We have developed an integrated, multidisciplinary methodology, termed systems pathology, to generate highly accurate predictive tools for complex diseases, using prostate cancer for the prototype. To predict the recurrence of prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy, defined by rising serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), we used machine learning to develop a model based on clinicopathologic variables, histologic tumor characteristics, and cell type–specific quantification of biomarkers. The initial study was based on a cohort of 323 patients and identified that high levels of the androgen receptor, as detected by immunohistochemistry, were associated with a reduced time to PSA recurrence. The model predicted recurrence with high accuracy, as indicated by a concordance index in the validation set of 0.82, sensitivity of 96%, and specificity of 72%. We extended this approach, employing quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence, on an expanded cohort of 682 patients. The model again predicted PSA recurrence with high accuracy, concordance index being 0.77, sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 72%. The androgen receptor was selected, along with 5 clinicopathologic features (seminal vesicle invasion, biopsy Gleason score, extracapsular extension, preoperative PSA, and dominant prostatectomy Gleason grade) as well as 2 histologic features (texture of epithelial nuclei and cytoplasm in tumor only regions). This robust platform has broad applications in patient diagnosis, treatment management, and prognostication.
Carlos Cordon-Cardo, Angeliki Kotsianti, David A. Verbel, Mikhail Teverovskiy, Paola Capodieci, Stefan Hamann, Yusuf Jeffers, Mark Clayton, Faysal Elkhettabi, Faisal M. Khan, Marina Sapir, Valentina Bayer-Zubek, Yevgen Vengrenyuk, Stephen Fogarsi, Olivier Saidi, Victor E. Reuter, Howard I. Scher, Michael W. Kattan, Fernando J. Bianco Jr., Thomas M. Wheeler, Gustavo E. Ayala, Peter T. Scardino, Michael J. Donovan
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 408 | 50 |
114 | 33 | |
Figure | 280 | 19 |
Table | 46 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 43 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 940 | 102 |
Total Views | 1,042 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.