Studies were performed in Munich-Wistar rats to determine whether changes in papillary plasma flow might be responsible for the concentrating defect which occurs after exposure of the extrarenal papilla. Papillary plasma flow was measured by 125I-albumin accumulation. Initial studies in hydropenic animals revealed that papillary plasma flow was 40% higher in the kidney with the exposured papilla, 41 vs. 29 ml/min per 100 g of papilla (P < 0.001). This increase in papillary plasma flow was detectable 15 or 45 min after removing the ureter. Because it was unclear whether the rise in papillary plasma flow was a cause or the result of the fall in urine osmolality, similar studies were performed in animals undergoing a water diuresis. In this setting, papillary plasma flow still increased on the exposed side compared to the control side, 81 vs. 60 ml/min per 100 g, despite similarly low urine osmolalities of 155 and 174 mosmol/kg, respectively. This finding is compatible with the possibility that papillary exposure per se causes an increase in papillary plasma flow and that this hemodynamic alteration may lead to a reduction in urinary osmolality secondary to washout of the medullary interstitium. A final group of hydropenic rats was given either indomethacin or meclofenamate before removing the ureter. In these studies, there was no difference in either the papillary plasma flow or the urine osmolality between control and exposed kidneys. It is therefore suggested that opening the ureter induces an increase in papillary plasma flow by some mechanism which may involve an alteration in prostaglandin synthesis.
Elaine L. Chuang, H. John Reineck, Richard W. Osgood, Robert T. Kunau Jr., Jay H. Stein
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 106 | 1 |
56 | 50 | |
Scanned page | 203 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
Totals | 403 | 54 |
Total Views | 457 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.