A sensitive and precise competitive-displacement double-antibody radioimmunoassay was developed for the human plasma enzyme lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT; Ec 2.3 1.43). The ability of plasma from various animal species to displace labeled human LCAT from goat anti-human LCAT could be ranked in the following order: man and sheep > nonhuman primates > cat or dog > pig > rabbit or guinea pig > mouse > rat. Normolipidemic subjects had levels of LCAT of 6.14 +/- 0.98 micrograms/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 66). Subjects with dysbeta-lipoproteinemia had the highest plasma LCAT levels (7.88 +/- 0.39 micrograms/ml, n = 7, P < 0.05), followed by hypercholesterolemic subjects (7.00 +/- 1.30, n = 41) and hypertriglyceridemic subjects (6.96 +/- 1.3, n = 10). LCAT-deficient subjects had the lowest enzyme levels (0.89, 0.83, and 0.05 micrograms/ml, respectively, and two subjects with no detectable enzyme). Males had lower LCAT levels (6.42 +/- 1.05 micrograms/ml, n = 90, for all subjects; 5.99 +/- 1.03, n = 44, for normolipidemics) than females (7.01 +/- 1.14, n = 34, for all subjects P < 0.01; 6.44 +/- 0.79, n = 22, for normolipidemics, P < 0.01). LCAT levels correlated significantly with total cholesterol (males, r = 0.384, P < 0.001; females, r = 0.519, P < 0.002); and total triglyceride (only in females, r = 0.512, P < 0.002). LCAT levels in females correlated inversely with HDL cholesterol (r = 0.341, P < 0.05) and apoprotein D (r = 0.443, P < 0.02), but no such relationship existed in males.
J J Albers, J L Adolphson, C H Chen
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 119 | 2 |
49 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 297 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 518 | 23 |
Total Views | 541 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.