The fact that adenoviral vectors activate innate immunity and induce type I IFNs has not been fully appreciated in the context of cancer gene therapy. Type I IFNs influence different aspects of human immune response and are believed to be crucial for efficient tumor rejection. We performed transcriptional profiling to characterize the response of cutaneous lymphomas to intralesional adenovirus-mediated IFN-γ (Ad-IFN-γ) gene transfer. Gene expression profiles of skin lesions obtained from 19 cutaneous lymphoma patients before and after treatment with Ad-IFN-γ revealed a distinct gene signature consisting of IFN-γ– and numerous IFN-α–inducible genes (type II– and type I–inducible genes, respectively). The type I IFN response appears to have been induced by the vector itself, and its complexity, in terms of immune activation, was potentiated by the IFN-γ gene insert. Intralesional IFN-γ expression together with the induction of a combined type I/II IFN response to Ad-IFN-γ gene transfer seem to underlie the objective (measurable) clinical response of the treated lesions. Biological effects of type I IFNs seem to enhance those set in motion by the transgene, in our case IFN-γ. This combination may prove to be of therapeutic importance in cytokine gene transfer using Ads.
Mirjana Urosevic, Kazuyasu Fujii, Bastien Calmels, Elisabeth Laine, Nikita Kobert, Bruce Acres, Reinhard Dummer
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 451 | 39 |
67 | 17 | |
Figure | 251 | 8 |
Table | 44 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 70 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
Totals | 943 | 64 |
Total Views | 1,007 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.