It has been recently proposed that 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11 beta-OHSD) is responsible for aldosterone tissue specificity. A 11 beta-OHSD deficiency has been invoked as a cause of the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess, and 11 beta-OHSD inhibition by liquorice has been invoked to explain the hypertension induced by this drug. Since the renal tubule is composed of aldosterone-sensitive and insensitive segments, we determined the distribution of 11 beta-OHSD along the rabbit tubule. Pools of tubular segments isolated by microdissection were incubated for 2 h at 37 degrees C in the presence of [3H]corticosterone (3H-B, 8.10(-9) M). Afterwards, the amounts of 3H-B and of the metabolite 11-dehydrocorticosterone (3H-A) were determined using HPLC analysis. In the proximal tubule, in either its convoluted or straight portion, and in the medullary thick ascending limb, the amount of 3H-A was 19.6 +/- 3.8% (n = 12), 17.9 +/- 3.4 (n = 8), and 15.0 +/- 2.2 (n = 4), respectively, of the sum of 3H-A + 3H-B. In the cortical ascending limb and the collecting tubule in its cortical and medullary parts, it was 74.7 +/- 6.8% (n = 4), 74.1 +/- 4.9 (n = 9) and 64.6 +/- 14.1 (n = 3), respectively. In both proximal and cortical collecting tubule, addition of carbenoxolone 8.10(-4) M, an inhibitor of 11 beta-OHSD, almost completely inhibited the conversion of 3H-B to 3H-A. Thus, 11 beta-OHSD activity was high in the aldosterone-sensitive segments, and low in the aldosterone-insensitive segments. These results strongly favor the hypothesis that 11 beta-OHSD is a key enzyme in mineralocorticoid tissue specificity along the rabbit nephron. They reinforce the notion that a defect in 11 beta-OHSD plays a major role in the syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess and liquorice-induced hypertension.
J P Bonvalet, I Doignon, M Blot-Chabaud, P Pradelles, N Farman
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.