Treatment with CD40Ig results in indefinite allograft survival in a complete MHC-mismatched heart allograft model in the rat. Here we show that serial second, third, and fourth adoptive transfers of total splenocytes from CD40Ig-treated recipients into secondary recipients led to indefinite donor-specific allograft acceptance. Purification of splenocyte subpopulations from CD40Ig-treated recipients demonstrated that only the adoptively transferred CD8+CD45RClow subset resulted in donor-specific long-term survival, whereas CD8+CD45RClow T cells from naive animals did not. Accepted grafts displayed increased indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expression restricted in the graft to ECs. Coculture of donor ECs with CD8+CD45RClow T cells purified from CD40Ig-treated animals resulted in donor-specific IDO expression dependent on IFN-γ. Neutralization of IFN-γ or IDO triggered acute allograft rejection in both CD40Ig-treated and adoptively transferred recipients. This study demonstrates for what we believe to be the first time that interference in CD40–CD40 ligand (CD40-CD40L) interactions induces allospecific CD8+ Tregs that maintain allograft survival. CD8+CD45RClow T cells act through IFN-γ production, which in turn induces IDO expression by graft ECs. Thus, donor alloantigen-specific CD8+ Tregs may promote local graft immune privilege through IDO expression.
Carole Guillonneau, Marcelo Hill, François-Xavier Hubert, Elise Chiffoleau, Caroline Hervé, Xian-Liang Li, Michèle Heslan, Claire Usal, Laurent Tesson, Séverine Ménoret, Abdelhadi Saoudi, Brigitte Le Mauff, Régis Josien, Maria Cristina Cuturi, Ignacio Anegon
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 578 | 52 |
77 | 28 | |
Figure | 270 | 10 |
Table | 35 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 33 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 1,042 | 90 |
Total Views | 1,132 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.