Submit a comment
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2023;133(12):e163548. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI163548.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adoptive transfer of EBV-specific T cells can restore specific immunity in immunocompromised patients with EBV-associated complications.METHODS We provide results of a personalized T cell manufacturing program evaluating donor, patient, T cell product, and outcome data. Patient-tailored clinical-grade EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (EBV-CTL) products from stem cell donors (SCDs), related third-party donors (TPDs), or unrelated TPDs from the allogeneic T cell donor registry (alloCELL) at Hannover Medical School were manufactured by immunomagnetic selection using a CliniMACS Plus or Prodigy device and the EBV PepTivators EBNA-1 and Select. Consecutive manufacturing processes were evaluated, and patient outcome and side effects were retrieved by retrospective chart analysis.RESULTS Forty clinical-grade EBV-CTL products from SCDs, related TPDs, or unrelated TPDs were generated for 37 patients with refractory EBV infections or EBV-associated malignancies with and without a history of transplantation, within 5 days (median) after donor identification. Thirty-four patients received 1–14 EBV-CTL products (fresh and cryopreserved). EBV-CTL transfer led to a complete response in 20 of 29 patients who were evaluated for clinical response. No infusion-related toxicity was reported. EBV-specific T cells in patients’ blood were detectable in 16 of 18 monitored patients (89%) after transfer, and their presence correlated with clinical response.CONCLUSION Personalized clinical-grade manufacture of EBV-CTL products via immunomagnetic selection from SCDs, related TPDs, or unrelated TPDs in a timely manner is feasible. Overall, EBV-CTLs were clinically effective and well tolerated. Our data suggest EBV-CTL transfer as a promising therapeutic approach for immunocompromised patients with refractory EBV-associated diseases beyond HSCT, as well as patients with preexisting organ dysfunction.TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.FUNDING This study was funded in part by the German Research Foundation (DFG, 158989968/SFB 900), the Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung (DKS 2013.09), Wilhelm-Sander-Stiftung (reference 2015.097.1), Ellen-Schmidt-Program of Hannover Medical School, and German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (reference 01EO0802).
Authors
Agnes Bonifacius, Britta Lamottke, Sabine Tischer-Zimmermann, Rebecca Schultze-Florey, Lilia Goudeva, Hans-Gert Heuft, Lubomir Arseniev, Rita Beier, Gernot Beutel, Gunnar Cario, Birgit Fröhlich, Johann Greil, Leo Hansmann, Justin Hasenkamp, Michaela Höfs, Patrick Hundsdoerfer, Edgar Jost, Kinan Kafa, Oliver Kriege, Nicolaus Kröger, Stephan Mathas, Roland Meisel, Michaela Nathrath, Mervi Putkonen, Sarina Ravens, Hans Christian Reinhardt, Elisa Sala, Martin G. Sauer, Clemens Schmitt, Roland Schroers, Nina Kristin Steckel, Ralf Ulrich Trappe, Mareike Verbeek, Daniel Wolff, Rainer Blasczyk, Britta Eiz-Vesper, Britta Maecker-Kolhoff
Guidelines
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.
- Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
- Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
- The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
- No appeals will be considered.
- Comments are not indexed in PubMed.
Specific requirements
- Maximum length, 400 words
- Entered as plain text or HTML
- Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
- Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
- Comments may not include figures
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)