Effects of a nitroxybutylester derivative of aspirin (NCX 4215) on platelet aggregation and prostanoid synthesis were compared to the effects of aspirin. NCX 4215 was approximately seven times more potent than aspirin as an inhibitor of thrombin-induced human platelet aggregation in vitro, but did not inhibit platelet thromboxane synthesis or gastric prostaglandin synthesis. NCX 4215 released nitric oxide when incubated in the presence of platelets and increased platelet levels of cGMP within 10 min of exposure, while aspirin did not. The anti-aggregatory effects of NCX 4215 in vitro were significantly attenuated by 10 microM hemoglobin. In ex vivo studies of ADP- or collagen- or thrombin-induced rat platelet aggregation, aspirin and NCX 4215 had comparable inhibitory effects 3 h after administration. Aspirin (10-120 mg/kg) caused extensive hemorrhagic erosion formation in the stomach of the rat within 3 h of oral administration, while NCX 4215 did not produce significant damage at doses of up to 300 mg/kg, nor when given daily for two weeks at 166 mg/kg. NCX 4215 did not alter systemic arterial blood pressure when administered intravenously to the rat. These studies demonstrate that NCX 4215 has comparable or enhanced anti-thrombotic activity to that of aspirin, but does not cause gastric damage or alter systemic blood pressure. The anti-thrombotic actions of NCX 4215 are, at least in part, due to generation of nitric oxide.
J L Wallace, W McKnight, P Del Soldato, A R Baydoun, G Cirino
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 157 | 0 |
43 | 37 | |
Scanned page | 211 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 36 | 0 |
Totals | 447 | 42 |
Total Views | 489 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.