Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1985;75(3):987-991. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI111800.
Abstract
The effect of human thrombomodulin isolated from placenta on the procoagulant activity of thrombin was studied and compared to that of rabbit thrombomodulin. The isolated protein was proved to be thrombomodulin because a rabbit antibody against the isolated protein blocked protein C activation by thrombomodulin in solution and also blocked the protein-C-activating cofactor activity of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. The affinity of human thrombomodulin for human thrombin in the presence of fibrinogen is 30 times less than that of rabbit thrombomodulin. This value is based on the measurements of the clotting time of human fibrinogen and thrombin in the presence of increasing amounts of thrombomodulin. Human thrombomodulin was also much less effective compared with rabbit thrombomodulin in inhibiting thrombin-induced human coagulation factor V activation. The ability to inhibit release of [3H]serotonin from washed human platelets was at least 10 times less using human thrombomodulin compared with rabbit thrombomodulin. A partially purified preparation of human lung thrombomodulin was also relatively ineffective in inhibiting thrombin-induced serotonin release from platelets, indicating that the difference between rabbit and human thrombomodulin is one of species rather than of tissue. Thus, while human thrombomodulin is a potent cofactor in protein C activation, it is not an efficient inhibitor of the procoagulant actions of thrombin.
Authors
I Maruyama, H H Salem, H Ishii, P W Majerus
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 109 | 3 |
| 46 | 10 | |
| Scanned page | 211 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 72 | 0 |
| Totals | 438 | 14 |
| Total Views | 452 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)