Advertisement
Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI12617
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Baldus, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Eiserich, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Mani, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Castro, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Figueroa, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Chumley, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Ma, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Tousson, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by White, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Bullard, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Brennan, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Lusis, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Moore, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Anesthesiology, and2The Center for Free Radical Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA3Center for Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom4Department of Medicine, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, and5The UAB Imaging Facility, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA6Department of Genomics and Pathobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA7Department of Cell Biology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA8Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA9Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Address correspondence to: Bruce Freeman, Department of Anesthesiology, 946 Tinsley Harrison Tower, 619 19th Street South, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA. Phone: (205) 934-4234; Fax: (205) 934-7437; E-mail: bruce.freeman@ccc.uab.edu.
Find articles by Freeman, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published December 15, 2001 - More info
Nitrotyrosine formation is a hallmark of vascular inflammation, with polymorphonuclear neutrophil–derived (PMN-derived) and monocyte-derived myeloperoxidase (MPO) being shown to catalyze this posttranslational protein modification via oxidation of nitrite (NO2–) to nitrogen dioxide (NO2•). Herein, we show that MPO concentrates in the subendothelial matrix of vascular tissues by a transcytotic mechanism and serves as a catalyst of ECM protein tyrosine nitration. Purified MPO and MPO released by intraluminal degranulation of activated human PMNs avidly bound to aortic endothelial cell glycosaminoglycans in both cell monolayer and isolated vessel models. Cell-bound MPO rapidly transcytosed intact endothelium and colocalized abluminally with the ECM protein fibronectin. In the presence of the substrates hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and NO2–, cell and vessel wall–associated MPO catalyzed nitration of ECM protein tyrosine residues, with fibronectin identified as a major target protein. Both heparin and the low–molecular weight heparin enoxaparin significantly inhibited MPO binding and protein nitrotyrosine (NO2Tyr) formation in both cultured endothelial cells and rat aortic tissues. MPO–/– mice treated with intraperitoneal zymosan had lower hepatic NO2Tyr/tyrosine ratios than did zymosan-treated wild-type mice. These data indicate that MPO significantly contributes to NO2Tyr formation in vivo. Moreover, transcytosis of MPO, occurring independently of leukocyte emigration, confers specificity to nitration of vascular matrix proteins.
Nitration of free and protein-associated tyrosine residues to 3-nitrotyrosine (NO2Tyr) is considered a hallmark of inflammatory tissue injury and has been detected in multiple species, organ systems, and cell types during both acute and chronic inflammation (1). Nitrotyrosine formation not only is a mechanistically revealing footprint of oxidative injury but is also critically linked to altered protein structure and function during inflammatory conditions. For example, the selective cellular incorporation of NO2Tyr into the extreme carboxyl terminus of the cytoskeletal protein α-tubulin impaired cell morphology, monolayer barrier function, and distribution of associated motor proteins (2). Also, nitration of Tyr 67 in cytochrome c profoundly affects its redox-related properties (3); nitration of SERCA2a Ca2+ATPase Tyr 294 and Tyr 295 inhibits the enzyme (4); nitration of Tyr 34 in concert with dityrosine formation accounts for inactivation of human Mn superoxide dismutase in rejecting transplanted kidneys (5, 6); and finally, nitration of Tyr 161, 164, and 166 reduces surfactant protein A–dependent lipid aggregation (7). The reversibility of NO2Tyr formation implies that tyrosine nitration not only represents a marker of reactive nitrogen species formation and loss of protein function but can potentially evoke protein conformational changes that mimic or impact on cell signaling events such as adenylation and tyrosine phoshorylation (8, 9).
Despite evidence for the prevalence of this protein modification under inflammatory conditions, the mechanisms underlying tyrosine nitration in vivo remain poorly understood. Presently, NO2Tyr formation is most frequently cited as a footprint of peroxynitrite (ONOO–) formation and reactivity. Peroxynitrite, the product of •NO and O2•– reaction, and nitrosoperoxocarbonate (ONOOCO2–), the product of ONOO– reaction with CO2, are both recognized oxidizing and nitrating species (10, 11).
However, myeloperoxidase (MPO), a heme protein abundantly expressed in polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) and monocytes, is also a catalyst of NO2Tyr formation via nitrite oxidation to the potent nitrating species nitrogen dioxide (•NO2) (12, 13–15). In addition, MPO is considered a general index of inflammation, with increased tissue MPO activity thought to reflect neutrophil and monocyte extravasation. Importantly, there is often increased free MPO observed in the plasma of patients during inflammatory conditions (16, 17). Thus, the intraluminal release of this highly cationic protein may facilitate electrostatic interactions with the negatively charged endothelial plasma membrane, thereby favoring neutrophil-independent binding of MPO with the vascular intima (18, 19). Independently, the endothelium and the subendothelial space have been identified as a predominant site for NO2Tyr formation during tissue inflammatory reactions (20–22), suggesting that MPO may catalyze this oxidative protein modification.
Herein, it is demonstrated that MPO significantly contributes to NO2Tyr formation in vivo. We identify a novel process of MPO extravasation that occurs independent of neutrophil diapedesis, thus leading to the deposition of MPO within the vascular ECM. From this, a high degree of spatial codistribution of MPO and NO2Tyr formation occurs, suggesting that this focalization of MPO confers specificity upon ECM proteins as targets of tyrosine nitration. In aggregate, these findings reveal that MPO catalysis provides an important enzymatic pathway for protein tyrosine nitration during vascular inflammation.
Materials. Purified MPO derived from human PMNs, xanthine oxidase (XO), rabbit polyclonal antisera against MPO, and rat fibronectin were obtained from Calbiochem Inc. (La Jolla, California, USA). Monoclonal anti-fibronectin (clone E3E) was purchased from Chemicon International (Temecula, California, USA). Heparin (porcine intestinal mucosa) was from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA), enoxaparin from Aventis Pharmaceuticals (Parsippany, New Jersey, USA). Glycosaminoglycan lyases were from Seikagaku Corp. (Tokyo, Japan). Mouse monoclonal anti–3-nitrotyrosine (clone 1A6) and ONOO– were a gift from Joe Beckman and Alvaro Estevez (University of Alabama at Birmingham). Sheep polyclonal anti-rat vWF was from Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd. (Hornby, Ontario, Canada). Secondary fluorescent antibodies Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugate, Alexa 594 goat anti-mouse IgG conjugate, Alexa 594 donkey anti-sheep IgG conjugate, and 4,6-diamino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eugene, Oregon, USA). Lymphocyte separation medium was obtained from Organon Teknika (Durham, North Carolina, USA), TRITC-labeled dextran (4,400 Da) and zymosan from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA), Transwell cell culture inserts from Becton Dickinson and Co. (Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), chambered cell culture slides (Permanox) from Nalge NUNC International (Rochester, New York, USA), gradient gels from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, California, USA), and enhanced chemiluminescence (Femto SuperSignal) for Western blot analysis from Pierce Chemical Co. (Rockford, Illinois, USA).
MPO activity assay. MPO activity in cell lysates was determined by adding an aliquot of cell lysate to 43 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 5.4), 1.2 mM tetramethylbenzidine, and 100 μM H2O2. Absorbance kinetics were assessed spectrophotometrically at 655 nm.
MPO binding studies. Confluent bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs; passages 4–9) seeded in 9-cm2 dishes were exposed to MPO (2–13 nM) in HBSS (pH 7.4) for various periods of time. Cells were scraped in lysis buffer (100 mM NaH2PO4 buffer containing 0.01% Triton X-100 [pH 5.5], aprotinin [10 μg·ml–1], leupeptin [10 μg·ml–1], and pepstatin A [1 μg·ml–1]). In some cases, cells were trypsinized until completely detached (8 minutes), trypsin inhibitor (1 mg trypsin inhibitor·1.8 mg trypsin–1) added, cells centrifuged for 10 minutes at 400 g, and the pellet resuspended in lysis buffer. In other experiments, BAECs were pretreated with heparin, enoxaparin, or chondroitin sulfate (all 150 μg·ml–1) for 45 minutes. Cells were washed and exposed to MPO (13 nM) for 2 hours and scraped in lysis buffer before further processing for DNA quantification, MPO activity, and immunoblotting. In some instances, cells were pretreated with heparinase, heparitinase, or chondroitinase (all 8 mU·ml–1) for 45 minutes at 37°C, and then cells were washed and exposed to MPO at 4°C for 2 hours before harvesting in lysis buffer and subsequent DNA content and MPO activity determination. BAECs were also exposed to MPO (13 nM, 1 μg·ml–1) for 2 hours in concert with increasing doses of xanthine oxidase (XO, 0–100 μg·ml–1) that was purified prior to use as described previously (23). Cell protein for Western blotting was quantitated by bicinchoninic acid assay (24) and the DNA content of cell lysates determined as described previously (25). In other experiments, endothelial cells were grown on Transwell filters and then exposed to MPO (13–130 nM) in HBSS containing TRITC-labeled dextran (4,400 Da, 100 μM). After 2 hours, MPO activity and TRITC fluorescence (excitation wavelength 557 nm, emission wavelength 576 nm) in the basolateral compartment were analyzed.
Localization of protein tyrosine nitration in cultured endothelial cells. BAECs were grown to confluence in chambered slides and exposed to MPO (13 nM; 1 μg) for 2 hours. In some cases, cell MPO incubation was followed by NO2– (100 μM) and H2O2 (50 μM) exposure prior to fixation and processing for immunocytochemistry. To evaluate the effect of ONOO–, confluent cells were grown in chambered slides and placed on a rocker platform, and ONOO– was infused for 10 minutes at 10 μM·min–1 in PBS (pH 7.4) for a cumulative exposure of 100 μM ONOO–. Cells were processed for immunohistochemistry as described below.
ECM isolation. ECM-rich fractions were isolated by rinsing cells with HBSS, placing culture dishes on ice, and extracting cell and membrane elements with 0.5% sodium desoxycholate in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0. Desoxycholate-resistant ECM was first rinsed with 10 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and then harvested by adding 17 μl/cm2 reducing buffer (1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 10% β-mercaptoethanol, 23% glycerol) and heated to 95°C. The samples were then sonicated, boiled at 95°C for 10 minutes, and processed for Western blotting as described below.
Purified fibronectin Western blot analysis. Soluble human plasma fibronectin and the 30-, 45-, and 70-kDa fragments of fibronectin (all 100 μg·ml–1) were incubated with MPO (26 nM), H2O2 (50 μM), and NO2– (100 μM) for 90 minutes at 37°C. In some cases, fibronectin was preincubated with enoxaparin (150 μg·ml–1) for 45 minutes. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels for fibronectin and on 10% gels for fibronectin fragments.
Cell lysate and ECM fraction Western blot analysis. For MPO detection, cell and ECM proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels. For fibronectin and NO2Tyr detection, proteins of ECM-rich fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE on 4–20% gradient gels. Loading of equal amounts of ECM proteins was affirmed by Coomassie blue staining. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and incubated in blocking buffer (PBS containing 0.05% Tween and 3% nonfat dry milk) overnight. Primary antibody concentrations were: rabbit polyclonal anti-MPO, 1:1,000; rabbit polyclonal anti-NO2Tyr, 1:1,000; and mouse monoclonal anti-fibronectin, 1:1,000. Horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was used as secondary antibody (1:150,000 for anti-MPO and anti-fibronectin, and 1:300,000 for anti-NO2Tyr) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence for detection.
Immunocytochemistry. Cell monolayers were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Rat aortic segments were embedded in OCT compound, frozen, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Following fixation, cell monolayers and tissues were permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS and blocked for 2 hours in 10% goat serum in PBS. Primary antibody incubations were for 12 hours at 4°C in 10% goat serum at the following dilutions: polyclonal rabbit anti-MPO, 1:500 for cell cultures and 1:100 for tissues; monoclonal mouse anti-fibronectin, 1:300); monoclonal mouse anti-nitrotyrosine, 1:200; and polyclonal rabbit anti-rat fibronectin, 1:200. Experiments with polyclonal rabbit anti-vWF (1:50) were performed in 10% BSA. Secondary antibodies were Alexa 488–conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 594–conjugated goat anti-rabbit, Alexa 594–conjugated goat anti-mouse, and Alexa 594–conjugated goat anti-sheep (all 1:80). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 μg·ml–1). Images were acquired on a Leitz orthoplan microscope (Leica Inc., Wetzlar, Germany) or a Leica DMIRBE inverted epifluorescence-Nomarski microscope with Leica TCS NT Laser Confocal optics (Leica Inc.).
Human PMN studies. Blood was drawn from healthy human volunteers after written informed consent, and isolation of PMNs was performed as described previously (12). The PMNs were suspended either in PBS containing MgCl2 (0.5 mM), CaCl2 (1 mM), and glucose (1 mg·ml–1), pH 7.4, or in 100% autologous serum supplemented with nitrite (200 μM). Neutrophils were activated with 12-D-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA; 50 ng·ml–1) or FMLP (1 μM) at the time of instillation into the vessel.
Vascular tissue models. Descending thoracic aorta was excised from rats and adventitial tissue was removed before the vessel was cut into rings measuring 3–4 mm in diameter. Aortic rings were incubated in HBSS and in some cases pretreated with enoxaparin (150 μg·ml–1) for 45 minutes. The rings were washed thoroughly and then exposed to MPO (65 nM) for 90 minutes. In all but the enoxaparin-pretreated rings, MPO was removed, and the rings were washed and finally exposed to hydrogen peroxide (50 μM) and NO2– (100 μM) in HBSS for 120 minutes at 37°C. In additional experiments, thoracic branches and the orifice of the aorta were cauterized and 200 μl of buffer containing activated PMNs (2 × 106 PMNs/aorta) was instilled. The aorta was placed in HBSS and kept on a rocker platform at 37°C for 4 hours. In some instances, PMNs (2 × 106 PMNs/aorta) were activated and instilled into rat aorta in 100% autologous serum containing nitrite (200 μM), incubated for 3 hours at 37°C, and freshly isolated PMNs were instilled into the aortic lumen for 3 hours as described above. The tissue was processed for immunohistochemical analysis of MPO as described above.
MPO-deficient mouse model of inflammation. Gene-targeted MPO-null (MPO–/–) mutant mice were generated as previously described (26). Both MPO–/– and control mice (MPO+/+) were from a mixed 129/Sv × C57BL/6 background. Mice were treated with zymosan (5 mg/ml in isotonic NaCl) boiled at 95°C for 30 minutes prior to intraperitoneal injection (0.25 mg/g body weight). After 96 hours, mice were anesthetized and the liver was perfused in situ with NaCl via the portal vein. For quantitative NO2Tyr analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, tissues were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at –80°C, and further processed as described below.
Quantification of tissue nitrotyrosine content. Nitrotyrosine and tyrosine content in liver proteins was measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as previously described (27). In brief, liver tissue was homogenized in a mixture of saline (2 ml) and chloroform/methanol (2:1) (13 ml) on ice, and the protein precipitate (middle layer) was isolated by centrifugation at 2000 g for 30 minutes at 4°C. Following lyophilization of precipitated proteins, 1–1.5 mg of tissue was hydrolyzed for 24 hours at 120°C in 1 ml 4 M sodium hydroxide following the addition of 20 ng 13C9-nitrotyrosine and 10 μg of D4-tyrosine as stable isotopic internal standards. These conditions prevent the nitration of tyrosine that occurs during acidic hydrolysis conditions and permit identification of potential artifactual nitration reactions. Following solid phase extraction, nitrotyrosine and tyrosine were quantitated by gas chromatography/negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Results are expressed as a ratio of nitrotyrosine to tyrosine (ng/mg).
Statistics. All data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis on Systat 7.0 software (SPSS Science, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results with P < 0.05 were considered significant.
MPO binding to endothelial cells after PMN degranulation. PMNs are typically viewed as exerting vascular injury after adherence and subsequent diapedesis across the endothelial barrier (28). However, in diverse inflammatory pathologies there is evidence for increased intraluminal degranulation of leukocytes releasing MPO that is accessible to the endothelium (29, 30). To evaluate the capacity of PMN-derived MPO to bind to vascular endothelium, rat aortae were exposed to activated human PMNs and tissue sections immunohistochemically analyzed for MPO deposition. Adhesion of MPO-immunoreactive PMNs onto endothelium was affirmed, with the concurrent observation of endothelial cell and the subendothelial compartment distribution of MPO immunoreactivity (Figure 1d) in the absence of attached PMNs (Figure 1e). Control studies analyzing rat aorta (Figure 1a), rat aorta exposed to TPA alone (Figure 1b), and rat aorta incubated with unstimulated neutrophils (Figure 1c) demonstrated no vessel wall MPO immunoreactivity. Stimulation of PMNs with FMLP resulted in an equivalent MPO staining along the vessel lumen (not shown). The localization of MPO immunoreactivity to endothelial cells was confirmed by counterstaining with anti-rat vWF (Figure 1f). These data reveal that MPO penetration into the vascular wall could occur independent of PMN diapedesis.
Immunohistochemical detection of aortic endothelial distribution of MPO following activation of PMNs. Isolated human PMNs (8 × 105) were instilled into the lumen of an excised rat aorta immediately after activation with 50 ng·ml–1 TPA. After 4 hours, aortic segments were frozen, sectioned, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100, and analyzed by immunofluorescence. Tissue sections were stained for MPO (green) using rabbit anti-MPO and nuclei (blue) were counterstained with DAPI. (a) Untreated vessel; (b) vessel treated with TPA alone; (c) unstimulated PMNs; (d and e) stimulated PMNs. Colocalization of MPO with anti-vWF immunoreactivity confirmed MPO binding and uptake by endothelial cells (f). L, vessel lumen; M, media. Arrows indicate endothelial cells. ×100 (a–d, f); ×50 (e).
Uptake and transcytosis of MPO depends on heparin/heparan glycosaminoglycans. The binding of MPO to cultured BAECs was evaluated by exposing BAECs to increasing concentrations of MPO, followed by determination of MPO activity in cell lysates and after digestion of exofacial cell proteins with trypsin. The MPO activity of cell lysates increased dose-dependently, and the appearance of MPO activity in a trypsin-resistant compartment suggested intracellular MPO deposition (Figure 2a). In addition, MPO bound to BAECs after degranulation of activated human neutrophils was enzymatically active, and endothelial cell–associated MPO activity was increased to an even greater extent when the respiratory burst of PMNs was inhibited by pretreatment with diphenyliodonium, which prevented the partial inactivation of MPO by PMN-derived oxidants (not shown). To test whether MPO uptake by endothelial cells was energy-dependent, BAECs were exposed to MPO at 4°C, and trypsin-resistant and total cell-associated MPO activity was determined (Figure 2b). Trypsin-resistant MPO activity at 4°C was reduced by more than 80%, suggesting energy-dependent internalization of the enzyme. The fact that total MPO activity was not decreased as much may be a result of enhanced cell surface binding under 4°C conditions, as well as a result of cold-induced retraction of the cytoskeleton directly exposing the subendothelial matrix to MPO. To evaluate the nature of MPO binding to cell surface glycosaminoglycans, cells were pretreated with heparin and the low–molecular weight heparin enoxaparin prior to addition of MPO. Cell-associated MPO activity and MPO protein content were significantly reduced, whereas pretreatment with chondroitin sulfate did not significantly alter cell MPO binding (Figure 2c). Enoxaparin, a low–molecular weight heparin, added to cells after MPO exposure reduced cell-associated MPO activity by 78% ± 3% (not shown). To further characterize the nature of the putative glycosaminoglycan-dependent binding of MPO, BAECs were pretreated with endoglycosidases prior to MPO exposure. Heparitinase or heparinase pretreatment of endothelial cells reduced cell-associated MPO activity by 63% ± 7% and 56% ± 8%, respectively, whereas chondroitinase did not significantly inhibit cell association of MPO (Figure 2d). Previous studies have revealed that binding of the O2•- and H2O2-generating enzyme xanthine oxidase (XO) to vascular endothelial cells is predominantly chondroitin sulfate–dependent (23). To evaluate the potential binding interactions of MPO and XO, the impact of increasing XO concentrations on endothelial cell MPO binding was determined. Increases in cell-associated MPO activity were not inhibited by XO concentrations both equaling and exceeding those found in the circulation during pathophysiological events (Figure 2e) (23).
Characterization of the binding and uptake of MPO by cultured endothelial cells. (a) Characterization of cell MPO association. BAECs were incubated with increasing concentrations of MPO (2–13 nM) for 2 hours at 37°C and harvested by scraping (total) or after exposure to trypsin (trypsin-resistant). Cell-associated MPO activity was about 10% of total MPO activity added (not shown). (b) The influence of temperature on cellular MPO binding and transport. BAECs exposed to MPO (13 nM) at 37°C and 4°C were harvested at different time points and MPO activity was determined. †P < 0.05 for MPO activity in total cell lysates at 37°C versus 4°C; *P < 0.05 for MPO activity in trypsin-resistant compartments at 37°C versus 4°C. (c) The influence of glycosaminoglycans on cell MPO binding. BAECs were pretreated with chondroitin sulfate (Chondr, 150 μg·ml–1), heparin (Hep, 150 μg·ml–1), or the low–molecular weight heparin enoxaparin (Enox, 150 μg·ml–1) for 45 minutes, washed with HBSS, and then exposed to MPO (13 nM) at 37°C. After washing again, cell-associated MPO was assessed by enzyme activity analysis and cellular MPO protein content by immunoblotting. “MPO hc ” denotes the immunoreactivity of the heavy chain (59 kDa) of MPO. (d) The effect of endoglycosidases on MPO binding. BAECs were pretreated with heparitinase, heparinase, and chondroitinase (all 8 mU·ml–1) for 2 hours at 37°C, washed, and exposed to MPO (13 nM) at 4°C for 2 hours. Cell-associated MPO enzyme activity was then determined. *P < 0.05 for MPO alone versus pretreatment with heparin and enoxaparin (c) and versus heparitinase and heparinase pretreatment (d). (e) Binding competition analysis of MPO and xanthine oxidase (XO). BAECs were incubated with MPO (1 μg·ml–1) and increasing concentrations of XO (0–100 μg·ml–1, equivalent to 0–100 mU·ml–1) for 2 hours at 37°C. Cells were harvested as above and MPO enzyme activity determined. Values represent mean ± SD.
MPO accumulates at the basolateral cell surface and colocalizes with the ECM protein fibronectin. Using laser confocal microscopy we further localized the site of endothelial MPO deposition, by revealing intracellular MPO distribution within minutes after MPO exposure and a strong gradient between apical and basolateral MPO immunoreactivity throughout the ECM after 2 hours (Figure 3a). Here, MPO was demonstrated to colocalize with the ECM protein fibronectin (Figure 3b). Addition of MPO (130 nM) to BAECs in the presence of 100% human serum led to both intracellular and subendothelial distribution of MPO in the subendothelial matrix (not shown). To test whether MPO influences endothelial cell barrier function, thereby further facilitating its subendothelial accumulation, we exposed endothelial cells grown on transwell filters to increasing doses of MPO in the presence of TRITC-labeled dextran. While MPO activity increased dose-dependently in the basolateral compartment, the transendothelial flux of dextran remained unchanged (Figure 3c). In contrast, exposure of BAECs to H2O2 (100 μM) resulted in a significant increase in TRITC-dextran permeability. In concert with demonstrating the energy-dependence of MPO transport (Figure 2b), the cell internalization of MPO the enzyme (Figure 3a), and a diffuse distribution of MPO throughout the subendothelial matrix that was in a diffuse manner not concentrated in cell junctional regions (Figure 3, a and b) are all supporting evidence that the mechanism by which MPO traverses endothelial cells is via transcytosis.
Transcytosis of MPO by endothelial cells. (a) Intracellular localization and accumulation of MPO at the ECM. Cultured BAECs were grown to confluence and exposed to MPO (13 nM) for 2 hours. Cells were processed as described in Methods and incubated with mouse monoclonal anti–α-tubulin (red) and rabbit polyclonal anti-MPO (green). Laser confocal microscopy revealed intracellular MPO immunoreactivity within 2 minutes after MPO exposure and a high degree of MPO deposition at the subcellular matrix. Time = 0 minutes represents BAECs not exposed to MPO but stained with anti-MPO. ×63. (b) Colocalization of MPO and fibronectin (FN). BAECs treated as described for a were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-fibronectin (red) and rabbit polyclonal anti-MPO (green). The nuclei (blue) were counterstained with DAPI. For assessing codistribution of MPO and fibronectin, images were merged (yellow). The control panel (Ctr) shows MPO-untreated cells stained with anti-MPO. The lower panel represents side-on views. ×63 (control, ×50). (c) Barrier function of endothelial cell monolayers exposed to MPO. BAECs were seeded on Transwell filters and exposed to increasing concentrations of MPO (13–130 nM) in the presence of TRITC-labeled dextran (4,400 Da) for 2 hours. MPO activity and TRITC fluorescence were assessed in the basolateral chamber. Treatment of the cells with H2O2 (100 μM) served as a control for increased permeability of TRITC-dextran. *P > 0.05 versus TRITC-labeled dextran alone. RFU, relative fluorescence units.
Characterization of MPO-dependent nitrotyrosine formation. To define whether the cell matrix distribution of MPO conferred specificity to protein tyrosine nitration, BAECs were exposed to MPO and washed before NO2– and H2O2 addition. Following reactions, cells were lysed and the ECM extracted. Western immunoblotting revealed fibronectin immunostaining that correlated with the electrophoretic mobility of the only NO2Tyr-immunoreactive species in the ECM protein–rich fraction. In ECM fractions of cells pretreated with enoxaparin, previously demonstrated to inhibit cell and vessel MPO binding/association (Figure 2c), NO2Tyr immunoreactivity was profoundly reduced (Figure 4a). MPO also catalyzed NO2Tyr formation in soluble human fibronectin exposed to H2O2 and NO2–, which increased as a function of NO2– concentration as shown by Western blot analysis (Figure 4b). When fibronectin was pretreated with enoxaparin prior to MPO-mediated reactions, fibronectin tyrosine nitration was not reduced, but rather was marginally increased (Figure 4c). The 30-, 45-, and 70-kDa fragments of fibronectin all contain tyrosine residues (31) potentially susceptible to nitration. As for native fibronectin, enoxaparin did not inhibit nitration of fibronectin fragments both encompassing (30 kDa and 70 kDa) and lacking (45 kDa) heparin binding sites (Figure 4d). These observations confirmed that endoglycosidase digestion and heparin (or enoxaparin) treatment inhibited fibronectin nitration by limiting MPO binding to cells and subsequent transcytosis to the ECM compartment, rather than by inhibition of MPO catalytic nitration activity. To further confirm that fibronectin is the predominant target protein for MPO-catalyzed endothelial cell nitration, BAECs were exposed to MPO, washed, and treated with H2O2 and NO2–, and then fibronectin and NO2Tyr distribution was determined by laser confocal immunocytochemical localization. The strong colocalization of fibronectin and NO2Tyr immunoreactivity in the merged images corroborated selective MPO-dependent NO2Tyr formation in fibronectin (Figure 5a). Moreover, side views indicated that NO2Tyr formation was predominantly at the basolateral surface of the cell, further strengthening the concept that the histologic location of MPO will determine principal targets of nitration. In contrast, ONOO– exposure of BAECs resulted in a diffuse cellular pattern of NO2Tyr formation (Figure 5b) and lacked the specific pattern characteristic of MPO-dependent nitration reactions.
MPO-dependent tyrosine nitration of ECM fibronectin. (a) NO2Tyr formation in cultured endothelial cell ECM proteins. Confluent BAEC monolayers were exposed to MPO (13 nM), and washed prior to NO2– (100 μM) and H2O2 (50 μM) addition. In some cases, cells were exposed to enoxaparin (Enox, 150 μg·ml–1) and washed, followed by MPO exposure and no washing, before NO2– and H2O2 were added. Matrix-enriched protein fractions were isolated as described in Methods, separated by 4–20% SDS-PAGE gradient gels, and probed with mouse monoclonal anti-fibronectin and rabbit anti-NO2Tyr. Protein staining with Coomassie blue confirmed that equal amounts of protein were electrophoretically resolved in each exposure condition. (b–d) NO2Tyr formation in purified human fibronectin and its major fragments. Fibronectin (100 μg·ml–1) (b) and the 30-, 45-, and 70-kDa fragments of fibronectin (d) were incubated with MPO (26 nM), μM NO2– (20–80 μM), and H2O2 (50 μM) in HBSS for 90 minutes. In some cases, fibronectin (c) and fibronectin fragments (d) were preincubated with enoxaparin (15 and 150 μg·ml–1) for 45 minutes before MPO, NO2–, and H2O2 addition. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (7.5% gels for fibronectin and 10% gels for fibronectin fragments) and then immunoblotted with rabbit polyclonal anti-NO2Tyr.
Immunohistochemical distribution of NO2Tyr in MPO- and ONOO—exposed cultured endothelial cells. (a) MPO exposure. BAECs were exposed to MPO (13 nM) for 2 hours and washed, and NO2– (100 μM) and H2O2 (50 μM) were added for 90 minutes. (b) Peroxynitrite exposure. BAECs were exposed to an infusion of ONOO– into culture medium for a final cumulative exposure of 100 μM. Cells were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized, and immunostained for fibronectin (red) and NO2Tyr (green). Nuclei (blue) were counterstained with DAPI. For assessing codistribution of fibronectin and NO2Tyr, images were merged (yellow). In control experiments, cells were incubated with MPO (13 nM) and H2O2 (50 μM) in the absence of added NO2–, and then immunostained for NO2Tyr. Image acquisition was performed using laser confocal microscopy, with the lower panel depicting side-on views. ×63.
Colocalization of MPO and nitrotyrosine in rat aorta. Rat aortic segments exposed to MPO, NO2–, and H2O2 displayed MPO and NO2Tyr immunoreactivity colocalizing along the endothelium (Figure 6, d–f), further supporting that the MPO-binding microenvironment confers specificity to tyrosine nitration. Adding MPO (130 nM), H2O2, and NO2– (both 100 μM) catalyzed tyrosine nitration of BAECs in the presence of 10% serum and led to equivalent distribution of NO2Tyr immunoreactivity in the subendothelial compartment (not shown). Localization of NO2Tyr formation in the subendothelium was affirmed by von Willebrand immunoreactivity of adjacent endothelial cells (not shown). When vessel rings were preincubated with enoxaparin, NO2Tyr immunoreactivity was significantly diminished (Figure 6, g–i), which is in agreement with the reduced NO2Tyr immunoreactivity observed by Western blot analysis (Figure 4a). Fibronectin immunoreactivity, which predominated along the subendothelium, colocalized with that of NO2Tyr (Figure 6, j–l) and further confirmed that fibronectin represents a dominant target protein for MPO-catalyzed tyrosine nitration. Rat aortic vessel explants, exposed to activated human neutrophils in 100% autologous serum containing nitrite (200 μM), revealed a similar distribution of MPO deposition along the fibronectin-rich sites at the endothelium, which colocalized with NO2Tyr formation (not shown).
Immunolocalization of MPO, NO2Tyr, and fibronectin in rat aortic rings. Rat aortic rings were exposed to MPO (65 nM) for 120 minutes, washed, and incubated with NO2– (100 μM) and H2O2 (50 μM) for 90 minutes. In some cases, vessel explants were preincubated with enoxaparin (150 μg·ml–1) and washed prior to MPO exposure and omitting the washing step before H2O2 and NO2– addition. Tissue antigen distribution was visualized using rabbit polyclonal anti-MPO (green), mouse monoclonal anti-NO2Tyr (red), and rabbit polyclonal anti-rat fibronectin (green). (a–c) Controls. Untreated vessel segments immunostained for MPO and NO2Tyr (a), vessel segments incubated with MPO and stained for NO2Tyr (b), and vessel segments treated with H2O2 and NO2 stained for NO2Tyr (c). (d–f) MPO and NO2Tyr distribution. Immunoreactivity for MPO (d) and NO2Tyr (e) colocalize, as shown when images were overlaid (f). (g–i) Effect of enoxaparin on NO2Tyr formation. Untreated vessel stained for NO2Tyr (g), MPO-catalyzed NO2Tyr formation (h) was reduced when vessel explants were preincubated with enoxaparin (i). (j–l) Vascular FN and NO2Tyr distribution. Subendothelial fibronectin immunoreactivity (j) colocalizes with NO2Tyr immunoreactivity (k), as shown in the merged image (l). L, vessel lumen; M, media. Arrows indicate endothelial cells. ×100 (a–f, j–l); ×50 (g–i).
MPO is an important catalyst of vascular NO2Tyr formation in vivo. To test whether MPO contributes quantitatively to NO2Tyr formation during tissue inflammatory responses, MPO–/– mice and wild-type (MPO+/+) controls were treated with intraperitoneal zymosan. Whereas the basal liver nitrotyrosine/tyrosine ratios of MPO+/+ and MPO–/– animals treated with intraperitoneal sodium chloride were not significantly different (62 ± 13 vs. 60 ± 11 ng nitrotyrosine/mg tyrosine, P > 0.05), zymosan-treated MPO+/+ mice displayed a significantly greater nitrotyrosine/tyrosine ratio in liver tissue than did MPO–/– mice (97 ± 20 vs. 57 ± 12 ng nitrotyrosine/mg tyrosine, P < 0.05; Figure 7).
Nitrotyrosine/tyrosine ratio in liver of MPO–/– mice after zymosan treatment. MPO–/– and wild-type mice (MPO+/+) received either intraperitoneal zymosan (n = 6), or sodium chloride (NaCl) as a control (n = 6). After 96 hours, the liver was perfused and processed for quantitative nitrotyrosine and tyrosine analysis as described in Methods. †P < 0.05, MPO–/– zymosan-treated versus MPO+/+ injected with zymosan. *P < 0.05, MPO+/+ zymosan-treated versus untreated MPO+/+ control.
Both nitric oxide and the heme peroxidase of neutrophils and monocytes, MPO, play central roles in regulating vascular inflammatory responses. Nitric oxide modulates the expression of inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, and enzymes of eicosanoid biosynthesis (32–34). The reactivity of •NO will also both potentiate and limit oxidative inflammatory injury, depending on the chemical nature and concentrations of the participating reactive species: •NO reacting with O2•– yields the oxidizing and nitrating species ONOO– (35), while •NO also modulates the expression, synthesis, and activity of multiple cellular antioxidant defense mechanisms (36, 37). MPO catalyzes the production of the microbicidal species hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and N-chloroamines and is viewed to play a critical role in cell-mediated immunity (38).
Recently, important areas of convergence have been noted for •NO and MPO in inflammatory reactions. As shown for other peroxidases, the catalytic activity of MPO is modulated by •NO, an •NO oxidase reaction that may contribute to altered vascular •NO-dependent signaling (39, 40). Also, MPO generates a diversity of radical intermediates of low–molecular weight, reducing substrates during its catalytic turnover (e.g., ascorbyl and tyrosyl radicals) that can react with and consume •NO (41). The present observations have expanded these critical linkages between MPO and •NO-mediated signaling and tissue injury mechanisms by revealing that (a) MPO can concentrate at the interface between endothelium and smooth muscle in the absence of PMNs through apical-to-basolateral transcytosis, (b) the association of MPO with interstitial matrix proteins (such as fibronectin) confers specificity to tyrosine nitration reactions, and (c) there is strong histological and biochemical support for the catalysis of protein tyrosine nitration by MPO. This protein modification, a hallmark of inflammatory reactions involving •NO and reactive oxygen species production, is shown not to adhere to the precept that NO2Tyr is a specific dosimeter of tissue ONOO– production and reaction, but rather to be a result of PMN degranulation and MPO catalysis.
The selectin- and adhesion molecule–dependent aggregation of PMNs to vascular endothelium is decisive in preceding their egress from the vessel lumen (42). MPO binding to the αMβ2 integrin of leukocytes and MPO binding to endothelial surface may further support the adherence of PMNs to endothelial cells (43). Moreover, not only does MPO uptake by endothelial cells allow for intracellular oxidant production, but transcytosis of MPO bound to PMNs may reflect an important event in PMN extravasation (44).
MPO is typically presumed to access sites of inflammation upon PMN release of azurophilic granules. The phenomenon of PMN-independent MPO accumulation across the endothelium challenges the view that MPO is a compelling indicator of neutrophil accumulation in tissues (45). Endothelial transcytosis of MPO, a mechanism previously described for other proteins such as IL-8 and lipoprotein lipase (46, 47), allows for oxidant formation remote from original sites of degranulation for extended periods of time. This also implies that PMNs may play a more significant causal role in inflammatory signaling and injury processes than previously viewed. This property of MPO can include chronic inflammatory conditions such as atherosclerosis and hypertension that are associated with increased PMN degranulation and tissue MPO activity, despite an apparent lack of elevation in PMN extravasation (18, 19, 29, 30, 48, 49).
Endothelial cell MPO binding was found to be dependent upon heparin/heparan-containing glycosaminoglycans, since exposing cells to heparin and the low–molecular weight heparin fraction enoxaparin profoundly reduced MPO binding and subsequent cell and vessel tyrosine nitration (Figure 2, c and d; Figure 4a; and Figure 6, g–i). The inhibition of endothelial MPO binding thus represents an additional mechanism by which heparin analogs exert anti-inflammatory properties (50–52). Interestingly, there was no competition between MPO and the chondroitin sulfate–dependent binding of XO to endothelium (Figure 2e) (23). This results in a provocative scenario of concerted pro-oxidative actions of endothelial and matrix-associated XO and MPO. Given the elevated levels of XO in the plasma during diverse inflammatory conditions, the ability of XO to bind to the vessel wall, and H2O2 production by XO, XO may synergize with MPO to inhibit •NO-dependent signaling mechanisms (53–55). For example, XO could serve as a source of the H2O2 that facilitates MPO-dependent oxidation, nitration, •NO consumption, and formation of secondary radical species. There are also a diversity of other sources of substrates to support these MPO-catalyzed reactions during inflammation, including the NADPH oxidase of PMNs, cytokine-activated sources of intracellular production of O2•– and H2O2, and the enhanced vascular smooth muscle cell, fibroblast, and endothelial expression of growth factor–inducible homologues of GP-91 phox (56, 57). Finally, under inflammatory conditions where intimal concentrations of MPO may occur, there is an increase in plasma and interstitial NO2– concentration to levels often exceeding 30 μM (58).
The binding and transcytosis of MPO by endothelial cells provide a defined distribution of MPO adjacent to the vascular lumen. Interestingly, this pattern of MPO deposition closely corresponds to the histological distribution of NO2Tyr (5, 20–22). Several lines of evidence derived from cell culture and isolated vascular segments also reveal a striking spatial colocalization between MPO deposition and NO2Tyr formation (Figure 5a and Figure 6, d–f). Given that NO2Tyr formation has been reported to correlate with MPO activity under various conditions (59–61), these observations indicate that MPO-catalyzed NO2Tyr formation is a prevalent mechanism in vivo. This is affirmed by the observation that zymosan-treated MPO–/– mice displayed a significant attenuation of inflammatory-induced increases in hepatic nitrotyrosine/tyrosine ratio (Figure 7). Given that neutrophils from mice display only 10–20% of the MPO content of human neutrophils (62, 63), and considering the prevalent occurrence of vessel wall–associated MPO in human disease (e.g., patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease; refs. 18, 19), MPO-catalyzed oxidative and tyrosine nitration reactions are expected to contribute significantly to human pathophysiology. This supposition is reinforced by the observation that leukocyte and blood MPO levels strongly correlate with the presence of coronary artery disease (64). In the context of the present report showing vascular cell binding, transcytosis and matrix deposition of MPO into the interstitial matrix, leukocyte and blood MPO levels will underestimate how extensively tissue is at risk from MPO-derived reactions.
These data challenge the current dogma that NO2Tyr, although frequently localized in the immediate vicinity of neutrophils, is a specific marker for ONOO– production and reactivity (65). Enzymatically catalyzed tyrosine nitration by MPO that is sequestered in defined tissue compartments represents a more controlled and specific process, compared with the diffusion controlled nitration reactions that are observed with ONOO– (66). MPO has also been proposed to catalyze ONOO––dependent tyrosine nitration (67). This may represent another mechanism linking NO2Tyr formation and MPO deposition. The biochemical occurrence and significance of this pathway in vivo remains undefined but, if relevant, still underscores the central role of peroxidases in catalyzing tyrosine nitration.
The ECM protein fibronectin proved to be the predominant protein target for MPO-dependent NO2Tyr formation. The impact of heparin and enoxaparin on inhibiting MPO-dependent NO2Tyr formation indicates that cell binding and transcytosis of MPO is of pivotal importance for fibronectin tyrosine nitration, a concept supported by the similar inhibitory effect of heparin on MPO-dependent cell protein oxidation (68). In contrast, heparin coincubated directly with fibronectin did not inhibit MPO-dependent nitration (Figure 4, c and d), mirroring in vitro observations that heparin-lipoprotein complex formation did not inhibit MPO-dependent lipid oxidation (69). This supports the view that the predominant nitrating species formed by MPO, •NO2, has a limited diffusion distance and reactivity capable of readily mediating fibronectin nitration in a glycosaminoglycan-containing microenvironment (e.g., the cell matrix). The local formation of both •NO2 and tyrosyl radicals may provide one explanation for the highly specific nitration patterns displayed by MPO; that is, the ability of •NO2 to promote tyrosine nitration is facilitated by simultaneous tyrosyl radical formation, as the reaction between •NO2 and tyrosyl radical occurs at a nearly diffusion-limited rate (109 M–1s–1). Fibronectin critically affects cellular signaling events via integrin and/or growth factor ligation, thereby orchestrating the adherence of neutrophils, as well as the growth and migration of SMC and fibroblasts (70–73). Oxidation and/or nitration of fibronectin has recently been shown to impair fibroblast migration (74). Therefore, “inflamed fibronectin,” which has long been associated with actions of PMN-derived or -activated proteases (75), may also be due to oxidative and nitrative modification of fibronectin that results in altered protein function during inflammatory conditions (76).
In summary, MPO is revealed to be an important mediator for NO2Tyr formation in vivo. Endothelial transcytosis of MPO resulted in MPO accumulation in the ECM and proved to be elemental for fibronectin nitration that can occur remote from the site of leukocyte degranulation. In addition to serving as a mediator of host defense and oxidative inflammatory tissue injury, MPO is identified as a NO2– oxidase whose close proximity to specific binding sites such as fibronectin will facilitate and confer specificity to nitration reactions within the vasculature.
This work was supported by grants from the NIH (to B.A. Freeman and C.R. White), the Deutsche Herz-stiftung (to S. Baldus), and the Max Planck Gesellschaft (to S. Baldus).
Stephan Baldus’ present address is: Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jason P. Eiserich’s present address is: Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of California at Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Stephan Baldus and Jason P. Eiserich contributed equally to this work.