Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Co-clinical assessment identifies patterns of BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma
Lawrence N. Kwong, … , Jennifer A. Wargo, Lynda Chin
Lawrence N. Kwong, … , Jennifer A. Wargo, Lynda Chin
Published February 23, 2015
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2015;125(4):1459-1470. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI78954.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology Article has an altmetric score of 82

Co-clinical assessment identifies patterns of BRAF inhibitor resistance in melanoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Multiple mechanisms have been described that confer BRAF inhibitor resistance to melanomas, yet the basis of this resistance remains undefined in a sizable portion of patient samples. Here, we characterized samples from a set of patients with melanoma that included individuals at baseline diagnosis, on BRAF inhibitor treatment, and with resistant tumors at both the protein and RNA levels. Using RNA and DNA sequencing, we identified known resistance-conferring mutations in 50% (6 of 12) of the resistant samples. In parallel, targeted proteomic analysis by protein array categorized the resistant samples into 3 stable groups, 2 of which were characterized by reactivation of MAPK signaling to different levels and 1 that was MAPK independent. The molecular relevance of these classifications identified in patients was supported by both mutation data and the similarity of resistance patterns that emerged during a co-clinical trial in a genetically engineered mouse (GEM) model of melanoma that recapitulates the development of BRAF inhibitor resistance. Additionally, we defined candidate biomarkers in pre- and early-treatment patient samples that have potential for predicting clinical responses. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that BRAF inhibitor–resistant melanomas can be actionably classified using protein expression patterns, even without identification of the underlying genetic alteration.

Authors

Lawrence N. Kwong, Genevieve M. Boland, Dennie T. Frederick, Timothy L. Helms, Ahmad T. Akid, John P. Miller, Shan Jiang, Zachary A. Cooper, Xingzhi Song, Sahil Seth, Jennifer Kamara, Alexei Protopopov, Gordon B. Mills, Keith T. Flaherty, Jennifer A. Wargo, Lynda Chin

×

Figure 2

Comparison of PLX4720 and genetic BRAF extinction.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Comparison of PLX4720 and genetic BRAF extinction.
(A) Comparison of PLX...
(A) Comparison of PLX4720 treatment and BRAF extinction in iBIP allografts. (B) RPPA data comparing BRAF extinction and PLX4720 daily time course treatments. Two tumors per time point. Gray boxes are log2 = 0. (C) Log2 microarray data comparing the fold change versus on-doxycycline controls of: 3 days of continual PLX4720 treatment versus 3 days of BRAF extinction via doxycycline withdrawal. Data are averaged from n = 2 each. (D and E) Proliferation and apoptosis in treated nude allograft tumors, as measured by phospho-histone 3 (p-H3) and TUNEL IHC staining, respectively. **P < 0.005 by Student’s t test. PLX, PLX4720.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Picked up by 11 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Posted by 4 X users
On 1 Facebook pages
85 readers on Mendeley
See more details