The effect of human beta-endorphin (h beta E) infusion (0.2 mg/h) on glucose homeostasis was studied in 10 conscious overnight fasted dogs in which endocrine pancreatic function was fixed at basal levels with somatostatin plus intraportal replacement of basal insulin and glucagon. h beta E caused a fall in plasma glucose from 107 +/- 5 to 76 +/- 6 mg/dl by 3 h (P less than 0.01). This was due to a 25% fall in tracer-determined glucose production (Ra; P less than 0.01). A significantly larger fall in Ra was observed in four dogs in which hypoglycemia was prevented by use of an exogenous glucose infusion (45 vs. 25%, P less than 0.05). These changes occurred in the absence of changes in circulating levels of insulin, glucagon, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol. We conclude that the naturally occurring opioid peptide, beta-endorphin, inhibits glucose production by the liver in vivo. This appears to be a direct effect of the opioid on the liver, since the inhibition took place in the absence of changes in the other hormones measured. These results suggest that endorphins act on glucose homeostasis in a complex way, both by affecting other glucoregulatory hormones as demonstrated elsewhere, and by directly modulating hepatic glucose production as shown here.
P M Radosevich, P E Williams, J R McRae, W W Lacy, D N Orth, N N Abumrad
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 101 | 3 |
60 | 19 | |
Scanned page | 120 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 27 | 0 |
Totals | 308 | 22 |
Total Views | 330 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.