To ascertain whether the inability to suppress glucose production and increase glucose utilization in response to glucose infusion is an inherent characteristic of immature individuals, we determined glucose rate of appearance (R(a)) in minimally stressed, clinically stable, extremely premature infants (approximately 26-wk gestation) at two glucose infusion rates (6.2 +/- 0.4 and 9.5 +/- 0.5 mg/kg per min). We also assessed whether an increase in glucose delivery suppresses proteolysis by measuring the R(a) of phenylalanine and leucine. Glucose R(a) (and utilization) increased significantly at the higher glucose infusion rate (7.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 9.8 +/- 0.6 mg/kg per min). Glucose production persisted at the lower glucose infusion rate but was suppressed to nearly zero at the higher rate (1.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.1 mg/kg per min). Proteolysis was unaffected by the higher glucose infusion rate as reflected by no change in the rates of appearance of either phenylalanine (96 +/- 5 vs. 95 +/- 3 mumol/kg per h) or leucine (285 +/- 20 vs. 283 +/- 14 mumol/kg per h). Thus, clinically stable, extremely premature infants suppress glucose production and increase glucose utilization in response to increased glucose infusion, demonstrating no inherent immaturity of these processes. In contrast, increasing the rate of glucose delivery results in no change in whole body proteolysis in these infants. The regulation of proteolysis in this population remains to be defined.
D E Hertz, C A Karn, Y M Liu, E A Liechty, S C Denne
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 108 | 0 |
79 | 13 | |
Scanned page | 258 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 493 | 15 |
Total Views | 508 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.