Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Studies on the Response of Patients with Classic Hemophilia to Transfusion with Concentrates of Antihemophilic Factor: A DIFFERENCE IN THE HALF-LIFE OF ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR AS MEASURED BY PROCOAGULANT AND IMMUNOLOGIC TECHNIQUES
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff
Published October 1, 1972
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1972;51(10):2593-2596. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107076.
View: Text | PDF

Studies on the Response of Patients with Classic Hemophilia to Transfusion with Concentrates of Antihemophilic Factor: A DIFFERENCE IN THE HALF-LIFE OF ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR AS MEASURED BY PROCOAGULANT AND IMMUNOLOGIC TECHNIQUES

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Antihemophilic factor (AHF, factor VIII) levels were measured by a standard coagulation method and by an immunologic technique before and after infusion of AHF concentrates into patients with classic hemophilia. After infusion of AHF concentrates, the half-life of the AHF procoagulant (i.e., clot-promoting) activity varied from 12 to 14 hr, whereas that of the antigen ranged from 24 to 40 hr. The half-life of the antigen was similar in patients with and without circulating anticoagulants to AHF. The data are compatible with the suggestion that the antigen may be carried on a precursor molecule which the patient with hemophilia produces but cannot convert to the functional clot-promoting agent. Other explanations of the observations are, however, recognized.

Authors

Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff

×

Full Text PDF

Download PDF (689.02 KB)

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts