In individuals with type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemia is a common consequence of overinsulinization. Under conditions of insulin-induced hypoglycemia, glucagon is the most important stimulus for hepatic glucose production. In contrast, during euglycemia, insulin potently inhibits glucagon’s effect on the liver. The first aim of the present study was to determine whether low blood sugar augments glucagon’s ability to increase glucose production. Using a conscious catheterized dog model, we found that hypoglycemia increased glucagon’s ability to overcome the inhibitory effect of insulin on hepatic glucose production by almost 3-fold, an effect exclusively attributable to marked enhancement of the effect of glucagon on net glycogen breakdown. To investigate the molecular mechanism by which this effect comes about, we analyzed hepatic biopsies from the same animals, and found that hypoglycemia resulted in a decrease in insulin signaling. Furthermore, hypoglycemia and glucagon had an additive effect on the activation of AMPK, which was associated with altered activity of the enzymes of glycogen metabolism.
Noelia Rivera, Christopher J. Ramnanan, Zhibo An, Tiffany Farmer, Marta Smith, Ben Farmer, Jose M. Irimia, Wanda Snead, Margaret Lautz, Peter J. Roach, Alan D. Cherrington
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 325 | 20 |
61 | 15 | |
Figure | 209 | 3 |
Table | 97 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 48 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 53 | 0 |
Totals | 793 | 38 |
Total Views | 831 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.