Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
A systematic analysis of the human immune response to Plasmodium vivax
Florian A. Bach, … , Simon J. Draper, Philip J. Spence
Florian A. Bach, … , Simon J. Draper, Philip J. Spence
Published August 24, 2023
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(20):e152463. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI152463.
View: Text | PDF
Clinical Research and Public Health Immunology Infectious disease Article has an altmetric score of 4

A systematic analysis of the human immune response to Plasmodium vivax

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND The biology of Plasmodium vivax is markedly different from that of P. falciparum; how this shapes the immune response to infection remains unclear. To address this shortfall, we inoculated human volunteers with a clonal field isolate of P. vivax and tracked their response through infection and convalescence.METHODS Participants were injected intravenously with blood-stage parasites and infection dynamics were tracked in real time by quantitative PCR. Whole blood samples were used for high dimensional protein analysis, RNA sequencing, and cytometry by time of flight, and temporal changes in the host response to P. vivax were quantified by linear regression. Comparative analyses with P. falciparum were then undertaken using analogous data sets derived from prior controlled human malaria infection studies.RESULTS P. vivax rapidly induced a type I inflammatory response that coincided with hallmark features of clinical malaria. This acute-phase response shared remarkable overlap with that induced by P. falciparum but was significantly elevated (at RNA and protein levels), leading to an increased incidence of pyrexia. In contrast, T cell activation and terminal differentiation were significantly increased in volunteers infected with P. falciparum. Heterogeneous CD4+ T cells were found to dominate this adaptive response and phenotypic analysis revealed unexpected features normally associated with cytotoxicity and autoinflammatory disease.CONCLUSION P. vivax triggers increased systemic interferon signaling (cf P. falciparum), which likely explains its reduced pyrogenic threshold. In contrast, P. falciparum drives T cell activation far in excess of P. vivax, which may partially explain why falciparum malaria more frequently causes severe disease.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03797989.FUNDING The European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, the Wellcome Trust, and the Royal Society.

Authors

Florian A. Bach, Diana Muñoz Sandoval, Michalina Mazurczyk, Yrene Themistocleous, Thomas A. Rawlinson, Adam C. Harding, Alison Kemp, Sarah E. Silk, Jordan R. Barrett, Nick J. Edwards, Alasdair Ivens, Julian C. Rayner, Angela M. Minassian, Giorgio Napolitani, Simon J. Draper, Philip J. Spence

×

Figure 7

The host response is shaped by parasite species.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
The host response is shaped by parasite species.
(A) The maximum circula...
(A) The maximum circulating parasite density in each volunteer during the VAC063/VAC063C CHMI trials (Plasmodium falciparum) and the VAC069A study (Plasmodium vivax). Significance between parasite species was assessed by 2-tailed Wilcoxon’s rank-sum exact test. (B) The total number of circulating lymphocytes through infection and convalescence; the memory time point is 90 days after challenge. In A and B, box (median and IQR) and whisker (1.5× upper or lower IQR) plots are shown with outliers as dots; n = 13 for P. falciparum and n = 6 for P. vivax (except at T6, where n = 3 for P. falciparum). (C–F) Whole blood RNA sequencing was performed identically during the VAC063/VAC063C and VAC069A studies and lists of differentially expressed genes (Padj < 0.05 and fold-change > 1.5) were combined for GO analysis at diagnosis and T6. Importantly, for every GO term the fraction of associated genes derived from each volunteer cohort was retained. (C and E) Each GO term is represented by a single point and these are positioned according to the proportion of genes that were differentially expressed in volunteers infected with P. falciparum or P. vivax. The gray circle represents a 65% threshold that needed to be crossed to call a GO term as predominantly derived from 1 volunteer cohort; beyond this threshold GO terms are colored by enrichment as shown in A. (D and F) ClueGO networks reveal the functional organization of GO terms at diagnosis (D) and T6 (F); nodes are color-coded by enrichment (shared GO terms are shown in gray) and each of the major functional groups is labeled with a representative GO term. In C and D, n = 13 for P. falciparum and n = 6 for P. vivax and in E and F, n = 3 and 6, respectively.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 7 X users
21 readers on Mendeley
See more details