Insulin receptors and Type I insulinlike growth factor (IGF) receptors have a similar structure with a major binding subunit of Mr approximately 130,000 linked by disulfide bonds to other membrane proteins to form a Mr greater than 300,000 complex. Both insulin and Type I IGF receptors also interact with both insulin and IGF, although with different binding affinities. We used a panel of human and rabbit sera containing antibodies to insulin receptors to determine whether these sera also interact with Type I IGF receptors. Immunoglobulins from five of five human sera inhibited binding of 125I-insulin and 125I-IGF-I to insulin receptors and Type I IGF receptors in human placenta and human lymphocytes. The rank order of reactivity with both receptors was the same; two sera, however, appeared to be selectively less reactive with the Type I IGF receptor, especially in placenta. Sera from five of seven patients and from a rabbit immunized with purified insulin receptor effectively immunoprecipitated both placental insulin receptors and Type I IGF receptors. Of the remaining sera, one had only a low titer against the insulin receptor and did not immunoprecipitate the IGF receptor, whereas the second serum effectively immunoprecipitated cross-linked and surface-iodinated insulin receptors, but had negligible reactivity against the Type I IGF receptor. These results suggest that most antisera to the insulin receptor also contain antibodies to Type I IGF receptors. Whether both specificities are inherent in the same or different antibody molecules remains to be determined. These data support the hypothesis that the insulin and IGF-I receptors are separate but related molecules, although there remains a small possibility that both receptors are domains on the same protein.
M Kasuga, N Sasaki, C R Kahn, S P Nissley, M M Rechler
The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.