Advertisement
Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI61332
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Selvaraj, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Sun, Y. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Watt, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Wang, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Lei, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Birnbaumer, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, and 3Department of Physiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. 4Laboratory of Signal Transduction, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Find articles by Singh, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published March 26, 2012 - More info
The hallmark of the movement disorder Parkinson’s disease (PD) is progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons. Mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of α-synuclein, and ER stress are each implicated in the complex and poorly understood sequence of events leading to dopaminergic neuron demise. In this issue of the JCI, Selvaraj et al. report that in a mouse neurotoxin-based model of PD, reduced Ca2+ influx through transient receptor potential C1 (TRPC1) channels in the plasma membrane of dopaminergic neurons triggers a cell death–inducing ER stress response. These new findings suggest that TRPC1 channels normally function in Ca2+-mediated signaling pathways that couple adaptive/neurotrophic responses to metabolic and oxidative stress and suggest that disruption of these pathways may contribute to PD.
Mark P. Mattson
Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience a progressive decline in motor function as a result of selective loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra. The mechanism(s) underlying the loss of DA neurons is not known. Here, we show that a neurotoxin that causes a disease that mimics PD upon administration to mice, because it induces the selective loss of DA neurons in the substantia nigra, alters Ca2+ homeostasis and induces ER stress. In a human neuroblastoma cell line, we found that endogenous store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), which is critical for maintaining ER Ca2+ levels, is dependent on transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC1) activity. Neurotoxin treatment decreased TRPC1 expression, TRPC1 interaction with the SOCE modulator stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), and Ca2+ entry into the cells. Overexpression of functional TRPC1 protected against neurotoxin-induced loss of SOCE, the associated decrease in ER Ca2+ levels, and the resultant unfolded protein response (UPR). In contrast, silencing of TRPC1 or STIM1 increased the UPR. Furthermore, Ca2+ entry via TRPC1 activated the AKT pathway, which has a known role in neuroprotection. Consistent with these in vitro data, Trpc1–/– mice had an increased UPR and a reduced number of DA neurons. Brain lysates of patients with PD also showed an increased UPR and decreased TRPC1 levels. Importantly, overexpression of TRPC1 in mice restored AKT/mTOR signaling and increased DA neuron survival following neurotoxin administration. Overall, these results suggest that TRPC1 is involved in regulating Ca2+ homeostasis and inhibiting the UPR and thus contributes to neuronal survival.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and is characterized by the selective loss of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta region (SNpc). Loss of DA neurons leads to a decrease in motor function resulting in symptoms that include resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability (1, 2). Although the cause of PD is not known, recent research suggests that more than 90% of PD cases are of idiopathic origin (3). Likewise, the mechanisms leading to selective DA neuronal loss in SNpc are also not fully understood. In recent years, attention has turned to the role of Ca2+ in PD, and it has been shown that L-type Ca2+ channels make DA neurons susceptible to mitochondrial toxins (4). Furthermore, changes in Ca2+ homeostasis especially in storage organelles, ER, and mitochondria have been shown to affect neuronal survival and are closely linked with PD (5). ER is a large organelle that serves as storage for Ca2+ ions, which is necessary for regulating protein translation, membrane folding, and protein secretion (6). Impairment of ER Ca2+ homeostasis, including ER Ca2+ depletion or inhibition of N-linked glycosylation, leads to the accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the ER lumen, thereby causing ER stress (7). As a defense mechanism, cells activate the unfolded protein response (UPR), thereby increasing ER chaperones and activating an ER-associated degradation (ERAD) pathway that is necessary to alleviate ER stress and improve cell survival (8, 9). However, prolonged activation of the UPR due to severe ER dysfunction results in programmed cell death (10).
The neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) has been used to develop PD models, as it induces selective loss of DA neurons in the SNpc. Systemically administered MPTP crosses the blood brain barrier and is taken up by glial cells, where it is metabolized/oxidized to 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+). MPP+ is then released and is specifically taken up by DA neurons via dopamine transporters and inhibits mitochondrial complex I activity (11–13). The cellular consequences of mitochondrial dysfunction, as induced by MPP+, are numerous and include disturbance in Ca2+ homeostasis and oxidative stress (14, 15). Results from various PD models and analysis of postmortem PD samples also point toward a role for ER stress in PD pathogenesis (16, 17). However, although it is apparent that ER stress plays a major role in neurodegeneration, the mechanism by which these neurotoxins induce ER stress is not known. Previously we reported that transient receptor potential channel 1 (TRPC1) is critical for neuronal survival and that MPP+ treatment decreases TRPC1 expression in SH-SY5Y and PC12 cells (18, 19); however, the mechanism is not known.
Members of the TRPC family have been suggested as mediators of Ca2+ entry into cells (20–22). Activation of the G protein (Gq/11)/PLC signaling pathway leads to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis that generates inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) (23). IP3 binds to the IP3 receptor (IP3R) and initiates Ca2+ release from the ER stores, which allows stromal interacting molecule 1 (STIM1) to rearrange and activate Ca2+ entry (24). Ca2+ entry through store-operated channels (SOCs) is essential for the refilling of ER Ca2+ stores as well as in regulating cellular functions. Two families of proteins (TRPCs and Orais) have been identified as potential candidates for SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry (21, 24–29). However, their role in PD has not yet been determined. Thus, this study aimed to elucidate the mechanism of MPTP/MPP+-mediated loss of DA neurons and to identify key molecular players that regulate neuronal survival. We report for the first time to our knowledge that the endogenous SOC channel in DA neurons is dependent on TRPC1 and that MPTP/MPP+-induced loss of TRPC1 function induces ER stress. Furthermore, activation of TRPC1 initiates Ca2+ entry that regulates the AKT/mTOR pathway, which is essential for the protection of DA neurons against neurotoxins that induce PD-like symptoms.
Evidence that loss of ER Ca2+ induces ER stress in cultured cells and that ER stress is increased in PD and in neurotoxin-induced animal models that mimic PD. Previous studies have suggested that the unfolded protein response (UPR) could be one of the reasons for the loss of DA neurons (17); however, the mechanism that triggers the UPR is not known. Thus, we examined this mechanism by evaluating the status of UPR proteins, critical for initiating ER stress in in vivo and in vitro PD models. As shown in Figure 1, UPR markers (GRP78 and CHOP) were upregulated at both the mRNA (Figure 1B) and the protein levels (Figure 1A) in the SNpc region of postmortem brains from PD patients when compared with age-matched control samples (quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI61332DS1). Based on these findings, we assessed whether neurotoxin-induced experimental PD models show signs of an activated UPR. As shown in Figure 1C, GRP78 and CHOP were also increased in the SNpc of mice treated with MPTP. Moreover, addition of MPP+ to SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells significantly increased the expression of ER chaperones GRP78/Bip and GRP94 (Figure 1D). Importantly, increased expression of both GRP78 and GRP94 was observed after 3 hours MPP+ treatment and remained elevated for 12 hours (Figure 1D). In addition, CHOP, which is an important mediator of ER stress–induced apoptosis, was upregulated at 6 hours of MPP+ treatment (Figure 1D). Quantification of individual proteins showed a 60% increase in their expression after 12 hours of MPP+ treatment when compared with control cells (Figure 1E), indicating that MPP+ activates a persistent UPR in SH-SY5Y cells. To confirm these results, we performed luciferase assays to evaluate the activation of the ER stress response element (ERSE), which is present in the promoter region of various UPR target genes, including CHOP. As shown in Figure 1F, a time-dependent increase in ERSE activity was observed after MPP+ treatment, further suggesting that addition of MPP+ induces ER stress. Overall, the results obtained from PD patients and experimental models of PD clearly revealed that ER stress is activated in PD and could lead to neurodegeneration.
MPP+ induces ER Ca2+ depletion by attenuating SOCE, which causes ER stress. (A) Representative blots from the SNpc region of postmortem human PD (n = 5) and age-matched controls (n = 4). (B) RNA was extracted, and RT-PCR was performed. Values represent mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments (*P < 0.05). (C) Mice received 25 mg/kg MPTP as described in ref. 19, and SNpc samples were removed, processed, and immunoblotted using the respective antibodies. (D) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 500 μM MPP+, and cell lysates were resolved and analyzed by Western blotting. Antibodies are labeled; β-actin was used as loading control. (E) Quantification (mean ± SD) from 3 or more independent experiments. The OD of GRP78 and GRP94 was normalized to β-actin. (F) Cells transfected with the ERSE promoter were lysed after MPP+ treatment, and luciferase assays were performed. Values represent mean ± SD from 3 independent experiments (*P < 0.05). (G) Analog plots of the fluorescence ratio (340/380 nm) from an average of 30–40 cells in each condition. (H) Quantification (mean ± SEM) of 340/380 ratio. *P < 0.05 versus untreated. (I) Tg-induced currents (mean ± SEM) were evaluated in control and MPP+-treated (12 hours) cells. The holding potential for current recordings was –80 mV. (J) I-V curves (mean current ± SEM) under these conditions; the average (8–10 recordings) current intensity under various conditions is shown in K. *P < 0.05 compared with control; values are shown as mean ± SEM. SKF, SKF-96365.
To determine the mechanism(s) underlying MPP+-induced ER stress, we investigated the effect of MPP+ on SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, since SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry is essential for maintaining ER Ca2+ levels and loss of ER Ca2+ can initiate UPR. For evaluation of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, ER Ca2+ stores were depleted by the addition of thapsigargin (Tg, 2 μM), a sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA) pump blocker. Importantly, in the absence of extracellular Ca2+, the increase in intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) evoked by Tg (first peak) was significantly decreased following 3 hours of MPP+ treatment, when compared with control untreated cells (Figure 1, G and H). Subsequently, addition of external Ca2+ (1 mM), which initiates SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, was decreased even within 1 hour of MPP+ treatment. Together these results suggest that loss of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry could decrease ER Ca2+ levels and initiate the UPR response. To establish the identity of the SOC channel, we performed electrophysiological recordings. Addition of Tg induced an inward current that was nonselective and reversed between 0 and –5 mV (Figure 1, I–K; characterization of the currents shown in Supplemental Figure 1, B–I). The currents shown are recorded at a holding potential of –80 mV, and maximum peak currents were used for tabulation. The current-voltage (I-V) curves were made using a ramp protocol wherein current density was evaluated at various membrane potentials and plotted in the figure. Importantly, the channel properties were similar to those previously observed with TRPC1 channels and the activity was blocked by Gd3+ (26), suggesting that TRPC1 could contribute to the endogenous SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry channel in SH-SY5Y cells. Also, SKF-96365, a nonspecific TRPC channel blocker, decreased these inward currents in SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 1K and Supplemental Figure 1, H and I). Importantly, the MPP+ treatment significantly decreased SOC currents without altering the I-V relationship (Figure 1J). Similar results were also obtained in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells (retinoic acid treatment), where MPP+ treatment decreased SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry (Supplemental Figure 1J). Collectively, these results suggest that MPP+ decreases ER Ca2+ by diminishing SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, which could lead to the activation of the UPR in these cells. Importantly, although 1-hour treatment with MPP+ or addition of MPP+ in the patch pipette decreased SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, no cell death was observed until 12 hours of treatment with MPP+ (Supplemental Figure 1, K–M). Importantly, since ER Ca2+ was decreased after 3 hours and ER stress was induced after 6 hours of MPP+ treatment, it can be hypothesized that the loss of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry is the early event that could lead to ER stress followed by neurotoxin-induced neuronal loss.
MPP+ decreases SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry by reducing TRPC1 expression. Given the importance of MPP+-induced ER stress caused by the loss of Ca2+ homeostasis, we next studied the expression of SOC(s) that were affected by prolonged treatment with MPP+. Although the molecular component(s) of SOCs in neurons are not known, members of TRPC and Orai that have been shown as candidates of SOC channels in many cell types (24, 27) could be present in neuronal cells. To address this issue, we performed real-time RT-PCR analysis to evaluate changes in TRPC mRNA. As shown in Figure 2A, a significant decrease in expression of TRPC1, but not other TRPCs (TRPC3, TRPC5, and TRPC6), was observed in MPP+-treated cells. TRPC4 and TRPC7 were not expressed in these cells. Western blot analysis confirmed the loss of TRPC1 after MPP+ treatment (12 hours), whereas no change in the expression of either Orai1 or STIM1 (a regulator for TRPC1 and Orai1) (24, 27) was observed (Figure 2, B and C).
TRPC1 mediates SOCE in SH-SY5Y cells, and MPP+ selectively decreases TRPC1 expression/function. (A) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with MPP+ (500 μM) for 12 hours. RNA was extracted, and quantitative RT-PCR was performed. Values represent mean ± SD from at least 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control. TRPC1 was evaluated after 15 cycles, whereas other TRPCs required at least 25 cycles. (B) Cells were treated with vehicle control or MPP+ and lysed, and proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. Membranes were reprobed with anti–β-actin antibody to confirm equal loading. (C) Quantification (mean ± SD) of individual proteins from 3 or more independent experiments. Relative expression of each individual proteins was normalized to β-actin. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control. (D and E) Immunoprecipitation with anti-STIM1 antibody of lysates from control or MPP+-treated cells with or without Tg. Immunoblotting was performed using anti-TRPC1, -Orai1, and -STIM1 antibodies. (E) Brain lysates from control and PD samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. (F) Paraffin-embedded sections of postmortem human SNpc samples obtained from control and PD patients were immunostained using TRPC1 and TH antibodies. Original magnification, ×40.
Previous studies have shown that upon store depletion, STIM1 interacts with TRPC1 as well as with Orai1 and thereby initiates Ca2+ entry (24, 28). Thus, to further confirm that TRPC1 is critical for Ca2+ entry in these cells, we performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments. Importantly, Tg-mediated store depletion induced STIM1-TRPC1 interaction in SH-SY5Y cells, which was decreased in MPP+-treated cells (Figure 2D). In addition, association of STIM1 with Orai11, which is also shown to increase upon store depletion (28), was unaffected upon MPP+ treatment (Figure 2D; quantification provided in Supplemental Figure 2, A and B). Together these data suggest that TRPC1 is essential for store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) in SH-SY5Y cells and that MPP+ decreases SOCE by decreasing TRPC1 expression and TRPC1-STIM1 interaction. While the above results suggest the significance of TRPC1 in an in vitro PD model, nothing is known about its function in PD patients. Thus, we further explored the potential relevance of TRPC1 in PD by evaluating TRPC1 expression in the SNpc of control and PD patients. Expression of TRPC1, but not Orai1 or STIM1, was decreased in the SNpc of PD patients as compared with age-matched control SNpc tissues (Figure 2E; quantification is shown in Supplemental Figure 2C). Moreover, TRPC1 was localized in or near the plasma membrane of the DA neurons, and expression was decreased in PD patients (Figure 2F). Similar results were also obtained in mouse primary DA cells, which also showed a significant decrease in TRPC1 expression when treated with MPP+ (Supplemental Figure 2F). Taken together, these findings suggest that PD patients have decreased TRPC1 expression in DA neurons; however, since these samples were obtained from patients at stages 3 and 4 of PD, caution should be used before interpreting these results, and more samples from patients at the early stage of disease are needed to confirm the loss of TRPC1 in PD samples.
Attenuation of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry or deletion of TRPC1 induces ER stress. TRPC1 is ubiquitously expressed, including in the SNpc (30), and although TRPC1 allows plasma membrane Ca2+ influx in response to ER Ca2+ depletion, so far there are no reports showing that TRPC1 mediates SOCE in SH-SY5Y cells. To address this, we silenced TRPC1 using TRPC1 siRNA and assessed both ER Ca2+ release and Ca2+ influx upon store depletion. Interestingly, Tg-induced SOC currents were significantly decreased in TRPC1 siRNA–transfected cells when compared with control siRNA–transfected cells (Figure 3, A and B). RNAi-mediated knockdown of TRPC1 not only abolished Ca2+ entry activated by store depletion, but also led to a significant decrease in ER Ca2+ (Figure 3, C and D). The efficiency of siRNA-mediated TRPC1 knockdown in SH-SY5Y cells was confirmed by Western blotting (Supplemental Figure 2D). These results suggested that TRPC1 is essential for SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry and that deletion of TRPC1 affects ER/cytosolic Ca2+ homeostasis. We further studied whether blocking of TRPC1 function or silencing of TRPC1 induces ER stress in SH-SY5Y cells. Indeed, TRPC1 silencing induced a UPR, which was clearly evidenced by increased expression of GRP78, GRP94, and CHOP (Figure 3E; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 2E). Also, silencing of TRPC1 led to increased phosphorylation of PERK and its downstream effector eIF2α. Similarly, blocking TRPC1 channel activity with SKF-96365 led to an increase in the UPR and inhibited protein translation by increasing eIF2α phosphorylation (Figure 3E; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 3, A–G). Interestingly, silencing of TRPC3 failed to upregulate UPR (Supplemental Figure 3F). These results indicate that inhibition of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry could be critical in inducing ER stress in SH-SY5Y cells.
TRPC1 functions as an endogenous SOCE channel, and knockdown of TRPC1 induces ER stress. (A) Tg-induced currents (mean ± SEM) were evaluated in control siRNA– and TRPC1 siRNA–transfected cells. The holding potential for the recordings was –80 mV, and an I-V curve (mean current ± SEM) under these conditions is shown in B. (C) Analog plots of the 340/380 ratio from an average of 40–60 cells are shown. (D) Quantification (mean ± SEM) of fluorescence ratio. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control; numbers of cells imaged are indicated. (E) SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with control siRNA or TRPC1 siRNA, or treated with 50 or 100 μM SKF-96365 for 24 hours. Cells were lysed, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. (F) SH-SY5Y cells transfected with control or STIM1 siRNA were lysed and immunoblotted with respective antibodies. (G) MTT assay was performed in control, TRPC1 siRNA–transfected, SKF-96365–treated (100 μM for 24 hours), or STIM1 siRNA–transfected cells. Values represent mean ± SD from at least 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus control. (H) Tissue lysates from the SNpc region of wild-type and Trpc1–/– mice were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. (I and J) Endogenous currents (mean ± SEM) and relative I-V curves (mean currents ± SEM) upon Tg stimulation in DA neurons in the SNpc of Trpc1+/+ and Trpc1–/– mice. The currents shown were recorded at a holding potential of –70 mV. (K) DA neurons induced a large inward current by a hyperpolarizing pulse of 60 mV, indicating the electrical signature of DA neurons.
To further validate this hypothesis, we repressed SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry by silencing STIM1, which again induced ER stress by increasing the expression of GRP78, GRP94, CHOP, and phospho-eIF2α (Figure 3F; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 4, A–C). Moreover, either silencing of TRPC1 or STIM1 or blocking of TRPC channel activity decreased the survival of SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 3G). Consistent with these results, Trpc1–/– mice had increased GRP78, GRP94, CHOP, and p-eIF2α levels (Figure 3H and Supplemental Figure 4D) compared with wild-type (Trpc1+/+). To determine whether SOC channels are also present in native DA neurons, we performed electrophysiological recordings in DA neurons (SNpc) of Trpc1+/+ and Trpc1–/– mice. Interestingly, addition of Tg in the SNpc of Trpc1+/+ initiated a linear, nonselective current in DA neurons, which was similar to the currents observed in SH-SY5Y cells and was absent in Trpc1–/– mice (Figure 3, I–K, and Supplemental Figure 4E). The electrical signature present in DA neurons was used to confirm that indeed these are DA neurons (Figure 3K and Supplemental Figure 4F). Collectively, these results reveal that TRPC1 mediates SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry in DA cells/neurons and that inhibition of Ca2+ entry (by TRPC1 or STIM1 silencing or blocking of TRPC1 channel activity) prevents optimal refilling of ER Ca2+, thereby inducing ER stress.
Overexpression of TRPC1 restores SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry and attenuates ER stress. The results shown above suggest that TRPC1 could be critical for SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry and in maintaining ER Ca2+ homeostasis; however, to confirm the role of TRPC1, we next overexpressed TRPC1 and evaluated its role in ER Ca2+ homeostasis and the ER stress response. SH-SY5Y cells were infected with Ad-HA-TRPC1 at an MOI of 5, and Ad-GFP (MOI of 5) was used as control. The efficiency of TRPC1 expression (HA-TRPC1) was confirmed by Western blotting (Supplemental Figure 5A). Importantly, overexpression of TRPC1, but not TRPC3 or Orai1, increased SOC currents (without changing the I-V relationship) and led to increased cell survival (Figure 4, A and B, and Supplemental Figure 5, B and C). The transfection efficiency of myc-tagged TRPC3 and Orai1 was confirmed by Western blotting (Figure 4F and Supplemental Figure 5A). Overexpression of TRPC1 also amended ER Ca2+ and restored SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry in MPP+-treated SH-SY5Y cells when compared with control GFP-expressing cells treated with MPP+ (Figure 4, C and D). In agreement with this finding, TRPC1 overexpression decreased the elevations in GRP78, GRP94, and CHOP that were induced after MPP+ treatment, indicating that TRPC1 could prevent prolonged UPR activation (Figure 4E; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 5, D and F). Phosphorylation of PERK, an important transducer of the UPR, and downstream signaling targets (eIF2α) was also increased after MPP+ treatment, but decreased in TRPC1-overexpressing cells (Figure 4E). Similarly, prolonged activation of the UPR, which has been shown to activate JNK and leads to cell death (31), was increased in MPP+-treated cells but restored to normal in TRPC1-overexpressing cells.
TRPC1 overexpression restores SOCE and attenuates ER stress. (A) Tg-induced currents (at –80 mV, mean ± SEM) were evaluated in control and TRPC1-overexpressing SH-SY5Y cells. (B) Average (mean ± SEM from 7–9 recordings) current intensity under various conditions. (C) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with MPP+ for 12 hours with or without TRPC1 overexpression, and analog plots (mean ± SEM) of the fluorescence ratio (340/380 nm) are shown. Fluorescence ratio was measured in the presence of 2 μM Tg with and without 1 mM Ca2+. (D) Quantification (mean ± SEM) of fluorescence ratio; *P < 0.05 versus MPP+-treated cells. (E–G) TRPC1-, Orai1-, or TRPC1pm-overexpressing SH-SY5Y cells were treated with MPP+ for 12 hours, lysed, resolved, and subjected to Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (H) Cell survival (MTT assay) under different conditions. Values are expressed as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 versus MPP+-treated cells.
Although Orai1 overexpression did not increased Tg-induced SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry in SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 4B), we still evaluated its role in regulating ER stress, since it has been also shown to contribute to SOC current in some cells (27–29). As shown in Figure 4F, Orai1 overexpression did not prevent the MPP+-induced ER stress response (quantification of individual proteins shown in Supplemental Figure 5, G–I). To further confirm that the TRPC1-dependent decrease in UPR was mediated by SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry through TRPC1, we overexpressed a TRPC1 pore mutant (TRPC1pm) in SH-SY5Y cells. Consistent with our previous results (32), overexpression of TRPC1pm failed to increase Tg-induced SOC currents in SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 4B). Interestingly, SH-SY5Y cells overexpressing TRPC1pm also failed to inhibit MPP+-induced UPR and did not protect against neurotoxin-induced cell death (Figure 4, G and H; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 5, J–L). Taken together, these results suggest that MPP+ induces ER stress by downregulating the function of TRPC1 and that overexpression of functional TRPC1 is crucial for maintaining ER Ca2+ homeostasis and inhibiting MPP+-induced ER stress response, thereby preventing neurodegeneration.
Modulation of AKT is essential for TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection. To better understand the link between TRPC1 and cell survival, we searched for downstream signaling molecules that could be responsible for TRPC1-mediated protection. Given the already known relationship between AKT and neuroprotection (33), we studied whether AKT plays a role in TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection. As shown in Figure 5A, a decrease in AKT phosphorylation was observed in PD patient samples (quantification of individual blots shown in Supplemental Figure 6, A and B). Interestingly, MPP+ treatment also significantly decreased AKT1 phosphorylation without affecting total AKT1 levels in SH-SY5Y cells (Figure 5B). In addition, overexpression of full-length TRPC1, but not TRPC1pm, prevented the decrease in AKT phosphorylation seen after MPP+ treatment (Figure 5, B–D; quantification of phospho-AKT [Ser473] shown in Supplemental Figure 6C). In addition, quantification of the phospho-AKT (Ser473) indicated an approximately 50% inhibition of the AKT activity after MPP+ treatment, which was restored to approximately 75% in cells overexpressing TRPC1 and treated with MPP+ (Figure 5C). We next examined whether SOCE that is dependent on TRPC1 activates AKT phosphorylation in SH-SY5Y cells. Interestingly, SH-SY5Y cells treated with Tg (5 μM) in the absence of external Ca2+ failed to show AKT phosphorylation (Figure 5E), suggesting that Ca2+ influx through SOCs was necessary for AKT1 phosphorylation, as Ca2+ release from internal ER stores by itself was not sufficient to activate AKT1 phosphorylation (quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 6D). Moreover, stimulation of TRPC1 by Tg or carbachol (CCh) (known activators of TRPC1) significantly increased AKT1 phosphorylation (Ser473) when compared with control untreated cells (Figure 5F). Furthermore, addition of SKF-96365 prevented the activation of AKT1 induced by Tg and CCh (Figure 5F). To evaluate whether other sources of Ca2+ influx can also stimulate AKT phosphorylation, we stimulated SH-SY5Y cells with oleyl-acetyl-glycerol (OAG), which is known to activate other TRPC channels and is independent of store depletion (34). Interestingly, AKT phosphorylation was not altered upon OAG stimulation (Supplemental Figure 6E), suggesting that the effect observed in AKT phosphorylation is dependent on Ca2+ entry via the SOC channel. In addition, expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) was also evaluated, since Ca2+ entry is known to induce the expression of these factors, which has been shown to increase protection of DA cells. As indicated in Supplemental Figure 6F, addition of MPP+ significantly decreased BDNF expression; however, no increase in BDNF expression was observed in cells overexpressing TRPC1, suggesting that TRPC1-mediated protection is independent of BDNF. To further evaluate the role of TRPC1 and AKT in cell survival, we performed MTT assays. MPP+-treated cells showed a significant decrease in neuronal survival, which was inhibited by TRPC1 overexpression (Figure 5G). Additionally, silencing of AKT1 completely blocked TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection against MPP+, indicating that AKT1 plays a crucial role in TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection (Figure 5, G and H). These results strongly suggest that TRPC1-mediated Ca2+ influx is vital for AKT1 activation in SH-SY5Y cells, which is critical for their survival.
AKT modulation is crucial for TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection. (A) Brain lysates from control and PD samples were immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. (B) Cells were treated with MPP+ (500 μM, 12 hours) with or without Ad-TRPC1, and Western blots were performed. For control, membranes were reprobed with anti-AKT1. (C) Relative expression of phospho-AKT1 (Ser473) is shown. Values are mean ± SD; *P < 0.05. (D) Cells were transfected with control vector or TRPC1pm (36 hours) and treated with MPP+ (500 μM) for 12 hours, lysed, and subjected to Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. (E) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 5 μM Tg in SES buffer for 10 minutes with or without Ca2+ (2 mM), lysed, resolved using SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with AKT1 and phosphorylated AKT antibodies. (F) SH-SY5Y cells were treated with 5 μM Tg or 100 μM CCh for 15 minutes with or without pretreatment with SKF-96365 (50 μM, 45 minutes), processed, and probed with phospho-AKT1 (Ser473). Diagram shows the densitometric values of phospho-AKT1 (Ser473). Values are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 versus untreated controls. (G) SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with AKT1 siRNA and/or with Ad-TRPC1, followed by the addition of MPP+ (12 hours) and assayed for cell survival. Values represent mean ± SD from at least 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 versus untreated control. (H) SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with 50 pmol AKT1 siRNA, lysed after 36 hours, resolved, and immunoblotted with anti-AKT1 and anti–β-actin.
TRPC1 overexpression protects DA neurons in an in vivo MPTP model of PD. While the above results strongly suggest the importance of TRPC1 in cellular models of PD, nothing is known regarding the role of TRPC1 in an in vivo PD model. Thus, we overexpressed HA-TRPC1 in the SNpc region by intranigral injection of Ad-TRPC1 as shown in Figure 6A. Control mice received intranigral injection of Ad-GFP, and as indicated in Figure 6B, GFP was expressed in DA neurons of the SNpc and colocalized with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH, a marker for DA neurons), indicating that we had been successful in targeting the SNpc with our injections. Thus, we next injected Ad-HATRPC1 and confirmed by confocal microscopy the overexpression of TRPC1 (HA-TRPC1), which also colocalized with TH-positive neurons (DA neurons) of SNpc (Figure 6C). Also as expected, MPTP treatment decreased the expression of TH and TRPC1 in SNpc (Figure 6D; quantification of individual proteins shown in Supplemental Figure 7, A and B). Importantly, MPTP treatment induced ER stress in DA neurons by activating the UPR, which was inhibited in mice treated with MPTP but overexpressing TRPC1 (Figure 6D; quantification of individual proteins shown in Supplemental Figure 7, C–E). To further understand the role of TRPC1 in the protection of DA neurons, we evaluated TH staining under these conditions. MPTP induces neuronal degeneration of DA neurons, which was indicated by the decrease in TH levels in MPTP-injected mice (Figure 6E). Importantly, a significant increase in TH-positive neurons was observed in TRPC1-overexpressing mice treated with MPTP. Quantification of the data indicated approximately 80% survival of DA neurons in TRPC1-overexpressing mice following MPTP treatment (Figure 6F). To further confirm these results, we quantified TH-positive neurons in wild-type and Trpc1–/– mice, since the results shown above indicated that Trpc1–/– mice have decreased SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry and increased ER stress. A significant decrease in TH-positive neurons was observed in Trpc1–/– mice even without MPTP treatment (Figure 6G).
TRPC1 overexpression protects DA neuron in an in vivo MPTP model of PD. (A) Graphic representation of intranigral injection protocol. (B and C) Unilateral injection of GFP or HA-TRPC1 adenovirus (3 × 107 particles) into the SNpc (n = 6). Brain samples containing the SNpc region were sectioned (12 μm) and stained for TH immunofluorescence. Expression of GFP and TH in the SNpc and in ventral tegmental area (VTA) were evaluated. HA-TRPC1 colocalized with TH (C, bottom row). Scale bars in C: 20 μm. (D) HA-TRPC1 or GFP adenovirus was injected directly into the SNpc of animals (n = 6–8 per group) 7 days before MPTP treatment. After 1 week of MPTP injection, SNpc samples were removed and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the respective antibodies. Control GFP virus–injected mice received an equal volume of saline. (E) Representative TH staining of the ipsilateral sides of animals injected with the indicated virus with and without MPTP. (F) Quantification of the number of TH-positive neurons from ipsilateral or contralateral sides for the indicated treatment groups. Data are mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05. (G) Brain samples containing the SNpc from wild-type and Trpc1–/– mice were sectioned (12 μm) and stained for TH. Quantification of TH-positive neurons is shown in the graph. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05. Original magnification, ×40; magnified images in B, ×100.
In vivo TRPC1 overexpression activates the AKT/mTOR pathway. The above results clearly suggest that TRPC1 overexpression prevented prolonged UPR activation and attenuated the degeneration of DA neurons in an in vivo PD model. However, the signaling intermediates linking TRPC1 and DA neuron survival in PD are still unknown. We therefore examined whether in vivo overexpression of TRPC1 would activate the AKT/mTOR pathway. Importantly, MPTP treatment attenuated the activation of mTOR, a kinase that regulates neuronal survival, in SNpc (Figure 7A; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 7F). This mTOR suppression could in turn suppress its downstream proteins that are involved in cellular signaling. Consistent with our in vitro observations (Figure 5B), as shown in Figure 7B, treatment with MPTP decreased the phosphorylation of AKT at both Ser473 and Thr378 in the SNpc, as indicated by Western blotting. These observations indicate that MPTP impaired the functions of AKT/mTOR in DA neurons and thereby induced neurodegeneration. Interestingly, TRPC1 overexpression in SNpc significantly restored the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets (Figure 7A). Consistent with this, TRPC1 overexpression in SNpc prevented the suppression of AKT1 activation by MPTP (Figure 7B; quantification shown in Supplemental Figure 7, G and H). These results suggest that TRPC1 is necessary to restore AKT/mTOR activation and in the protection of DA neurons.
TRPC1 overexpression activates the AKT/mTOR pathway in mice. (A and B) SNpc regions were removed from control animals and animals overexpressing TRPC1 that had been treated or not with MPTP, and were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the respective antibodies. Data are representative of 2–3 independent experiments. (C) Model for MPP+/MPTP-induced DA loss and TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection. MPP+/MPTP decreases the expression of TRPC1 and SOC-mediated Ca2+ influx either directly or indirectly via mitochondrial dysfunction. This leads to prolonged ER Ca2+ depletion and activation of the UPR and subsequent ER stress–mediated neurodegeneration. In contrast, TRPC1 overexpression restores SOCE function and maintains ER Ca2+ homeostasis. Further, Ca2+ influx through TRPC1 activates AKT/mTOR-mediated survival mechanisms in DA cells, which leads to increased neuronal survival.
Disturbances in ER Ca2+ homeostasis have been associated with many neurological disorders including PD (7, 17, 35). Disruption of ER Ca2+ homeostasis induces the UPR, which is a pro-survival defense mechanism that prevents further accumulation of newly synthesized proteins in the ER in order to reduce further burden to the ER. However, prolonged UPR activation occurs when physiological mechanisms fail to restore normal ER function, thereby causing ER stress and cell death (10). Thus, disturbances in ER Ca2+ homeostasis could play an important role in neurodegenerative diseases. Our studies provide direct evidence that inhibition of SOCE by MPP+ promotes ER Ca2+ depletion during the early phase and that a decrease in TRPC1 function leads to ER stress and subsequent cell death. Importantly, it has been shown that depletion of ER Ca2+ stores is toxic to SH-SY5Y cells and that Ca2+ chelators increase cell death (36, 37). These studies are consistent with our results and imply that restoration of ER Ca2+ stores, which depends on TRPC1 activity, can protect SH-SY5Y cells.
Ca2+ release from internal ER stores plays an important role in maintaining normal cell function. Ca2+ entry through SOC channels not only ensures optimal refilling of the ER, but also leads to a prolonged increase in cytosolic Ca2+. Importantly, both TRPC and Orai channels have been shown to mediate Ca2+ entry upon store depletion (22–29). Our results indicate that although other TRPCs and Orais are expressed in DA cells/neurons, MPTP/MPP+ specifically targets TRPC1. Furthermore, the endogenous SOC has I-V relationships that are similar to those observed for TRPC1-dependent currents (26). Importantly, SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry decreased 2- to 3-fold in MPP+-treated cells, and since only TRPC1 expression was decreased, we infer that the loss of endogenous SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry was due to the loss of TRPC1. Our results offer a mechanism by which MPP+ induces ER stress, which is consistent with previous reports that addition of MPP+ causes ER stress (16, 17, 38). Consistent with this, Brandman et al. have shown that basal SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry maintains ER Ca2+ homeostasis and that a decrease in SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry contributes to the reduction in ER Ca2+ content (39). Importantly, TRPC1 silencing also caused decreased ER Ca2+ and Ca2+ influx, suggesting that TRPC1 mediates SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry in SH-SY5Y cells. However, it is still unclear how MPTP/MPP+ impairs TRPC1 channel activity. One possibility is that MPP+ could induce mitochondrial membrane depolarization, which could contribute to the reduction in SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, since mitochondria have a fundamental role in regulating this type of Ca2+ entry (40, 41). The other possibility is that MPP+ could directly inhibit TRPC1 channel activity; more research is needed to explore this concept.
Various physiological conditions that are known to be associated with ER stress have been shown to alter ER Ca2+ homeostasis (37). We observed that inhibition of SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry by MPP+ leads to a decrease in ER Ca2+, which in turn induces ER stress. Our data substantiate recent studies indicating that MPP+ induces ER stress through a mechanism involving the depletion of ER Ca2+ (38). Importantly, blocking TRPC channel activity or TRPC1 silencing, but not TRPC3 silencing, activates the UPR pathway. Consistent with these results, the UPR markers were significantly increased in the midbrain region of Trpc1–/– mice, and there was a significant decrease in SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry and TH-positive neurons. These results are important, since they highlight for the first time to our knowledge that either TRPC1 silencing or inhibition of TRPC channel activity activates ER stress by altering SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry, which contributes to a decrease in ER Ca2+. We further suggest that the MPP+-induced ER Ca2+ depletion is directly influenced by TRPC1-mediated changes in Ca2+ entry. Moreover, silencing of STIM1 also activated the UPR in SH-SY5Y cells. STIM1 is an ER Ca2+ binding protein that senses ER Ca2+ levels, and upon store depletion, STIM1 aggregates and interacts with TRPC1 and Orai1 channels, thereby activating SOC-mediated Ca2+ entry (42, 43). Interestingly, STIM1 has also been shown to inactivate voltage-gated channels, and Ca2+ entry via the voltage-gated channels has been shown to be deleterious for DA neurons (44–46). Thus, it is possible that activation of TRPC1 via its interaction with STIM1 could inhibit voltage-gated channels and thereby protect DA neurons.
The documentation of the significance of TRPC1 in neuroprotection against store depletion–induced ER stress by MPTP/MPP+ is, to our knowledge, a novel aspect of this study, as it lends credence to previous studies pointing to a neuroprotective role of TRPC channels in the SNpc. Ca2+ influx through TRPC channels appears to be a critical component of the signaling cascade that mediates growth cone guidance and survival of neurons in response to several growth factors (47, 48). In particular, recent studies have shed light on the neuroprotective effect of TRPC channels in the SNpc against Tat neurotoxicity (49). Our previous studies also show the neuroprotective action of TRPC1 against in vitro cell culture models of PD (19); however, the precise mechanisms by which TRPC1 regulates neuronal survival remained poorly understood. In this study, we showed that TRPC1 overexpression confers protection against ER stress in both in vivo and in vitro models of PD. TRPC1 overexpression, but not a TRPC1 pore mutant that has decreased permeability to Ca2+, prevented MPP+-mediated cell death by inhibiting the elevation of CHOP and JNK. Also, in our studies TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection against ER stress–induced neurodegeneration correlated with its ability to maintain ER Ca2+ homeostasis, since the TRPC1 pore mutant failed to rescue SH-SY5Y cells from MPP+-induced ER stress and cell death.
Our findings also unravel the downstream signaling pathways through which TRPC1 promotes neuronal survival induced by a neurotoxin that mimics PD. We observed that MPP+ decreases AKT1 activation by decreasing cellular levels of phosphorylated AKT1, which is consistent with previous studies indicating that PD-inducing neurotoxins including MPP+ and 6-OHDA decrease phospho-AKT (50, 51). Interestingly, TRPC1 overexpression prevented MPTP/MPP+-mediated loss of AKT1 function by increasing its phosphorylation. AKT1 plays a major role in neuronal survival by phosphorylating its substrates, including BAD, GSK3, NF-κB, and forkhead proteins (52–55), and AKT1 overexpression has been shown to protect against MPP+ (33). TRPC1 overexpression activates the phosphorylation of AKT at both Ser473 and Thr308, which are necessary for complete activation of AKT1. Also, Ca2+ influx via TRPC1 was necessary for the activation of AKT1, since removal of external Ca2+ prevented, whereas addition of external Ca2+ restored, AKT1 phosphorylation. Similarly, the TRPC1pm was unable to activate AKT1 phosphorylation in MPP+-treated cells. These findings were further confirmed by the use of pharmacological TRPC channel activators (Tg and CCh) and its inhibitor (SKF-96365). Activation of TRPC1 by Tg and CCh led to increased phospho-AKT1 (Ser473), whereas pretreatment with SKF-96365 significantly prevented TRPC1-mediated AKT1 phosphorylation. More importantly, TRPC1 exerted neuroprotection via AKT activation, since silencing AKT1 abolished TRPC1-mediated neuroprotection in SH-SY5Y cells. Although no increase in BDNF expression was observed in TRPC1-overexpressing cells treated with MPP+, we cannot rule out the possibility that the release of BDNF under these conditions is also not altered.
Consistent with the in vitro studies, we found that overexpression of TRPC1 in the mouse SNpc also resulted in rescue of MPTP-mediated loss of DA neurons. We previously reported that MPTP treatment decreases the membrane expression of TRPC1. Consistent with this, the present study also showed that MPTP treatment significantly decreased TRPC1 expression and increased activation of UPR markers in the SNpc. Growing evidence also indicates the importance of the mTOR pathway in apoptosis and autophagy that can lead to neuronal death, but in all these cases it was the inhibition of the AKT phosphorylation, rather than mTOR activation, that eventually led to neuronal loss (51, 56). Our results show that MPTP represses the phosphorylation of AKT, mTOR, p70 S6 kinase, and 4EBP1 and that loss of AKT leads to neuronal loss. Importantly, mTOR kinases are downstream of the AKT pathway and have been shown to have a dual role (in both neuronal survival and neuronal demise); however, it is the activation of the AKT pathway that might phosphorylate mTOR differently that can have a positive effect rather than leading to neuronal loss, as observed in some of these studies. ER stress induced by tunicamycin has shown to downregulate the activity of AKT and mTOR and induced apoptosis in rat hippocampal neurons (55). In contrast, Deguil et al. reported that there were no significant differences in the expression of mTOR and its downstream protein in the midbrain of MPTP-treated mice, though the changes were observed in the striatum, frontal cortex, and hippocampus (57). Interestingly, our data demonstrate that TRPC1 overexpression protects DA neurons by preventing MPTP-induced ER stress, which is evidenced by increased survival of TH-positive DA neurons in mice that overexpressed TRPC1 and were treated with MPTP.
To relate these observations to human disease, we used postmortem SNpc samples from PD and non-PD individuals. Our results indicate that TRPC1 expression is decreased in the SNpc of PD patients, and activation of UPR proteins is increased. Consistent with previous studies, the level of AKT phosphorylation was also decreased in the SNpc of samples from PD patients (56), and since our cellular models indicate that loss of TRPC1 due to MPP+/MPTP treatment decreases AKT phosphorylation, it could be anticipated that loss of AKT activation in PD samples is due to the loss of TRPC1. Overall, these data support our hypothesis that TRPC1 plays a vital role in maintaining ER Ca2+ homeostasis and that reduction in its function leads to prolonged activation of the UPR pathway and impairs AKT activation, which subsequently leads to neurodegeneration as observed in PD (Figure 7C).
Reagents. MPP+ and MPTP were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Tg, tunicamycin, and Fura-2 were obtained from Calbiochem. Antibodies that were used in this study are described in Supplemental Table 1. All other reagents used were of molecular biology grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Cell culture and transfections. SH-SY5Y cells were obtained from ATCC and cultured/maintained at 37°C as previously described (18). SH-SY5Y cells were differentiated by the addition of retinoic acid for 6 days and used for the experiments. MPP+ was added to cells and was present during the duration of the experiment (12 hours) unless otherwise stated. For adenoviral expression, SH-SY5Y cells were infected with Ad-TRPC1 at an MOI of 5. For transient transfection, SH-SY5Y cells (1.5 × 105 cells/ml) were transfected with TRPC1 siRNAs (Ambion) or STIM1 siRNA (58) or scrambled control siRNA (Ambion negative control siRNA #1) using HiPerFect transfection reagent (QIAGEN). Cells were passaged and transfected with siRNA every 3 days when the cells were 80%–90% confluent and in log growth phase. The transfection efficiency of FAM-labeled negative control siRNA (Ambion) was greater than 90%. AKT1 siRNA and control siRNA, obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., were transfected using siRNA transfection reagent (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.) as per the manufacturer’s instruction and were used 48 hours after transfection. Cell viability was measured by using the Vybrant MTT cell proliferation assay kit (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen). Absorbance was read at 570 nm (630 nm as a reference) on a microplate reader (Molecular Devices). Cell viability was expressed as a percentage of the control culture. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) was used to transfect myc-Orai1, myc-TRPC3 (Origene Technologies), and TRPC1pm (32).
Quantitative RT-PCR. TRPC, GRP78, and CHOP mRNA expression was assessed with real-time RT-PCR using commercially available primers (Origene Technologies). cDNA was transcribed from 1 μg of total RNA with iScript cDNA (Bio-Rad). An equal amount of cDNA template was added to iQ SYBR Green Supermix together with appropriate primers at 0.2 μM each. Quantitative PCR was performed using an iCycler iQ real-time detection system following the specifications of the manufacturer. The relative level of mRNA was interpolated from a standard curve prepared by serially diluting the cDNA reaction. GAPDH was used for normalization of the transcripts. Specificity of PCR product formation was confirmed by monitoring melting peaks.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Immunoprecipitations were carried out as described earlier (58, 59). Following stimulation, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer and used for immunoprecipitation. Proteins were resolved in 4%–12% NuPAGE gels, followed by Western blotting with the desired antibodies. Crude membrane or lysates were prepared from SH-SY5Y cells and from animal and human tissues as previously described (18, 19). Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad), and 25–50 μg of lysates were resolved on NuPAGE 4%–12% Bis-Tris gel or NuPAGE 3%–8% Tris-acetate gels (Invitrogen), followed by Western blotting as described in refs. 18, 19.
Calcium measurements and electrophysiology. SH-SY5Y cells were incubated with 2 μM Fura-2 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) for 45 minutes and washed twice with Ca2+-free SES buffer as described in ref. 19. For patch clamp experiments, coverslips with cells were transferred to the recording chamber and perfused with an external Ringer’s solution of the following composition (in mM): NaCl, 145; KCl, 5; MgCl2, 1; CaCl2, 1; HEPES, 10; glucose, 10; pH 7.4 (NaOH). The divalent-free solution (DVF) contained (in mM) 165 NaCl, 5 CsCl, 10 EDTA, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, pH 7.4. The patch pipette had resistances between 3 and 5 mΩ after being filled with the standard intracellular solution containing the following (in mM): cesium methane sulfonate, 145; NaCl, 8; MgCl2, 10; HEPES, 10; EGTA, 10; pH 7.2 (CsOH). All electrophysiological experiments were performed using a previously described protocol (26). The maximum peak currents were calculated at a holding potential of –80 mV. The I-V curves were made using a ramp protocol, whereby current density was evaluated at various membrane potentials and plotted. For the tabulation of statistics, peak currents were used as described in ref. 26.
Brain slice preparation and DA cell identification. Fifteen- to 22-day-old mice were sacrificed, and brain was dissected out in ice-cold saline solution. Coronal brain sections (400 μm) were cut using a vibrating blade microtome (VT1000S; Leica). Neurons were visualized with infrared videomicroscopy (Olympus BX51WI) and differential interference contrast optics. Recording electrodes were filled with (in mM) 110 CsCl, 5 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 4 Na-ATP, and 0.1 GTP, pH 7.4. The extracellular solution comprised (in mM) 130 NaCl, 24 NaHCO3, 3.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.5 CaCl2, 1.5 MgCl2, 0.25 TTX, and 10 glucose, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2, pH 7.4 Data were filtered at 2 kHz, digitized at 10 kHz, and acquired and analyzed using pCLAMP 10 software (Molecular Devices). The DA neurons differ from GABA neurons based on their electrophysiological properties, which included hyperpolarization-activated inward current (Ih). To evoke an Ih current, a hyperpolarizing pulse of 60 mV and of 1.5-second duration was applied to all cells. An Ih current ratio was calculated by measuring the current at the end of the capacitive transient over the amplitude of the current at the end of the voltage command. For DA neurons, Ih is pronounced (Ih ratio <0.6), whereas for GABA neurons Ih is small (Ih ratio >0.6).
Luciferase reporter assays. SH-SY5Y cells were transfected with either 100 ng of ERSE reporter (SABiosciences) or negative/positive controls using Lipofectamine 2000 in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). After 4 hours of transfection, cells were infected with adenovirus expressing HA-TRPC1 in DMEM/F12. Cells were then incubated for 36 hours before induction. For the MPP+ induction, fresh medium with 500 μM MPP+ was added to each well. After MPP+ treatment, cells were lysed, and a dual luciferase assay was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega). Luciferase activity was measured using a Zylux Femtomaster FB12 luminometer (PerkinElmer).
Immunofluorescence. Animals were anesthetized and perfused with PBS, followed by paraformaldehyde (4%, w/v) in PBS. The brain was removed intact and postfixed overnight in paraformaldehyde, cryoprotected in 30% sucrose in PBS for 24–48 hours at 4°C, and then frozen in O.C.T. freezing compound (Ted Pella Inc.). Serial cryosections were collected through the entire midbrain (12 μM). All samples were examined and images obtained using a Zeiss Meta confocal microscope. For quantitative measurements, researchers blind to the treatment protocol counted the TH-positive neurons in the SNpc. Measurements from 4–6 sections per brain were averaged to obtain one value per subject.
Animals. Eight- to 10-month-old male Trpc1–/– and wild- type mice were used for this experiment. The generation of Trpc1–/– mice was described previously (26). All animals were housed in a temperature-controlled room under a 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. All animal experiments were carried out according to University of North Dakota guidelines for the use and care of animals.
Injection into the substantia nigra. Mice received unilateral injection of either control virus (Ad-GFP) or Ad-HA-TRPC1 (3 × 107 particles in 3 μl) into the substantia nigra (coordinates from bregma: anterior-posterior, –3.3; medial-lateral, –1.5; dorsal-ventral, –4.6). The solution was injected into the substantia nigra with a 10 μl Hamilton syringe coupled to a motorized injector (Stoelting) at a rate of 0.3 μl/min, and the needle was left in place for at least 10 minutes after injection. After 1 week of adenovirus injection, mice were challenged with MPTP (MPTP-HCl, 25 mg/kg per injection, i.p.) for 5 consecutive days at 24-hour intervals as described in ref. 19. Mice were sacrificed 7 days after the last MPTP injection, and the brain was removed from the skull and placed with the dorsal side up. Using a scalpel blade, a coronal cut was made adjacent to the inferior colliculi approximately at bregma –6.36 mm. A second cut was made approximately at bregma –2.54 mm, based on the mouse brain atlas. The ventral midbrain was dissected to ensure that there was no contamination of the hippocampus, cortex, or cerebellum. Brain regions from 2–3 animals were pooled for each experiment.
Human brain samples. Frozen and paraffin-embedded blocks of postmortem human substantia nigral samples of control and PD patients (stage 3–4 based on the Hoehn and Yahr scale; ref. 60) were obtained from the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Tissue Bank at Imperial College and the Udall Center at the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA). The frozen tissues were used to isolate RNA and proteins, and expression of genes and proteins was evaluated using RT-PCR and Western blotting as described above. Immunofluorescence was performed on 8-μm sections using TRPC1 and TH antibodies as described above.
Statistics. Data analysis was performed using Origin 7.0 (OriginLab). Statistical comparisons were made using Student’s t test (2-tailed). Experimental values are expressed as mean ± SD or mean ± SEM. Differences in the mean values were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.
Study approval. The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of North Dakota. Informed consent was not required, since we used autopsy samples donated to the brain bank.
We greatly acknowledge the use of the Edward C. Carlson Imaging and Image Analysis Core Facility. We especially thank Laura Leiphon and Virginia Achen for their help. We greatly acknowledge the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Tissue Bank at Imperial College and John Trojanowski (University of Pennsylvania) for providing the PD and control samples. Also, grant support from the National Science Foundation (no. 0548733) and the NIH (DE017102 and 5P20RR017699) awarded to B.B Singh; from the NIH Intramural Program (project Z01-ES-101684) to L. Birnbaumer; and from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS; P50 NS-053488) awarded to John Trojanowski is acknowledged.
Address correspondence to: Brij B Singh or Senthil Selvaraj, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, 501 N Columbia Road, Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201, USA. Phone: 701.777.0834; Fax: 701.777.2382; E-mail: brij.singh@med.und.edu (B.B Singh). Phone: 701.777.2012; Fax 701.777.2382; E-mail: senthilbio@gmail.com (S. Selvaraj).
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2012;122(4):1354–1367. doi:10.1172/JCI61332.
See the related article at Parkinson’s disease: don’t mess with calcium.