Advertisement
Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI21140
Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Address correspondence to: Akira Takashima, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA. Phone: (214) 648-3419; Fax: (214) 648-3472; E-mail: Akira.Takashima@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Find articles by Mizumoto, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Address correspondence to: Akira Takashima, Department of Dermatology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA. Phone: (214) 648-3419; Fax: (214) 648-3472; E-mail: Akira.Takashima@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Find articles by Takashima, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published March 1, 2004 - More info
Langerhans cells (LCs) represent a unique DC subset populating the outermost body surface, i.e., the epidermis. Although CD1a and langerin (CD207) are used as specific markers to distinguish LCs from other DC subsets, their immunological functions have remained mostly unknown. A new paper (see the related article beginning on page 701) demonstrates that LCs utilize these markers to induce cellular immune responses to Mycobacterium leprae: CD1a mediates the presentation of nonpeptide antigens to T cells, while langerin facilitates uptake of microbial fragments and perhaps their delivery to a specialized subcellular compartment.
As a tissue constantly exposed to external insults, the skin is equipped with layers of protective mechanisms. Stratum corneum serves as a physical barrier against infectious microbes, foreign proteins, and harmful chemicals, and keratinocytes produce a wide array of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, as well as antimicrobial peptides. As a skin resident member of the DC family of APCs, Langerhans cells (LCs) initiate both innate and adaptive immune responses to skin-relevant antigens, thereby acting as immunological sentinels. Although LCs were discovered in 1868 by gold chloride staining as a highly dendritic epidermal cell population, their lineage or function remained unknown until the 1960s and 1970s when appropriate LC “markers” were discovered. These include surface I-A molecules (i.e., murine MHC class II molecules; refs. 1 and 2), membrane-associated enzymatic activities to hydrolyze extracellular ATP (ecto-ATPase) (3), and rod/tennis racket–shaped intracellular organelles (Birbeck granules) (4). More specific markers, such as CD1a (5), E-cadherin (6), and langerin (7), are now known to distinguish LCs from other DC subsets.
Although identified initially as LC markers, these molecules have subsequently been shown to play functional roles in various aspects of LC biology. LCs employ I-A molecules for presentation of peptide antigens to CD4 T cells. CD39, which is responsible for LC-associated ecto-ATPase activities, regulates extracellular nucleotide-mediated skin inflammatory responses and immune reactions (8). Birbeck granules constitute a subdomain of the endosomal recycling compartment, perhaps being involved in an antigen loading process (9). E-cadherin–mediated LC-keratinocyte interaction facilitates epidermal retention of LCs (6) and also prevents their spontaneous maturation in the steady state (10). In this issue of the JCI, Hunger and colleagues have unveiled closely related functions of two additional LC markers: CD1a and langerin (11).
Group 1 CD1 isoforms (CD1a, CD1b, and CD1c in humans) expressed on APCs are capable of presenting various forms of self- and microbial lipid antigens to CD4, CD8, and double-negative T cell populations, whereas group 2 isoforms (CD1d in humans and mice) present an unusual glycosphingolipid, α-galactosylceramide, to a specialized T cell subset known as NK T cells (reviewed in ref. 12). These findings have changed our classic view that T cells recognize only peptide antigens presented by MHC class I or class II molecules.
LCs express CD1a molecules at exceptionally high levels with virtually no detectable CD1b and only modest CD1c expression, whereas other DC subsets (e.g., dermal DCs and monocyte-derived DCs) predominantly display CD1b molecules with varying degrees of CD1a and CD1c expression. Following assembly with β2-microglobulin in the endoplasmic reticulum, all CD1 isoforms are transported to the cell surface but are subsequently delivered to distinct endosomal and/or lysosomal compartments. For example, CD1b isoform is internalized in clathrin-coated pits via a tyrosine-based motif in its cytoplasmic tail (YXXΦ where Y is tyrosine, X is any amino acid, and Φ is a bulky hydrophobic residue), sorted to early endosomes, late endosomes/lysosomes, and MHC II–rich compartments (MIICs), and recycled back to the plasma membrane. By contrast, CD1a isoform, which lacks the YXXΦ motif, mainly traffics between the cell surface and early recycling vesicles (13). CD1c and CD1d exhibit distinct trafficking patterns reflecting the difference in YXXΦ motifs and usages of adaptor-protein complexes (reviewed in ref. 12). The resulting diversity in surface expression profiles of CD1 isoforms among DC subsets and in their subcellular trafficking routes enables broad sampling of lipid antigens in different tissues and in various subcellular compartments.
Most of the lipid-reactive T cell clones generated from patients with Mycobacterium leprae or M. tuberculosis infection are restricted to the CD1b isoform. Hunger and colleagues reasoned that it might simply reflect the conventional use of monocyte-derived CD1bhigh DC cultures as APCs for stimulating T cells. In fact, by using CD34+ progenitor-derived CD1ahigh DC cultures as APCs, they have generated several M. leprae–reactive, CD1a-restricted double-negative T cell clones from leprosy patients (11). Both CD1ahigh DC cultures and LCs freshly procured from skin activated these T cell clones in the presence of M. leprae extracts, and anti-CD1a antibodies completely blocked this DC-T cell interaction. With respect to the identity of putative antigens, the CD1a-restricted T cell clones recognized non-peptide moieties in insoluble mycobacterial cell wall fractions but failed to respond to a tested panel of currently known CD1 lipid antigens, suggesting that one or more unusual (glyco)lipids are presented by CD1a molecules. These observations, together with recent other reports (14, 15), now establish the concept that LCs employ CD1a to present mycobacterial lipid antigens to T cells.
Langerin (CD207) is a type II membrane-associated C-type lectin known to be expressed exclusively by LCs and to recognize mannose residues via its single carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD). Langerin is localized not only on the cell surface, but also intracellularly in close association with Birbeck granules. Transfection of langerin cDNA leads to Birbeck granule formation in fibroblasts. Upon binding to the cell surface, antilangerin antibodies are rapidly internalized and delivered to Birbeck granules. These observations indicate that langerin functions as an endocytic receptor for targeted transport of mannose-containing ligands to Birbeck granules (7, 16).
Strikingly, Hunger and colleagues found that treatment of CD1ahigh DCs with antilangerin antibodies before, but not after, pulsing with M. leprae extracts completely abrogated their ability to stimulate CD1a-restricted T cell clones. Antilangerin antibodies also blocked the activation of CD1a-restricted T cell clones by freshly procured LCs (11). Importantly, antilangerin antibodies failed to inhibit the presentation of M. tuberculosis extracts by the same DC population to a CD1b-restricted T cell clone, with the implication that langerin-mediated antigen uptake and delivery to Birbeck granules may be involved only in the CD1a-dependent antigen presentation pathway. In fact, intracellular CD1a molecules are found in close association with Birbeck granules (13, 15). Thus, it is tempting to speculate that Birbeck granules serve as a specialized subcompartment for orchestrating langerin-mediated, CD1a-dependent presentation of lipid antigens by LCs (Figure 1).
Geographic and functional coupling of CD1 isoforms and C-type lectins. (A) CD1a molecules are transported from the cell surface to early recycling vesicles and Birbeck granules. Glycolipid antigens captured by langerin are also internalized selectively to Birbeck granules, where CD1a is coupled with lipid moieties. This pathway enables LCs to present lipid antigens to CD1a-restricted T cells. (B) CD1b molecules recycle to early endosomes and then late endosomes, and MMR and DC-SIGN deliver glycolipid antigens to these subcompartments, respectively. Certain DC subsets (e.g., dermal DCs) may employ these pathways for CD1b-restricted lipid antigen presentation. (C) Glycoprotein antigens can be internalized via DEC-205 to MIICs, where peptide antigens bind to MHC class II molecules. This pathway presumably promotes MHC II–restricted peptide antigen presentation by many DC subsets known to express DEC-205.
Langerin is not the only C-type lectin expressed by LCs or other DC subsets. DEC-205 (CD205) is a type I membrane-associated C-type lectin containing ten contiguous CRDs and known to be expressed by various DC subsets (e.g., LCs, dermal DCs, and monocyte-derived DCs) and thymic epithelial cells (17). Macrophage mannose receptor (MMR) (CD206) is another type I lectin with eight CRDs and expressed by macrophages and select DC subsets including dermal DCs and monocyte-derived DCs, but not LCs (18). DC-SIGN (CD209) is a type II lectin with a single CRD and expressed by select DC subsets (again, excluding LCs) (19). Interestingly, epidermal LCs have been postulated to primarily employ langerin for binding HIV gp120, while dermal DCs mainly rely on MMR and DC-SIGN (20). Thus, different DC populations employ distinct sets of C-type lectins for capturing carbohydrate-bearing antigens (reviewed in ref. 21).
The above DC-associated C-type lectins further differ from each other in their subcellular sorting profiles. For example, DEC-205 recycles into MIICs via a triacidic cluster in its cytoplasmic tail, thereby facilitating the formation of MHC II-peptide complexes. DEC-205–mediated antigen uptake and sorting, indeed, produced a 100-fold augmentation of CD4 T cell–stimulatory capacities (17, 22). Although MMR binds mannosylated antigens, this lectin receptor is constitutively internalized from the cell surface into early endosomes and recycled back to the surface. DC-SIGN, which also functions as an endocytic receptor and facilitates antigen presentation to T cells, shows a late endosomal trafficking profile (23). DEC-205, MMR, and DC-SIGN, but not langerin, contain the YXXΦ motifs in cytoplasmic tails, suggesting that CD1 and C-type lectins share the same molecular sorting mechanisms for recycling to particular subcompartments (21).
In summary, each C-type lectin transports antigens to one or more specific subcompartments where selected antigen presentation molecules (i.e., MHC class I and II molecules and CD1 isoforms) recycle preferentially (Figure 1). Thus, C-type lectins govern not only the subcellular destination of newly captured antigens, but also their presentation pathway. In fact, geographic and functional coupling of CD1b and MMR has been reported to mediate CD1b-restricted presentation of mycobacterial lipoglycan antigens (24). The striking diversity in surface expression profiles of CD1 isoforms and C-type lectins among DC subsets and in intracellular trafficking routes of both classes of the receptors enables the DC system to survey a wide variety of tissues and subcompartments for carbohydrate-bearing antigens and to present distinct antigenic moieties to respective effector T cell populations.
See the related article beginning on page 701.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD); Langerhans cell (LC); macrophage mannose receptor (MMR); MHC II–rich compartment (MIIC).
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.