Testosterone is the canonical growth factor of prostate cancer but can paradoxically suppress its growth when present at supraphysiological levels. We have previously demonstrated that the cyclical administration of supraphysiological androgen (SPA), termed bipolar androgen therapy (BAT), can result in tumor regression and clinical benefit for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, predictors and mechanisms of response and resistance have been ill defined. Here, we show that growth inhibition of prostate cancer models by SPA required high androgen receptor (AR) activity and were driven in part by downregulation of MYC. Using matched sequential patient biopsies, we show that high pretreatment AR activity predicted downregulation of MYC, improved clinical response, and prolonged progression-free and overall survival for patients on BAT. BAT induced strong downregulation of AR in all patients, which is shown to be a primary mechanism of acquired resistance to SPA. Acquired resistance was overcome by alternating SPA with the AR inhibitor enzalutamide, which induced adaptive upregulation of AR and resensitized prostate cancer to SPA. This work identifies high AR activity as a predictive biomarker of response to BAT and supports a treatment paradigm for prostate cancer involving alternating between AR inhibition and activation.
Laura A. Sena, Rajendra Kumar, David E. Sanin, Elizabeth A. Thompson, D. Marc Rosen, Susan L. Dalrymple, Lizamma Antony, Yuhan Yang, Carolina Gomes-Alexandre, Jessica L. Hicks, Tracy Jones, Kiara A. Bowers, Jillian N. Eskra, Jennifer Meyers, Anuj Gupta, Alyza Skaist, Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian, Jun Luo, W. Nathaniel Brennen, Sushant K. Kachhap, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Angelo M. De Marzo, John T. Isaacs, Mark C. Markowski, Samuel R. Denmeade
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,987 | 882 |
358 | 184 | |
Figure | 693 | 18 |
Supplemental data | 133 | 35 |
Citation downloads | 111 | 0 |
Totals | 3,282 | 1,119 |
Total Views | 4,401 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.