We examined effects of acetylcholine (ACh) on the electrical parameters and intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in the isolated rabbit cortical collecting duct (CCD) perfused in vitro using the conventional microelectrode technique and microscopic fluorescence spectrophotometry. ACh (10(-8) to 10(-5) M) in the bath caused a positive deflection of the transepithelial voltage (VT) and an increase in [Ca2+]i. Carbachol also showed similar but smaller effects. The effects of ACh were antagonized by muscarinic receptor antagonists. ACh at 10(-6) M hyperpolarized the apical membrane voltage and increased the fractional resistance of the apical membrane of the collecting duct cells accompanied by a positive deflection of VT and an increase in transepithelial resistance, whereas it did not affect these parameters in the beta-intercalated cells. In the presence of 10(-5) M amiloride in the lumen, the effects of ACh were almost completely abolished. The ACh-induced increase in [Ca2+]i is accounted for by the release of Ca2+ from intracellular store and Ca2+ entry from the bath. In the absence of Ca2+ in the bath, the ACh-induced changes in electrophysiological parameters were significantly smaller than those observed in the presence of Ca2+. Both phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) and phorbol-12,13-dibutylate (PDBu), activators of protein kinase C (PKC), also inhibited the apical Na+ conductance. In the presence of PMA or PDBu in the bath, ACh did not show further inhibitory effect. 1-(5-Isoquinolinylsulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine, an inhibitor of PKC, partially attenuated the effect of ACh. These observations indicate that ACh inhibits the apical Na+ conductance partly by both increasing [Ca2+]i and activating PKC. Such an action of ACh may partially explain its natriuretic effect.
M Takeda, K Yoshitomi, J Taniguchi, M Imai
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 136 | 0 |
90 | 15 | |
Scanned page | 417 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
Totals | 685 | 22 |
Total Views | 707 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.