Calmodulin (CaM) plays critical roles in cardiomyocytes, regulating Na+ (NaV) and L-type Ca2+ channels (LTCCs). LTCC dysregulation by mutant CaMs has been implicated in action potential duration (APD) prolongation and arrhythmogenic long QT (LQT) syndrome. Intriguingly, D96V-CaM prolongs APD more than other LQT-associated CaMs despite inducing comparable levels of LTCC dysfunction, suggesting dysregulation of other depolarizing channels. Here, we provide evidence implicating NaV dysregulation within transverse (T) tubules in D96V-CaM–associated arrhythmias. D96V-CaM induced a proarrhythmic late Na+ current (INa) by impairing inactivation of NaV1.6, but not the predominant cardiac NaV isoform NaV1.5. We investigated arrhythmia mechanisms using mice with cardiac-specific expression of D96V-CaM (cD96V). Super-resolution microscopy revealed close proximity of NaV1.6 and RyR2 within T-tubules. NaV1.6 density within these regions increased in cD96V relative to WT mice. Consistent with NaV1.6 dysregulation by D96V-CaM in these regions, we observed increased late NaV activity in T-tubules. The resulting late INa promoted aberrant Ca2+ release and prolonged APD in myocytes, leading to LQT and ventricular tachycardia in vivo. Cardiac-specific NaV1.6 KO protected cD96V mice from increased T-tubular late NaV activity and its arrhythmogenic consequences. In summary, we demonstrate that D96V-CaM promoted arrhythmias by dysregulating LTCCs and NaV1.6 within T-tubules and thereby facilitating aberrant Ca2+ release.
Mikhail Tarasov, Heather L. Struckman, Yusuf Olgar, Alec Miller, Mustafa Demirtas, Vladimir Bogdanov, Radmila Terentyeva, Andrew M. Soltisz, Xiaolei Meng, Dennison Min, Galina Sakuta, Izabella Dunlap, Antonia D. Duran, Mark P. Foster, Jonathan P. Davis, Dmitry Terentyev, Sándor Györke, Rengasayee Veeraraghavan, Przemysław B. Radwański
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,409 | 165 |
185 | 50 | |
Figure | 484 | 1 |
Supplemental data | 157 | 14 |
Citation downloads | 102 | 0 |
Totals | 2,337 | 230 |
Total Views | 2,567 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.