Advertisement
Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI109318
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Find articles by Williams, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Find articles by Hollenberg, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Find articles by Moore, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Find articles by Swartz, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Find articles by Dluhy, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published March 1, 1979 - More info
To determine the mechanism underlying altered adrenal responsiveness in patients with essential hypertension, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis was assessed in normotensive and hypertensive subjects using three pharmacological probes: SQ 20881, a converting enzyme inhibitor; saralasin, a competitive angiotensin antagonist with prominent agonist properties; and angiotensin itself. All subjects were studied while supine and in balance on a 10 meq Na/100 meq K intake. The decrement in plasma aldosterone with SQ 20881 in 26 hypertensive subjects (15±3 ng/dl) was normal (13±4 ng/dl), suggesting that the altered adrenal responsiveness in hypertensives is not because of a change in a postreceptor event or in the relative contribution of angiotensin to the control of aldosterone secretion.
Saralasin at a dose (0.1 μg/kg per min) that reduced aldosterone levels in all normals produced a normal aldosterone decrement (14±3 ng/dl) in 19 patients with renovascular hypertension (12±4 ng/dl). The same dose, however, had no net effect on plasma aldosterone levels in 70 patients with normal or high renin essential hypertension (−1±1 ng/dl) despite identical metabolic balance and control renin and angiotensin levels. The altered response could be explained by an agonist effect, aldosterone rising in 45 of the essential hypertensives. There were no significant differences between normal and abnormal responders in pre- and postcortisol, -potassium, -renin and -angiotensin concentrations.
Angiotensin was infused (0.1-3 ng/kg per min) in 15 patients with normal renin essential hypertension, previously studied with saralasin. A probit transformation defined the dose required to induce a 50% increase in aldosterone (ED50). In the patients in whom aldosterone rose with saralasin, the dose required to induce a 50% increase was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than in those in whom aldosterone fell normally (1.02±0.06 [SD] vs. 0.38±0.07 ng/kg per min). Vascular responses were similar in the various groups. We conclude that altered adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin in some essential hypertensive patients is secondary to a change in the interaction of angiotensin with its adrenal receptor.