The complement activation product, C5a, may play a key role in the acute inflammatory response. Polyclonal antibody to rat C5a was used to define the requirements for C5a in neutrophil-dependent inflammatory lung injury after systemic activation of complement by cobra venom factor (CVF) or after intrapulmonary deposition of IgG immune complexes. In the CVF model, intravenous infusion (but not intratracheal instillation) of anti-C5a produced a dose-dependent reduction in lung permeability and in lung content of myeloperoxidase. In C6-deficient rats, CVF infusion caused the same level of lung injury (measured by leak of 125I-albumin) as found in C6-sufficient rats. In the IgG immune complex model of lung injury, anti-C5a administered intratracheally (but not intravenously) reduced in a dose-dependent manner both the increase in lung vascular permeability as well as the buildup of lung myeloperoxidase. Treatment with anti-C5a greatly suppressed upregulation of lung vascular intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). This was correlated with a substantial drop in levels of TNFalpha in bronchoalveolar fluids. These data demonstrate the requirement for C5a in the two models of injury. In the IgG immune complex model, C5a is required for the full production of TNFalpha and the corresponding upregulation of lung vascular ICAM-1.
M S Mulligan, E Schmid, B Beck-Schimmer, G O Till, H P Friedl, R B Brauer, T E Hugli, M Miyasaka, R L Warner, K J Johnson, P A Ward
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 238 | 34 |
105 | 33 | |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 388 | 67 |
Total Views | 455 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.