The opsonophagocytic requirements of human sera containing endogenous complement for a variety of type Ia, and group B streptococcal strains were defined. Significant reduction (≧90%) in colony-forming units was noted after a 40-min incubation for the highly encapsulated, mouse-passed prototype strain 090 by sera containing moderate to high concentrations of antibody to type Ia polysaccharide (mean, 16.5 μg/ml), whereas bacterial growth occurred in 25 sera with low levels of specific antibody (mean, 2.1 μg/ml). This absolute requirement for a critical amount of specific antibody in promoting opsonophagocytic killing of strain 090 was not found when 18 fresh clinical type Ia isolates were tested. In antibody-deficient and agammaglobulinemic sera, respectively, mean reductions in colony-forming units of 94 and 95% were seen for fresh clinical isolates, whereas strain 090 was not killed by polymorphonuclear leukocytes in the presence of these sera. All strains required a considerable amount of specific antibody for alternative pathway-mediated opsonophagocytosis. That opsonophagocytic killing of clinical type Ia isolates was mediated by the classical pathway in a nonantibody-dependent fashion was shown when MgEGTA chelation of agammaglobulinemic serum or use of serum deficient in C2 resulted in bacterial growth. The addition of C2 to C2-deficient serum restored bactericidal activity of this serum. These experiments indicate that substances other than the exposed surface of the type Ia capsular polysaccharide initiate classical pathway-mediated opsonophagocytosis of clinical isolates of type Ia, group B streptococci by human sera in the absence of immunoglobulin. Perhaps, a deficiency in classical complement pathway function is critical to the susceptibility of neonates to type Ia, group B streptococcal disease.
Carol J. Baker, Morven S. Edwards, Bette J. Webb, Dennis L. Kasper
Usage data is cumulative from July 2023 through July 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 131 | 0 |
55 | 32 | |
Scanned page | 182 | 8 |
Citation downloads | 16 | 0 |
Totals | 384 | 40 |
Total Views | 424 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.