Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1974;54(6):1455-1461. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107893.
Abstract
Cardiac slowing occurring during diagnostic coronary arteriography was studied in 78 patients. Comparable degrees of slowing occurred with injections into the right and into the left coronary arteries into the contralateral artery, and with injections into the coronary artery giving rise to the sinus node artery and into the contralateral artery. Rapid intracoronary injections of isosmotic dextrose solution produced significantly less slowing than comparable injections of contrast medium. Slow injections of contrast medium produced cardiac slowing comparable to that caused by rapid injections of contrast medium. However, the cardiac slowing was significantly greater than that produced by rapid injections of dextrose solution. Inhalation of 100% oxygen did not alter the heart rate response to injections of contrast medium. Atropine produced dose-related attenuation of cardiac slowing. Bradycardia persisting after cholinergic blockade was significantly greater after injections into the coronary artery supplying the sinus node than it was after injections into the contralateral artery. Coronary arteriography produced transient, occasionally profound, arterial hypotension in 38 of 41 patients in whom arterial pressures were recorded. Arterial pressure did not change in three patients.
Authors
Dwain L. Eckberg, Carl W. White, Michael Kioschos, Francois M. Abboud
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 123 | 0 |
| 40 | 16 | |
| Scanned page | 209 | 22 |
| Citation downloads | 34 | 0 |
| Totals | 406 | 38 |
| Total Views | 444 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)