length AIRE transcripts detected in both mice and patients with APS-1. However, the total AIRE activity was probably severely reduced, as the patients displayed clear APS-1 disease, albeit with later onset and slower disease progression than classical APS-1 (5, 7, 33, 34). Our data illustrate an interesting quantitative association between AIRE activity and the severity of the autoimmune disease, with implications for more common autoimmune diseases like primary adrenal insufficiency, pernicious anemia, type 1 diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis, for which coding variants in AIRE have been identified in GWAS studies (35–38).

Most human genes contain exons and introns that are spliced together before transcription or cotranscriptionally. The correct identification of exons within the pre-mRNA is essential for splicing and depends on the recognition of a variety of motifs, including the highly conserved GT and AG nucleotides at the 5′ (donor) and 3′ (acceptor) splice sites (39), and the branch site about 15–35 bases upstream of the 3′ splice site. Splicing requires extreme precision because even a single nucleotide addition or deletion will shift the reading frame. The c.879+1G>A mutation is located in the invariant dinucleotide GT at the 5′ splice site donor of intron 7 in AIRE, leading to an alternative splice pattern, in which exon 7 is lost but the reading frame is retained. Exon 7 lies between the SAND and PHD1 domains with no described function, but its loss will bring these domains closer together, likely affecting the 3D protein structure (16). Donor splice-site mutations are often located in positions +2 or +1 and are generally more common than mutations located in the splice acceptor site (40). Mutations in the obligate GT and AG dinucleotides virtually always cause exon skipping, cryptic splice-site utilization, or intron retention, resulting in a substantial reduction or absence of normally spliced mRNA (40). Our findings suggest that the c.879+1G>A mutation weakens exon recognition. Thus, both aberrantly and correctly spliced products are made. Surprisingly, we observed 2 aberrantly splice products: the expected skipping of exon 7 and the skipping of exon 7 and loss of the first 3 nucleotides (AAG) of exon 8. A likely explanation for the latter pattern is that the second and third nucleotide (AG) of exon 8 acts as an alternative splice acceptor site, previously described as a potential splicing isoform in mice and in human spleen and bone marrow (41).

Several disease-causing mutations are suggested to affect mRNA splicing (42), which makes splicing mechanisms highly relevant to understanding the molecular pathobiology of genetic diseases, including AIRE and APS-1. Functional alternative splicing was previously reported for 2 AIRE-mutations: c.463G>A and c.653-1G>A (13, 14). Both mutations cause alternative pre-mRNA splicing by intron retention. Another study involving patients with APS-1 in North America described a patient with the genotype Q173X/IVS9-1G>A. The authors speculate that this splicing mutation, which affects the splice acceptor site of exon 10, could lead to the skipping of exon 10 and thus to the deletion of 60 amino acids from the proline-rich region between the 2 PHD finger motifs, or, alternatively, to the use of a cryptic 3′ splice site in exon 10 (15). However, this was not verified by molecular analyses.

A previous study described the construction of a series of deletion mutants in AIRE by systematically removing 1 or more of the functional domains and investigating the stability and subcellular compartmentalization of the corresponding polypeptides (43). One of these was the deletion of exon 7 of AIRE studied here. Both the estimated half-life and the intracellular localization of the AIRE polypeptide without exon 7 were comparable to full-length AIRE (43). AIRE mRNA without exon 7 also probably escapes degradation by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, as the reading frame is intact in contrast to AireC313X–/– (22, 44). In line with this, we observed AIRE transcripts in the patients and Aire expression in Aireex7–/– mice at both the mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, we detected the typical nuclear localization and colocalization with WT AIRE in transfected 4D6 cells, in line with previous findings (21).

Here, we demonstrate that AireEx7–/–mice, as opposed to the AireC313X–/– mouse model, had the potential to induce transcription of some AIRE-dependent genes. The functional effect of T cell responses to identified Aire-dependent antigens was not studied here but would be an interesting path to explore in the future. As AIRE has been shown to act in a dose-dependent manner (45), this residual AIRE function may contribute to prevent severe disease, thus explaining the delayed disease onset and slower disease progression. Scrutiny of patients with atypical APS-1 has highlighted how genetic variants in AIRE confer a broad clinical outcome. The dominant mutations located primarily in the PHD domains of AIRE have been shown to yield mild autoimmune disease with incomplete penetrance within several families (21, 46). In GWAS studies, the AIRE p.Arg471Cys variant has been linked to an increased risk of developing autoimmune Addison’s disease (47), type 1 diabetes (35), and pernicious anemia (36) (Figure 7), while a coding variant in the SAND domain is also associate with Addison’s disease and rheumatoid arthritis (37, 38). As it has been suggested that AIRE-dependent thymic dysfunction may underly the production of autoantibodies against type I IFNs, the spectrum of residual AIRE function might affect the natural protection against infections in these patients (48).

Proposed spectrum of AIRE variants and phenotypical patterns.Figure 7

Proposed spectrum of AIRE variants and phenotypical patterns. The range of AIRE, from normal to completely inhibited protein expression with the corresponding type of mutation and phenotypic consequences. A common SNP (p.R471C), dominant-negative mutations, and exon 7 (Ex7) splice mutation give a partially inhibited phenotype, with an increasing level of penetrance.

The correlation between protein function and clinical phenotype is demonstrated in several genetic diseases. Duchenne muscular dystrophy and its milder variant Becker muscular dystrophy are both caused by dystrophin gene mutations (49), which often eliminate 1 or more internal exons or alter proper splicing. However, mutations that preserve the reading frame produce a semifunctional protein and cause a mild phenotype, whereas mutations disrupting the reading frame cause a severely truncated protein that would be unstable and result in a severe phenotype (49, 50). Patients with Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (LNS) have disease-causing splicing mutations in the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 (HPRT1) gene, which normally causes exclusion of exon 4, exon 5, and exon 6, respectively. This genotype results in a complete deficiency of HPRT activity, leading to an error in purine metabolism associated with uric acid overproduction and neurological manifestations (51). Similar to what we found, patients with mild LNS lacking some of the typical symptoms are reported to have a minor amount of normally spliced HPRT mRNA despite disease-causing mutations (51). Mutations that alter the ratio of alternatively spliced isoforms can also influence the disease phenotype. A well-characterized example is frontotemporal dementia and Parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FDTP-17), which is caused by mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene encoding the tau protein (52). These mutations alter the ratio of the 2 tau isomers by disrupting the splicing of exon 10, which is the causative event in tau aggregation and onset of disease (52). Given the above findings, associations between genotype, altered mRNA splicing, protein function, and phenotypic expression seem to be well established for several genetic disorders. Our data indicate that AIREEx7–/– transcripts are translated into a hypomorphic AIRE protein with the capability to induce AIRE-regulated genes, resulting in a milder phenotype in patients.

In conclusion, we report an AIRE splice mutation (c.879+1G>A) found in 4 Norwegian patients with APS-1 who have a milder phenotype compared with classical APS-1. The pathogenic role in altering AIRE pre-mRNA splicing was confirmed by minigene analyses and subsequent cDNA sequencing. The altered AIRE transcripts (skipping exon 7) produced a protein with residual AIRE function with a normal nuclear localization. Importantly, the occurrence of full-length transcripts and a residual function of the AIRE protein lacking exon 7 explain the milder phenotype observed in these patients. Taken together, studies of the functional mutations at the genomic DNA level will widen the molecular spectrum of APS-1 and provide valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying its pathophysiology.

Methods

Study design. Sample sizes for the patients were determined by their AIRE mutation, hence, all patients in our registry with this mutation were included. Healthy controls were always analyzed alongside patient material. For the in vitro experiments, we chose to use 3 independent experiments, each with 3 parallels. For the mouse work, we used between 3 and 6 mice in each group in total, a minimum of 2 independent experiments were executed for all experiments, and mice from all 3 groups were always included in each individual experiment. The scoring of the tissue infiltrates was done in a blinded fashion by 4 individual scientists, whereby the scoring was determined before the genetic background was revealed. The objective of the study was to determine the functional outcome of the exon 7 splice mutation identified in the patients and to further elaborate AIRE’s function in negative selection.

Patients and clinical data. The patients with APS-1 presented were previously described as part of the Norwegian cohort and included in our National Registry of Autoimmune Diseases (7, 53, 54). The cohort includes 4 patients from 3 families, with the first major APS-1 manifestations diagnosed between 19 and 43 years of age. An overview of their characteristics is provided in Table 1. The patients were followed at least annually by an endocrinologist. Healthy age- and sex-matched controls were recruited from the local blood bank at Haukeland University Hospital.

Isolation of PBMCs, RNA isolation, and cDNA synthesis. PBMCs were isolated from heparinized blood by Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) density gradient centrifugation and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% human AB serum (MilliporeSigma) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (MilliporeSigma) for 72 hours. Total RNA was then isolated (RNeasy Mini Kit, QIAGEN) and stored at –80°C. Reverse transcription reaction was performed using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems), strictly according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

PCR and cDNA sequencing of AIRE in PBMCs. A minigene construct, spanning the splice site affected by the mutation c.879+1G>A, and with a total length of 5 exons (exon 5 to exon 10) was designed to map mRNA transcripts of AIRE in PBMCs from patients and healthy individuals. The constructs with their flanking exon-intron boundaries of the AIRE gene were amplified by PCR using AmpliTaq 360 DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and the following program on a thermal cycler (GeneAmp PCR System 9700, Applied Biosystems): 98°C for 10 minutes, followed by 10 cycles of 98°C for 15 seconds, 69°C for 15 seconds, and 72°C for 1 minute, and 42 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 50°C for 15 seconds, and 72°C 1 minute, followed by 78°C for 1 minute and, finally, 4°C. The PCR product was purified with ExoSap (GE Healthcare) and sequenced using the BigDye Terminator version 1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). The primer sequences (5′–3′) were as follows: forward primer, GATTCAGACCATGTCAGCTTC and reverse, GCAGCACGTCCGTACCATCTC (MilliporeSigma), both of which were used for amplification and the sequencing reaction. PCR products were visualized on a simulated gel system following the instructions of the manufacturer (Agilent Technologies).

Plasmid construction. WT AIRE and AIRE without exon 7 (AIREwoEX7) in pCMV6 vectors with C-terminal Myc- DDK Tag were purchased from OriGene and Thermo Fisher Scientific, respectively, and the mutations c.769C>T, p.(Arg257Ter) and c.932G>A, p.(Cys311Tyr) were created using the QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies) to mimic known recessive and dominant APS-1–causing mutations. The plasmid pEGFP-C1 containing WT AIRE was a gift from Ismo Ulmanen (Department of Molecular Medicine, National Public Health Institute, Finland). All plasmids were amplified using TOP10-competent E. coli (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and purified with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (QIAGEN), and their correct sequences were confirmed by sequencing (3730 DNA Analyzer, Applied Biosystems).

Cell culturing, transfection, and RNA extraction. The transfection of cells and RNA extraction were mainly executed as previously described (21). In brief, human thymic 4D6 epithelial cells, a gift from Christophe Benoist (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (55, 56) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 10 mM HEPES buffer (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), 1% nonessential amino acids (Lonza), 2 mM l-glutamine (Lonza), 100 U/mL penicillin (MilliporeSigma), and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (MilliporeSigma) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were then plated in a 6-well plate at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well and incubated overnight. Samples (2.5 μg) of the pCMV6 plasmids were mixed with 10 μL FuGene HD transfection reagent (Promega) to a total volume of 160 μL supplemented with RPMI 1640 (without penicillin or streptomycin) and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature before being added to the cells. Cells were incubated for another 24 hours before total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, QIAGEN). cDNA was prepared from 1 μg total RNA (High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA Kit, Applied Biosystems).

Assay of AIRE-regulated genes. The ability of transfected AIRE plasmids to induce the expression of selected AIRE-regulated genes and control genes was measured as previously described (21). In summary, the AIRE-regulated genes were analyzed by qPCR using the following primers and probes (Applied Biosystems): keratin 14 (KRT14) (Hs00265033-m1) and IGF-like family member 1 (IGFL1) (Hs01651089-g1), while the expression of AIRE itself was tested with AIRE (Hs01102906-g1 and Hs01102908-g1). The results were compared with β2-microglobulin (B2M) (4333766) as an endogenous control and with the AIRE-independent genes cyclin H (CCNH) (Hs00236923_m1) and protein arginine methyltransferase 3 (PRMT3) (Hs00411605_m1). Data sets were normalized to B2M. Ct values from cells transfected with pCMV6 plasmids harboring the current mutation or the empty pCMV6 plasmid were then subtracted from the Ct values obtained after transfection with pCMV6 harboring WT AIRE. The fold difference was calculated as 2^ [Ct (target gene) – Ct(B2M)] – [Ct (test sample) – Ct (calibrator sample)], with the test sample defined as the current mutation and the calibrator as WT AIRE. The assays were repeated 2–4 times ,and the results are shown as the mean values of these replicates.

Immunofluorescence. 4D6 cells were plated in a 6-well plate containing 18 mm sterile cover slips at a density of 5 × 105 cells per well and incubated overnight, transfected with the pCMV6 plasmids and/or the human EGFP-AIRE fusion plasmid as described above, and incubated for another 24 hours. Coverslips with cells were then washed with PBS (MilliporeSigma) and fixed with 4% formaldehyde (MilliporeSigma) in PBS for 7 minutes at room temperature and again washed with PBS. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X (MilliporeSigma) in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature, washed in PBS, and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in PBS. Another washing step was done before staining with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-DYDDDDK (clone L5, BioLegend) in 1% BSA (MilliporeSigma) in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Then, the coverslips were washed in PBS and water and attached to SuperFrost microscope slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Slides were incubated for 24 hours in the dark at room temperature and analyzed using a Leica SP5 microscope.

Mouse models. B6.AireC313X (22) and B6.AireEx7 mice were generated in the transgene mouse facility at The Weizmann Institute of Science, using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in isolated 1-cell embryos from C57Bl/6, mice (Supplemental Figure 6 and Supplemental Table 1). Genotyping of mice with splice or point mutations was conducted using custom TaqMan (Thermo Fisher Scientific) SNP Genotyping assays (Supplemental Table 1). Mice were transferred to the animal facility at the University of Bergen and were provided with standard rodent chow and autoclaved water ad libitum. Four- to 7-week-old mice were used in all experiments unless stated otherwise.

Immunohistochemistry. Mouse tissues were fixated in 10% formalin at room temperature (RT) for 24 hours before being further processed. Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned, stained with H&E, and imaged with an Olympus VS120 slide scanner. Images were assessed with QuPath software (57) and scored according to the following categories: 0 = no infiltration/retinal degradation; 1 = little infiltration/retinal degradation; 2 = moderate infiltration/retinal degradation; and 3 = severe infiltration/retinal degradation.

SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis of Aire. EpCAM-enriched thymic stromal cells from 2–3 thymi from each genotype were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 1% IGEPAL CA-360, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) complemented with complete proteinase inhibitors (539134, Calbiochem). Proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes of samples derived from thymus were treated with Pierce Western Blot Signal Enhancer (21050, Thermo Fisher Scientific) before nonspecific binding blockade performed in a solution of 5% milk in 1× PBS supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20. All incubations with antibodies/serum were done overnight. Signals were detected with an EZ-ECL Kit (Biological Industries) or Immobilion Crescendo Western HRP Substrate (WBLUR0500; MilliporeSigma) and were captured using the ImageQuant TM-RT ECL image analysis system (GE Healthcare). Quantification of WBs was done using Image Lab Software 6.1 (Bio-Rad). The following antibodies were used: polyclonal anti–rat AIRE SAND antibody (a gift from Diane Mathis, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA), anti-GAPDH antibody (MAB374; MilliporeSigma), HRP-conjugated anti-rat monoclonal IgG light chain antibody (112–035-175; Jackson ImmunoResearch), and HRP-conjugated goat anti–mouse polyclonal antibody (115–035-003; Jackson ImmunoResearch).

Isolation, flow cytometry, and sorting of mTEChi. Thymic epithelial cells were isolated from 4-week-old mice by enzymatic digestion of thymic lobes using 0.30 mg/mL Liberase TM Research grade (Roche) and 75 μg/mL DNase I (PanReac AppliChem). Cells were counted and stained with anti-CD45 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 15 minutes at 4°C before depletion using an LD column (Miltenyi Biotec) to remove the thymocytes. The cells were subsequently stained with the surface markers for 20 minutes at 4°C. The following panel was used: CD86 phycoerythrin/Cyanine 7 (Pe/Cy7), CD80 Pe/Cy5, Ly51 Pe, CD45 AF700, MHC-II BV711, EpCam BV605, UEA biotin, and streptavidin FITC or BV785 (when staining for AIRE) (see Supplemental Table 1 for antibody specifics and Supplemental Figure 7A for the gating strategy). To assure proper segregation of mTEChi and mTEClo, the panel was established including an antibody recognizing AIRE (AF-488) using the Foxp3 Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Intracellular stainings were performed for 60 minutes at 4°C in the dark. DAPI (BioLegend) was added as a dead cell marker. Cortical TECs (cTECs), mTEChi, and mTEClo were sorted on a BD FACS Symphony S6 instrument, directly into 150 μL RNeasy micro lysis buffer (QIAGEN), and RNA was extracted immediately with the RNeasy Plus Micro Kit according to the manufacturers standard protocol (QIAGEN).

RNA-Seq of mTEChi. cDNA was made from RNA and amplified using the SMART-Seq version 4 Ultra Low Input RNA Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Takara Bio). Undiluted RNA samples from 2,000–8,000 cells were used for cDNA amplification with 14 cycles (Supplemental Table 2). The cDNA was purified by the Agencourt AMPure XP Kit (Beckman Coulter) and the quality assessed by TapeStation (High Sensitivity D5000 ScreenTape kit) according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Agilent Technologies). The samples were stored at –20°C before use.

Library preparation was performed using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation kit and the Nextera XT Index kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina). The input cDNA was diluted according to the results from the TapeStation (Supplemental Table 2), and unique combinations of i5 (5 μL) and i7 (5 μL) index adapters were added to each respective sample. The libraries were assessed by TapeStation High sensitivity D5000 ScreenTape (Agilent Technologies), consisting of fragments mostly of 250–1,500 bp, with a peak of 600–1,000. Sequencing of the products was performed at the Bergen Genomics core facility, using a HiSeq 4000 sequencer according to the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA protocol.

RNA-Seq alignment. Quality control of fastq files was performed using FastQC (version 0.11.9, https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) and MultiQC (version 1.12) (58). Fastq files were subsequently aligned using the Kallisto pseudoaligner (version 0.46.2) (59) to the GRCm39 release 103 reference genome provided by Ensembl (60). All subsequent analyses were performed using R (version 4.0.2, R Core Team, 2020) and Rstudio (version 1.4.1103, RStudio Team, 2021), in which tximport (version 1.18) (61) was used to import Kallisto output files into R and aggregate transcript data to the gene level using the “mmusculus_gene_ensembl” gene annotation data accessed from biomaRt (version 2.46.3) (62)).

Differential expression analysis. Differential expression analysis was performed with DESeq2 (version 1.30.1) (63) using the design formula “~batch + genotype,” with each Aire-mutant mouse population compared separately with WT mice and AireEx7–/– mice compared with AireC313X–/– mice. Significance testing was performed using a likelihood ratio test with the reduced formula “~batch” and a FDR threshold of 5%. A log2 FC shrinkage analysis was performed using the ASHR package (version 2.2-47) (64). For robust removal of genes found differentially expressed due to single-sample outliers from the analysis, the max Cook’s distance (63) was set to discard genes with a distance of 3 or greater using the Cooks Cutoff variable. Genes with a log2 FC value between 1 and –1 were also removed. Results tables were generated using tidy data principles with the tidyverse package (version 1.3.1, 10.21105/joss.01686), and volcano, hexbin, violin, and dot plots were generated using ggplot2 (version 3.3.5, ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4). The color scales used were generated using the packages RColorBrewer (version 1.1-2, http://colorbrewer2.org/) and Viridis (version 0.6.2, 10.5281/zenodo.4679424). Plots were also generated with the help of the additional packages ggrepel (version 0.9.1), cowplot (version 1.1.1), ggtext (version 0.1.1), and scales (version 1.1.1). Venn diagrams were generated using the VennDiagram (version 1.7.0) package but plotted in ggplot using draw_grob from cowplot. Humanizing the mouse genes was performed with the “mmusculus_gene_ensembl” gene annotation data accessed from biomaRt (version 2.46.3) (62), and the humanized mouse genes were compared with the Human Protein Atlas data on “Tissue Specific,” “Group Specific,” and “Tissue Enhanced” genes (65).

Differential exon use analysis and read distribution visualization. Fastq files were aligned to the GRCm39 release 103 reference genome using the STAR aligner (version 2.7.7a) (66) in order to generate BAM files for analysis. STAR was run according to the standard options used by the ENCODE project. In R, the package ensembldb (version 2.14.1) (67) was used with the ensDbFromGtf function to generate a EnsDB annotation object from a GRCm39 release 103 reference GTF file. The genomic coordinates for exons were extracted using the exonicParts function of the GenomicFeatures package (version 1.42.3) (68). In order to quantify exon use in the BAM files, the summarizeOverlaps function from the GenomicAlignments package (version 1.26.0) (68) was used with the exon coordinates previously generated to quantify reads within exons. SummarizeOverlaps was run with the options “mode=”Union”, singleEnd=FALSE, ignore.strand=F, inter.feature=FALSE, fragments=TRUE”. To easily work with the SummarizedExperiment object, the tidySummarizedExperiment package (version 1.0.0) was used. Differential exon use analysis was performed on the comparison of the AireEx7–/– samples versus WT by using the DEXseq package (version 1.36.0) (69) with the design formula “~ batch + sample + exon + genotype:exon”. Coverage and sashimi plots for read distribution within the Aire gene were generated using the Gviz package (version 1.34.1) (70) with the previously generated BAM files and the EnsDB annotation reference.

T cell analysis by flow cytometry. T cells from mouse thymus or spleen were analyzed using flow cytometry. Briefly, the organs were harvested, and the immune cells were released from the tissue by gently straining the tissue through a 70 μm filter using the plunger from a 5 mL syringe. For the spleen samples, cells were treated with 3 mL RBC lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 minutes and 2 μL Purified Rat Anti-Mouse CD16/CD32 (Fc Block) (BD Biosciences) was added before counting and subsequent staining. Staining for cell-surface antigens was performed at 4°C for 20 minutes in the dark. The thymocytes analyzed lacked the expression of CD11b, CD11c, Gr1, CD19, CD49b, F4/80, NK1.1, GL3, and Ter119 (lineage negative). The following panels were used: SM, M1 and M2, antibodies recognizing CCR7 BV421, CD4 APC/Cy7, CD8 FITC, CD69 Pe-Cy5, TCRβ Pe, MHC-1 BV711, cleaved caspase 3 AF647 (Supplemental Figure 7B). The following Treg panel (thymic and peripheral) was used: TCRβ Pe, CD4 APC-Cy7, CD8a FITC, CD25 BV605, FoxP3 PerCP/Cy5.5, and CCR6 BV785 (Supplemental Figure 7, C and D). The following memory/naive panel was used: CD4 APC-Cy7, CD8a FITC, B220 BV650, CD44 phycoerythrin/Texas Red (Pe/TxR), CD62L PE-Cy7, TCRβ Pe, CD25 BV605, FR4 PerCP/Cy5.5, and CD73 PE/Cy7 (Supplemental Figure 7E) (see Supplemental Table 1 for details on the antibodies used). Where needed, staining for CCR6 and CCR7 was performed for 30 minutes at 37°C in a water bath, directly followed by the addition of other cell-surface stains. For the identification of intracellular markers (Foxp3, Helios), the Foxp3 Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Intracellular stainings were performed for 60 minutes at 4°C in the dark. Cell viability was measured using the LIVE/DEAD Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The panels were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa at the Flow Cytometry Core Facility of the University of Bergen and analyzed using FlowJo version 10 (BD Life Sciences).

Statistics. Two-tailed Student’s t tests were performed with GraphPad Prism version 9 (GraphPad Software), and the level of significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05. When comparing 3 groups, 1-way ANOVA was used with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test.

Study approval. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics approved the study (approval no. REK 2009/2055 and 2013/1504), and all participants provided written informed consent. All animal handling and experiments were approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority and conducted in strict accordance with the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrates used for Scientific Purposes (FOTS no. 13570).

Data availability. RNA-Seq data were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena; accession number PRJEB57099). The Supplemental Supporting Data Values file contains all values for data points shown in graphs and values behind the reported means. Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding author.

Author contributions

BEO and ESH organized the study. ØB and ESH recruited the patients and described their clinical history. ØB, ASBW, AH, PMK, SJ, EB, and BEO characterized the patients genetically and biochemically. SBD, RHK, JA, and YGAS generated mouse models. YGAS, BEO, AHB, ASBW, LB, and EB characterized and maintained the mouse models. BEO and ESH led the writing of the manuscript, and all authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and conclusions of the manuscript.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We highly appreciate the technical assistance of Hajirah Muneer, Elin Theodorsen, Marie Karlsen, and Elisabeth Tombra Halvorsen (all from Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway); Brith Bergum at the Flow Cytometry Section, Core Facilities, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen; and Endy Spriet at the Molecular Imaging Center, Core Facilities, Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen. The Genomics Core Facility (GCF) at the University of Bergen, which is a part of the NorSeq Consortium, provided RNA-Seq services. GCF is supported in part by major grants from the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 245979/F50), Trond Mohn Stiftelse (grant no. BFS2016-genom), and the Bergen Research Foundation (BFS) (grant no. BFS2017TMT04 and BFS2017TMT08). This study was supported by grants from the University of Bergen, the Bergen Research Foundation, Stiftelsen KG Jebsen, and the Regional Health Authorities of Western Norway. BEO received grant funding from the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 250030), the Regional Health Authorities of Western Norway, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant no. 103302). AHB received a project grant from the Meltzer Research Fund.

Address correspondence to: Bergithe Eikeland Oftedal, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.976.89.880; Email: Bergithe.oftedal@uib.no. Or to: Eystein S. Husebye, Department of Clinical Science and KG Jebsen Center for Autoimmune Diseases, University of Bergen, 5023 Bergen, Norway and Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, 5023 Bergen, Norway. Phone: 47.559.73.078; Email: eystein.sverre.husebye@helse-bergen.no.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Authorship note: AHB and OB contributed equally to this work.

Copyright: © 2023, Oftedal et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(21):e169704.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI169704.

References
  1. Husebye ES, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1132–1141.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Ahonen P, et al. Clinical variation of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) in a series of 68 patients. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(26):1829–1836.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Nagamine K, et al. Positional cloning of the APECED gene. Nat Genet. 1997;17(4):393–398.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Consortium. F-GA. An autoimmune disease, APECED, caused by mutations in a novel gene featuring two PHD-type zinc-finger domains. Nature genetics. 1997;17(4):399–403.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Perheentupa J. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2843–2850.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Husebye ES, et al. Clinical manifestations and management of patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I. J Intern Med. 2009;265(5):514–529.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Bruserud O, et al. A longitudinal follow-up of Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(8):2975–2985.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Pitkanen J, et al. Subcellular localization of the autoimmune regulator protein. characterization of nuclear targeting and transcriptional activation domain. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(22):19597–19602.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Anderson MS, et al. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science. 2002;298(5597):1395–1401.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Yang S, et al. Immune tolerance. Regulatory T cells generated early in life play a distinct role in maintaining self-tolerance. Science. 2015;348(6234):589–594.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Bruserud O, et al. AIRE-mutations and autoimmune disease. Curr Opin Immunol. 2016;43:8–15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Faustino NA, Cooper TA. Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease. Genes Dev. 2003;17(4):419–437.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Mora M, et al. New splice site acceptor mutation in AIRE gene in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101616.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Zhang J, et al. A functional alternative splicing mutation in AIRE gene causes autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53981.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Heino M, et al. Mutation analyses of North American APS-1 patients. Hum Mutat. 1999;13(1):69–74.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Passos GA, et al. Update on Aire and thymic negative selection. Immunology. 2018;153(1):10–20.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Bruserud O, et al. A Longitudinal follow-up of autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(8):2975–2983.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Kogawa K, et al. Expression of AIRE gene in peripheral monocyte/dendritic cell lineage. Immunol Lett. 2002;80(3):195–198.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Nagafuchi S, et al. Autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene is expressed in human activated CD4+ T-cells and regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50(12):979–987.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Suzuki E, et al. Expression of AIRE in thymocytes and peripheral lymphocytes. Autoimmunity. 2008;41(2):133–139.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Oftedal BE, et al. Dominant mutations in the autoimmune regulator AIRE are associated with common organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Immunity. 2015;42(6):1185–1196.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Goldfarb Y, et al. Mechanistic dissection of dominant AIRE mutations in mouse models reveals AIRE autoregulation. J Exp Med. 2021;218(11):e20201076.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Aschenbrenner K, et al. Selection of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells specific for self antigen expressed and presented by Aire+ medullary thymic epithelial cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8(4):351–358.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Hinterberger M, et al. Autonomous role of medullary thymic epithelial cells in central CD4(+) T cell tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(6):512–519.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Malchow S, et al. Aire enforces immune tolerance by directing autoreactive T cells into the regulatory T cell lineage. Immunity. 2016;44(5):1102–1113.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Wirnsberger G, et al. Regulatory T cell differentiation of thymocytes does not require a dedicated antigen-presenting cell but is under T cell-intrinsic developmental control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(25):10278–10283.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Cowan JE, et al. Aire controls the recirculation of murine Foxp3+ regulatory T-cells back to the thymus. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48(5):844–854.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Xing Y, et al. Late stages of T cell maturation in the thymus involve NF-κB and tonic type I interferon signaling. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(5):565–573.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Kalekar LA, et al. CD4(+) T cell anergy prevents autoimmunity and generates regulatory T cell precursors. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(3):304–314.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Wang Z, et al. Improved prediction of smoking status via isoform-aware RNA-seq deep learning models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(10):e1009433.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Jiang W, et al. Modifier loci condition autoimmunity provoked by Aire deficiency. J Exp Med. 2005;202(6):805–815.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Warren BD, et al. Autoimmune Regulator is required in female mice for optimal embryonic development and implantationdagger. Biol Reprod. 2019;100(6):1492–1504.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Valenzise M, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy: report of seven additional sicilian patients and overview of the overall series from sicily. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;82(2):127–132.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Meloni A, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1: an extensive longitudinal study in Sardinian patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1114–1124.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Chiou J, et al. Interpreting type 1 diabetes risk with genetics and single-cell epigenomics. Nature. 2021;594(7863):398–402.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Laisk T, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies five risk loci for pernicious anemia. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3761.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Feng ZJ, et al. Association of rs2075876 polymorphism of AIRE gene with rheumatoid arthritis risk. Hum Immunol. 2015;76(4):281–285.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Terao C, et al. The human AIRE gene at chromosome 21q22 is a genetic determinant for the predisposition to rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese population. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(13):2680–2685.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Burset M, et al. Analysis of canonical and non-canonical splice sites in mammalian genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(21):4364–4375.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Krawczak M, et al. Single base-pair substitutions in exon-intron junctions of human genes: nature, distribution, and consequences for mRNA splicing. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(2):150–158.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Blechschmidt K, et al. The mouse Aire gene: comparative genomic sequencing, gene organization, and expression. Genome Res. 1999;9(2):158–166.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Lopez-Bigas N, et al. Are splicing mutations the most frequent cause of hereditary disease. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(9):1900–1903.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Ramsey C, et al. Systematic mutagenesis of the functional domains of AIRE reveals their role in intracellular targeting. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(26):3299–3308.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Kurosaki T, Maquat LE. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(3):461–467.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  45. Liston A, et al. Gene dosage--limiting role of Aire in thymic expression, clonal deletion, and organ-specific autoimmunity. J Exp Med. 2004;200(8):1015–1026.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Oftedal BE, et al. Dominant-negative heterozygous mutations in AIRE confer diverse autoimmune phenotypes. iScience. 2023;26(6):106818.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Eriksson D, et al. GWAS for autoimmune Addison’s disease identifies multiple risk loci and highlights AIRE in disease susceptibility. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):959.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Casanova JL, Anderson MS. Unlocking life-threatening COVID-19 through two types of inborn errors of type I IFNs. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(3):e166283.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Koenig M, et al. The molecular basis for Duchenne versus Becker muscular dystrophy: correlation of severity with type of deletion. Am J Hum Genet. 1989;45(4):498–506.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Chelly J, et al. Effect of dystrophin gene deletions on mRNA levels and processing in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies. Cell. 1990;63(6):1239–1248.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Torres RJ, et al. Partial HPRT deficiency phenotype and incomplete splicing mutation. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2010;29(4-6):295–300.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Liu F, Gong CX. Tau exon 10 alternative splicing and tauopathies. Mol Neurodegener. 2008;3:8.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Wolff AS, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 in Norway: phenotypic variation, autoantibodies, and novel mutations in the autoimmune regulator gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(2):595–603.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Myhre AG, et al. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS I) in Norway. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2001;54(2):211–217.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Fernandez E, et al. Establishment and characterization of cloned human thymic epithelial cell lines. Analysis of adhesion molecule expression and cytokine production. Blood. 1994;83(11):3245–3254.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Koh AS, et al. Aire employs a histone-binding module to mediate immunological tolerance, linking chromatin regulation with organ-specific autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(41):15878–15883.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Bankhead P, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):16878.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Ewels P, et al. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Bray NL, et al. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(5):525–527.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Howe KL, et al. Ensembl 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(d1):D884–D891.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Soneson C, et al. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 2015;4:1521.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Durinck S, et al. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(8):1184–1191.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Love MI, et al. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Stephens M. False discovery rates: a new deal. Biostatistics. 2017;18(2):275–294.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  65. Fagerberg L, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(2):397–406.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Rainer J, et al. ensembldb: an R package to create and use Ensembl-based annotation resources. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(17):3151–3153.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Lawrence M, et al. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(8):e1003118.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Anders S, et al. Detecting differential usage of exons from RNA-seq data. Genome Res. 2012;22(10):2008–2017.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Hahne F, Ivanek R. Visualizing genomic data using gviz and bioconductor. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1418:335–351.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 1, 2023): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 28
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (6)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Picked up by 1 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Posted by 20 X users
12 readers on Mendeley
See more details