Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Resting transmembrane potential difference of skeletal muscle in normal subjects and severely ill patients
J. N. Cunningham Jr., … , F. C. Rector Jr., D. W. Seldin
J. N. Cunningham Jr., … , F. C. Rector Jr., D. W. Seldin
Published January 1, 1971
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1971;50(1):49-59. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106483.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Resting transmembrane potential difference of skeletal muscle in normal subjects and severely ill patients

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The resting membrane potential difference (Em) of skeletal muscle was measured in 26 normal human subjects, 7 patients with mild illness, and 21 patients with severe, debilitating medical disorders. A closed transcutaneous approach to the muscle was made by needle puncture and the Em was measured utilizing standard Ling electrodes. Measurements revealed an Em of -88 ±3.8 mv in healthy subjects and -89 ±2.1 mv in patients hospitalized for minor medical problems. The mean Em in 21 in-hospital patients, judged to be severely ill clinically from a variety of causes, was -66.3 ±9.0 mv. Open deltoid muscle biopsies were performed in 7 of the healthy subjects and in 13 of the severely ill group. Estimation of the intra-extracellular water partition was made by calculating the chloride space from the previously measured Em. Analysis of the muscle samples revealed no significant difference in the intra-extracellular potassium ratios of the two groups biopsied. Intracellular Na+ concentrations were uniformly increased in the muscle samples of the severely ill subjects and averaged 42.3% higher than those of the normal subjects. The mechanisms which might account for the elevation of intracellular Na+ and a depression of Em independent of changes in intra-extracellular K+ ratios are discussed and it is suggested that this defect may be a generalized cellular abnormality which is a common quality of serious illnesses.

Authors

J. N. Cunningham Jr., N. W. Carter, F. C. Rector Jr., D. W. Seldin

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 180 9
PDF 50 15
Scanned page 486 3
Citation downloads 56 0
Totals 772 27
Total Views 799
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts