Submit a comment
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2024;134(14):e173096. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI173096.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predicting immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in patients infused with CAR T cells is still a conundrum. This complication, thought to be consequent to CAR T cell activation, arises a few days after infusion, when circulating CAR T cells are scarce and specific CAR T cell–derived biomarkers are lacking.METHODS CAR+ extracellular vesicle (CAR+EV) release was assessed in human CD19.CAR T cells cocultured with CD19+ target cells. A prospective cohort of 100 patients with B cell lymphoma infused with approved CD19.CAR T cell products was assessed for plasma CAR+EVs as biomarkers of in vivo CD19.CAR T cell activation. Human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived (iPSC-derived) neural cells were used as a model for CAR+EV-induced neurotoxicity.RESULTS In vitro release of CAR+EVs occurs within 1 hour after target engagement. Plasma CAR+EVs are detectable 1 hour after infusion. A concentration greater than 132.8 CAR+EVs/μL at hour +1 or greater than 224.5 CAR+EVs/μL at day +1 predicted ICANS in advance of 4 days, with a sensitivity and a specificity outperforming other ICANS predictors. ENO2+ nanoparticles were released by iPSC-derived neural cells upon CAR+EV exposure and were increased in plasma of patients with ICANS.CONCLUSION Plasma CAR+EVs are an immediate signal of CD19.CAR T cell activation, are suitable predictors of neurotoxicity, and may be involved in ICANS pathogenesis.TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04892433, NCT05807789.FUNDING Life Science Hub–Advanced Therapies (financed by Health Ministry as part of the National Plan for Complementary Investments to the National Recovery and Resilience Plan [NRRP]: E.3 Innovative health ecosystem for APC fees and immunomonitoring).
Authors
Gianluca Storci, Francesco De Felice, Francesca Ricci, Spartaco Santi, Daria Messelodi, Salvatore Nicola Bertuccio, Noemi Laprovitera, Michele Dicataldo, Lucrezia Rossini, Serena De Matteis, Beatrice Casadei, Francesca Vaglio, Margherita Ursi, Francesco Barbato, Marcello Roberto, Maria Guarino, Gian Maria Asioli, Mario Arpinati, Pietro Cortelli, Enrico Maffini, Enrica Tomassini, Marta Tassoni, Carola Cavallo, Francesco Iannotta, Maria Naddeo, Pier Luigi Tazzari, Elisa Dan, Cinzia Pellegrini, Serafina Guadagnuolo, Matteo Carella, Barbara Sinigaglia, Chiara Pirazzini, Caterina Severi, Paolo Garagnani, Katarzyna Malgorzata Kwiatkowska, Manuela Ferracin, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Massimiliano Bonafè, Francesca Bonifazi
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)