The cytotoxic effect of a lymphocyte-specific immunotoxin formed by disulfide conjugation of an anti-T11 monoclonal antibody with the ribosome-inactivating protein gelonin was assessed in vitro on peripheral blood T cells and in vivo on splenic and lymph node T cells of macaque monkeys. This immunotoxin was cytotoxic to proliferating peripheral blood T cells in vitro as measured by both direct and indirect assays. Two sequential intravenous infusions into macaque monkeys achieved plasma concentrations of immunotoxin far in excess of those shown to be cytotoxic for cultured T cells and coated all T cells in lymph nodes and spleen with intact immunotoxin for four days. However, the cytotoxic effect of the immunotoxin on T cells in vivo was considerably less than that predicted by the in vitro studies. Further experiments suggested that the state of activation of the targeted T cell population in vivo, or the appearance of anti-immunotoxin antibodies, which occurred in all infused monkeys, might attenuate immunotoxin-mediated cell killing in vivo. These studies illustrate the significant differences between the action of immunotoxin conjugates in vitro, and those seen when these conjugates are utilized as therapeutic agents in vivo.
K A Reimann, V S Goldmacher, J M Lambert, L V Chalifoux, S B Cook, S F Schlossman, N L Letvin
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 132 | 0 |
94 | 22 | |
Scanned page | 309 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 44 | 0 |
Totals | 579 | 25 |
Total Views | 604 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.