Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Mitochondria and aging
  • Microproteins
  • Mitochondrial microproteins (mitochondria-derived peptides)
  • Human mitochondrial genomics
  • MDPs in age-related diseases
  • MDPs in longevity
  • The future of MDP science
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Review Series Open Access | 10.1172/JCI158449

Mitochondria-derived peptides in aging and healthspan

Brendan Miller, Su-Jeong Kim, Hiroshi Kumagai, Kelvin Yen, and Pinchas Cohen

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Find articles by Miller, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Find articles by Kim, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Find articles by Kumagai, H. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Find articles by Yen, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Find articles by Cohen, P. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published May 2, 2022 - More info

Published in Volume 132, Issue 9 on May 2, 2022
J Clin Invest. 2022;132(9):e158449. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI158449.
© 2022 Miller et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published May 2, 2022 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The mechanisms that explain mitochondrial dysfunction in aging and healthspan continue to be studied, but one element has been unexplored: microproteins. Small open reading frames in circular mitochondria DNA can encode multiple microproteins, called mitochondria-derived peptides (MDPs). Currently, eight MDPs have been published: humanin, MOTS-c, and SHLPs 1–6. This Review describes recent advances in microprotein discovery with a focus on MDPs. It discusses what is currently known about MDPs in aging and how this new understanding could add to the way we understand age-related diseases including type 2 diabetes, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases at the genomic, proteomic, and drug-development levels.

Mitochondria and aging

Mitochondria have been closely examined in aging because of their roles in cellular energy production, calcium homeostasis, apoptosis, and cell signaling (1). For example, mitochondrial dysfunction is linked to metabolic and oxidative damage pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease (2–5). This is not entirely surprising because the brain is one of the most mitochondria-rich tissues and is particularly sensitive to changes in mitochondrial function. Similarly, mitochondrial dysfunction is also linked to diabetes and obesity. Recent research suggests that this dysfunction may even be causative (6–8). Likewise, mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial DNA instability are highly associated with cancer (9–11). In many cancers, a phenomenon called the Warburg effect, in which these cancerous cells switch to glycolysis over oxidative respiration, has been observed (12).

Several aspects of mitochondrial dysfunction — such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations, nuclear DNA mutations that encode mitochondrial proteins, mitochondrial copy number, and morphological dynamics (i.e., fusion and fission) — have been studied in aging. First, mitochondria do not possess comparable DNA repair mechanisms to those found in the nucleus. Their inefficient repair mechanism combined with the proximity of the mtDNA to the electron transport chain — which generates a large amount of reactive oxygen species — promotes a high number of mtDNA mutations over a lifetime. Excessive mtDNA mutations cause an aging phenotype, as demonstrated in POLG mutator mice, which have early sarcopenia, hair graying and loss, abnormal body composition, reduced fertility, and reduced lifespan (13–15). Additional studies in worms, flies, and mice suggested that manipulating mitochondria and mitochondrial genes could increase lifespan across species (16–19). For example, increased lifespan by anywhere from 15% to 30% depending on the genetic background is observed following reduction of the gene encoding the mitochondrial enzyme CLK-1, which is required for proper mitochondrial function (clk-1 in worms, or Mclk1 in mice) (17, 20, 21). Yet exactly how this increase in lifespan is dependent on mitochondrial mechanisms remains unclear (22, 23).

Furthermore, mitochondrial copy number, the relative ratio of mtDNA compared with nuclear DNA, has been connected to aging. In humans, low mitochondrial copy number in peripheral blood cells is associated with poorer cognitive functioning and higher all-cause mortality (24). However, these results should be interpreted with caution. It is unclear whether changes in mitochondrial copy number in, for example, brain regions and brain cell types absolutely affect cognition. To robustly estimate the effects of mitochondrial copy number on cognitive function requires great statistical power in the form of sufficient sample size, cell dissociation, and deep phenotypic characterization. However, a recent report did implement whole-genome sequencing on 1361 human brain samples and highlighted that Alzheimer’s disease patients showed low mitochondrial copy number (25). Determining whether neuronal or glial mitochondrial copy number is driving these effects, and improving mtDNA-specific next-generation sequence analysis, are excellent objectives worth addressing in future research. The latest research has suggested the usefulness of machine learning–based approaches to improve quantification of mtDNA copy number and low-frequency variants to estimate heteroplasmy (26).

Moreover, the roles of mitochondrial morphological dynamics in aging continue to be explored, but many questions remain unanswered. Still, inhibition of fission in Saccharomyces cerevisiae resulted in accelerated death, an effect that was also seen in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster (27–29). Additionally, mice under calorie restriction not only lived longer but also showed increased mitochondrial length in muscle fibers (30). Likewise, in human postmortem brain samples with Alzheimer’s disease, the mitochondrial fusion proteins OPA1, MFN1, and MFN2 were significantly reduced, and levels of the mitochondrial fission protein FIS1 were significantly elevated (31).

Taken together, these findings suggest that mitochondria are central to many age-related diseases and perhaps to the fundamental aging process.

Microproteins

Nearly 20 years ago, the Human Genome Project estimated that 20,000 to 25,000 genes encode functional proteins (32). Today, over 18,000 of these proteins have been validated by the Human Proteome Project (33). However, one element has been missed: microproteins. The term “microprotein” refers to biologically active peptides shorter than 100 amino acids (34). Bioinformatics analysis of all possible open reading frames in the human genome suggests that there may be millions of theoretical microproteins, and tens of thousands of potential microprotein mRNAs have been proposed based on ribosome profiling experiments, although most have not been detected by mass spectrometry because they are small, low-abundance, or hydrophobic (35). Indeed, thousands of microproteins have been inferred by ribosome profiling. In some ribosome profiling experiments, approximately 10,000 microproteins were identified (35). In other ribosome profiling setups with relaxed parameters, nearly half a million small open reading frames (sORFs) were identified (36). Data from several of these experiments have been added to genome-wide information on protein synthesis visualization (GWIPS-viz; https://gwips.ucc.ie/) (37), allowing researchers to explore ribosome profiling data across species, models, and experimental conditions. Nevertheless, ribosome profiling has several limitations. It is computationally challenging to detect the exact sORF undergoing translation, because codon periodicity often overlaps several sORFs. As a result, calling algorithms make two choices: throw away the reads as low-confidence, leading to false negatives; or infer active sORF translation, leading to false positives (38). Because of these limitations, hundreds of thousands of exclusive sORFs might be called across experiments, leading to reproducibility problems. To overcome these limitations, antibodies have been made against select microproteins such as the mitochondria-modifying peptides BRAWNIN, humanin, and MOTS-c (39, 40).

Detectable microproteins challenge traditional gene annotation. Most human genes have been described as monocistronic, but nearly three-quarters of microprotein sORFs detected by ribosome profiling are encoded within 5′-untranslated regions (5′-UTRs) (35, 41). As a result, many transcriptomes might not actually be monocistronic and might in fact encode multiple unique proteins ranging from dozens of amino acids (sORF) to hundreds of amino acids (large downstream coding region). One example of this phenomenon is a microprotein encoded by a sORF in the 5′-UTR of the gene encoding mitochondrial elongation factor 1 (MIEF1) (42). The MIEF1 microprotein (MIEF-1MP) and the MIEF annotated large protein act together. MIEF1-MP localizes to mitochondria — as does the larger MIEF protein — and modifies mitochondrial translation rates. Other examples include the microproteins ASDURF, BiP ORF, HJV uORF (upstream ORF), MP31, PRL-1 and PRL-2 uORF, and SEHBP, all of which have diverse functionality related to protein chaperones, ion homeostasis, and metabolic regulation (43–48). Without advances in proteomic and genomic technologies, the transcripts on which these sORFs reside would still be considered monocistronic.

Many other transcript types in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes contain sORFs. Ironically, several “long noncoding RNAs” encode biologically active microproteins. The microprotein ASAP, encoded by LINC00467, induces age-associated colorectal cancer proliferation, while the microprotein CIP2A-BP, encoded by LINC00665, inhibits triple-negative breast cell invasion (49, 50). Additionally, in a comparative genomics study on almost 2000 metagenomes, approximately 4500 candidate microproteins were categorized into cell-cell communication, antimicrobial, antiphage, and adaptation activities (51). Since the gut microbiome has been connected to age-related disease progression — including Alzheimer’s disease and metabolic dysfunction (52) — the repercussions of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic microproteins are relevant to human biology.

Mitochondrial microproteins (mitochondria-derived peptides)

Human mtDNA contains hundreds of sORFs that encode putative microproteins called mitochondria-derived peptides (MDPs). Some of these act intracellularly, while others are found in the systemic circulation and target various tissues (ref. 53 and Figure 1). The first MDP to be discovered was humanin. Humanin is a 24–amino acid peptide encoded from the 16S rRNA region of mtDNA (54). Hashimoto et al. initially cloned humanin from the resilient occipital lobe of an Alzheimer’s disease patient’s brain and found that the peptide protected against amyloid-β toxicity in neuronal cells (55). Around the same time, two additional laboratories discovered humanin as a cytoprotective peptide that binds the proapoptotic molecules IGFBP3 and BAX (56, 57). Since then, humanin has been described as a cytoprotective factor in cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurological contexts (Table 1). These effects have been in part mediated by the interaction of humanin with the tripartite receptor complex comprising gp130, WSX1, and CNTF receptor as well as with a second interacting receptor, formyl peptide receptor 2 (58). Downstream effects of this humanin cascade include activation of the AKT/ERK1/2 and STAT3 pathways (59).

Overview of mitochondria-derived peptides.Figure 1

Overview of mitochondria-derived peptides. Mitochondria contain DNA with small open reading frames (sORFs) that encode functional microproteins, called mitochondria-derived peptides (MDPs). These MDPs can stay inside mitochondria, enter the cytosol, translocate to the nucleus, or be secreted extracellularly to target tissues.

Table 1

Physiologically relevant roles of MDPs

After the discovery of humanin, seven additional mitochondrial microproteins were identified. Six of these, named small humanin-like peptides 1 to 6 (SHLPs 1–6), are encoded from the 16S rRNA region and share some biological features with humanin (60). For example, SHLP2 protects cells from amyloid β–induced toxicity and age-related macular degeneration (61). SHLP2 also has been characterized as a chaperone, because it bound IAPP species and blocked amyloid seeding (62). This chaperone-like activity might link its cytoprotective roles, suggesting that SHLP2 has potential as a metabolic therapeutic. Moreover, administration of SHLP2 and SHLP3 promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, reduces reactive oxygen species, and decreases mtDNA oxidation (60). Unlike these cytoprotective SHLPs, SHLP6 was shown to induce apoptosis in multiple cell lines (60). Much remains to be learned about the mechanisms of these SHLPs through future experimentation.

Another MDP that has been studied deeply over the past several years is MOTS-c, a 16–amino acid peptide encoded by a mitochondrial sORF within the 12S rRNA (63). MOTS-c was first described as an exercise mimetic peptide because it prevented weight gain in mice with high-fat diet–induced obesity, improved insulin sensitivity, and increased exercise capacity in both obese and old mice (64, 65). In addition, MOTS-c acts as a retrograde signaling molecule by translocating from mitochondria to the nucleus and binding to metabolism-regulating transcription factors (e.g., NRF1) (66). Separate reports showed that MOTS-c increased glucose uptake and stimulated glycolysis (67). These glycolysis-stimulated effects of MOTS-c were notably muted when AMPK and SIRT1 were knocked down, suggesting that AMPK and SIRT1 might be part of the action of MOTS-c (63) and might be involved in longevity.

Currently, mtDNA is annotated with 13 large mRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs. Yet since the emergence of MDPs, long noncoding RNAs, and small RNAs, mitochondrial genomic regulation appears much more complex. In their landmark paper, Mercer et al. found dozens of previously uncharacterized cleavage sites and small RNAs derived from tRNAs with unknown function (68). In another report, nearly 400 putative MDPs between 9 and 40 amino acids in silico were annotated and considered putative (69). To characterize these putative orphan MDPs, existing technology needs to be enhanced, especially ribosome profiling technology. Specifically, a mitochondrial ribosome inhibitor that stalls ribosomes at the start codon could yield additional MDPs. Overall, technical advancement in mitochondrial ribosome profiling and small peptide enrichment mass spectrometry has potential for discovery of new MDPs.

Human mitochondrial genomics

Given that there are approximately 100 to 1000 copies of mtDNA per cell and 37 trillion cells in the human body, one human might contain nearly 2 × 1015 copies of mtDNA (70, 71). However, existing genomic tools are primarily designed to study nuclear DNA, as mtDNA does not undergo recombination or follow Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. As a result, bioinformatics pipelines and genetic editing techniques for mtDNA are limited. For instance, during genome-wide association studies (GWAS), mtDNA variants are usually filtered from analytic plans. Just a few years ago, a commonly used GWAS tool called PLINK was updated to accurately estimate the effect of mtDNA variants during mtDNA-exclusive analysis (72). Yet unlike traditional GWAS, there is no gold standard method for mitochondrial GWAS (MiWAS). In GWAS, genetic population structures (genetic ancestry) are controlled by data reduction techniques such as principal component analysis. Perhaps the best illustration of this is the 2008 report by Novembre et al. in which principal component analysis on half a million DNA variants in Europeans mirrored the geography of Europe (73). In previous MiWAS reports, though, many analytic methods did not consider controls for mtDNA-specific genetic ancestry. Some of these analytic methods instead considered mitochondrial haplogroups based on mitochondrial SNPs (mtSNPs), but these haplogroup assignments are largely based on genome arrays that might lack depth (74–76). Further complicating MiWAS is that population cohorts often have extremely variable mtSNP frequencies.

Nevertheless, recent reports highlighted significant effects of frequent mtSNPs on human phenotypes in large population cohorts. For example, a report by Yonova-Doing et al. included a phenome-wide mtDNA-phenotype association analysis on 260 candidates in over 300,000 individuals (77). They found significant associations between mtDNA variants and type 2 diabetes (T2D), multiple sclerosis, height, and liver and renal function. Likewise, Kraja et al. found several mtDNA variants that associated with multiple metabolic traits in 45 combined cohorts (78). Independent reports on smaller cohorts noted associations between mtDNA variation and neurodegeneration including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and eye disease (79–81). While MiWAS can reveal meaningful mitochondrial genomic regions, its statistical limitations necessitate experimental validation.

Validating MiWAS associations experimentally is incredibly challenging because of the fundamental problem that mtDNA editing lacks fidelity. Whereas laboratories can edit single nuclear nucleotides with CRISPR, mtDNA cannot be edited with similar precision (82). Thus, MiWAS is rarely followed up with comprehensive functional experimentation, although in vitro models called cybrids, whereby mtDNA is depleted from a cell line and then replaced by donor mtDNA, have been used (83, 84). Cybrid approaches have revealed functional effects of certain mtDNA variants, but they are limited by the fact that other mtDNA variants are transferred to the parent cell line. To bypass problems with cybrids and mtDNA gene editing, overexpression or recombinant administration of mitochondrially encoded proteins has been considered. In cells that harbored mtATP6 mutations, overexpression of mtATP6 restored homeostasis (85). Similarly, a SNP in MOTS-c leading to a MOTS-c variant called K14Q raises the risk of T2D in Japanese men, and unlike WT MOTS-c, K14Q failed to protect from metabolic dysfunction in vivo, proving it to be a bioinactive form of the hormone (86). Moreover, a separate mtSNP within the humanin sORF associated with lower circulating humanin peptide and with more severe cognitive decline, suggesting that the variant affects translation of the humanin transcript (87), leading to decreased neuroprotection. In the coming years, precise mtDNA editing, whole-genome sequencing of large population cohorts, and functional mitochondrial gene annotation can all help validate MiWAS associations.

MDPs in age-related diseases

MDPs have been extensively studied in the context of aging. Age-related diseases such as T2D, coronary endothelial dysfunction, and Alzheimer’s disease have been associated with lower MOTS-c or humanin levels in plasma (refs. 63, 88, 89, and Figure 2). In humans, circulating MOTS-c and humanin were downregulated in patients with T2D (90), and circulating MOTS-c levels were negatively correlated with BMI, fasting insulin levels, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (91). T2D was also associated with the MOTS-c variant K14Q (mentioned above), a naturally occurring m.1382A>C polymorphism (rs111033358) that changes the 14th amino acid of MOTS-c from lysine to glutamine (i.e., K14Q). In human skeletal muscle, MOTS-c expression correlated with slow-twitch muscle fiber gene expression (89); the C allele carriers of the m.1382A>C polymorphism were associated with more fast-twitched fibers (92); and circulating MOTS-c levels predicted myostatin levels in men (93). These human associations were corroborated in vivo when skeletal muscle atrophy was attenuated by MOTS-c during aging in mice fed a high-fat diet (65, 93).

Mitochondria-derived peptides in age-related disease.Figure 2

Mitochondria-derived peptides in age-related disease. Three MDPs have been studied in the context of age-related diseases: humanin, MOTS-c, and SHLP2. Humanin has been shown to mitigate Alzheimer’s disease pathology in rodents, and its levels and genetic variation associate with age and cognition. MOTS-c has been described as an exercise mimetic and prevents muscle atrophy in mice, and its levels and genetic variation associate with age and type 2 diabetes (T2D). SHLP2 functions as a mitochondrial modulator and protein chaperone, and its levels associate with age and prostate cancer.

Several studies suggest that MOTS-c and humanin are possible biomarkers for cardiovascular disease. People with endothelial dysfunction, a strong risk factor for cardiovascular events (94), displayed low MOTS-c and humanin levels. Likewise, circulating MOTS-c and humanin levels positively correlated with coronary endothelial function (95, 96). A follow-up study by Ikonomidis et al. demonstrated that T2D patients with low circulating MOTS-c levels (<167 ng/mL) exhibited a more than 3-fold higher risk of cardiac events than those with high MOTS-c levels (97). Similarly, Cai et al. demonstrated that circulating humanin levels at baseline were an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiac events in patients with angina (98). In vivo and in vitro experiments support these observations. Wei et al. reported that MOTS-c prevented vascular calcification by activating the AMPK signaling pathway and suppressing angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1) and endothelin B expression in rats treated with vitamin D3 and nicotine (99). Moreover, humanin has increased expression of KLF2, an essential transcriptional regulator of endothelial function, and regulated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and endothelin-1 in vitro. Comparably, humanin has suppressed endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis progression in vivo (100). These findings suggest that MOTS-c and humanin are associated with cardiovascular disorders via endothelin and vasoactive regulation.

Since humanin was originally detected in the occipital lobe of a patient with Alzheimer’s disease, it has been tested as a therapeutic agent in several models of neurodegeneration. For example, humanin has prevented synaptic loss in hippocampal neurons and reduced astrocytic inflammation (101). In double- and triple-transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease, an analog of humanin called S14G-humanin (or S14G-HNG) improved cognition (102, 103). In humans, patients with Alzheimer’s disease had lower humanin levels in cerebrospinal fluid than controls (104), and humanin genetic variation was linked to cognition, as the naturally occurring m.2706A>G polymorphism (rs2854128) within the humanin sORF associated with accelerated cognitive aging in African Americans (87). Altogether, these observations suggest that humanin could be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for cognitive decline and neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Studies have demonstrated associations between MDPs and cancer. Xiao et al. showed that prostate cancer (PCa) patients had low circulating SHLP2 levels (105). They suggested that circulating SHLP2 levels may be useful for predicting the risk of PCa in patients undergoing biopsy (105). Separately, several studies suggest that humanin ameliorates negative side effects of chemotherapy (106–108). In addition, Lue et al. demonstrated that S14G-HNG treatment in mouse models not only decreased negative side effects of chemotherapy but also decreased metastasis of cancer cells (109).

MDPs in longevity

In addition to their ability to attenuate age-related diseases, MDPs have promoted lifespan and healthspan. In fact, circulating humanin levels decreased with age in both mice and human plasma (88). Intriguingly, further studies found that this decrease also occurred in monkeys but not in the long-lived naked mole rat, which is a model of negligible senescence and healthy aging (104). Human offspring of centenarians, who have a greater chance of living to be 100 years old, even displayed elevated levels of circulating humanin compared with age-matched controls without family history of exceptional longevity (104). These associations have been studied intensively using two separate experimental paradigms. The first was to utilize the power of C. elegans to generate transgenic worms overexpressing humanin. Humanin is the best-conserved MDP and is found in as diverse species as humans, naked mole rats, and nematodes (65, 110). Overexpression of humanin sufficiently increased lifespan, and this was dependent on FOXO (104). These data supported our previous work that found that humanin is regulated by and also regulates the insulin/IGF pathway, the upstream signaling pathway of FOXO (111). Additionally, humanin has increased autophagy in cells, and this increase in autophagy was also required for the lifespan extension in the transgenic worms (112–114). The second approach was to initiate a longevity experiment in mice in which we injected middle-aged (18-month-old) female mice with humanin twice a week (104, 115). Although lifespan was not increased — likely because of humanin’s short half-life of approximately 20 minutes — healthspan measures such as memory and metabolic parameters improved (87, 104, 115). Thus, humanin is sufficient to increase lifespan and healthspan in model organisms, and an optimized dosing of humanin may lead to increases in lifespan in more complex organisms.

Exercise has been shown to have many benefits preventing and attenuating age-related diseases such as sarcopenia and cognitive decline. MOTS-c — previously described as an exercise mimetic — may also show similar benefits (116). In humans, circulating MOTS-c levels decrease with age, as does humanin. But unlike humanin, MOTS-c has been shown to increase its levels in skeletal muscle (89). Moreover, MOTS-c was found to have effects on lifespan itself. Reynolds et al. found that intraperitoneal administration of 15 mg/kg MOTS-c three times a week starting at 23.5 months of age caused a trend toward increased lifespan that did not quite reach significance (65). As with the lifespan study in humanin-treated mice, this lack of significant increase may have been due to a suboptimal dosing for a lifespan study and relatively short half-life of circulating MOTS-c. On the other hand, these mice did have significant improvement in grip strength, gait, and physical performance, demonstrating an increase in healthspan in MOTS-c–treated animals.

Although other MDPs have been discovered, they have not been examined in the context of general aging, except for SHLP2. Circulating SHLP2 levels did decrease with age in both female and male mice, but no lifespan experiments have been conducted (60). Given SHLP2’s ability to protect against models of macular degeneration, its correlation with PCa risk, and its effect on senescent cells, it is easy to imagine that SHLP2 could also affect lifespan and healthspan similarly to other MDPs (61, 105, 117). A complete list of the physiological significance of SHLP and other MDPs is shown in Table 1.

The future of MDP science

As technology improves, more MDPs and nuclear-encoded microproteins will be discovered and functionalized. Technologies such as ribosome profiling and small peptide–enriched peptidomics represent enormous opportunities for microprotein discovery pipelines. Currently, there are no chemicals that stall mitochondrial ribosomes at their start codons, in contrast to harringtonine and lactimidomycin, which stall cytoplasmic ribosomes at their start codons (35). Despite the need to identify these mitochondria-specific start codon inhibitors, there has still been high interest in mitochondrial ribosome profiling and specific protocols described that might guide further development (118). The capacity to stall mitochondrial ribosomes at their start codons would reveal MDPs that are preferentially translated by mitochondrial ribosomes. Moreover, enhancing the purity of existing ribosome profiling methods might also reveal mitochondrial transcripts that undergo translation by cytoplasmic ribosomes.

Ribosome-centric technologies are nevertheless snapshots of translation. Peptide evidence of translation and stability in the form of mass spectrometry is crucial. While invaluable innovations in small peptide mass spectrometry have pushed the microprotein field forward over the last decade, there is still room for optimization. Many microproteins possess intrinsically disordered regions or hydrophobicity that make their detection difficult for existing mass spectrometry methods. New methods to capture these difficult-to-detect MDPs and nuclear-encoded microproteins would greatly inform the field.

Moreover, innovative discovery methods might differentiate humanin-like sequences encoded by nuclear mtDNA segments (NUMTs). For instance, Eltermaa et al. reported that NUMT genetic variation within proximity of MTRNR2L2 (a humanin NUMT) and MTRNR2L13 (a separate humanin NUMT) nominally associated with coronary function, albeit these associations did not survive statistical correction (44). Whether these NUMTs functionally encode humanin-like sequences remains unknown, but if indeed they do, then their levels have implications for measuring humanin levels considering their sequence identity to mtDNA-encoded humanin.

The ability to sensitively detect microproteins will have enormous clinical implications. Microproteins might serve as novel biomarkers and diagnostics for diseases that lack such predictive measures. Targeted assays using immunological techniques (e.g., ELISA) are logical, but they lack the high throughput capacity for the omics boom. Measuring MDPs across biological tissues in large-scale tissue banks would also address the degree to which disease, mitochondrial copy number, and mitochondrial morphological dynamics affect MDP levels. Moreover, microprotein detection at the large-scale omics levels would promote interdisciplinary collaboration and data sharing, possibly leading to rapid clinical translation. Some microproteins might even serve as therapeutic targets. In fact, the MOTS-c analog CB4211 has been posed as a therapeutic target in clinical trials for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and obesity (NCT03998514; ClinicalTrials.gov). Information about this MOTS-c analog is publicly available. Its intellectual property was licensed by CohBar Inc. and used to develop potent analogs of MOTS-c, for which the US Patent and Trademark Office has granted a patent (US 11,111,271). As the field discovered the function of many miRNAs, it was suggested that a new therapeutic era was unfolding (119). Indeed, miRNAs have informed the field about biological processes that could very well lead to viable interventions. In the same vein, both nuclear-encoded and mitochondrially encoded microproteins might represent a new era of therapeutics, genomics, and proteomics.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH grants R01AG061834, R01AG069698, P30AG068345, R01AG068405, and P01AG034906 (to PC).

Address correspondence to: Pinchas Cohen, Leonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, 3715 McClintock Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA. Phone: 213.740.1354; Email: hassy@usc.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: PC is an advisor to and stockholder in CohBar Inc. UCLA has licensed the intellectual property on humanin, MOTS-c, and SHLPs, on which PC is listed as an inventor, to CohBar.

Copyright: © 2022, Miller et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(9):e158449.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI158449.

References
  1. Linford N, et al. Oxidative damage and aging: spotlight on mitochondria. Cancer Res. 2006;66(5):2497–2499.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Yao J, et al. Mitochondrial bioenergetic deficit precedes Alzheimer’s pathology in female mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(34):14670–14675.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Swerdlow RH, et al. The Alzheimer’s disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(suppl 2):265–279.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Rango M, et al. Parkinson’s disease and brain mitochondrial dysfunction: a functional phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26(2):283–290.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Shi X, et al. Intravenous administration of mitochondria for treating experimental Parkinson’s disease. Mitochondrion. 2017;34:91–100.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Maassen J, et al. Mitochondrial diabetes: molecular mechanisms and clinical presentation. Diabetes. 2004;53(90001):S103–S109.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Newsholme P, et al. Diabetes associated cell stress and dysfunction: role of mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial ROS production and activity. J Physiol. 2007;583(pt 1):9–24.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Cheng Z, et al. Targeting mitochondrial alterations to prevent type 2 diabetes—evidence from studies of dietary redox-active compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2014;58(8):1739–1749.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Wallace DC. Mitochondria and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(10):685–698.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Choudhury AR, Singh KK. Mitochondrial determinants of cancer health disparities. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;47:125–146.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Bussard KM, Siracusa LD. Understanding mitochondrial polymorphisms in cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(22):6051–6059.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123(3191):309–314.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Kujoth G, et al. Mitochondrial DNA mutations, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in mammalian aging. Science. 2005;309(5733):481–484.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Kujoth G, et al. The role of mitochondrial DNA mutations in mammalian aging. PLoS Genet. 2007;3(2):e24.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Vermulst M, et al. Mitochondrial point mutations do not limit the natural lifespan of mice. Nat Genet. 2007;39(4):540–543.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Schriner S, et al. Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria. Science. 2005;308(5730):1909–1911.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Liu X, et al. Evolutionary conservation of the clk-1-dependent mechanism of longevity: loss of mclk1 increases cellular fitness and lifespan in mice. Genes Dev. 2005;19(20):2424–2434.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Lakowski B, Hekimi S. Determination of life-span in Caenorhabditis elegans by four clock genes. Science. 1996;272(5264):1010–1013.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Copeland JM, et al. Extension of Drosophila life span by RNAi of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Curr Biol. 2009;19(19):1591–1598.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Wong A, et al. Mutations in the clk-1 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans affect developmental and behavioral timing. Genetics. 1995;139(3):1247–1259.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Yen K, Mobbs CV. Evidence for only two independent pathways for decreasing senescence in Caenorhabditis elegans. Age (Dordr). 2010;32(1):39–49.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Munkácsy E, et al. DLK-1, SEK-3 and PMK-3 are required for the life extension induced by mitochondrial bioenergetic disruption in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(7):e1006133.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Wu Z, et al. Mitochondrial unfolded protein response transcription factor ATFS-1 promotes longevity in a long-lived mitochondrial mutant through activation of stress response pathways. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):147.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Mengel-From J, et al. Mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood cells declines with age and is associated with general health among elderly. Hum Genet. 2014;133(9):1149–1159.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Klein HU, et al. Characterization of mitochondrial DNA quantity and quality in the human aged and Alzheimer’s disease brain. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):75.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Singh LN, et al. MitoScape: a big-data, machine-learning platform for obtaining mitochondrial DNA from next-generation sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(11):e1009594.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Scheckhuber CQ, et al. Reducing mitochondrial fission results in increased life span and fitness of two fungal ageing models. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(1):99–105.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Chaudhari SN, Kipreos ET. Increased mitochondrial fusion allows the survival of older animals in diverse C. elegans longevity pathways. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):182.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Rana A, et al. Promoting Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission in midlife prolongs healthy lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):448.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Finley LW, et al. Skeletal muscle transcriptional coactivator PGC-1α mediates mitochondrial, but not metabolic, changes during calorie restriction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(8):2931–2936.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Wang X, et al. Impaired balance of mitochondrial fission and fusion in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2009;29(28):9090–9103.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature. 2004;431(7011):931–945.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Omenn GS. Reflections on the HUPO human proteome project, the flagship project of the human proteome organization, at 10 years. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2021;20:100062.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Saghatelian A, Couso JP. Discovery and characterization of smORF-encoded bioactive polypeptides. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11(12):909–916.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Martinez TF, et al. Accurate annotation of human protein-coding small open reading frames. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16(4):458–468.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Tharakan R, Sawa A. Minireview: Novel micropeptide discovery by proteomics and deep sequencing methods. Front Genet. 2021;12:651485.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Michel AM, et al. GWIPS-viz: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(d1):D823–D830.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Ji Z. RibORF: identifying genome-wide translated open reading frames using ribosome profiling. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2018;124(1):e67.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Zhang S, et al. Mitochondrial peptide BRAWNIN is essential for vertebrate respiratory complex III assembly. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1312.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Kim SJ, et al. Mitochondrial-derived peptides in aging and age-related diseases. GeroScience. 2021;43(3):1113–1121.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Mouilleron H, et al. Death of a dogma: eukaryotic mRNAs can code for more than one protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(1):14–23.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Rathore A, et al. MIEF1 microprotein regulates mitochondrial translation. Biochemistry. 2018;57(38):5564–5575.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Cloutier P, et al. Upstream ORF-encoded ASDURF is a novel prefoldin-like subunit of the PAQosome. J Proteome Res. 2020;19(1):18–27.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Eltermaa M, et al. Genetic variants in humanin nuclear isoform gene regions show no association with coronary artery disease. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):759.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Onofre C, et al. Expression of human Hemojuvelin (HJV) is tightly regulated by two upstream open reading frames in HJV mRNA that respond to iron overload in hepatic cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35(8):1376–1389.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Huang N, et al. An upstream open reading frame in phosphatase and tensin homolog encodes a circuit breaker of lactate metabolism. Cell Metab. 2021;33(2):454.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Hardy S, et al. Magnesium-sensitive upstream ORF controls PRL phosphatase expression to mediate energy metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(8):2925–2934.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Koh M, et al. A short ORF-encoded transcriptional regulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(4):e2021943118.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Ge Q, et al. Micropeptide ASAP encoded by LINC00467 promotes colorectal cancer progression by directly modulating ATP synthase activity. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(22):e152911.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Guo B, et al. Micropeptide CIP2A-BP encoded by LINC00665 inhibits triple-negative breast cancer progression. EMBO J. 2020;39(1):e102190.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Sberro H, et al. Large-scale analyses of human microbiomes reveal thousands of small, novel genes. Cell. 2019;178(5):1245–1259.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Jiang C, et al. The gut microbiota and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(1):1–15.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Lee C, et al. Humanin: a harbinger of mitochondrial-derived peptides? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013;24(5):222–228.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Hashimoto Y, et al. A rescue factor abolishing neuronal cell death by a wide spectrum of familial Alzheimer’s disease genes and Abeta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(11):6336–6341.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Hashimoto Y, et al. Mechanisms of neuroprotection by a novel rescue factor humanin from Swedish mutant amyloid precursor protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283(2):460–468.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Ikonen M, et al. Interaction between the Alzheimer’s survival peptide humanin and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 regulates cell survival and apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(22):13042–13047.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Guo B, et al. Humanin peptide suppresses apoptosis by interfering with Bax activation. Nature. 2003;423(6938):456–461.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Hashimoto Y, et al. Humanin inhibits neuronal cell death by interacting with a cytokine receptor complex or complexes involving CNTF receptor alpha/WSX-1/gp130. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20(12):2864–2873.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Kim SJ, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide humanin activates the ERK1/2, AKT, and STAT3 signaling pathways and has age-dependent signaling differences in the hippocampus. Oncotarget. 2016;7(30):46899–46912.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Cobb LJ, et al. Naturally occurring mitochondrial-derived peptides are age-dependent regulators of apoptosis, insulin sensitivity, and inflammatory markers. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(4):796–809.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Nashine S, et al. Characterizing the protective effects of SHLP2, a mitochondrial-derived peptide, in macular degeneration. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15175.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Okada AK, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptides, humaninS14G and small humanin-like Peptide 2, exhibit chaperone-like activity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7802.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Lee C, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Metab. 2015;21(3):443–454.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Lee C, et al. MOTS-c: a novel mitochondrial-derived peptide regulating muscle and fat metabolism. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;100:182–187.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Reynolds JC, et al. MOTS-c is an exercise-induced mitochondrial-encoded regulator of age-dependent physical decline and muscle homeostasis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):470.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Kim KH, et al. The mitochondrial-encoded peptide MOTS-c translocates to the nucleus to regulate nuclear gene expression in response to metabolic stress. Cell Metab. 2018;28(3):516–524.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Kim S-J, et al. MOTS-c: an equal opportunity insulin sensitizer. J Mol Med (Berl). 2019;97(4):487–490.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Mercer TR, et al. The human mitochondrial transcriptome. Cell. 2011;146(4):645–658.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. Miller B, et al. Peptides derived from small mitochondrial open reading frames: genomic, biological, and therapeutic implications. Exp Cell Res. 2020;393(2):112056.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Rooney JP, et al. PCR based determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number in multiple species. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1241:23–38.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Bianconi E, et al. An estimation of the number of cells in the human body. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40(6):463–471.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Miller B, et al. Comparing the utility of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA to adjust for genetic ancestry in association studies. Cells. 2019;8(4):E306.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Novembre J, et al. Genes mirror geography within Europe. Nature. 2008;456(7218):98–101.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Biffi A, et al. Principal-component analysis for assessment of population stratification in mitochondrial medical genetics. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86(6):904–917.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. van Oven M, Kayser M. Updated comprehensive phylogenetic tree of global human mitochondrial DNA variation. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(2):386–394.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  76. McRae AF, et al. Power and SNP tagging in whole mitochondrial genome association studies. Genome Res. 2008;18(6):911–917.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Yonova-Doing E, et al. An atlas of mitochondrial DNA genotype-phenotype associations in the UK Biobank. Nat Genet. 2021;53(7):982–993.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Kraja AT, et al. Associations of mitochondrial and nuclear mitochondrial variants and genes with seven metabolic traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(1):112–138.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Hudson G, et al. Two-stage association study and meta-analysis of mitochondrial DNA variants in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2013;80(22):2042–2048.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Lakatos A, et al. Association between mitochondrial DNA variations and Alzheimer’s disease in the ADNI cohort. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(8):1355–1363.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Miller B, et al. A mitochondrial genome-wide association study of cataract in a Latino population. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(6):25.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Hussain SA, et al. Adapting CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeting mitochondrial genome. Front Genet. 2021;12:627050.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Fang H, et al. mtDNA Haplogroup N9a increases the risk of type 2 diabetes by altering mitochondrial function and intracellular mitochondrial signals. Diabetes. 2018;67(7):1441–1453.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Khan SM, et al. Alzheimer’s disease cybrids replicate beta-amyloid abnormalities through cell death pathways. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(2):148–155.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Chin RM, et al. Optimized mitochondrial targeting of proteins encoded by modified mRNAs rescues cells harboring mutations in mtATP6. Cell Rep. 2018;22(11):2818–2826.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Zempo H, et al. A pro-diabetogenic mtDNA polymorphism in the mitochondrial-derived peptide, MOTS-c. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(2):1692–1717.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Yen K, et al. Humanin prevents age-related cognitive decline in mice and is associated with improved cognitive age in humans. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Muzumdar RH, et al. Humanin: a novel central regulator of peripheral insulin action. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6334.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. D’Souza RF, et al. Increased expression of the mitochondrial derived peptide, MOTS-c, in skeletal muscle of healthy aging men is associated with myofiber composition. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(6):5244–5258.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Ramanjaneya M, et al. Mitochondrial-derived peptides are down regulated in diabetes subjects. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:331.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Du C, et al. Circulating MOTS-c levels are decreased in obese male children and adolescents and associated with insulin resistance. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19(6):1058–1064.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Kumagai H, et al. The MOTS-c K14Q polymorphism in the mtDNA is associated with muscle fiber composition and muscular performance. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2022;1866(2):130048.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Kumagai H, et al. MOTS-c reduces myostatin and muscle atrophy signaling. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021;320(4):E680–E690.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Widlansky ME, et al. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(7):1149–1160.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Qin Q, et al. Downregulation of circulating MOTS-c levels in patients with coronary endothelial dysfunction. Int J Cardiol. 2018;254:23–27.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Widmer RJ, et al. Circulating humanin levels are associated with preserved coronary endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304(3):H393–H397.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Ikonomidis I, et al. β-Amyloid and mitochondrial-derived peptide-c are additive predictors of adverse outcome to high-on-treatment platelet reactivity in type 2 diabetics with revascularized coronary artery disease. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;49(3):365–376.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. Cai H, et al. Circulating humanin is lower in coronary artery disease and is a prognostic biomarker for major cardiac events in humans. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2022;1866(1):130010.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. Wei M, et al. Mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c attenuates vascular calcification and secondary myocardial remodeling via adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase signaling pathway. Cardiorenal Med. 2020;10(1):42–50.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  100. Wang X, et al. Humanin prevents high glucose-induced monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells by targeting KLF2. Mol Immunol. 2018;101:245–250.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Zarate SC, et al. Humanin, a mitochondrial-derived peptide released by astrocytes, prevents synapse loss in hippocampal neurons. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:123.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. Niikura T, et al. A humanin derivative reduces amyloid beta accumulation and ameliorates memory deficit in triple transgenic mice. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16259.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  103. Zhang W, et al. S14G-humanin improves cognitive deficits and reduces amyloid pathology in the middle-aged APPswe/PS1dE9 mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012;100(3):361–369.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  104. Yen K, et al. The mitochondrial derived peptide humanin is a regulator of lifespan and healthspan. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(12):11185–11199.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  105. Xiao J, et al. Low circulating levels of the mitochondrial-peptide hormone SHLP2: novel biomarker for prostate cancer risk. Oncotarget. 2017;8(55):94900–94909.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Cohen P. New role for the mitochondrial peptide humanin: protective agent against chemotherapy-induced side effects. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):dju006.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. Eriksson E, et al. Protective role of humanin on bortezomib-induced bone growth impairment in anticancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(3):djt459.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  108. Jia Y, et al. The effects of humanin and its analogues on male germ cell apoptosis induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. Apoptosis. 2015;20(4):551–561.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  109. Lue Y, et al. The potent humanin analogue (HNG) protects germ cells and leucocytes while enhancing chemotherapy-induced suppression of cancer metastases in male mice. Endocrinology. 2015;156(12):4511–4521.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  110. Emser SV, et al. Extension of mitogenome enrichment based on single long-range PCR: mtDNAs and putative mitochondrial-derived peptides of five rodent hibernators. Front Genet. 2021;12:685806.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  111. Lee C, et al. IGF-I regulates the age-dependent signaling peptide humanin. Aging Cell. 2014;13(5):958–961.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  112. Gong Z, et al. Humanin is an endogenous activator of chaperone-mediated autophagy. J Cell Biol. 2017;217(2):635–647.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  113. Kim SJ, et al. Humanin-induced autophagy plays important roles in skeletal muscle function and lifespan extension. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2022;1866(1):130017.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  114. Han K, et al. S14G-humanin alleviates insulin resistance and increases autophagy in neurons of APP/PS1 transgenic mouse. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(4):3111–3117.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  115. Yen K, et al. Humanin prevents age-related cognitive decline in mice and is associated with improved cognitive age in humans. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14212.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  116. Fuku N, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c: a player in exceptional longevity? Aging Cell. 2015;14(6):921–923.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  117. Kim S-J, et al. Mitochondrial peptides modulate mitochondrial function during cellular senescence. Aging (Albany NY). 2018;10(6):1239–1256.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  118. Pearce SF, et al. Mitoribosome profiling from human cell culture: a high resolution view of mitochondrial translation. Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2192:183–196.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  119. Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(3):203–222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  120. Hashimoto Y, et al. Identification of soluble WSX-1 not as a dominant-negative but as an alternative functional subunit of a receptor for an anti-Alzheimer’s disease rescue factor Humanin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009;389(1):95–99.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  121. Ying G, et al. Humanin, a newly identified neuroprotective factor, uses the G protein-coupled formylpeptide receptor-like-1 as a functional receptor. J Immunol. 2004;172(11):7078–7085.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  122. Romeo M, et al. Humanin specifically interacts with amyloid-β oligomers and counteracts their in vivo toxicity. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(3):857–871.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  123. Guo F, et al. [Gly(14)]-humanin rescues long-term potentiation from amyloid beta protein-induced impairment in the rat hippocampal CA1 region in vivo. Synapse. 2010;64(1):83–91.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  124. Tajima H, et al. A humanin derivative, S14G-HN, prevents amyloid-beta-induced memory impairment in mice. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79(5):714–723.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  125. Yuan L, et al. [Gly14]-humanin protects against amyloid β peptide-induced impairment of spatial learning and memory in rats. Neurosci Bull. 2016;32(4):374–382.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  126. Gong Z, et al. Cardio-protective role of Humanin in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2022;1866(2):130066.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  127. Bachar AR, et al. Humanin is expressed in human vascular walls and has a cytoprotective effect against oxidized LDL-induced oxidative stress. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;88(2):360–366.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  128. Muzumdar RH, et al. Acute humanin therapy attenuates myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(10):1940–1948.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  129. Oh YK, et al. Humanin preserves endothelial function and prevents atherosclerotic plaque progression in hypercholesterolemic ApoE deficient mice. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219(1):65–73.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  130. Sequeira IR, et al. Plasma mitochondrial derived peptides MOTS-c and SHLP2 positively associate with android and liver fat in people without diabetes. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2021;1865(11):129991.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  131. Kim SJ, et al. Subcellular fractionation for ERK activation upon mitochondrial-derived peptide treatment. J Vis Exp. 2017;(127):56496.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  132. Yu WD, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes homeostasis in aged human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Mitochondrion. 2021;58:135–146.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  133. Lu H, et al. MOTS-c peptide regulates adipose homeostasis to prevent ovariectomy-induced metabolic dysfunction. J Mol Med (Berl). 2019;97(4):473–485.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  134. Zhai D, et al. MOTS-c peptide increases survival and decreases bacterial load in mice infected with MRSA. Mol Immunol. 2017;92:151–160.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  135. Shen C, et al. The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c attenuates oxidative stress injury and the inflammatory response of H9c2 cells through the Nrf2/ARE and NF-kappaB pathways. [published online December 2, 2021]. Cardiovasc Eng Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-021-00589-w.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  136. Liu C, et al. Reduced skeletal muscle expression of mitochondrial-derived peptides humanin and MOTS-C and Nrf2 in chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(5):F1122–F1131.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  137. Woodhead JST, Merry TL. Mitochondrial-derived peptides and exercise. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2021;1865(12):130011.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  138. von Walden F, et al. Acute endurance exercise stimulates circulating levels of mitochondrial-derived peptides in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2021;131(3):1035–1042.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  139. Lu H, et al. Mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c increases adipose thermogenic activation to promote cold adaptation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):E2456.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (May 2, 2022): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Review Series

Aging

  • Epigenetics, DNA damage, and aging
    Carolina Soto-Palma et al.
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction in cell senescence and aging
    Satomi Miwa et al.
  • Connecting aging biology and inflammation in the omics era
    Keenan A. Walker et al.
  • Mitochondria-derived peptides in aging and healthspan
    Brendan Miller et al.
  • Cellular senescence: a key therapeutic target in aging and diseases
    Lei Zhang et al.
  • Metabolic changes in aging humans: current evidence and therapeutic strategies
    Allyson K. Palmer et al.
  • The Achilles’ heel of cancer survivors: fundamentals of accelerated cellular senescence
    Shameel Shafqat et al.
  • Biological aging processes underlying cognitive decline and neurodegenerative disease
    Mitzi M. Gonzales et al.

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Mitochondria and aging
  • Microproteins
  • Mitochondrial microproteins (mitochondria-derived peptides)
  • Human mitochondrial genomics
  • MDPs in age-related diseases
  • MDPs in longevity
  • The future of MDP science
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts