The subcellular distribution of the superoxide (O2-)-forming enzyme in human neutrophils was investigated. Cells were activated by phorbolmyristate acetate or by opsonized zymosan, and were then fractionated by zonal-rate sedimentation at two different speeds. At high speed, the specific granules were resolved from the azurophils and the membrane fraction, while at low speed, the azurophil granules could be separated from fast-sedimenting particle aggregates. Under both conditions, the major portion of the O-2--forming activity (60--70% of the total) was found to be associated with the membrane fraction which was characterized by the presence of alkaline phosphatase, alkaline phosphodiesterase I, and acid aryl phosphatase. No significant O-2--forming activity was found in either specific or azurophil granules. Some activity was present in the fastest sedimenting fractions which, as shown by electron microscopy, were heterogeneous and contained aggregated material which included membrane fragments. These fractionation results provide strong additional support for the current view that the activable O-2--forming system is localized in the plasma membrane of human neutrophils.
B Dewald, M Baggiolini, J T Curnutte, B M Babior
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 149 | 0 |
60 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 318 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 578 | 17 |
Total Views | 595 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.