Mutations in SCN5A, encoding the cardiac sodium (Na) channel, are linked to a form of the congenital long-QT syndrome (LQT3) that provokes lethal ventricular arrhythmias. These autosomal dominant mutations disrupt Na channel function, inhibiting channel inactivation, thereby causing a sustained ionic current that delays cardiac repolarization. Sodium channel–blocking antiarrhythmics, such as lidocaine, potently inhibit this pathologic Na current (INa) and are being evaluated in patients with LQT3. The mechanism underlying this effect is unknown, although high-affinity “block” of the open Na channel pore has been proposed. Here we report that a recently identified LQT3 mutation (R1623Q) imparts unusual lidocaine sensitivity to the Na channel that is attributable to its altered functional behavior. Studies of lidocaine on individual R1623Q single-channel openings indicate that the open-time distribution is not changed, indicating the drug does not block the open pore as proposed previously. Rather, the mutant channels have a propensity to inactivate without ever opening (“closed-state inactivation”), and lidocaine augments this gating behavior. An allosteric gating model incorporating closed-state inactivation recapitulates the effects of lidocaine on pathologic INa. These findings explain the unusual drug sensitivity of R1623Q and provide a general and unanticipated mechanism for understanding how Na channel–blocking agents may suppress the pathologic, sustained Na current induced by LQT3 mutations.
Nicholas G. Kambouris, H. Bradley Nuss, David C. Johns, Eduardo Marbán, Gordon F. Tomaselli, Jeffrey R. Balser
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 329 | 22 |
71 | 24 | |
Figure | 282 | 3 |
Table | 32 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 767 | 49 |
Total Views | 816 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.