Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Age-specific effects of vaccine egg adaptation and immune priming on A(H3N2) antibody responses following influenza vaccination
Feng Liu, … , Bin Zhou, Min Z. Levine
Feng Liu, … , Bin Zhou, Min Z. Levine
Published March 9, 2021
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2021;131(8):e146138. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI146138.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Infectious disease Article has an altmetric score of 2

Age-specific effects of vaccine egg adaptation and immune priming on A(H3N2) antibody responses following influenza vaccination

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

A(H3N2) influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) was low during the 2016–19 seasons and varied by age. We analyzed neutralizing antibody responses to egg- and cell-propagated A(H3N2) vaccine and circulating viruses following vaccination in 375 individuals (aged 7 months to 82 years) across all vaccine-eligible age groups in 3 influenza seasons. Antibody responses to cell- versus egg-propagated vaccine viruses were significantly reduced due to the egg-adapted changes T160K, D225G, and L194P in the vaccine hemagglutinins. Vaccine egg adaptation had a differential impact on antibody responses across the different age groups. Immunologically naive children immunized with egg-adapted vaccines mostly mounted antibodies targeting egg-adapted epitopes, whereas those previously primed with infection produced broader responses even when vaccinated with egg-based vaccines. In the elderly, repeated boosts of vaccine egg-adapted epitopes significantly reduced antibody responses to the WT cell–grown viruses. Analysis with reverse genetic viruses suggested that the response to each egg-adapted substitution varied by age. No differences in antibody responses were observed between male and female vaccinees. Here, the combination of age-specific responses to vaccine egg-adapted substitutions, diverse host immune priming histories, and virus antigenic drift affected antibody responses following vaccination and may have led to the low and variable VE against A(H3N2) viruses across different age groups.

Authors

Feng Liu, F. Liaini Gross, Stacie N. Jefferson, Crystal Holiday, Yaohui Bai, Li Wang, Bin Zhou, Min Z. Levine

×

Figure 4

Neutralizing antibody responses to egg- versus cell-propagated A(H3N2) WT vaccine viruses among primed and unprimed young children (<3 years old) in 3 influenza seasons (2016–19).

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Neutralizing antibody responses to egg- versus cell-propagated A(H3N2) W...
Young children (<3 years old) in each season were grouped according to the following pre-vaccination MN titers: “unprimed” (MN <40 against both egg- and cell-propagated A(H3N2) WT vaccine viruses) versus “primed” (MN ≥40 against cell-propagated WT vaccine virus). (A and B) Antibody responses of unprimed (A) and primed (B) children in the 2018–19 season. (C and D) Antibody responses of unprimed (C) and primed (D) children in the 2017–18 season. (E and F) Antibody responses of unprimed (E) and primed (F) children in the 2016–17 season. The y axis shows MN antibody titers for each individual. Bars reflect the MN GMTs (95% CI) against egg-propagated (solid circles) and cell-propagated (open circles) vaccine viruses. Dashed lines denote a MN titer of 40. P values are indicated where there was statistical significance (P < 0.05). P values shown at the top of the graphs represent a comparison of titers against egg- versus cell-propagated vaccine viruses (Wilcoxon matched-pairs, signed-rank test). P values shown on the side of the graphs are a comparison of post-vaccination MN GMTs between unprimed and primed children in each season (Mann-Whitney U unpaired t test). **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, comparing post-vaccination GMTs with egg virus in unprimed versus primed children. ††P < 0.01 and ††††P < 0.0001, comparing post-vaccination GMTs with cell virus in unprimed versus primed children.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 3 X users
20 readers on Mendeley
See more details