Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominantly inherited predisposition to neoplastic lesions of the parathyroids, pancreas, and the pituitary. We have previously located the predisposing genetic defect to the long arm of chromosome 11 by genetic linkage. In this study, 124 members of six MEN1 families, including 59 affected individuals, were genotyped for restriction fragment length polymorphisms with different DNA probes, and the genetic linkage between these marker systems and MEN1 was determined. 13 marker systems (17 DNA probes) were found to be linked to MEN1. These markers are located within a region on chromosome 11 spanning 14% meiotic recombinations, with the MEN1 locus in the middle. Four of the marker systems are on the centromeric side of MEN1, and four on the telomeric side, based on meiotic crossovers. The remaining five DNA probes are closely linked to MEN1, with no crossovers in our set of families. The 13 marker systems can be used for an accurate and reliable premorbid test for MEN1. In most clinical situations it is possible to identify a haplotype of this part of chromosome 11 with the mutant MEN1 allele in the middle. The calculated predictive accuracy is greater than 99.5% if three such marker systems are informative. Therefore, genetic linkage testing can be used for informed genetic counseling in MEN1 families, and to avoid unnecessary biochemical screening programs.
C Larsson, J Shepherd, Y Nakamura, C Blomberg, G Weber, B Werelius, N Hayward, B Teh, T Tokino, B Seizinger
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 103 | 3 |
76 | 15 | |
Scanned page | 180 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 41 | 0 |
Totals | 400 | 21 |
Total Views | 421 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.