Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Liver-infiltrating Tregs inhibit Teffs in chronic HCV infection
  • Liver-infiltrating Tregs express high levels of PD-1
  • Treg PD-1 signaling prevents IL-2–driven STAT-5 phosphorylation
  • A model for balancing liver immune responses
  • Impact of Treg control on clinical outcome
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 1

See more details

Posted by 1 X users
70 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (22)

Advertisement

Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI38661

PD-1 tempers Tregs in chronic HCV infection

Henry Radziewicz, Richard M. Dunham, and Arash Grakoui

Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Address correspondence to: Arash Grakoui, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA. Phone: (404) 727-5850; Fax: (404) 727-7768; E-mail: arash.grakoui@emory.edu.

Find articles by Radziewicz, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Address correspondence to: Arash Grakoui, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA. Phone: (404) 727-5850; Fax: (404) 727-7768; E-mail: arash.grakoui@emory.edu.

Find articles by Dunham, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Emory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Address correspondence to: Arash Grakoui, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA. Phone: (404) 727-5850; Fax: (404) 727-7768; E-mail: arash.grakoui@emory.edu.

Find articles by Grakoui, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published February 23, 2009 - More info

Published in Volume 119, Issue 3 on March 2, 2009
J Clin Invest. 2009;119(3):450–453. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI38661.
© 2009 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published February 23, 2009 - Version history
View PDF

Related article:

PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV
Debora Franceschini, … , Mario U. Mondelli, Vincenzo Barnaba
Debora Franceschini, … , Mario U. Mondelli, Vincenzo Barnaba
Research Article Article has an altmetric score of 5

PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs suppress autoimmune responses. In addition, they limit T cell responses during chronic infection, thereby minimizing T cell–dependent immunopathology. We sought to investigate how Tregs are regulated in the livers of patients chronically infected with HCV, where they control the balance between an adequate protective immune response and suppression of immunopathology. We found that, despite accumulating and proliferating at sites of infection in the livers of patients chronically infected with HCV, Tregs were relatively less expanded than CD4+CD25+Foxp3– effector T cells. The relative lower expansion of intrahepatic Tregs coincided with their upregulation of programmed death–1 (PD-1). PD-1 expression inversely correlated with both Treg proliferation and clinical markers of immune suppression in vivo. Consistent with the possibility that PD-1 controls Tregs, blockade of the interaction between PD-1 and programmed death–1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) enhanced the in vitro expansion and function of Tregs isolated from the livers of patients chronically infected with HCV. Blockade of the interaction between PD-L1 and B7.1 also improved the proliferation of these cells. Interestingly, both PD-1 and phosphorylated STAT-5 were overexpressed in intrahepatic Tregs in a parallel fashion in steady disease conditions, and in an alternate-fluctuating fashion during the course of severe hepatitis reactivation. Notably, PD-L1 blockade upregulated STAT-5 phosphorylation in Tregs ex vivo. These data suggest that PD-L1 negatively regulates Tregs at sites of chronic inflammation by controlling STAT-5 phosphorylation.

Authors

Debora Franceschini, Marino Paroli, Vittorio Francavilla, Melissa Videtta, Stefania Morrone, Giancarlo Labbadia, Antonella Cerino, Mario U. Mondelli, Vincenzo Barnaba

×

Abstract

Adaptive T cell responses are critical for controlling infections with viruses such as HIV, HBV, and HCV. However, these responses must be carefully regulated because overly vigorous T cell activation can lead to excessive host tissue damage. T cell expression of the inhibitory receptor programmed death–1 (PD-1) and inhibition of effector T cells (Teffs) by CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs are among the many described mechanisms for achieving a balanced immune response. Although the signals that contribute to Teff function are well understood, less is known about the signals controlling Tregs. In this issue of the JCI, Franceschini et al. extend our understanding of how Tregs are modulated during chronic HCV infection by demonstrating that Treg proliferation is inhibited by PD-1 and that this inhibition is mediated by a potentially novel mechanism involving the prevention of IL-2–driven STAT-5 phosphorylation (see the related article beginning on page 551).

Tregs represent a subset of CD4+ T cells that can inhibit the proliferation and/or cytokine production of responding effector T cells (Teffs). There are many proposed mechanisms by which this can occur, including production of IL-10 or TGF-β or by acting as an “IL-2 sink” and depleting Teffs of available IL-2 (1). Tregs can be identified by the expression of the transcription factor Foxp3 and by high-level expression of CD25, the high-affinity chain of the IL-2 receptor complex. Tregs play a critical role in the maintenance of immune tolerance (1), and accumulating evidence suggests that they also play a central role in balancing the immune response to infection (2–4). They may be particularly important in preventing tissue injury in the setting of chronic viral infections such as HBV and HCV (4). Prior studies of patients with HCV infection have reported higher Treg levels in blood during chronic infection compared with resolved infection, Treg accumulation at the site of infection, and the ability of Tregs from the peripheral blood to suppress CD4+ and CD8+ T cell IFN-γ production as well as CD4+CD25– and HCV-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation (4). Despite these findings, there has been an incomplete understanding of whether Tregs can suppress highly activated liver-infiltrating Teffs, how Tregs are regulated in the liver, and whether Tregs alter clinical outcomes of patients with HCV infection.

Liver-infiltrating Tregs inhibit Teffs in chronic HCV infection

In order to fully understand the immune deficits seen in HCV infection and the mechanism of immune failure, it is critical to study immune cells and signaling at the site of infection, since responses measured in the blood may not always overlap with those measured in the liver, particularly in the chronic phase of infection. In this issue of the JCI, Franceschini et al. (5) compared blood- and liver-infiltrating Tregs from patients with chronic HCV infection and observed an increased frequency of Foxp3+ Tregs in the liver versus peripheral blood as well as that liver-derived Foxp3+ Tregs from pooled liver biopsies suppressed the proliferation of CD4+ Teffs. Moreover, this inhibition required cell-cell contact, since separation of Tregs and Teffs in a transwell plate system prevented this inhibition. The frequencies of intrahepatic Foxp3+ Tregs correlated directly with plasma HCV viral load and inversely with histological injury, indicating that these liver-infiltrating Tregs were actively modulating the overall effector response to HCV infection in the liver.

Liver-infiltrating Tregs express high levels of PD-1

While Tregs have been shown to be prevalent in the livers of HCV-infected patients, little is known about how these cells are regulated at the site of infection. Franceschini et al. addressed this question by measuring the level of programmed death–1 (PD-1) expression on intrahepatic Tregs (5). PD-1 is a 288–amino acid type I transmembrane protein in the CD28 family of receptors, and in humans is expressed on T cells, B cells, monocytes, and myeloid DCs (6). Ligation of PD-1 by its receptors programmed death ligand–1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2 imparts a negative signal to the responding cell via an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif associated with Src homology region 2–containing protein tyrosine phosphatase–1 (SHP1) and SHP2, which dephosphorylate molecules in the TCR signaling cascade (Figure 1). This inhibitory signaling leads to decreased cytokine production and proliferation of Teffs (6). Given the overall lack of vigorous T cell responses in patients with chronic HBV and HCV infection, it is hypothesized that high expression of PD-1 on Teffs contributes to the immune deficits in these patients. We and others have demonstrated higher PD-1 expression on HCV-specific CD8+ Teffs in liver compared with blood (7, 8). Franceschini et al. also report high expression of PD-1 on Tregs, particularly those infiltrating the liver; in fact, the frequency of PD-1+ Tregs was greater than the frequency of PD-1+ CD4+ Teffs (5).

Pathway for inhibition of IL-2 signaling in Tregs by PD-1.Figure 1

Pathway for inhibition of IL-2 signaling in Tregs by PD-1. PD-1 signaling leads to dephosphorylation of molecules in the T cell activation cascade previously phosphorylated in response to TCR ligation. In this issue of the JCI, Franceschini et al. show that PD-1 signaling leads to inhibition of IL-2 signals in Tregs (5). (i) IL-2 signaling via the IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) induces STAT-5 phosphorylation (pSTAT-5). (ii) Dimerization and nuclear translocation of phosphorylated STAT-5 leads to increased proliferation of Tregs but also to PD-1 upregulation. (iii) Increased surface PD-1 expression inhibits STAT-5 phosphorylation (5), possibly via SHP2. ITSM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif.

What impact, then, does PD-1 expression have on Treg function? Studies in mice have documented PD-1 expression on Tregs (9), but the function of this inhibitory molecule on these cells is not well understood. Franceschini et al. evaluated the function of PD-1 expression on Tregs in humans during chronic HCV infection and demonstrated that PD-1 ligation likely provides an overall inhibitory signal to Tregs in this setting (5). Specifically, the authors showed that PD-1 blockade enhanced IL-2–dependent proliferation of intrahepatic Tregs in response to HCV antigens and enhanced the overall ability of Tregs to inhibit Teffs. This effect was linked to an increase in Treg proliferation with PD-1 blockade and not to an enhancement of suppressive function on a per-cell basis. In further support of an inhibitory role for PD-1 on Tregs, the authors also demonstrated a direct correlation of PD-1 expression on Foxp3+CD4+ T cells with greater liver injury.

Treg PD-1 signaling prevents IL-2–driven STAT-5 phosphorylation

In addition to providing strong evidence for the regulation of Tregs by PD-1, Franceschini et al. also demonstrated a potential mechanism for this effect by evaluating the impact of PD-1 on IL-2 signaling (5). Binding of IL-2 to its receptor on T cells results in STAT-5 phosphorylation, which likely has a critical role in Treg development and function (10). In the current study, PD-1 blockade led to greater STAT-5 phosphorylation in Tregs in response to stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 plus IL-2 (5). Thus, the impairment of intrahepatic Treg proliferation by PD-1 may be directly related to inhibition of IL-2 signaling. A potential model of the impairment of STAT-5 phosphorylation by PD-1 ligation involves SHP2, the same phosphatase responsible for the dephosphorylation of molecules in the TCR activation cascade (Figure 1). While some studies have demonstrated that SHP2 can directly dephosphorylate STAT-5 (11, 12), others indicated that SHP2 enhances STAT-5 signal transduction (13). Therefore, the relationship between SHPs and JAK/STAT signaling may be complex, and future studies will need to address the activity of PD-1–associated SHP1 and SHP2 on STAT-5 phosphorylation to confirm and advance the current findings. In addition, because IL-2 itself has been shown to induce PD-1 expression on T cells (14), a negative feedback mechanism for Treg proliferation might involve the inhibition of IL-2 signaling by IL-2–induced upregulation of PD-1 expression (Figure 1).

A model for balancing liver immune responses

PD-L1 is highly expressed in the liver during viral infection (15, 16). Given the high-level expression of its receptor, PD-1, on both liver-infiltrating Teffs (7, 8) and now Tregs (5) in chronic HCV infection, the PD-1/PD-L1 system likely plays a central role in regulating liver-specific immune responses in this setting. The finding that PD-1 expression is elevated on liver Tregs at the same time as it is elevated on Teffs, and that this expression inhibits Treg proliferation, is somewhat surprising, since one might expect a need for enhancing the Treg population at sites of intense inflammation in order to prevent tissue injury by infiltrating Teffs. Franceschini et al. provided some insight into this issue by investigating STAT-5 phosphorylation and PD-1 expression on Tregs prospectively in 2 patients with a severe flare of chronic HCV-induced liver injury (5). In so doing, they may have uncovered an important mechanism for balancing intrahepatic immune responses that requires eventual Treg inhibition by PD-1 in order to maintain homeostasis. The authors demonstrated that liver injury, as evidenced by high alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in 2 patients with reactivation of hepatitis, was followed first by increased STAT-5 phosphorylation in Tregs, then by decreased ALT, and finally by increased PD-1 expression on Tregs. Once Treg responses waned, PD-1 expression decreased (Figure 2). In a sense, Treg activity increased in response to liver injury, as measured by increased STAT-5 phosphorylation. Once liver injury was under control, increased PD-1 expression — potentially induced by IL-2 (14) — served to inhibit Tregs and maintain homeostasis. Hence, the interplay of Treg activation and relative expression of PD-1 may be a critical factor in controlling the intrahepatic immune response. Recent compelling evidence has suggested that a “dynamic coevolution” of memory and regulatory CD4+ T cells occurs at the site of infections (17–19), and the current findings suggest that PD-1 may be essential to this process.

Model for balancing intrahepatic immune responses to HCV.Figure 2

Model for balancing intrahepatic immune responses to HCV. (i) Teffs and Tregs extravasate from the blood vessel to the site of infection. (ii) Vigorous Teff responses induced by HCV infection promote liver injury, leading to ALT elevation. Increased PD-1 expression on Teffs, and PD-L1 expression on hepatocytes, counter this liver injury by providing an inhibitory signal to the Teffs. (iii) In addition, Tregs proliferate and act to decrease Teff-induced liver injury. Franceschini et al. demonstrate that STAT-5 is phosphorylated in the Tregs at this time (5). (iv) Thereafter, Treg responses are tempered by upregulation of PD-1 (5). (v) After Treg responses wane, PD-1 expression decreases and homeostasis is achieved, preventing further liver injury while maintaining a capacity for future Teff responses if needed.

Impact of Treg control on clinical outcome

The findings of Franceschini et al. demonstrate the importance of PD-1 expression, not only on Teffs, but also on Tregs, in modulating the balance between liver injury and viral control in HCV infection (5). Evaluation of their findings longitudinally in acute HCV infection and in larger cohorts of chronically infected patients will be important in determining the role of PD-1 expression on Tregs in resolution of infection and liver disease progression. These observations have particular relevance for the potential use of PD-1 blockade in the clinical setting. In the mouse model of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and a nonhuman primate model of HIV, improved viral control and survival of infected animals was seen after PD-1 blockade (20, 21) and was linked to enhanced Teff responses. This observation lends hope for therapeutic application in humans, but a major risk of PD-1 blockade is unwanted autoimmunity induced by overenhancement of Teff activity. However, if PD-1 blockade also enhances the function of Tregs, as Franceschini et al. demonstrate, this may counter Teff responses and help to achieve an effective yet balanced therapeutic antiviral response.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Holly L. Hanson and Huiming Hon for critical review of this manuscript. The authors acknowledge support from the NIH National Center for Research Resources, grant K08 AI072191 (to H. Radziewicz); the Cancer Research Institute Investigator Award (to A. Grakoui); and Yerkes Research Center Base grant RR-00165 and US Public Health Service grant AI070101 (to A. Grakoui).

Address correspondence to: Arash Grakoui, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30329, USA. Phone: (404) 727-5850; Fax: (404) 727-7768; E-mail: arash.grakoui@emory.edu.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: ALT, alanine transaminase; PD-1, programmed death–1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand–1; SHP, Src homology region 2–containing protein tyrosine phosphatase; Teff, effector T cell.

Reference information: J. Clin. Invest.119:450–453 (2009). doi:10.1172/JCI38661.

See the related article at PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV.

References
  1. Tang, Q., Bluestone, J.A. 2008. The Foxp3+ regulatory T cell: a jack of all trades, master of regulation. Nat. Immunol. 9:239-244.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Belkaid, Y. 2007. Regulatory T cells and infection: a dangerous necessity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7:875-888.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Dolganiuc, A., Szabo, G. 2008. T cells with regulatory activity in hepatitis C virus infection: what we know and what we don’t. J. Leukoc. Biol. 84:614-622.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Manigold, T., Racanelli, V. 2007. T-cell regulation by CD4 regulatory T cells during hepatitis B and C virus infections: facts and controversies. Lancet Infect. Dis. 7:804-813.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Franceschini, D., et al. 2009. PD-L1 negatively regulates CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs by limiting STAT-5 phosphorylation in patients chronically infected with HCV. J. Clin. Invest. 119:551-564.
    View this article via: JCI Google Scholar
  6. Keir, M.E., Butte, M.J., Freeman, G.J., Sharpe, A.H. 2008. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26:677-704.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Radziewicz, H., et al. 2007. Liver-infiltrating lymphocytes in chronic human hepatitis C virus infection display an exhausted phenotype with high levels of PD-1 and low levels of CD127 expression. J. Virol. 81:2545-2553.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Golden-Mason, L., et al. 2007. Upregulation of PD-1 expression on circulating and intrahepatic hepatitis C virus-specific CD8+ T cells associated with reversible immune dysfunction. J. Virol. 81:9249-9258.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Gavin, M.A., Clarke, S.R., Negrou, E., Gallegos, A., Rudensky, A. 2002. Homeostasis and anergy of CD4(+)CD25(+) suppressor T cells in vivo. Nat. Immunol. 3:33-41.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Zhu, J., Paul, W.E. 2008. CD4 T cells: fates, functions, and faults. Blood. 112:1557-1569.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Chen, Y., et al. 2003. Identification of Shp-2 as a Stat5A phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 278:16520-16527.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Yu, C.L., Jin, Y.J., Burakoff, S.J. 2000. Cytosolic tyrosine dephosphorylation of STAT5. Potential role of SHP-2 in STAT5 regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 275:599-604.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Gadina, M., Stancato, L.M., Bacon, C.M., Larner, A.C., O’Shea, J.J. 1998. Involvement of SHP-2 in multiple aspects of IL-2 signaling: evidence for a positive regulatory role. J. Immunol. 160:4657-4661.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Kinter, A.L., et al. 2008. The common gamma-chain cytokines IL-2, IL-7, IL-15, and IL-21 induce the expression of programmed death-1 and its ligands. J. Immunol. 181:6738-6746.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Iwai, Y., Terawaki, S., Ikegawa, M., Okazaki, T., Honjo, T. 2003. PD-1 inhibits antiviral immunity at the effector phase in the liver. J. Exp. Med. 198:39-50.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Muhlbauer, M., et al. 2006. PD-L1 is induced in hepatocytes by viral infection and by interferon-alpha and -gamma and mediates T cell apoptosis. J. Hepatol. 45:520-528.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Akbar, A.N., Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., Taams, L.S., Macallan, D.C. 2007. The dynamic co-evolution of memory and regulatory CD4+ T cells in the periphery. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7:231-237.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., et al. 2008. The kinetics of CD4+Foxp3+ T cell accumulation during a human cutaneous antigen-specific memory response in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 118:3639-3650.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Vukmanovic-Stejic, M., et al. 2006. Human CD4+ CD25hi Foxp3+ regulatory T cells are derived by rapid turnover of memory populations in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 116:2423-2433.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Barber, D.L., et al. 2006. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature. 439:682-687.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Velu, V., et al. 2008. Enhancing SIV-specific immunity in vivo by PD-1 blockade. Nature.Online publication ahead of print. doi: 10.1038/nature07662
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (February 23, 2009): No description
  • Version 2 (March 2, 2009): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 1
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (22)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Liver-infiltrating Tregs inhibit Teffs in chronic HCV infection
  • Liver-infiltrating Tregs express high levels of PD-1
  • Treg PD-1 signaling prevents IL-2–driven STAT-5 phosphorylation
  • A model for balancing liver immune responses
  • Impact of Treg control on clinical outcome
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 1 X users
70 readers on Mendeley
See more details
Posted by 1 X users
Referenced in 2 patents
Highlighted by 1 platforms
185 readers on Mendeley
See more details