Advertisement
Research ArticleImmunologyInflammation Free access | 10.1172/JCI128164
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Liu, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Perego, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Xiao, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by He, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Fu, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by He, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Liu, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Li, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Tang, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Li, X. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Yuan, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Zhou, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Wu, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Jia, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Cui, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Worthen, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Jensen, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Gabrilovich, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Disease of the Ministry of Education, Department of Immunology, School of Basic Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
2Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
3Institute of Human Virology, Zhongshan School of Medicine,
4First Affiliated Hospital, and
5Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (SYSU), Guangzhou, China.
6Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Centre, Guangzhou, China.
7Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
8Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Find articles by Zhou, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Authorship note: DIG and JZ are co–senior authors.
Published September 4, 2019 - More info
Recent work demonstrated a role for myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the antimicrobial response in newborns, but the signals guiding their differentiation remained unknown. In this issue of the JCI, Liu et al. demonstrate that lactoferrin (LF) converts newborn neutrophils and monocytes to MDSCs via the low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein-2 (LRP2) receptor and NF-κB activation. Due to their strong antimicrobial activity, adoptive transfer of MDSCs generated by in vitro culture with LF prolonged the survival of newborn mice with necrotizing enterocolitis, a severe pathology in preterm infants. These findings indicate a surprising protective role of MDSCs in newborns and demonstrate the potential of MDSC therapy for the treatment of infants with diseases associated with deregulated inflammation.
Rebekka Weber, Viktor Umansky
Inflammation plays a critical role in the development of severe neonatal morbidities. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) were recently implicated in the regulation of immune responses in newborns. Here, we report that the presence of MDSCs and their functional activity in infants are closely associated with the maturity of newborns and the presence of lactoferrin (LF) in serum. Low amounts of MDSCs at birth predicted the development of severe pathology in preterm infants — necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). In vitro treatment of newborn neutrophils and monocytes with LF converted these cells to MDSCs via the LRP2 receptor and activation of the NF-κB transcription factor. Decrease in the expression of LRP2 was responsible for the loss of sensitivity of adult myeloid cells to LF. LF-induced MDSCs (LF-MDSCs) were effective in the treatment of newborn mice with NEC, acting by blocking inflammation, resulting in increased survival. LF-MDSCs were more effective than treatment with LF protein alone. In addition to affecting NEC, LF-MDSCs demonstrated potent ability to control ovalbumin-induced (OVA-induced) lung inflammation, dextran sulfate sodium–induced (DSS-induced) colitis, and concanavalin A–induced (ConA-induced) hepatitis. These results suggest that cell therapy with LF-MDSCs may provide potent therapeutic benefits in infants with various pathological conditions associated with dysregulated inflammation.
Early life, especially the first weeks after birth, is characterized by high vulnerability to infection and inflammation-mediated tissue injury. Dysregulation of inflammatory responses and host-microbial interactions play a central role in the development of the most common and severe neonatal morbidities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and sepsis. Together, these conditions contribute to over half of all deaths in extremely preterm infants and result in health care costs totaling over $4 billion annually in the US (1–4). NEC is the most common gastrointestinal emergency in preterm infants. The disorder is characterized by ischemic necrosis of the intestinal mucosa, severe bowel and systemic inflammation, invasion of enteric gas-forming organisms into the surrounding organs and systemic bloodstream, and dissection of gas into the bowel wall and portal venous system (5, 6). NEC develops in 7%–11% of infants born with birth weights of less than 1,500 g (7–9). The estimated mortality rate due to NEC is nearly 30% and approaches 100% among those with the most severe form, NEC totalis (10). The systemic inflammatory response that accompanies the acute intestinal injury in NEC adversely affects multiple organs, placing survivors at high risk for chronic deficits in lung and renal function and lifelong neurologic impairment (11–13).
Microbial pathogens are recognized by the innate immune system via diverse pattern recognition receptors that trigger proinflammatory and antimicrobial responses. However, the same response is also triggered by commensal organisms that colonize mucosal surfaces at birth and therefore must be regulated to avoid harmful inflammation. Among the factors involved in the regulation of immune responses in newborns (14), the prominent role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) became apparent in recent years. MDSCs have emerged as major regulators of inflammation and immune function in many pathological conditions. MDSCs consist of 2 groups of cells: polymorphonuclear (PMN-MDSCs) and monocytic (M-MDSCs) (15). These cells share characteristics with neutrophils (PMN) and monocytes (MON), but comparatively, display a relatively immature phenotype and morphology, increased levels of ROS and NO production, and higher expression of arginase (ARG1), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and a number of antiinflammatory cytokines, including IL-10 (16–18). A primary feature of MDSCs is their potent ability to inhibit immune responses, including those of T cells, B cells, and NK cells (19).
Until recently, MDSCs were exclusively associated with various pathologic conditions and pregnancy and were not known to be present in steady-state conditions in healthy individuals (19). Recent studies challenged this paradigm by demonstrating expansion of MDSCs in healthy neonates (20, 21). Similarly to MDSCs observed in chronic inflammation and cancer, these cells suppressed T cells in a contact-dependent manner and reduced IFN-γ production (20, 22, 23). PMN-MDSCs from cord blood (CB) directly inhibited Th1 response and induced Th2 response and Tregs (24). However, in contrast to MDSCs in cancer, MDSCs in newborn mice have enriched gene expression associated with greater antimicrobial activity and more potent ability to kill pathogens than PMNs or MONs obtained from adult mice (21). Neonatal PMN-MDSCs show reduced apoptosis and immunosuppressive activity upon infection with E. coli (25). S100A8/A9 proteins (one of the hallmarks of MDSCs) prevented death from septic shock in newborn mice (26). Evidence from humans showed that S100A9 secretion protected neonates from sepsis by regulating MyD88-dependent gene programs (27). In a recent study, we demonstrated that MDSCs could be an important component of natural host defense mechanisms in newborns (21). However, very preterm infants, not those born at or near term gestation, are at the greatest risk of infection and inflammatory injury. The clinical significance of MDSCs in preterm infants remains unclear. Our previous study demonstrated the important role of lactoferrin (LF) in the regulation of MDSCs in newborns (21). It opened an opportunity to leverage LF for the development of cell-based therapy of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. Here, we report that the presence of MDSCs and their functional activity in infants are closely associated with the maturity of newborns and predict the development of NEC in preterm infants. We found that, in mice and humans, LF was able to convert myeloid cells to potent MDSCs only in infants, but not in adults. Moreover, we identified the mechanism of this phenomenon. Finally, we demonstrated the ability of cell therapy with LF-induced MDSCs (LF-MDSCs) to control different pathological inflammatory conditions, including NEC, lung and colon inflammation, and hepatitis.
MDSCs in preterm infants. Analysis of peripheral blood (PB) was performed in parallel at 2 institutions, SYSU and CHOP, using the same phenotypic criteria and protocols. PMN-MDSCs in whole blood were evaluated as LOX-1+CD15+cells (28) and in PBMCs as low-density CD11b+HLA-DR–CD14–CD15+ cells (29). Infants that were born at full term (gestational age ≥37 weeks) had much higher proportions of LOX-1+CD15+ PMN-MDSCs in the PB than healthy adult volunteers. The amount of detectable PMN-MDSCs was significantly lower (P = 0.0007) in preterm infants (gestational age <37 weeks) (Figure 1A). Similar results were obtained when PMN-MDSCs were evaluated as low-density CD11b+HLA-DR–CD14–CD15+ cells (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI128164DS1). In contrast, no differences were observed in the total number of PMNs (Supplemental Figure 1B).
Clinical significance of MDSCs in infants. (A) Percentages of Lox1+CD15+ PMN-MDSCs in adults (AD) (n = 10), full-term (term) (n = 8), and preterm (n = 11) infants and patients with NEC (n = 14). Samples from NEC patients were collected at diagnosis (6 to 66 days after birth). In all other cases, samples were collected between days 1 and 4 after birth. (B) Percentages of PMN-MDSCs in infants who later developed or did not develop NEC. Samples were collected on days 1–3 (AD, n = 10; term, n = 8; preterm, no NEC, n = 51; preterm with NEC, n = 9) or 4–7 (term, n = 9; preterm, no NEC, n = 15; preterm with NEC, n = 5) after birth. (C) Correlation between proportion of PMN-MDSCs and body weight of infants at different age. (D) Functional activity of PMN-MDSCs from infants using T cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies. T cell proliferation was measured in triplicate with CFSE labeling (n = 4–8). (E) Expression of indicated genes in PMN-MDSCs measured by quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) (n = 4). (F) Antibacterial activity of PMN-MDSCs against E. coli (n = 4). (G) Concentrations of LF in plasma from adults and newborns determined by ELISA (n = 8–11). (H) Correlation between LF concentration (plasma) and proportion of PMN-MDSCs, body weight, or gestational age of newborns. (I) LF concentration in plasma of infants who were fed with breast milk (n = 13) or formula (n = 4). In all panels, individual results and mean ± SD are shown. P values were calculated using 2-sided Student’s t tests (E, F, and I) or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (A, B, D, and G). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001. For C and H, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated, and actual P values are shown.
Infants with NEC showed variable presence of PMN-MDSCs at the time of diagnosis (mostly between days 6 and 24 after birth) (Figure 1A). To assess the possible link between PMN-MDSCs and the development of NEC, we evaluated populations of PMN-MDSCs in preterm infants before the development of NEC. On days 1–3 after birth, preterm infants who eventually developed NEC had significantly (P = 0.002) lower numbers of PMN-MDSCs than preterm infants who did not develop NEC. These differences were not observed on days 4–7 after birth (Figure 1B). No differences in the total presence of PMN were observed between the groups (Supplemental Figure 1C). To exclude the possible influence of weight and gestational age on the association between PMN-MDSC level and the development of NEC (risk of NEC is inversely proportional to birth weight and gestational age), we evaluated samples, collected 1–3 days after birth, from infants with similar birth weights (1,700–2,000 g) and gestational ages (31–34 weeks). The proportion of PMN-MDSCs measured during the first days after birth in newborns that later developed NEC were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in infants who did not develop NEC (Supplemental Figure 1D). On days 1–3, there was a strong positive correlation (P = 0.004) between the birth weight of the infant and the presence of PMN-MDSCs. This correlation gradually disappeared with time (Figure 1C). No correlation with the total population of PMNs was observed (Supplemental Figure 1E).
PMN-MDSCs from healthy full-term infants had potent T cell–suppressive activity. This activity was substantially lower in preterm infants and even lower in patients with NEC (Figure 1D). Decreased ability of PMN-MDSCs to inhibit T cells in preterm infants was associated with lower expression of factors responsible for suppressive activity of MDSCs (21): S100A9, S100A8, ARG1, and NOS2 (Figure 1E). PMN-MDSCs from preterm infants had lower antibacterial activity than cells from full-term infants (Figure 1F).
We tested for the presence of M-MDSCs in PBMCs of infants based on a standard set of criteria CD11b+HLA-DR–CD14+CD15– cells (29). As was the case for PMN-MDSCs, the presence of M-MDSCs in infants was dramatically higher than in adults. In preterm infants, it was significantly lower (P = 0.0007) than in infants born full term (Supplemental Figure 2A). The ability of M-MDSCs to suppress T cell proliferation was substantially reduced in preterm infants and patients with NEC as compared with healthy full-term infants (Supplemental Figure 2B).
LF may be involved in the accumulation of MDSCs in newborn mice (21), but its significance in human infants remained unknown. We investigated the link between LF and PMN-MDSCs in infants. The amount of LF in the serum of preterm infants was significantly lower (P = 0.0002) than in full-term infants, and patients with NEC had less LF than preterm infants (Figure 1G). The presence of LF correlated closely with the level of PMN-MDSCs in infants (R = 0.71, P < 0.0001), but not with birth weight or gestational age (Figure 1H). The amount of LF in the serum of infants fed with formula (which contains considerably less LF than human milk) was dramatically lower than in infants who received breast milk (Figure 1I). These results indicate that both the presence and the activity of MDSCs were closely associated with the maturity of the infants and the level of LF in serum.
LF converts PMNs and MONs to MDSCs in newborns, but not in adults. We asked whether LF exposure alone could generate MDSCs. We used BM cells from mice of different ages: 2 weeks old and 6–8 weeks old. A previous study demonstrated that 2 weeks was the time when MDSC activity was lost, and adult 6- to 8-week-old mice don’t have detectable MDSC activity (21). BM cells were cultured for 48 hours with GM-CSF and LF. In the BM cells of 2-week-old mice, treatment with LF caused substantial expansion of both PMN and MON (Figure 2A). The effect was observed at a LF concentration of greater than 300 μg/ml (Supplemental Figure 3A). We found that treatment with LF did not affect T cell proliferation in response to stimulation with CD3/CD28 antibodies (Supplemental Figure 3B) and that the production of IFN-γ was moderately suppressed (Supplemental Figure 3C). LF converted PMN to highly immune-suppressive PMN-MDSCs (Figure 2B). Although the population of MON was relatively small, LF also enhanced suppressive activity of these cells (Supplemental Figure 3D). Twenty-four–hour treatment caused only a partial effect, and treatment lasting longer than 48 hours did not substantially increase the effect. Similar experiments were performed with mononuclear cells isolated from human CB. Two-day treatment with LF expanded the population of myeloid cells (Figure 2C and Supplemental Figure 3E) and converted them into cells with potent ability to suppress CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Figure 2D). We next tested to determine whether LF could affect PMNs isolated from human CB. Two-day treatment of CB PMN with LF, but not with PBS, resulted in the acquisition of potent suppressive activity (Supplemental Figure 3F). When similar experiments were performed with BM of 6- to 8-week-old mice or PBMCs isolated from healthy adult donors, no effect of LF on suppressive activity of myeloid cells was observed (Supplemental Figure 4, A–D).
LF converts PMN and MON to MDSCs. (A) BM cells from 2-week-old mice were treated with LF or vehicle (PBS) in the presence of GM-CSF for 2 days. Typical example of flow cytometry (left), absolute numbers, and proportion of PMN and MON (right) (n = 6). (B) Suppressive activity of LF-induced PMN-MDSCs against proliferation of OT-I–derived CD8+ T cells stimulated with cognate peptide (n = 6). Nonstimulated T cells (No-stim) and stimulated T cells without PMN (No-PMN) were used as controls. (C) Absolute numbers of CD11b+HLA-DR–/lo cells in PBS- or LF-treated CB mononuclear cells for 2 days (n = 6). (D) Suppression of LF-induced CD11b+HLA-DR–/lo cells from CB mononuclear cells against T cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies. T cell proliferation was measured in triplicate by CFSE dilution (n = 6). (E) PGE2 and NO in myeloid cells from PBS- or LF-treated CB mononuclear cells (n = 6). (F) Absolute numbers of myeloid cells in PBS- or LF-treated preterm infant–derived CB mononuclear cells for 2 days (n = 6). (G) CD11b+HLA-DR–/lo were sorted from PBS- or LF-treated preterm infant CB mononuclear cells, followed by incubation with T cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies. T cell proliferation was measured in triplicate by CFSE labeling (n = 6). In all plots, the results of individual experiments and mean ± SD are shown. P values were calculated using 2-sided Student’s t tests (A and C–G) or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (B). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
A previous study demonstrated that the suppressive activity of PMN-MDSCs in newborns was mediated via S100A8/A9 proteins and increased production of PGE2, whereas M-MDSCs were mediated via increased expression of Nos2 and production of NO (21). We found that treatment of newborn mouse BM cells with LF caused upregulation of the expression of S100a9 and S100a8 (Supplemental Figure 5A) and PGE2 production (Supplemental Figure 5B) in PMN-MDSCs and upregulation of S100a9, S100a8, and Nos2 (Supplemental Figure 5C) as well as increased NO production by M-MDSCs (Supplemental Figure 5D).
Similar results were obtained with myeloid cells (CD11b+HLA-DR–/lo) from CB obtained from full-term infants (Figure 2E and Supplemental Figure 5E). However, preterm infants more commonly develop inflammatory-mediated pathological conditions. We asked whether LF could cause expansion of myeloid cells and their conversion to MDSCs. Treatment of CB mononuclear cells from preterm infants caused expansion of suppressive M-MDSCs (Figure 2, F and G).
Potent antibacterial activity is a prominent feature of newborn MDSCs (21). We assessed the effect of LF on this activity of myeloid cells. BM cells from 2-week-old mice treated with LF for 48 hours demonstrated increased killing of E. coli and Candida albicans (Figure 3, A and B). Similar results were obtained with Cronobacter sakazakii, which can result in fatal infectious disease in infants (Figure 3C). Treatment with LF was associated with a substantial increase in phagocytic activity by MDSCs (Figure 3D). Similar experiments were performed with human myeloid cells from CB. LF induced substantial increases in both phagocytic activity (Figure 3E) and killing of pathogens (Figure 3F).
Antibacterial activity of LF-MDSCs. (A and B) Antibacterial activity of PMN-MDSCs or M-MDSCs isolated from PBS- or LF-treated newborn BM cells against E. coli (A, n = 6) or with C. albicans (B, n = 3–6). CFU were calculated after 24 hours of incubation. Medium (Med) alone was used as control. (C) Antibacterial activity of PMN-MDSCs and M-MDSCs against C. sakazakii (n = 6). (D) Phagocytosis of FITC-labeled pHrodo E. coli BioParticles (100 μg/1 × 105 cells for 90 minutes) by LF-induced mouse PMN-MDSCs or M-MDSCs. Typical example (left) and cumulative results (right) are shown (n = 6). (E) Phagocytosis of FITC-labeled pHrodo E. coli BioParticles by LF-induced human MDSCs from CB (n = 6). (F) Antibacterial activity of myeloid cells from PBS- or LF-treated CB mononuclear cells (n = 3–6). Medium alone was used as control. In all plots, the results of individual experiments and mean ± SD are shown. P values were calculated using 2-sided Student’s t tests (D and E) or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (A–C and F). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Mechanism of LF-MDSC expansion in newborns. Activation of NF-κB transcription factor is one of the major downstream targets of LF (30, 31). As expected, treatment of BM cells from 2-week-old mice with LF caused accumulation of p65 (RelA) in the nucleus, which was cancelled by the selective NF-κB inhibitor JSH23 (Figure 4A). Inhibition of NF-κB abrogated LF-induced accumulation (Figure 4B) and suppressive activity of PMN-MDSCs (Figure 4C) and M-MDSCs (Supplemental Figure 6A). It was associated with inhibition of major mechanisms of LF-mediated MDSC activation: production of S100A9 (Figure 4D), PGE2 (Figure 4E), and NO (Supplemental Figure 6B). Similar experiments were performed with myeloid cells from human CB. JSH23 cancelled LF-induced accumulation (Figure 4F), suppressive activity (Figure 4G) of myeloid cells, and upregulation of S100A9, PGE2, and NO (Supplemental Figure 6, C–E). We further evaluated the expression of phosphorylated NF-κB (p65) in myeloid cells isolated from infants. Preterm infants had significantly lower (P = 0.02) phosphorylated p65 levels than children born at term (Supplemental Figure 6F). Using siRNA, we silenced p65 in myeloid cells (Supplemental Figure 6G) and found that it abrogated LF-induced expansion of PMN- and M-MDSCs (Supplemental Figure 6H) and acquisition of suppressive activity by these cells (Supplemental Figure 6, I and J). All these results suggest that NF-κB may mediate acquisition of MDSC characteristics by LF in myeloid cells.
LF regulates MDSC function via NF-κB transcription factor. (A) Western blot of p65 in cytoplasm (Cyt) and nuclei (Nuc) in MDSCs from newborn mouse BM cells treated with LF and/or NF-κB inhibitor (JSH23, 2.5 μM). Control cells were treated with PBS. Typical example of 3 performed experiments is shown. (B) Typical example of staining (on the left) and absolute numbers of PMN-MDSCs and M-MDSCs (right) from mouse BM cells treated with LF and/or JSH23 (n = 6). (C) Suppressive activity of PMN-MDSCs (n = 6). T cell proliferation of OT-I CD8+ T cells stimulated with SIINFEKL was measured in triplicate by CFSE staining. Mean ± SD are shown. (D) The amount of S100A9 in PMN-MDSCs measured by ELISA. (E) The amount of PGE2 in PMN-MDSCs measured by ELISA (n = 6). (F) Absolute numbers of myeloid cells from LF-treated CB mononuclear cells in the presence or absence of JSH23 (n = 6). (G) Suppressive activity of myeloid cells from LF-treated CB cells in the presence or absence of JSH23. Effectors were CD4+ or CD8+ T cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies. Proliferation was measured in triplicate by CFSE staining. Results of individual experiments are shown (n = 4). In all plots, data represent mean ± SD. P values were calculated using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Our results indicate that myeloid cells in mouse and human newborns were sensitive to LF, whereas myeloid cells from adults were not. This raised the question, why does LF affect myeloid cells only in newborns? To address this question, we evaluated the expression of different receptors capable of binding LF: low density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 1 (LRP1), LRP2, intelectin 1 (ITLN1), and ITLN2. Myeloid cells in newborn mice demonstrated much stronger expression of Lrp2 than Itln1, Itlnb, or Lrp1 (Figure 5A). There was a drop in the expression of Lrp2 with age (Figure 5B), which translated to a substantial reduction of Lrp2 expression on the cell surface (Figure 5C). Similar expression patterns were observed in human myeloid cells from either PB or CB from infants (Figure 5D). In humans, myeloid cells in preterm infants had only slightly lower expression of ITLN1 and LRP2 than those in full-term infants. Adults and infants with NEC had much lower expression of LF receptors (Figure 5E).
The effect of LF on myeloid cells is mediated by the LRP2 receptor. (A) Expression of indicated LF receptors in MDSCs from 2-week-old mice measured by qRT-PCR (n = 6). (B) Expression of Lrp2 in myeloid cells from mice of different ages measured by qRT-PCR (n = 6). (C) Surface expression of Lrp2 on mouse myeloid cells measured by flow cytometry (n = 6). (D) Expression of LF receptors in myeloid cells from PB (PBMC) or CB in full-term infants measured by qRT-PCR (n = 5). (E) Expression of ITLN1 and LRP2 in myeloid cells from PB of adults (AD) and full-term, preterm, and NEC infants or CB measured by qRT-PCR (n = 5–6). (F–K) Silencing of Itln1 and Lrp2 in newborn mouse BM cells with shRNA or scramble shRNA (control) lentiviruses, followed by treatment with PBS or LF for 2 days. (F) The absolute numbers of PMN-MDSCs and M-MDSCs measured by flow cytometry (n = 4–6). (G) Suppressive activity of PMN-MDSCs. Effectors were OT-I CD8+ T cells stimulated with SIINFEKL. T cell proliferation was measured in triplicate by CFSE staining (n = 3). Upper panel shows typical example. Lower panel shows cumulative results. (H) Suppressive activity of M-MDSCs. Effectors were CD4+ or CD8+ T cells stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies (n = 3). Left panel shows typical example. Right panel shows cumulative results. (I) The amount of S100A9 in PMN-MDSCs measured by ELISA. (J) The amount of PGE2 in PMN-MDSCs measured by ELISA. (K) The amounts of nitrites in M-MDSCs measured by the Nitrite Assay Kit. (I–K, n = 6) Data represent individual results and mean ± SD. P values were calculated using 2-sided Student’ s t tests (F–K) or 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (A–E). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
To assess the contribution of individual LF receptors to the regulation of MDSC function by LF, we silenced Itln1 and Lrp2 in BM cells by using shRNA lentiviral vectors (Supplemental Figure 7A). Silencing of Itln1 did not affect LF-inducible expansion of myeloid cells from newborn mice, whereas Lrp2 shRNA completely abrogated it (Figure 5F and Supplemental Figure 7B). Downregulation of Lrp2, but not Itln1, abrogated LF-induced suppressive activity of PMN-MDSCs (Figure 5G) and M-MDSCs (Figure 5H). Downregulation of Lrp2 cancelled LF-induced increases in S100A9 (Figure 5I) and PGE2 (Figure 5J) in PMN-MDSCs. Increased production of NO was the main mechanism of LF-mediated M-MDSC activity. Silencing of Lrp2 abrogated this effect (Figure 5K). Thus, the loss of sensitivity to LF by myeloid cells in adults could result from the downregulation of LF receptor Lrp2.
As we described, myeloid cells from adults did not respond to LF (Supplemental Figure 4). We tested to determine whether upregulation of Lrp2 can sensitize these cells to the effect of LF. To address this question, we overexpressed Lrp2 in adult mouse myeloid cells by using synergistic activation mediator CRISPRa-Cas9 (lentiSAMv2) lentivirus and different gRNA primers. After selection of 1 sgRNA that provided the best overexpression (Supplemental Figure 8A), we tested the effect of LF on these adult myeloid cells. We found that overexpression of Lrp2 sensitized adult BM cells to the effects of LF. It manifested in increased cell numbers (Supplemental Figure 8B) and acquisition of immune-suppressive activity (Supplemental Figure 8, C and D). Previously, PPARα and PPARγ were implicated in the upregulation of Lrp2 expression (32). We tested the effect of PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone on the expression of Lrp2 in myeloid cells and their sensitivity to LF. It was found that rosiglitazone substantially increased the expression of Lrp2 on PMNs (Supplemental Figure 8E) and that treatment with LF converted those PMNs to suppressive PMN-MDSCs (Supplemental Figure 8F).
LF-MDSCs as the treatment of immune-mediated pathologies. Since a previous study implicated MDSCs in the control of NEC (21) and low levels of MDSCs correlated with the development of NEC in preterm infants (Figure 1B), we tested the possibility of using LF-MDSCs in the treatment of experimental NEC in mice. NEC was induced in 1- to 3-day-old mice. BM cells from 2-week-old mice (lacking immune-suppressive activity) were treated for 48 hours with LF or vehicle alone in the presence of GM-CSF. The total population of Gr-1+CD11b+ MDSCs was isolated and injected i.p. into mice with NEC on 2 occasions during a 2-day interval (Supplemental Figure 9A). Administration of vehicle- or LF-treated myeloid cells resulted in equal accumulation of donor Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid cells in the lamina propria of small intestine (Figure 6A). Intestinal inflammation was reduced in mice injected with vehicle-treated myeloid cells. However, this effect was substantially more pronounced after administration of LF-MDSCs (Figure 6B). Similar results were observed when intestinal permeability was assessed (Figure 6C). Injection of LF-MDSCs into mice with NEC significantly (P < 0.0001) prolonged survival, whereas injection of vehicle-treated myeloid cells did not provide a therapeutic benefit (P = 0.07) and was markedly (P = 0.03) less effective than injection of LF-MDSCs (Figure 6D). Injection of LF-MDSCs significantly reduced the bacterial load in the intestine and PB of mice with NEC; this effect was stronger than the effect observed with control myeloid cells (Figure 6E). If LF had such a strong effect on myeloid cells, then administration of LF alone without myeloid cells may be sufficient to cause a therapeutic effect in mice with NEC. To test this hypothesis, we compared, side by side, the effect of administering LF-MDSCs (twice within a 3-day interval) to daily injections of LF (at a maximum tolerated dose of 0.25 g/kg). Treatment with LF-MDSCs caused significantly (P < 0.05) stronger inhibition of inflammation (Figure 6F), intestinal permeability (Figure 6G), and improvement of mouse survival (Figure 6H) than injections of LF. Treatment of mice with LF-MDSCs was more efficient in reducing bacterial load in the intestine and blood of mice than treatment with LF alone (Figure 6I). Thus, LF-MDSCs were more effective for the treatment of NEC than LF alone.
Therapeutic effect of LF-MDSCs in the model of NEC. (A–E) NEC was induced in 1- to 3-day-old mice as described in Supplemental Figure 9A. (A) Proportion of CFSE-labeled donor CD11b+Gr1+ cells in small intestine lamina propria (SILP) of recipients (n = 6). (B) Representative H&E staining of mouse intestine after NEC induction with or without transfer of MDSCs (left). Inflammation scores were calculated based on the severity of NEC (right) (n = 8). (C) FITC-labeled dextran (FD70) (reflecting intestine permeability) after NEC induction with or without transfer of MDSCs (n = 6). (D) Survival of mice after NEC induction with or without transfer of MDSCs (n = 28 in each group). (E) Bacterial load in small intestine and blood after NEC induction with or without transfer of cells from PBS- or LF-treated BM cells (n = 6). (F–I) NEC was induced in 7-day-old mice treated with LF protein or transfer with LF-MDSCs. (F) Inflammation scores in the small intestine after NEC was induced and treated with LF protein or transfer of LF-MDSCs. (G) Detection of FITC-labeled dextran (FD70) after NEC was induced and treated with LF protein or transfer of LF-MDSCs (n = 6). (H) Survival of mice after NEC was induced and treated with LF protein or transfer of LF-MDSCs. Control, n = 40; NEC, n = 37; LF, n = 40; LF-MDSCs, n = 40. (I) Bacterial load in small intestine (left) and blood (right) after NEC was induced and treated with LF protein or transfer or LF-MDSCs (n = 6). In all plots, data represent mean ± SD. P values were calculated using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (A–C, E–G, and I). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Survival statistics were calculated using log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
Next, we tested the effect of the treatment with LF-MDSCs of different inflammatory conditions not limited to newborns. In these experiments, MDSCs were generated from 2-week-old mice with ex vivo treatment with LF as described above. Recipients were adult 6- to 8-week-old mice. In the model of OVA-induced lung inflammation (Supplemental Figure 9B), administration of LF-MDSCs caused a dramatic reduction in lung inflammation (Figure 7A) and decrease of serum IgE (Supplemental Figure 10A) as well as the cellular content of the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (Supplemental Figure 10B), proportion of eosinophils in BALF (Figure 7B) and concentration of IL-13 and IL-4 in BALF (Supplemental Figure 10C). In the model of dextran sulfate sodium–induced (DSS-induced) colitis (Supplemental Figure 9C), treatment with LF-MDSCs caused a dramatic reduction in inflammation (Figure 7C) and abrogated DSS-induced disease activity index (DAI) (Figure 7D), weight loss (Figure 7E), and decrease in length of colon (Supplemental Figure 10D). In the model of concanavalin A–induced (ConA-induced) hepatitis (Supplemental Figure 9D), LF-MDSCs reduced histological (Figure 7F) and enzymatic (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) signs of hepatitis (Figure 7G). Administration of LF-MDSCs substantially reduced the presence of IFN-γ–producing CD4+ T cells (Supplemental Figure 10E) and the expression of Ifng, Tnfa, and Il6 (Supplemental Figure 10F) in liver tissues. Thus, LF-treated MDSCs provided strong therapeutic benefits in the array of inflammation-mediated diseases.
Therapeutic effect of LF-MDSCs under inflammatory conditions. (A and B) Lung inflammation induced by OVA in 6- to 8-week-old adult mice. (A) Representative H&E images of lungs (left) and inflammation scores (right) after lung inflammation induction with or without transfer of LF-MDSCs (n = 6). (B) Percentages of eosinophils in BALF (n = 9). (C–E) DSS-induced model of colitis in 6- to 8-week-old adult mice. (C) H&E staining of colon (left) and histology scores (right) after DSS-induced colitis, with or without transfer of LF-MDSCs. n = 7. (D and E) DAI (D) and loss of body weight (E) after colitis induction with or without transfer of exogenous LF-MDSCs were measured (n = 6). (F and G) Model of ConA-induced hepatitis in 6- to 8-week-old adult mice. (F) H&E staining of liver after induction of hepatitis with or without transfer of exogenous LF-MDSCs. (G) Levels of ALT (left) and AST (right) in serum (n = 6). In all plots, data represent individual results and mean ± SD. P values were calculated using 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparisons test (A, B, C, and G). ***P < 0.001.
This study presents evidence that MDSCs in newborns can be leveraged to control clinically relevant conditions marked by severe inflammation and associated tissue injury. MDSCs are pathologically activated PMNs and MONs with potent immune-suppressive activity that are implicated in the regulation of immune responses in cancer, chronic infections and inflammation, autoimmune diseases, etc. (19). Recent reports challenged the prevailing view that MDSCs are not present in steady-state conditions. We and others have demonstrated the existence of potently immune-suppressive MDSCs in healthy mouse and human neonates (20–24). We hypothesized that MDSCs were evolutionarily developed to control potent inflammation associated with seeding of the gut microbiota during the first week of life. However, the clinical significance of MDSCs was uncertain. In this study, we found that the presence of PMN-MDSCs in the blood of preterm infants was substantially lower than that observed in full-term infants. Moreover, there was a strong negative correlation between the birth weight of the infants and the number of PMN-MDSCs, supporting the conclusion that the presence of MDSCs in newborns is inversely associated with their degree of immaturity. Importantly, the low number of PMN-MDSCs in preterm infants during the first 3 days of life was associated with the development of NEC at a later time. This suggests that MDSCs in newborns may have a clinical and potentially therapeutic significance. Late-onset infection (>72 hours after birth), NEC, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia are 3 of the most common and consequential sequalae of very preterm birth (<32 weeks’ gestation) (33). Pathological inflammation is one of the major features of each of these morbidities and plays a critical role in determining the long-term outcomes associated with these conditions. Therefore, control of inflammation, together with the treatment of infection, could provide clinical benefit for these high-risk infants.
Exclusive breast milk feeding has been shown to reduce the risk of developing NEC in very preterm infants. Recently, accumulation of PMN-MDSCs with suppressive activity was found in breast milk (34). This finding is consistent with the role of PMN-MDSCs in the control of NEC described in our study. Our previous work indicated that the appearance of MDSCs in newborns was transitory during the first 10–12 days of life and was caused by LF (21). Consistent with those findings, we observed a direct correlation between the amount of LF in serum and the frequency of PMN-MDSCs in neonates. LF, a member of the transferrin family of iron-binding glycoproteins, is a cell-secreted mediator that has potent immune-regulatory activity and is a key component of the mammalian innate response to infection (31, 35). Our study demonstrated that PMNs and MONs from human and mouse neonates could be converted by LF, within 48 hours, to MDSCs with potent immune-suppressive activity. Importantly, this effect was observed not only in full-term infants, but also in preterm neonates. LF induced potent antibacterial activity in MDSCs, which could be exploited in future therapeutic applications. Activation of NF-κB transcription factor is a known downstream target of LF (36, 37). We confirmed upregulation of NF-κB in neonate myeloid cells by LF and demonstrated that selective inhibition of NF-κB abrogated the effect of LF.
No effect of LF was observed in cells obtained from adult volunteers and 6- to 8-week-old adult mice. We investigated the possibility that differences in the effect of LF on myeloid cells in newborns and adults could be the result of changes in the expression of LF receptors. Several LF-binding receptors have been previously described. Low-density LRP1 and LRP2 are considered primary LF receptors (38). The receptors for LF expressed on activated human lymphocytes (39) can be internalized by human MONs (40) and murine peritoneal macrophages (41), but the nature of the receptors on these cells was not clearly defined (42). The mechanism of LF endocytosis appears to be clathrin mediated (43). Human LF is capable of interacting with soluble CD14 to prevent CD14-LPS interaction (42). We found that newborn mice express only 1 common receptor for LF, Lrp2, and that its expression gradually decreased with age. Similar changes were observed in human neonates. In addition to LRP2, however, another receptor normally expressed in intestinal epithelia, ITLN1 (44), was also expressed. Downregulation of these receptors using shRNA demonstrated that Lrp2 was directly responsible for the effect of LF on the generation of MDSCs. Importantly, although expression of LRP2 in preterm infants was lower than in full-term neonates, it was still substantially higher than in adults. It was consistent with the fact that LF had a potent effect on the generation of MDSCs in preterm neonate myeloid cells. Upregulation of Lrp2 either by genetic manipulation or by the treatment of cells with PPARγ agonist sensitized adult myeloid cells to the conversion to MDSCs by LF.
These results suggested that LF can be used for the generation of MDSCs in newborns. These MDSCs not only inhibit T cells and blunt inflammation, but also have potent antibacterial activity. We tested the possibility of therapeutic utility of LF-MDSCs in an experimental model of NEC. BM PMNs and MONs from 2-week-old mice were used. At this age, mice lack functional MDSCs. We found that treatment of mice with LF-MDSCs had potent antiinflammatory activity and substantially prolonged the life of the mice. Importantly, LF-MDSCs markedly decreased bacterial load in the intestine and blood of mice with NEC. Moreover, LF-MDSCs demonstrated potent antiinflammatory properties in other experimental models of inflammation more commonly observed outside the newborn period: autoimmune lung inflammation, colitis, and hepatitis. Considering that myeloid cells from adults can be made sensitive to LF after in vitro manipulation, this may open a possibility of therapeutic utility of LF-MDSCs, not only in neonates, but also in adults.
LF is present in human breast milk at a concentration of about 1 mg/mL. Very preterm infants typically ingest little or no milk during the first few days after birth, resulting in low intake of LF (45). Therefore, enteral supplementation with bovine LF has been proposed as a simple strategy to compensate for this deficiency. However, despite demonstration in several small trials that supplementing the enteral diet of very preterm infants with LF prevents infection and associated complications, a recent large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial failed to establish clinical benefit of LF supplementation in this population (46). In our study, LF-MDSCs had much more potent antiinflammatory and antbacterial activity than LF alone, when used to treat experimental NEC. In late-onset NEC (induction in 7-day-old mice), LF-MDSCs substantially prolonged the life of the mice, whereas LF injections had a much smaller effect. One of the possible explanations of this phenomenon is the observation that LF could convert myeloid cells to MDSCs at only a relatively high dose (>500 μg/ml). This dose is much higher than that present in the serum of even full-term infants (<30 μg/ml) and may not be achievable through enteral supplementation. Thus, our study revealed the clinical significance of MDSCs in preterm infants and demonstrated that ex vivo LF-MDSCs have potent antiinflammatory and antibacterial activity that may be a powerful therapeutic tool in the treatment of inflammatory-mediated morbidity associated with very low–weight infants.
Human subjects. Samples of PB were collected from healthy adults, full-term infants, preterm infants, and patients with NEC (1 to 24 days old). Samples of CB were collected from full-term infants and preterm infants. In China, samples were collected from 111 subjects from the First Affiliated Hospital of SYSU, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. In the US, samples were collected from 32 subjects (19 males and 13 females) at the CHOP and the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP) (Supplemental Table 1). Preterm infants were defined as those with gestational age of less than 37 weeks. Full-term infants were defined as those with gestational age between 37 and 42 weeks.
Mice. C57BL/6 and BALB/c mice were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of SYSU, and OT-1 mice (C57BL/6-Tg(TCRaTCRb)1100mjb) were provided by Hui Zhang (SYSU). C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Taconic Biosciences and OT-1 mice from the Jackson Laboratory. All mice were bred in pathogen-free facilities, and age-matched littermates were used as controls.
Reagents. Reagents are listed in Supplemental Table 2.
Isolation of cells. Human mononuclear cells were isolated from PB or CB by Ficoll gradient. Mouse BM cells were isolated as described (47). Isolation of cells from intestine was performed by digestion in 0.5 mg/ml collagenase I and 5 U/ml DNase for 40 minutes after removal of intestinal epithelial cells. Leukocytes from lamina propria were enriched by a 40%/80% Percoll gradient (48). For all samples, red blood cells were lysed using ACK buffer, and cell suspensions from all tissues were filtered through 70 μm cell strainers before subsequent analysis.
Flow cytometric analysis and sorting. Single-cell suspensions were preincubated with anti-CD16/CD32 to block Fc receptors, spun down before cell-surface staining with specific antibodies. A cell-viability dye kit was used to exclude dead cells from subsequent analysis. Cells were incubated with antibodies (Supplemental Table 3) for 20 minutes at 4°C in the dark and then acquired on LSRFortessa or LSRII flow cytometers (BD Bioscience). For LRP2 staining, primary antibody (1:200 dilution) incubation was followed by a second antibody (goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated at 1:200) incubation for 20 minutes at 4°C in dark. The data were analyzed by FlowJo V10 (Tree Star). For cell sorting, a BD FACSAria III cell sorter (BD Bioscience) was used. The gating strategy for mouse MDSCs was: CD11b+Ly6ChiLy6G– for M-MDSCs and CD11b+Ly6C–Ly6Ghi for PMN-MDSCs. Mouse MONs (CD11b+Ly6ChiLy6G–) and PMNs (CD11b+Ly6C–Ly6Ghi) were isolated by sorting after LF treatment. For isolation of MONs and PMNs from human infants, mononuclear cell suspension from the PB was prepared by Ficoll gradient centrifugation and flow sorting was performed using FACSAria III based on the following markers: PMNs, CD11b+HLA-DR–/loCD15+CD14–; MONs: CD11b+HLA-DR–/loCD14+CD15–.
Immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs. Several methods were used. To evaluate M-MDSC–suppressive activity, sorted CD3+ T cells from spleen were labeled with CFSE (2 μM) (Invitrogen), stimulated with anti-CD3–coated (5 μg/mL) plates and soluble anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL) antibody (eBioscience), and cultured alone or with M-MDSCs at different ratios for 3 days. Cells were then stained with CD4-PE-Cy5 and CD8a-PE antibodies, and T cell proliferation was analyzed by flow cytometry. T cell proliferation was also measured by 3H-thymidine uptake. For PMN-MDSC functional assay, CD8+ T cells were isolated from spleens of OT-I mice labeled with CFSE and then mixed with splenocytes from WT mice at a 1:4 ratio and incubated with PMN-MDSCs in the presence of cognate peptides (SIINFEKL).
For human samples, myeloid cells from PB or CB were plated on U-bottomed 96-well plates, cocultured with autologous CD3+ T cells, which were labeled with CFSE (2 μM), and stimulated with CD3/CD28 antibodies. After 72 hours, cells were stained with anti–CD4-PE and anti–CD8a-APC, and T cell proliferation was measured by flow cytometry.
LF treatment. For in vitro treatment, mouse BM cells were cultured in the presence of murine recombinant GM-CSF (20 ng/ml) in RPMI 1640 medium (supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 nM glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, and 1% antibiotics) in the presence of LF protein (500 μg/ml) or PBS (control) for 1–3 days. For human samples, mononuclear cells from PB or CB were cultured in human recombinant GM-CSF (20 ng/ml) with LF protein (500 μg/ml) or PBS (control) for 1–2 days. Rosiglitazone was added at a final concentration of 2 μM at the same time as for ON incubation; then PMN were extensively washed and used in antigen-specific suppression assays, as described above. For some experiments of blocking NF-κB activity, selective NF-κB inhibitor JSH23 was added. For in vivo treatment in mice, 1-week-old WT mice were injected i.p. with LF protein (0.25 g/kg, in PBS) daily for 3 days.
Mouse NEC model. The NEC model was performed as previously described (21). One- to three-day-old mice received adult mouse cecum-derived bacteria (7 × 107 CFU/mouse) via gavage. From day 1, mice were stressed by a hypoxia-cold shock cycle twice per day for 3 days, and then mice were returned to their cages and observed for NEC symptoms (characterized by lethargy, cyanosis, abdominal distention, and bloody stools). When mice displayed NEC symptoms, they were euthanized and a complete autopsy was performed. Small intestines were examined grossly and immediately placed in buffered formalin for H&E staining. Pathological changes in intestine were scored by a blinded pathologist on a scale of 0 to 4; injury grades of 2, 3, or 4 were defined as NEC, with injury grades 3 and 4 defined as severe NEC.
Intestinal mucosa permeability. FITC-labeled dextran (FD70, Sigma-Aldrich) was used to assess intestinal mucosal permeability, as described previously (49). Briefly, mice from each experimental group were gavaged with 750 mg/kg FD70 suspended in PBS. The levels of FD70 were measured by spectra-fluorimeter after 4 hours. Levels of FD70 were measured by spectra-fluorimeter after 4 hours, and were calculated based on standard curve.
Bacterial loading in NEC model. Blood and intestine (stripped of feces) were collected from NEC mice, and total DNA was extracted. The amount of bacterial 16sRNA within the blood and intestine was then quantified by quantitative PCR (qPCR) as described previously (50).
Antimicrobial activity and phagocytosis. 1 × 105 PBS- or LF-treated MDSCs were incubated with 107 CFU of E. coli, C. albicans, or C. sakazakii for 2 hours, and bacterial growth was assessed 24 hours later as described (21). pHrodo Green E. coli BioParticles (Thermo Fisher, P35366) were used for the detection of phagocytic ingestion, as described previously (51). For the assessment of phagocytosis of MDSCs in vitro, PBS- or LF-treated MDSCs were cultured with E. coli BioParticles at 100 μg/1 × 105 cells for 90 minutes at 37°C, 5% CO2. The reaction was stopped by washing with PBS, cells were stained with surface antibodies against MDSCs, and BioParticle internalization was evaluated by flow cytometry.
MDSC transfer. For MDSC transfer in the NEC model, 106 LF-treated CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs were administered i.p. 1 hour before initiation of the NEC procedure at days 1 and 3; PBS-treated CD11b+Gr-1+ cells were used as controls.
OVA-induced lung inflammation. Mice were sensitized i.p. with 5 μg/g OVA (grade V, Sigma-Aldrich) emulsified in 200 μg/g of aluminum hydroxide on days 0 and 7, followed by intranasal instillation with OVA (5 μg/μl of PBS) on days 17 to 21. Mice were sacrificed for analysis 24 hours after the last challenge. For MDSC transfer, 106 LF-treated CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs were injected into recipient mice i.v. at days –1 and 6 before each sensitization.
Induction of murine colitis by DSS. Mice were given 2.5% (w/v) DSS (MP Biomedicals) in drinking water for 7 days; this was then changed to regular drinking water. Mice were weighed every day to determine weight loss. The clinical scoring of a DAI that ranged from 0 to 4 was calculated as described previously (52). Colon length was measured and fixed in buffered paraformaldehyde for H&E staining. Histological quantification was done in a blinded fashion. For MDSC transfer, 106 enriched LF-induced CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs were injected into recipient mice i.v. at days 2 and 5.
ConA-induced murine hepatitis. We followed the procedures described earlier (53). Mice were given a single i.v. injection of ConA (Sigma-Aldrich) at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight and were sacrificed 24 hours later. 106 LF-MDSCs were injected i.v. into recipient mice before ConA injection. Liver tissues were fixed in buffered paraformaldehyde for H&E staining. Hepatic mononuclear cells (HMCs) were isolated on Percoll gradient, and the cells were stained with specific antibodies, including anti–CD45-PE and anti–CD4-PE-cy7. For intracellular staining, the cells were fixed and permeabilized in Fix/Perm Buffer (BD Biosciences) and then stained with anti–IFN-γ–APC antibody. Serum was collected, and the levels of ALT and AST were measured by an automatic biochemical analyzer (Beckman Coulter, CX9).
Real-time qPCR. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN, catalog 74104). 1 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara, catalog RR037Q) at 37°C for 15 minutes. qPCR was run on a Bio-Rad CFX96 PCR System (Bio-Rad) using SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM (Takara). The mRNA levels of specific genes were determined by the relative standard curve method, normalized against β-actin levels. qPCR analyses were done in triplicate, and experiments were repeated at least twice. Primers are listed in Supplemental Table 4.
ELISA. 2 × 106/ml cells were cultured for 48 hours in RPMI complete medium; the amounts of PGE2 and S100A9 in the cell lysates were measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Invitrogen and R&D Systems, respectively). For human LF, plasma was collected and the concentration of LF was measure by ELISA.
NO production. The NO content in culture supernatants was measured with the Nitrite Assay Kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Griess reagent) (K544-200, BioVision) (54).
Western blotting. Cells were lysed with 10 μl lysis buffer in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Equal amounts of cellular proteins were subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. After blocking, membranes were immunoblotted with the indicated primary Abs and secondary Abs. Results were visualized using ECL detection. All antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 2.
shRNAs, lentivirus production, and infection of BM cells. shRNA sequences against Lrp2 and Itln1 were obtained from the Sigma-Aldrich Mission shRNA Library (sequences listed in Supplemental Table 4) and cloned into the lentiviral vector pLKO.3G. Then the 293T cells were cotransfected with shRNA vector and lentiviral packaging plasmids (psPAX2 and pMD2.G). At 48 and 72 hours, the supernatant containing virus was harvested, filtered through a 0.45 mm filter, and mixed with 5 μg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog H9268). For infection, BM cells were cultured overnight, and supernatants were aspirated and replaced with lentiviral supernatants, followed by centrifugation (900 g for 45 minutes). After 6 hours of infection, medium was changed. Infection was repeated the next day, and then cells were treated with PBS or LF for another 2 days.
Synergistic activation mediator CRISPRa-Cas9 (lentiSAMv2) lentivirus was used to overexpress the Lrp-2 gene in adult mouse BM cells. Six sgRNA-specific primers for the Lrp-2 gene (Supplemental Table 4) were obtained from the Synergistic Activation Mediator (SAM) sgRNA library (55) and cloned into the lentiviral vector lentiSAMv2. 293T cells were transfected with the lentiviral vector–expressing sgRNA (15 μg), the packaging plasmid psPAX2 (12.3 μg), and the envelope expression plasmid pMD2.G (6.7 μg) to produce lentiviral particles. BM cells from adult mice were infected with lentiviral particles, followed by LF treatment for 48 hours before measurement of MDSC levels and their immunosuppressive function. Lentiviral vectors lacking any sgRNA were used as a no-guide control.
Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-tailed Student’s t tests for comparing 2 groups. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test was performed for comparing 3 or more groups within the same experiment. Survival curves were compared with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. Statistical tests were performed in GraphPad Prism, version 8.0, software (GraphPad Software Inc.). Correlations between different parameters were analyzed using Spearman’s rank test. All data are presented as mean ± SD, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Study approval. The study was approved by the clinical ethics review boards of SYSU, Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, and CHOP. All participants or legal guardians of the participants signed informed consent forms. Animal experiments were approved by the SYSU Animal Care and Use Committee. Experiments performed at Wistar Institute were approved by the IACUC of the Wistar Institute.
DIG and JZ conceived and supervised the study and wrote the manuscript. YL, MP, QX, SF, YH, JH, and XL performed experiments. WL, YT, XL, WY, WZ, FW, CJ, QC, and EAJ provided clinical resources, collected patients’ information, and contributed to writing the manuscript. GSW contributed to writing the manuscript. Authors with equal contribution listed in alphabetical order.
This work was supported by the Wistar Institute Animal and Flow Cytometry Core Facilities (NIH grant P30 CA010815-50) as well as a CHOP pilot grant (to DIG). It was also supported by grants from the following institutions (to JZ): High-Level Talent Start-Up Funding of Tianjin Medical University, National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81571520, 81771665, and 91542112), and National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2017B030311014).
Address correspondence to: Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4265, USA. Phone: 215.495.6955; Email: dgabrilovich@wistar.org. Or to: Jie Zhou, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, China, 300070. Phone: 86.22.8333.6137; Email: zhoujie@tmu.edu.cn.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(10):4261–4275.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI128164.
See the related Commentary at Fighting infant infections with myeloid-derived suppressor cells.